scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Rutgers University

EducationNew Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
About: Rutgers University is a education organization based out in New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 68736 authors who have published 159418 publications receiving 6713860 citations. The organization is also known as: Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey & Rutgers.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is found that most people use few search terms, few modified queries, view few Web pages, and rarely use advanced search features, and the language of Web queries is distinctive.
Abstract: In studying actual Web searching by the public at large, we analyzed over one million Web queries by users of the Excite search engine. We found that most people use few search terms, few modified queries, view few Web pages, and rarely use advanced search features. A small number of search terms are used with high frequency, and a great many terms are unique; the language of Web queries is distinctive. Queries about recreation and entertainment rank highest. Findings are compared to data from two other large studies of Web queries. This study provides an insight into the public practices and choices in Web searching.

1,153 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
09 Oct 1996-JAMA
TL;DR: Recommendations apply to analyses intended to inform the allocation of health care resources across a broad range of conditions and interventions to improve the comparability and quality of studies.
Abstract: Objective: To develop consensus-based recommendations guiding the conduct of cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) to improve the comparability and quality of studies. The recommendations apply to analyses intended to inform the allocation of health care resources across a broad range of conditions and interventions. This article, first in a 3-part series, discusses how this goal affects the conduct and use of analyses. The remaining articles will outline methodological and reporting recommendations, respectively. Participants: The Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine, a nonfederal panel with expertise in CEA, clinical medicine, ethics, and health outcomes measurement, was convened by the US Public Health Service (PHS). Evidence: The panel reviewed the theoretical foundations of CEA, current practices, and alternative procedures for measuring and assigning values to resource use and health outcomes. Consensus process: The panel met 11 times during 2 1/2 years with PHS staff and methodologists from federal agencies. Working groups brought issues and preliminary recommendations to the full panel for discussion. Draft recommendations were circulated to outside experts and the federal agencies prior to finalization. Conclusions: The panel's recommendations define a "reference case" cost-effectiveness analysis, a standard set of methods to serve as a point of comparison across studies. The reference case analysis is conducted from the societal perspective and accounts for benefits, harms, and costs to all parties. Although CEA does not reflect every element of importance in health care decisions, the information it provides is critical to informing decisions about the allocation of health care resources.

1,149 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An overview of the IMPACT molecular mechanics program is provided with an emphasis on recent developments and a description of its current functionality and a status report for the fixed charge and polarizable force fields is included.
Abstract: We provide an overview of the IMPACT molecular mechanics program with an emphasis on recent developments and a description of its current functionality. With respect to core molecular mechanics technologies we include a status report for the fixed charge and polarizable force fields that can be used with the program and illustrate how the force fields, when used together with new atom typing and parameter assignment modules, have greatly expanded the coverage of organic compounds and medicinally relevant ligands. As we discuss in this review, explicit solvent simulations have been used to guide our design of implicit solvent models based on the generalized Born framework and a novel nonpolar estimator that have recently been incorporated into the program. With IMPACT it is possible to use several different advanced conformational sampling algorithms based on combining features of molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo simulations. The program includes two specialized molecular mechanics modules: Glide, a high-throughput docking program, and QSite, a mixed quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics module. These modules employ the IMPACT infrastructure as a starting point for the construction of the protein model and assignment of molecular mechanics parameters, but have then been developed to meet specialized objectives with respect to sampling and the energy function.

1,144 citations

Book ChapterDOI
TL;DR: This expository presentation addresses the precise formulation of questions of robustness with respect to disturbances, formulated in the paradigm of input to state stability, with an intuitive and informal presentation of the main concepts.
Abstract: The analysis and design of nonlinear feedback systems has recently undergone an exceptionally rich period of progress and maturation, fueled, to a great extent, by (1) the discovery of certain basic conceptual notions, and (2) the identification of classes of systems for which systematic decomposition approaches can result in effective and easily computable control laws. These two aspects are complementary, since the latter approaches are, typically, based upon the inductive verification of the validity of the former system properties under compositions (in the terminology used in [62], the “activation” of theoretical concepts leads to “constructive” control). This expository presentation addresses the first of these aspects, and in particular the precise formulation of questions of robustness with respect to disturbances, formulated in the paradigm of input to state stability. We provide an intuitive and informal presentation of the main concepts. More precise statements, especially about older results, are given in the cited papers, as well as in several previous surveys such as [103] and [105] (of which the present paper represents an update), but we provide a little more detail about relatively recent work. Regarding applications and extensions of the basic framework, we give some pointers to the literature, but we do not focus on feedback design and specific engineering problems; for the latter we refer the reader to textbooks such as [43], [60], [58], [96], [66], [27], [44].

1,142 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Kurt Lejaeghere1, Gustav Bihlmayer2, Torbjörn Björkman3, Torbjörn Björkman4, Peter Blaha5, Stefan Blügel2, Volker Blum6, Damien Caliste7, Ivano E. Castelli8, Stewart J. Clark9, Andrea Dal Corso10, Stefano de Gironcoli10, Thierry Deutsch7, J. K. Dewhurst11, Igor Di Marco12, Claudia Draxl13, Claudia Draxl14, Marcin Dulak15, Olle Eriksson12, José A. Flores-Livas11, Kevin F. Garrity16, Luigi Genovese7, Paolo Giannozzi17, Matteo Giantomassi18, Stefan Goedecker19, Xavier Gonze18, Oscar Grånäs20, Oscar Grånäs12, E. K. U. Gross11, Andris Gulans13, Andris Gulans14, Francois Gygi21, D. R. Hamann22, P. J. Hasnip23, Natalie Holzwarth24, Diana Iusan12, Dominik B. Jochym25, F. Jollet, Daniel M. Jones26, Georg Kresse27, Klaus Koepernik28, Klaus Koepernik29, Emine Kucukbenli8, Emine Kucukbenli10, Yaroslav Kvashnin12, Inka L. M. Locht12, Inka L. M. Locht30, Sven Lubeck13, Martijn Marsman27, Nicola Marzari8, Ulrike Nitzsche29, Lars Nordström12, Taisuke Ozaki31, Lorenzo Paulatto32, Chris J. Pickard33, Ward Poelmans1, Matt Probert23, Keith Refson25, Keith Refson34, Manuel Richter29, Manuel Richter28, Gian-Marco Rignanese18, Santanu Saha19, Matthias Scheffler14, Matthias Scheffler35, Martin Schlipf21, Karlheinz Schwarz5, Sangeeta Sharma11, Francesca Tavazza16, Patrik Thunström5, Alexandre Tkatchenko36, Alexandre Tkatchenko14, Marc Torrent, David Vanderbilt22, Michiel van Setten18, Veronique Van Speybroeck1, John M. Wills37, Jonathan R. Yates26, Guo-Xu Zhang38, Stefaan Cottenier1 
25 Mar 2016-Science
TL;DR: A procedure to assess the precision of DFT methods was devised and used to demonstrate reproducibility among many of the most widely used DFT codes, demonstrating that the precisionof DFT implementations can be determined, even in the absence of one absolute reference code.
Abstract: The widespread popularity of density functional theory has given rise to an extensive range of dedicated codes for predicting molecular and crystalline properties. However, each code implements the formalism in a different way, raising questions about the reproducibility of such predictions. We report the results of a community-wide effort that compared 15 solid-state codes, using 40 different potentials or basis set types, to assess the quality of the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof equations of state for 71 elemental crystals. We conclude that predictions from recent codes and pseudopotentials agree very well, with pairwise differences that are comparable to those between different high-precision experiments. Older methods, however, have less precise agreement. Our benchmark provides a framework for users and developers to document the precision of new applications and methodological improvements.

1,141 citations


Authors

Showing all 69437 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Salim Yusuf2311439252912
Daniel Levy212933194778
Eugene V. Koonin1991063175111
Eric Boerwinkle1831321170971
David L. Kaplan1771944146082
Derek R. Lovley16858295315
Mark Gerstein168751149578
Gang Chen1673372149819
Hongfang Liu1662356156290
Robert Stone1601756167901
Mark E. Cooper1581463124887
Michael B. Sporn15755994605
Cumrun Vafa15750988515
Wolfgang Wagner1562342123391
David M. Sabatini155413135833
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Minnesota
257.9K papers, 11.9M citations

97% related

Cornell University
235.5K papers, 12.2M citations

97% related

University of Washington
305.5K papers, 17.7M citations

97% related

Columbia University
224K papers, 12.8M citations

97% related

University of Wisconsin-Madison
237.5K papers, 11.8M citations

97% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023274
20221,028
20218,250
20208,150
20197,397
20186,594