scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Royal Society for the Protection of Birds

NonprofitSandy, United Kingdom
About: Royal Society for the Protection of Birds is a nonprofit organization based out in Sandy, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Biodiversity. The organization has 670 authors who have published 1425 publications receiving 88006 citations. The organization is also known as: RSPB & Plumage League.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated the winter grazing intensities of brent geese Branta bernicla, pink-footed geese Anser brachyrhynchus, and white-fronted geese A. albifrons, and the breeding densities of lapwing Vanellus vanellus, redshank Tringa totanus and snipe Gallinago gallinago.

40 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The relationship between nature and cultural ecosystem service (CES) benefits is well accepted but poorly understood, as is the potential role of biodiversity in the relationship as discussed by the authors by means of a public questionnaire survey in Wiltshire, UK, the relationship between the presence of a range of common species groups, species group charisma, group abundance in the landscape, and the benefit that people felt that they derived from the species groups was investigated for a lowland multifunctional landscape.
Abstract: The relationship between nature and cultural ecosystem service (CES) benefits is well accepted but poorly understood, as is the potential role of biodiversity in the relationship. By means of a public questionnaire survey in Wiltshire, UK, the relationship between the presence of a range of common species groups, species group ‘charisma’, group abundance in the landscape, and the benefit that people felt that they derived from the species groups was investigated for a lowland multifunctional landscape. Findings showed that species group charisma influenced the benefit reported by respondents for current abundance levels, and influenced their response to potential increases or decreases in abundance. Respondents reported high levels of benefit from species groups hypothesised to be charismatic (birds, flowering plants, butterflies) and there was high consistency in the pattern of response. Respondents reported less benefit from groups hypothesised to be less charismatic (beetles/bugs, brambles and nettles), the latter response patterns showing much greater variation. These results could be used to promote a more holistic understanding of the value of biodiversity by educating and informing the public so that they derive benefit not just from the charismatic, but also from the everyday, the commonplace and less obviously charismatic species.

40 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
08 Feb 2010-The Auk
TL;DR: Arithmetic lipid correction provided accurate values for lipid-extracted &dgr;13C in captive Spectacled Eiders fed on a homogeneous high-quality diet, however, arithmetic lipid correction was unreliable for wild King Eiders, likely because of their differential incorporation of macronutrients from isotopically distinct environments during migration.
Abstract: . Many studies of nutrient allocation to egg production in birds use stable isotope ratios of egg yolk to identify the origin of nutrients. Dry egg yolk contains >50% lipids, which are known to be depleted in 13C. Currently, researchers remove lipids from egg yolk using a chemical lipid-extraction procedure before analyzing the isotopic composition of protein in egg yolk. We examined the effects of chemical lipid extraction on δ13C, δ15N, and δ34S of avian egg yolk and explored the utility of an arithmetic lipid correction model to adjust whole yolk δ13C for lipid content. We analyzed the dried yolk of 15 captive Spectacled Eider (Somateria fischeri) and 20 wild King Eider (S. spectabilis) eggs, both as whole yolk and after lipid extraction with a 2:1 chloroform:methanol solution. We found that chemical lipid extraction leads to an increase of (mean ± SD) 3.3 ± 1.1‰ in δ13C, 1.1 ± 0.5‰ in δ15N, and 2.3 ± 1.1‰ in δ34S. Arithmetic lipid correction provided accurate values for lipid-extracted δ13C in...

40 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Marlee A. Tucker1, Olga Alexandrou, Richard O. Bierregaard2, Keith L. Bildstein3, Katrin Böhning-Gaese1, Chloe Bracis, John N. Brzorad4, Evan R. Buechley5, David Cabot6, Justin M. Calabrese7, Justin M. Calabrese8, Carlos Carrapato, André Chiaradia9, André Chiaradia10, Lisa C. Davenport11, Lisa C. Davenport12, Lisa C. Davenport13, Sarah C. Davidson14, Sarah C. Davidson15, Mark Desholm, Christopher R. DeSorbo, Robert Domenech, Peter Enggist, William F. Fagan8, Nina Farwig16, Wolfgang Fiedler15, Wolfgang Fiedler17, Christen H. Fleming8, Christen H. Fleming7, Alastair Franke18, John M. Fryxell19, Clara García-Ripollés20, David Grémillet21, David Grémillet22, Larry Griffin23, Roi Harel24, Adam Kane25, Roland Kays26, Roland Kays27, Erik Kleyheeg15, Erik Kleyheeg28, Anne E. Lacy, Scott D. LaPoint15, Scott D. LaPoint29, Rubén Limiñana20, Pascual López-López30, Alan D. Maccarone31, Ugo Mellone20, Elizabeth K. Mojica32, Ran Nathan24, Scott H. Newman33, Michael J. Noonan7, Michael J. Noonan8, Steffen Oppel34, Mark Prostor, Eileen C. Rees23, Yan Ropert-Coudert35, Sascha Rösner16, Nir Sapir36, Dana G. Schabo16, Matthias Schmidt, Holger Schulz, Mitra Shariati37, Adam Shreading, João P. Silva38, João P. Silva39, João P. Silva40, Henrik Skov, Orr Spiegel41, John Y. Takekawa42, Claire S. Teitelbaum43, Mariëlle Liduine van Toor15, Vicente Urios20, Javier Vidal-Mateo20, Qiang Wang44, Bryan D. Watts32, Martin Wikelski17, Martin Wikelski15, Kerri Wolter, Ramūnas Žydelis, Thomas Mueller1 
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined how the distribution of resources affects the movement patterns of both large terrestrial birds (e.g., raptors, bustards and hornbills) and waterbirds (i.e., cranes, storks, ducks, geese and flamingos).
Abstract: Aim Animal movement is an important determinant of individual survival, population dynamics and ecosystem structure and function. Nonetheless, it is still unclear how local movements are related to resource availability and the spatial arrangement of resources. Using resident bird species and migratory bird species outside the migratory period, we examined how the distribution of resources affects the movement patterns of both large terrestrial birds (e.g., raptors, bustards and hornbills) and waterbirds (e.g., cranes, storks, ducks, geese and flamingos). Location Global. Time period 2003–2015. Major taxa studied Birds. Methods We compiled GPS tracking data for 386 individuals across 36 bird species. We calculated the straight‐line distance between GPS locations of each individual at the 1‐hr and 10‐day time‐scales. For each individual and time‐scale, we calculated the median and 0.95 quantile of displacement. We used linear mixed‐effects models to examine the effect of the spatial arrangement of resources, measured as enhanced vegetation index homogeneity, on avian movements, while accounting for mean resource availability, body mass, diet, flight type, migratory status and taxonomy and spatial autocorrelation. Results We found a significant effect of resource spatial arrangement at the 1‐hr and 10‐day time‐scales. On average, individual movements were seven times longer in environments with homogeneously distributed resources compared with areas of low resource homogeneity. Contrary to previous work, we found no significant effect of resource availability, diet, flight type, migratory status or body mass on the non‐migratory movements of birds. Main conclusions We suggest that longer movements in homogeneous environments might reflect the need for different habitat types associated with foraging and reproduction. This highlights the importance of landscape complementarity, where habitat patches within a landscape include a range of different, yet complementary resources. As habitat homogenization increases, it might force birds to travel increasingly longer distances to meet their diverse needs.

40 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Green et al. as mentioned in this paper found that the lack of sound science in assessing wind farm impacts on seabirds was a major barrier to assessing the impact of wind farms on birds.
Abstract: Lack of sound science in assessing wind farm impacts on seabirds Rhys E. Green*, Rowena H. W. Langston, Aly McCluskie, Rosie Sutherland and Jeremy D. Wilson Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK; RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, RSPB, The Lodge, Sandy Bedfordshire SG19 2DL, UK; and RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, RSPB Scotland, 2 Lochside View, Edinburgh Park, Edinburgh EH12 9DH, UK

40 citations


Authors

Showing all 672 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Andrew Balmford9129033359
Rhys E. Green7828530428
Richard D. Gregory6116518428
Richard Evans4830610513
Rafael Mateo462387091
Deborah J. Pain46996717
Jeremy D. Wilson4512312587
Les G. Underhill452338217
Richard B. Bradbury421138062
Paul F. Donald4111711153
James W. Pearce-Higgins401445623
Jörn P. W. Scharlemann408416393
Juliet A. Vickery391168494
Mark A. Taggart381113703
Patrick W Thompson381446379
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Zoological Society of London
3.7K papers, 201.2K citations

85% related

The Nature Conservancy
3.7K papers, 202K citations

84% related

Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
3.2K papers, 161.6K citations

84% related

Wildlife Conservation Society
4.9K papers, 243.8K citations

83% related

Conservation International
1.5K papers, 167.2K citations

82% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20224
202190
202073
201993
201882
201770