San Diego State University

About: San Diego State University is a education organization based out in San Diego, California, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 12418 authors who have published 27950 publications receiving 1192375 citations. The organization is also known as: SDSU & San Diego State College.

Lessons from a dozen years of group support systems research: a discussion of lab and field findings

Abstract: During the past dozen years, researchers at the University of Arizona have built six generations of group support systems software, conducted over 150 research studies, and facilitated over 4,000 projects. This article reports on lessons learned through that experience. It begins by presenting a theoretical foundation for the Groupware Grid, a tool for designing and evaluating GSS. It then reports lessons from nine key domains: (1)GSS in organizations; (2) cross-cultural and multicultural issues; (3) designing GSS software; (4) collaborative writing; (5) electronic polling; (6) GSS facilities and room design; (7) leadership and facilitation; (8) GSS in the classroom; and (9) business process reengineering.

Hearing impairment and cognitive energy: the Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL)

Abstract: The Fifth Eriksholm Workshop on “Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy” was convened to develop a consensus among interdisciplinary experts about what is known on the topic, gaps in knowledge, the use of terminology, priorities for future research, and implications for practice. The general term cognitive energy was chosen to facilitate the broadest possible discussion of the topic. It goes back to Titchener (1908) who described the effects of attention on perception; he used the term psychic energy for the notion that limited mental resources can be flexibly allocated among perceptual and mental activities. The workshop focused on three main areas: (1) theories, models, concepts, definitions, and frameworks; (2) methods and measures; and (3) knowledge translation. We defined effort as the deliberate allocation of mental resources to overcome obstacles in goal pursuit when carrying out a task, with listening effort applying more specifically when tasks involve listening. We adapted Kahneman’s seminal (1973) Capacity Model of Attention to listening and proposed a heuristically useful Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL). Our FUEL incorporates the well-known relationship between cognitive demand and the supply of cognitive capacity that is the foundation of cognitive theories of attention. Our FUEL also incorporates a motivation dimension based on complementary theories of motivational intensity, adaptive gain control, and optimal performance, fatigue, and pleasure. Using a three-dimensional illustration, we highlight how listening effort depends not only on hearing difficulties and task demands but also on the listener’s motivation to expend mental effort in the challenging situations of everyday life.

Environmental and societal factors affect food choice and physical activity: rationale, influences, and leverage points.

Abstract: Sarah L. Booth, Ph.D., Vitamin K Laboratory, Jean Mayer USDAHuman Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, MA; James F. Sallis, Ph.D., F.A.C.S.M., Department ofPsychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA; Cheryl Ritenbaugh, Ph.D., M.P.H., Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, O R James 0. Hill, Ph.D., Center for Human Nutrition, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO; Leann L. Birch, Ph.D., Department ofHuman Development and Family Studies, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA; Lawrence D. Frank, Ph.D., College OfArchitecture, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA; Karen Glanz, Ph.D., M.P.H., Cancer Research Center of Hawaii, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI; David A. Himmelgreen, Ph.D., Department ofAnthropology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Michael Mudd, Corporate Affairs, Kraft Foods, Inc., Northfield, IL; Barry M. Popkin, Ph.D., Department ofNutrition, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Karyl A. Rickard, Ph.D., R.D., C.S.P., F.A.D.A., Nutrition and Dietetics Program, School ofAllied Health Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Sachiko St. Jeor, Ph.D., R.D., Nutrition Education and Research Program, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Reno, W, Nicholas P. Hays, M.S., Energy Metabolism Laboratory, Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, MA.

Quantifying inactive lithium in lithium metal batteries

Abstract: Lithium metal anodes offer high theoretical capacities (3,860 milliampere-hours per gram)1, but rechargeable batteries built with such anodes suffer from dendrite growth and low Coulombic efficiency (the ratio of charge output to charge input), preventing their commercial adoption2,3. The formation of inactive ('dead') lithium- which consists of both (electro)chemically formed Li+ compounds in the solid electrolyte interphase and electrically isolated unreacted metallic Li0 (refs 4,5)-causes capacity loss and safety hazards. Quantitatively distinguishing between Li+ in components of the solid electrolyte interphase and unreacted metallic Li0 has not been possible, owing to the lack of effective diagnostic tools. Optical microscopy6, in situ environmental transmission electron microscopy7,8, X-ray microtomography9 and magnetic resonance imaging10 provide a morphological perspective with little chemical information. Nuclear magnetic resonance11, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy12 and cryogenic transmission electron microscopy13,14 can distinguish between Li+ in the solid electrolyte interphase and metallic Li0, but their detection ranges are limited to surfaces or local regions. Here we establish the analytical method of titration gas chromatography to quantify the contribution of unreacted metallic Li0 to the total amount of inactive lithium. We identify the unreacted metallic Li0, not the (electro)chemically formed Li+ in the solid electrolyte interphase, as the dominant source of inactive lithium and capacity loss. By coupling the unreacted metallic Li0 content to observations of its local microstructure and nanostructure by cryogenic electron microscopy (both scanning and transmission), we also establish the formation mechanism of inactive lithium in different types of electrolytes and determine the underlying cause of low Coulombic efficiency in plating and stripping (the charge and discharge processes, respectively, in a full cell) of lithium metal anodes. We propose strategies for making lithium plating and stripping more efficient so that lithium metal anodes can be used for next-generation high-energy batteries.