Institution
Rutgers University
Education•New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States•
About: Rutgers University is a education organization based out in New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 68736 authors who have published 159418 publications receiving 6713860 citations. The organization is also known as: Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey & Rutgers.
Topics: Population, Poison control, Health care, Cancer, Galaxy
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: It is found that most people use few search terms, few modified queries, view few Web pages, and rarely use advanced search features, and the language of Web queries is distinctive.
Abstract: In studying actual Web searching by the public at large, we analyzed over one million Web queries by users of the Excite search engine. We found that most people use few search terms, few modified queries, view few Web pages, and rarely use advanced search features. A small number of search terms are used with high frequency, and a great many terms are unique; the language of Web queries is distinctive. Queries about recreation and entertainment rank highest. Findings are compared to data from two other large studies of Web queries. This study provides an insight into the public practices and choices in Web searching.
1,153 citations
••
TL;DR: Recommendations apply to analyses intended to inform the allocation of health care resources across a broad range of conditions and interventions to improve the comparability and quality of studies.
Abstract: Objective: To develop consensus-based recommendations guiding the conduct of cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) to improve the comparability and quality of studies. The recommendations apply to analyses intended to inform the allocation of health care resources across a broad range of conditions and interventions. This article, first in a 3-part series, discusses how this goal affects the conduct and use of analyses. The remaining articles will outline methodological and reporting recommendations, respectively.
Participants: The Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine, a nonfederal panel with expertise in CEA, clinical medicine, ethics, and health outcomes measurement, was convened by the US Public Health Service (PHS).
Evidence: The panel reviewed the theoretical foundations of CEA, current practices, and alternative procedures for measuring and assigning values to resource use and health outcomes.
Consensus process: The panel met 11 times during 2 1/2 years with PHS staff and methodologists from federal agencies. Working groups brought issues and preliminary recommendations to the full panel for discussion. Draft recommendations were circulated to outside experts and the federal agencies prior to finalization.
Conclusions: The panel's recommendations define a "reference case" cost-effectiveness analysis, a standard set of methods to serve as a point of comparison across studies. The reference case analysis is conducted from the societal perspective and accounts for benefits, harms, and costs to all parties. Although CEA does not reflect every element of importance in health care decisions, the information it provides is critical to informing decisions about the allocation of health care resources.
1,149 citations
••
TL;DR: An overview of the IMPACT molecular mechanics program is provided with an emphasis on recent developments and a description of its current functionality and a status report for the fixed charge and polarizable force fields is included.
Abstract: We provide an overview of the IMPACT molecular mechanics program with an emphasis on recent developments and a description of its current functionality. With respect to core molecular mechanics technologies we include a status report for the fixed charge and polarizable force fields that can be used with the program and illustrate how the force fields, when used together with new atom typing and parameter assignment modules, have greatly expanded the coverage of organic compounds and medicinally relevant ligands. As we discuss in this review, explicit solvent simulations have been used to guide our design of implicit solvent models based on the generalized Born framework and a novel nonpolar estimator that have recently been incorporated into the program. With IMPACT it is possible to use several different advanced conformational sampling algorithms based on combining features of molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo simulations. The program includes two specialized molecular mechanics modules: Glide, a high-throughput docking program, and QSite, a mixed quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics module. These modules employ the IMPACT infrastructure as a starting point for the construction of the protein model and assignment of molecular mechanics parameters, but have then been developed to meet specialized objectives with respect to sampling and the energy function.
1,144 citations
••
TL;DR: This expository presentation addresses the precise formulation of questions of robustness with respect to disturbances, formulated in the paradigm of input to state stability, with an intuitive and informal presentation of the main concepts.
Abstract: The analysis and design of nonlinear feedback systems has recently undergone an exceptionally rich period of progress and maturation, fueled, to a great extent, by (1) the discovery of certain basic conceptual notions, and (2) the identification of classes of systems for which systematic decomposition approaches can result in effective and easily computable control laws. These two aspects are complementary, since the latter approaches are, typically, based upon the inductive verification of the validity of the former system properties under compositions (in the terminology used in [62], the “activation” of theoretical concepts leads to “constructive” control). This expository presentation addresses the first of these aspects, and in particular the precise formulation of questions of robustness with respect to disturbances, formulated in the paradigm of input to state stability. We provide an intuitive and informal presentation of the main concepts. More precise statements, especially about older results, are given in the cited papers, as well as in several previous surveys such as [103] and [105] (of which the present paper represents an update), but we provide a little more detail about relatively recent work. Regarding applications and extensions of the basic framework, we give some pointers to the literature, but we do not focus on feedback design and specific engineering problems; for the latter we refer the reader to textbooks such as [43], [60], [58], [96], [66], [27], [44].
1,142 citations
••
Ghent University1, Forschungszentrum Jülich2, Åbo Akademi University3, Aalto University4, Vienna University of Technology5, Duke University6, University of Grenoble7, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne8, Durham University9, International School for Advanced Studies10, Max Planck Society11, Uppsala University12, Humboldt University of Berlin13, Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society14, Technical University of Denmark15, National Institute of Standards and Technology16, University of Udine17, Université catholique de Louvain18, University of Basel19, Harvard University20, University of California, Davis21, Rutgers University22, University of York23, Wake Forest University24, Science and Technology Facilities Council25, University of Oxford26, University of Vienna27, Dresden University of Technology28, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology29, Radboud University Nijmegen30, University of Tokyo31, Centre national de la recherche scientifique32, University of Cambridge33, Royal Holloway, University of London34, University of California, Santa Barbara35, University of Luxembourg36, Los Alamos National Laboratory37, Harbin Institute of Technology38
TL;DR: A procedure to assess the precision of DFT methods was devised and used to demonstrate reproducibility among many of the most widely used DFT codes, demonstrating that the precisionof DFT implementations can be determined, even in the absence of one absolute reference code.
Abstract: The widespread popularity of density functional theory has given rise to an extensive range of dedicated codes for predicting molecular and crystalline properties. However, each code implements the formalism in a different way, raising questions about the reproducibility of such predictions. We report the results of a community-wide effort that compared 15 solid-state codes, using 40 different potentials or basis set types, to assess the quality of the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof equations of state for 71 elemental crystals. We conclude that predictions from recent codes and pseudopotentials agree very well, with pairwise differences that are comparable to those between different high-precision experiments. Older methods, however, have less precise agreement. Our benchmark provides a framework for users and developers to document the precision of new applications and methodological improvements.
1,141 citations
Authors
Showing all 69437 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Salim Yusuf | 231 | 1439 | 252912 |
Daniel Levy | 212 | 933 | 194778 |
Eugene V. Koonin | 199 | 1063 | 175111 |
Eric Boerwinkle | 183 | 1321 | 170971 |
David L. Kaplan | 177 | 1944 | 146082 |
Derek R. Lovley | 168 | 582 | 95315 |
Mark Gerstein | 168 | 751 | 149578 |
Gang Chen | 167 | 3372 | 149819 |
Hongfang Liu | 166 | 2356 | 156290 |
Robert Stone | 160 | 1756 | 167901 |
Mark E. Cooper | 158 | 1463 | 124887 |
Michael B. Sporn | 157 | 559 | 94605 |
Cumrun Vafa | 157 | 509 | 88515 |
Wolfgang Wagner | 156 | 2342 | 123391 |
David M. Sabatini | 155 | 413 | 135833 |