scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Sao Paulo State University

EducationSão Paulo, Brazil
About: Sao Paulo State University is a education organization based out in São Paulo, Brazil. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Large Hadron Collider. The organization has 55715 authors who have published 100436 publications receiving 1375332 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Current data about the structure and functions of bone cells and the factors that influence bone remodeling are discussed, indicating the dynamic nature of bone tissue.
Abstract: Bone tissue is continuously remodeled through the concerted actions of bone cells, which include bone resorption by osteoclasts and bone formation by osteoblasts, whereas osteocytes act as mechanosensors and orchestrators of the bone remodeling process. This process is under the control of local (e.g., growth factors and cytokines) and systemic (e.g., calcitonin and estrogens) factors that all together contribute for bone homeostasis. An imbalance between bone resorption and formation can result in bone diseases including osteoporosis. Recently, it has been recognized that, during bone remodeling, there are an intricate communication among bone cells. For instance, the coupling from bone resorption to bone formation is achieved by interaction between osteoclasts and osteoblasts. Moreover, osteocytes produce factors that influence osteoblast and osteoclast activities, whereas osteocyte apoptosis is followed by osteoclastic bone resorption. The increasing knowledge about the structure and functions of bone cells contributed to a better understanding of bone biology. It has been suggested that there is a complex communication between bone cells and other organs, indicating the dynamic nature of bone tissue. In this review, we discuss the current data about the structure and functions of bone cells and the factors that influence bone remodeling.

1,160 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
24 Apr 2009-Science
TL;DR: To understand the biology and evolution of ruminants, the cattle genome was sequenced to about sevenfold coverage and provides a resource for understanding mammalian evolution and accelerating livestock genetic improvement for milk and meat production.
Abstract: To understand the biology and evolution of ruminants, the cattle genome was sequenced to about sevenfold coverage. The cattle genome contains a minimum of 22,000 genes, with a core set of 14,345 orthologs shared among seven mammalian species of which 1217 are absent or undetected in noneutherian (marsupial or monotreme) genomes. Cattle-specific evolutionary breakpoint regions in chromosomes have a higher density of segmental duplications, enrichment of repetitive elements, and species-specific variations in genes associated with lactation and immune responsiveness. Genes involved in metabolism are generally highly conserved, although five metabolic genes are deleted or extensively diverged from their human orthologs. The cattle genome sequence thus provides a resource for understanding mammalian evolution and accelerating livestock genetic improvement for milk and meat production.

1,144 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
A.C.R. da Silva, Jesus Aparecido Ferro1, Fernando C. Reinach2, Chuck S. Farah2, Luiz Roberto Furlan1, Ronaldo Bento Quaggio2, Claudia Barros Monteiro-Vitorello3, M. A. Van Sluys2, Nalvo F. Almeida4, Lucia Maria Carareto Alves1, A. M. do Amaral5, Maria Célia Bertolini1, Luis Eduardo Aranha Camargo3, Giovana Camarotte3, Fabiana de Souza Cannavan, Cardozo Jc1, Felipe S. Chambergo2, L. P. Ciapina1, Regina Maria Barretto Cicarelli1, Luiz Lehmann Coutinho3, Jeny R. Cursino-Santos2, Hamza El-Dorry2, J. B. Faria2, Ari J. S. Ferreira2, Rita de Cássia Café Ferreira2, Maria Inês Tiraboschi Ferro1, Eduardo Fernandes Formighieri, Marília Caixeta Franco, Christian C. Greggio1, Arthur Gruber2, Angela M. Katsuyama2, Luciano Takeshi Kishi1, Rui P. Leite, Eliana Gertrudes de Macedo Lemos1, Manoel Victor Franco Lemos1, E. C. Locali5, Marcos Antonio Machado5, Alda Maria Backx Noronha Madeira2, Nilce Maria Martinez-Rossi2, E. C. Martins1, João Meidanis6, Carlos Frederico Martins Menck2, Cristina Yumi Miyaki2, D. H. Moon, Leandro Marcio Moreira2, M. T. M. Novo1, Vagner K. Okura6, Mariana Cabral de Oliveira2, V. R. Oliveira2, H. A. Pereira1, Antonio Rossi2, Janete Apparecida Desidério Sena1, Cícero Lopes da Silva2, R. F. B. de Souza2, L. A. F. Spinola2, Marco Aurélio Takita5, Rodrigo Esaki Tamura2, E. C. Teixeira1, R. I. D. Tezza1, M. Trindade dos Santos2, Daniela Truffi3, Siu Mui Tsai, Frank F. White1, Frank F. White7, João C. Setubal6, João Paulo Kitajima6 
23 May 2002
TL;DR: The genus Xanthomonas is a diverse and economically important group of bacterial phytopathogens, belonging to the γ-subdivision of the Proteobacteria, and several groups of strain-specific genes are identified and proposed mechanisms that may explain the differing host specificities and pathogenic processes are proposed.
Abstract: The genus Xanthomonas is a diverse and economically important group of bacterial phytopathogens, belonging to the gamma-subdivision of the Proteobacteria. Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri (Xac) causes citrus canker, which affects most commercial citrus cultivars, resulting in significant losses worldwide. Symptoms include canker lesions, leading to abscission of fruit and leaves and general tree decline. Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc) causes black rot, which affects crucifers such as Brassica and Arabidopsis. Symptoms include marginal leaf chlorosis and darkening of vascular tissue, accompanied by extensive wilting and necrosis. Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris is grown commercially to produce the exopolysaccharide xanthan gum, which is used as a viscosifying and stabilizing agent in many industries. Here we report and compare the complete genome sequences of Xac and Xcc. Their distinct disease phenotypes and host ranges belie a high degree of similarity at the genomic level. More than 80% of genes are shared, and gene order is conserved along most of their respective chromosomes. We identified several groups of strain-specific genes, and on the basis of these groups we propose mechanisms that may explain the differing host specificities and pathogenic processes.

1,141 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes.
Abstract: In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.

1,129 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A historical review of the main authors and their writings that are representative of this particular kind of methodological research in social sciences is presented in this article, where the authors present a set of main authors' works.
Abstract: A historical review of the main authors and their writings that are representative of this particular kind of methodological research in Social Sciences.

1,077 citations


Authors

Showing all 56201 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Russel J. Reiter1691646121010
Tobin J. Marks1591621111604
Joseph T. Hupp14173182647
Luca Lista1402044110645
Sergio F Novaes1381559101941
Wagner Carvalho135139594184
Alberto Santoro1351576100629
Andre Sznajder134146498242
Luiz Mundim133141389792
Eduardo De Moraes Gregores133145492464
Helio Nogima132127484368
Pedro G Mercadante129133186378
D. De Jesus Damiao128116282707
Sandra S. Padula128113177174
Sudha Ahuja127101675739
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
75.6K papers, 1.2M citations

96% related

University of São Paulo
272.3K papers, 5.1M citations

96% related

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
89.4K papers, 1.4M citations

96% related

Federal University of Paraná
46.6K papers, 546.5K citations

95% related

State University of Campinas
104.6K papers, 1.8M citations

95% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023127
2022765
20216,826
20206,949
20196,316
20186,314