scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Royal Society for the Protection of Birds

NonprofitSandy, United Kingdom
About: Royal Society for the Protection of Birds is a nonprofit organization based out in Sandy, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Biodiversity. The organization has 670 authors who have published 1425 publications receiving 88006 citations. The organization is also known as: RSPB & Plumage League.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Antica Culina, Frank Adriaensen1, Liam D. Bailey2, Malcolm D. Burgess3, Malcolm D. Burgess4, Anne Charmantier, Ella F. Cole5, Tapio Eeva6, Erik Matthysen1, Chloé R. Nater7, Ben C. Sheldon5, Bernt-Erik Sæther7, Stefan J. G. Vriend7, Zuzana Zajková, Peter Adamík, Lucy M. Aplin8, Lucy M. Aplin9, Elena Angulo10, Alexandr Artemyev11, Emilio Barba12, Sanja Barišić13, Eduardo J. Belda14, C. Can Bilgin15, Josefa Bleu, Christiaan Both16, Sandra Bouwhuis, Claire J. Branston17, Juli Broggi10, Terry Burke18, A.V. Bushuev19, Carlos Camacho20, Daniela Campobello21, David Canal, Alejandro Cantarero6, Samuel P. Caro, Maxime Cauchoix22, Alexis S. Chaine22, Mariusz Cichoń23, Davor Ćiković13, Camillo Cusimano, Caroline Deimel8, André A. Dhondt1, André A. Dhondt24, Niels Jeroen Dingemanse25, Blandine Doligez26, Blandine Doligez27, Davide M. Dominoni17, Claire Doutrelant, Szymon M. Drobniak28, Szymon M. Drobniak23, Anna Dubiec29, Marcel Eens1, Kjell Einar Erikstad30, Silvia Espín31, Damien R. Farine9, Damien R. Farine8, Jordi Figuerola10, Pınar Kavak Gülbeyaz32, Pınar Kavak Gülbeyaz15, Arnaud Grégoire, Ian R. Hartley33, Michaela Hau8, Michaela Hau9, Gergely Hegyi34, Sabine Marlene Hille35, Camilla A. Hinde36, Benedikt Holtmann25, T.A. Ilyina19, Caroline Isaksson20, Arne Iserbyt1, E.V. Ivankina19, Wojciech Kania29, Bart Kempenaers8, Anvar Kerimov19, Jan Komdeur16, Peter Korsten37, Miroslav Král, Miloš Krist, Marcel M. Lambrechts, Carlos E. Lara38, Agu Leivits, András Liker39, Jaanis Lodjak40, Marko Mägi40, Mark C. Mainwaring41, Raivo Mänd40, Bruno Massa, Sylvie Massemin, Jesús Martínez-Padilla10, Tomasz D. Mazgajski29, Adèle Mennerat42, Juan Moreno10, Alexia Mouchet25, Shinichi Nakagawa28, Jan-Åke Nilsson20, Johan Nilsson20, Ana Cláudia Norte43, Kees van Oers44, Markku Orell45, Jaime Potti10, John L. Quinn46, Denis Réale47, Tone Kristin Reiertsen30, Balázs Rosivall34, Andrew F. Russell4, Seppo Rytkönen45, Pablo Sánchez-Virosta31, Eduardo S. A. Santos48, Julia Schroeder49, Juan Carlos Senar, Gábor Seress39, Tore Slagsvold50, Marta Szulkin51, Céline Teplitsky, Vallo Tilgar40, Andrey Tolstoguzov11, János Török34, Mihai Valcu8, Emma Vatka52, Simon Verhulst16, Hannah Watson20, Teru Yuta53, Teru Yuta54, José M. Zamora-Marín31, Marcel E. Visser 
University of Antwerp1, Leibniz Association2, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds3, University of Exeter4, University of Oxford5, University of Turku6, Norwegian University of Science and Technology7, Max Planck Society8, University of Konstanz9, Spanish National Research Council10, Russian Academy of Sciences11, University of Valencia12, Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts13, Polytechnic University of Valencia14, Middle East Technical University15, University of Groningen16, University of Glasgow17, University of Sheffield18, Moscow State University19, Lund University20, University of Palermo21, Centre national de la recherche scientifique22, Jagiellonian University23, Cornell University24, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich25, Uppsala University26, University of Lyon27, University of New South Wales28, Museum and Institute of Zoology29, Norwegian Institute for Air Research30, University of Murcia31, Hacettepe University32, Lancaster University33, Eötvös Loránd University34, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna35, Anglia Ruskin University36, Bielefeld University37, University of Otago38, University of Pannonia39, University of Tartu40, University of Montana41, University of Bergen42, University of Coimbra43, Wageningen University and Research Centre44, University of Oulu45, University College Cork46, Université du Québec à Montréal47, University of São Paulo48, Imperial College London49, University of Oslo50, University of Warsaw51, University of Helsinki52, Hokkaido University53, Yamashina Institute for Ornithology54
TL;DR: The SPI‐Birds Network and Database is created, a large‐scale initiative that connects data from, and researchers working on, studies of wild populations of individually recognizable (usually ringed) birds, and acts as a data hub and a catalogue of studied populations.
Abstract: The SPI-Birds have been supported by an NWO personal grant (grant number 016.Veni.181.054) to A.C., and a Research Council of Norway grant: 223257 (SFF-III) and 267511 (EVOCLIM).

17 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Analysis of behaviour patterns across the first day and the 3 days of exposure suggested that the novelty of the test fences, rather than the designs per se, influenced the behaviour of the deer.

17 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This work uses novel field-collected data on large-scale spatial variation in prey abundance and vegetation structure to understand drivers of breeding abundance and breeding success, and advises adaptive management in the face of climate change to include appropriate vegetation management.
Abstract: Understanding large-scale drivers of animal breeding densities and demography has a range of important uses, including informing conservation management. Given the threat of climate change, the importance of developing a process-based understanding of variation in animal populations is increased to inform adaptive management. For a climate-change sensitive species, the European Golden Plover Pluvialis apricaria, we use novel field-collected data on large-scale spatial variation in prey abundance and vegetation structure to understand drivers of breeding abundance and breeding success, and inform potential management responses. The abundance of the key prey, crane flies (Tipulidae), increased with altitude (a surrogate for temperature) and peat depth (a surrogate for soil moisture). Golden plover breeding densities were highest where vegetation was shortest, probably reflecting greater prey accessibility. In contrast, breeding success was not strongly related to vegetation height, but positively correlated with both crane fly abundance and daily minimum temperatures. When combined to model the number of likely successful pairs in any 1 year, the magnitude of vegetation height effect far exceeded that of crane fly abundance. Thus, for golden plover and other shorebirds sharing similar habitats, management to optimize breeding habitat (grazing or burning to promote short vegetation) may differ from management to promote breeding success (drain blocking to increase soil moisture and prey abundance). Adaptive management in the face of climate change should therefore include appropriate vegetation management, as well as maximizing prey abundance. More broadly, as the drivers of breeding density and demographic parameters may differ, we advocate that conservation practitioners collect not just information on species' distributions but also underpinning demographic processes when using science to inform management.

17 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated the role of the James Hutton Institute and the School of Biological Sciences at the University of St Andrews in the management of birds in the UK.
Abstract: 1 School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of St Andrews, UK 2 Environmental Research Institute, University of the Highlands and Islands, UK 3 Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (CEH), Edinburgh, UK 4 Botany Department, School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland 5 The James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen, UK 6 Conservation Science Unit, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB), Edinburgh, UK 7 School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, UK 8 Department of Geography, University of Exeter, UK ______________________________________________________________________________________

17 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: To compare the breeding bird communities, counts were made at a total of 408 points in 482 ha of oak plantations and 641 ha of ancient pasture woodlands of the New Forest and there was much overlap and, particularly in the plantations, considerable variation in structure.
Abstract: To compare the breeding bird communities, counts were made at a total of 408 points in 482 ha of oak plantations and 641 ha of ancient pasture woodlands of the New Forest. Thirty-three species were recorded in each woodland type and the overall breeding bird density was similar in each, with Blue Tit and Chaffinch the most abundant species. Measurements at each point showed significant habitat differences between the 2 woodland types although there was much overlap and, particularly in the plantations, considerable variation in structure. The habitat variables were used to distinguish those points where the structure was typical of the plantations from those where the structure was more characteristic of the pasture woodlands. Seven species were more numerous in areas where the structure was typical of the plantations (Blue Tit, Chaffinch, Robin, Treecreeper, Coal Tit, Blackbird and Mistle Thrush) and three species (Great Tit, Willow Warbler and Jackdaw) were more numerous in typical pasture woodlands. Es...

17 citations


Authors

Showing all 672 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Andrew Balmford9129033359
Rhys E. Green7828530428
Richard D. Gregory6116518428
Richard Evans4830610513
Rafael Mateo462387091
Deborah J. Pain46996717
Jeremy D. Wilson4512312587
Les G. Underhill452338217
Richard B. Bradbury421138062
Paul F. Donald4111711153
James W. Pearce-Higgins401445623
Jörn P. W. Scharlemann408416393
Juliet A. Vickery391168494
Mark A. Taggart381113703
Patrick W Thompson381446379
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Zoological Society of London
3.7K papers, 201.2K citations

85% related

The Nature Conservancy
3.7K papers, 202K citations

84% related

Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
3.2K papers, 161.6K citations

84% related

Wildlife Conservation Society
4.9K papers, 243.8K citations

83% related

Conservation International
1.5K papers, 167.2K citations

82% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20224
202190
202073
201993
201882
201770