scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Roma Tre University

EducationRome, Lazio, Italy
About: Roma Tre University is a education organization based out in Rome, Lazio, Italy. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Large Hadron Collider & Galaxy. The organization has 4434 authors who have published 15352 publications receiving 374888 citations. The organization is also known as: Universita degli Studi Roma Tre & RomaTre.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The first data release of the VIPERS survey is presented in this article, where the authors present the general real and redshift-space clustering properties of galaxies as measured in the first data set.
Abstract: We present in this paper the general real- and redshift-space clustering properties of galaxies as measured in the first data release of the VIPERS survey. VIPERS is a large redshift survey designed to probe the distant Universe and its large-scale structure at 0.5 < z < 1.2. We describe in this analysis the global properties of the sample and discuss the survey completeness and associated corrections. This sample allows us to measure the galaxy clustering with an unprecedented accuracy at these redshifts. From the redshift-space distortions observed in the galaxy clustering pattern we provide a first measurement of the growth rate of structure at z = 0.8: f\sigma_8 = 0.47 +/- 0.08. This is completely consistent with the predictions of standard cosmological models based on Einstein gravity, although this measurement alone does not discriminate between different gravity models.

321 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Richard J. Abbott1, T. D. Abbott2, Sheelu Abraham3, Fausto Acernese4  +1335 moreInstitutions (144)
TL;DR: The data recorded by these instruments during their first and second observing runs are described, including the gravitational-wave strain arrays, released as time series sampled at 16384 Hz.

320 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
M. Punturo, M. R. Abernathy1, Fausto Acernese2, Benjamin William Allen3, Nils Andersson4, K. G. Arun5, Fabrizio Barone2, B. Barr1, M. Barsuglia, M. G. Beker6, N. Beveridge1, S. Birindelli7, Suvadeep Bose8, L. Bosi, S. Braccini, C. Bradaschia, Tomasz Bulik9, Enrico Calloni, G. Cella, E. Chassande Mottin, Simon Chelkowski10, Andrea Chincarini, John A. Clark11, E. Coccia12, C. N. Colacino, J. Colas, A. Cumming1, L. Cunningham1, E. Cuoco, S. L. Danilishin13, Karsten Danzmann3, G. De Luca, R. De Salvo14, T. Dent11, R. T. DeRosa, L. Di Fiore, A. Di Virgilio, M. Doets6, V. Fafone12, Paolo Falferi15, R. Flaminio16, J. Franc16, F. Frasconi, Andreas Freise10, Paul Fulda10, Jonathan R. Gair17, G. Gemme, A. Gennai10, A. Giazotto, Kostas Glampedakis18, M. Granata, Hartmut Grote3, G. M. Guidi19, G. D. Hammond1, Mark Hannam20, Jan Harms21, D. Heinert22, Martin Hendry1, Ik Siong Heng1, Eric Hennes6, Stefan Hild3, J. H. Hough, Sascha Husa3, S. H. Huttner1, Gareth Jones11, F. Y. Khalili13, Keiko Kokeyama10, Kostas D. Kokkotas18, Badri Krishnan3, M. Lorenzini, Harald Lück3, Ettore Majorana, Ilya Mandel23, Vuk Mandic21, I. W. Martin1, C. Michel16, Y. Minenkov12, N. Morgado16, Simona Mosca, B. Mours24, Helge Müller-Ebhardt3, P. G. Murray1, Ronny Nawrodt1, John Nelson1, Richard O'Shaughnessy25, Christian D. Ott14, C. Palomba, A. Paoli, G. Parguez, A. Pasqualetti, R. Passaquieti26, D. Passuello, L. Pinard16, Rosa Poggiani26, P. Popolizio, Mirko Prato, P. Puppo, D. S. Rabeling6, P. Rapagnani27, Jocelyn Read3, Tania Regimbau7, H. Rehbein3, Stuart Reid1, Luciano Rezzolla3, F. Ricci27, F. Richard, A. Rocchi, Sheila Rowan1, Albrecht Rüdiger3, Benoit Sassolas16, Bangalore Suryanarayana Sathyaprakash11, Roman Schnabel3, C. Schwarz28, Paul Seidel28, Alicia M. Sintes3, Kentaro Somiya3, Fiona C. Speirits1, Kenneth A. Strain3, S. E. Strigin13, P. J. Sutton11, S. P. Tarabrin13, J. F. J. van den Brand6, C. van Leewen6, M. van Veggel1, C. Van Den Broeck11, Alberto Vecchio10, John Veitch10, F. Vetrano19, A. Viceré19, Sergey P. Vyatchanin13, Benno Willke3, Graham Woan1, P. Wolfango29, Kazuhiro Yamamoto3 
TL;DR: The status of the project Einstein Telescope (ET), a design study of a third-generation gravitational wave observatory, is reported in this paper, where an overview of the possible science reaches and the technological progress needed to realize a third generation observatory are discussed.
Abstract: Large gravitational wave interferometric detectors, like Virgo and LIGO, demonstrated the capability to reach their design sensitivity, but to transform these machines into an effective observational instrument for gravitational wave astronomy a large improvement in sensitivity is required. Advanced detectors in the near future and third-generation observatories in more than one decade will open the possibility to perform gravitational wave astronomical observations from the Earth. An overview of the possible science reaches and the technological progress needed to realize a third-generation observatory are discussed in this paper. The status of the project Einstein Telescope (ET), a design study of a third-generation gravitational wave observatory, will be reported.

319 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Georges Aad1, Brad Abbott2, Jalal Abdallah3, Ovsat Abdinov4  +2862 moreInstitutions (191)
TL;DR: The methods employed in the ATLAS experiment to correct for the impact of pile-up on jet energy and jet shapes, and for the presence of spurious additional jets, are described, with a primary focus on the large 20.3 kg-1 data sample.
Abstract: The large rate of multiple simultaneous protonproton interactions, or pile-up, generated by the Large Hadron Collider in Run 1 required the development of many new techniques to mitigate the advers ...

316 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: The United States and European Union differ significantly in terms of their innovative capacity: the former have been able to gain and maintain world leadership in innovation and technology while the latter continues to lag as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: The United States and European Union differ significantly in terms of their innovative capacity: the former have been able to gain and maintain world leadership in innovation and technology while the latter continues to lag. Notwithstanding the magnitude of this innovation gap and the political emphasis placed upon it on both sides of the Atlantic, very little systematic comparative analysis has been carried out on its causes. The empirical literature has emphasized the structural differences between the two continents in the quantity and quality of the major ‘inputs’ to innovation: R&D investments and human capital. The very different spatial organization of innovative activities in the EU and the US—as suggested by a variety of contributions in the field of economic geography—could also influence innovative output. This article analyses and compares a wide set of territorial processes that influence innovation in Europe and the United States. The higher mobility of capital, population and knowledge in the US not only promotes the agglomeration of research activity in specific areas of the country but also enables a variety of territorial mechanisms to fully exploit local innovative activities and (informational) synergies. In the European Union, in contrast, imperfect market integration and institutional and cultural barriers across the continent prevent innovative agents from maximizing the benefits from external economies and localized interactions, but compensatory forms of geographical process may be emerging in concert with further European integration.

313 citations


Authors

Showing all 4598 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Andrew White1491494113874
Sw. Banerjee1461906124364
Fuqiang Wang145151895014
Stefano Giagu1391651101569
Silvia Masi13966997618
Filippo Ceradini131101682732
Mattias Ellert131102282637
Francesco Lacava130104279680
Giovanni Organtini129143885866
Georg Zobernig129112583321
Monica Verducci12989676002
Marzio Nessi129104678641
Cristian Stanescu12892276446
Domizia Orestano12898278297
Lashkar Kashif12878274072
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Royal Institute of Technology
68.4K papers, 1.9M citations

91% related

École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
98.2K papers, 4.3M citations

90% related

University of Pisa
73.1K papers, 2.1M citations

89% related

Nanyang Technological University
112.8K papers, 3.2M citations

89% related

ETH Zurich
122.4K papers, 5.1M citations

89% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20251
2023121
2022212
20211,137
20201,200
20191,224