scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Shepherd Center

HealthcareAtlanta, Georgia, United States
About: Shepherd Center is a healthcare organization based out in Atlanta, Georgia, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Spinal cord injury & Rehabilitation. The organization has 268 authors who have published 461 publications receiving 15304 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: While great improvements in life expectancy have been achieved since the Model SCI Systems program began, current data support the need for renewed efforts to improve the prevention and treatment of the complications of spinal cord injury.

775 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A systematic review of behavioral assessment scales for disorders of consciousness (DOC) provides evidence-based recommendations for clinical use based on their content validity, reliability, diagnostic validity, and ability to predict functional outcomes; and provides research recommendations on DOC scale development and validation.

487 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Jerry S. Wolinsky1, Ponnada A. Narayana1, Paul O'Connor2, P. K. Coyle3, Corey C. Ford4, Kenneth P. Johnson5, Kenneth P. Johnson6, Aaron Miller7, Aaron Miller6, Lillian Pardo, Shaul Kadosh, David Ladkani, Lorne F. Kastrukoff8, Pierre Duquette9, Mark S. Freedman10, Marc Debouverie, Catherine Lubetski11, Gilles Edan, E Roullet, Christian Confavreux6, Alan J. Thompson, L D Blumhardt12, L D Blumhardt6, Stanley Hawkins, Thomas F. Scott13, Daniel Wynn, Joanna Cooper, Stephen Thurston, Stanton B. Elias14, Clyde E. Markowitz15, David Mattson16, John H. Noseworthy17, Elizabeth A. Shuster17, Jonathan L. Carter17, Fred D. Lublin18, WH Stuart19, Michael D. Kaufman, Gary Birnbaum, Kottil Rammohan20, Ruth H. Whitham21, Cornelia Mihai22, Steven J. Greenberg23, Craig M. Smith, Mark A. Agius24, Stan Van Den Noort25, Lawrence W. Myers26, James G. Nelson27, Douglas S. Goodin28, Barry G. W. Arnason29, Khurram Bashir30, Sharon G. Lynch31, Patricia K. Coyle3, Stephen Kamin32, William A. Sheremata33, Galen Mitchell34, Andrew D. Goodman35, Norman J Kachuck36, Peter B. Dunne37, J. William Lindsey1, Elliot M. Frohman38, James D. Bowen39, Benjamin Rix Brooks40, John W. Rose41, Harold L. Moses42, Douglas Jeffrey43, Anne H. Cross44, Robert P. Lisak45, Timothy Vollmer46, Jack P. Antel47, Gary Cutter, Luanne M. Metz48, Henry F. McFarland49, Steven Reingold, Fred D. Lublin6, Irina Vainrub, Lucie Lambert, Fengwei Zhong, Jeff Rasmituth, Saria Momin, Rivka Kreitman, Galia Shifroni, Irit Pinchasi, Yafit Stark 
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston1, University of Toronto2, Stony Brook University3, University of New Mexico4, University of Maryland, Baltimore5, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai6, Maimonides Medical Center7, University of British Columbia8, Université de Montréal9, University of Ottawa10, University of Paris11, Queen's University12, Allegheny General Hospital13, Henry Ford Health System14, University of Pennsylvania15, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis16, Mayo Clinic17, Drexel University18, Shepherd Center19, Ohio State University20, Oregon Health & Science University21, State University of New York Upstate Medical University22, Roswell Park Cancer Institute23, University of California, Davis24, University of California, Irvine25, University of California, Los Angeles26, University of California, San Diego27, University of California, San Francisco28, University of Chicago29, University of Alabama at Birmingham30, University of Kansas31, Rutgers University32, University of Miami33, University of Pittsburgh34, University of Rochester35, University of Southern California36, University of South Florida37, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center38, University of Washington39, University of Wisconsin-Madison40, University of Utah41, Vanderbilt University42, Wake Forest University43, Washington University in St. Louis44, Wayne State University45, Yale University46, McGill University47, Foothills Medical Centre48, National Institutes of Health49
TL;DR: To determine whether glatiramer acetate slows accumulation of disability in primary progressive multiple sclerosis, a new drug is developed that acts as a ‘spatially aggregating agent’ to reduce the risk of disease progression.
Abstract: Objective To determine whether glatiramer acetate (GA) slows accumulation of disability in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Methods A total of 943 patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis were randomized to GA or placebo (PBO) in this 3-year, double-blind trial. The primary end point was an intention-to-treat analysis of time to 1- (entry expanded disability status scale, 3.0–5.0) or 0.5-point expanded disability status scale change (entry expanded disability status scale, 5.5–6.5) sustained for 3 months. The trial was stopped after an interim analysis by an independent data safety monitoring board indicated no discernible treatment effect on the primary outcome. Intention-to-treat analyses of disability and magnetic resonance imaging end points were performed. Results There was a nonsignificant delay in time to sustained accumulated disability in GA- versus PBO-treated patients (hazard ratio, 0.87 [95% confidence interval, 0.71–1.07]; p = 0.1753), with significant decreases in enhancing lesions in year 1 and smaller increases in T2 lesion volumes in years 2 and 3 versus PBO. Post hoc analysis showed that survival curves for GA-treated male patients diverged early from PBO-treated male subjects (hazard ratio, 0.71 [95% confidence interval, 0.53–0.95]; p = 0.0193). Interpretation The trial failed to demonstrate a treatment effect of GA on primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Both the unanticipated low event rate and premature discontinuation of study medication decreased the power to detect a treatment effect. Post hoc analysis suggests GA may have slowed clinical progression in male patients who showed more rapid progression when untreated. Ann Neurol 2007;61:14–24

406 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: There is marked loss of contractile protein early afterSCI which differs among affected skeletal muscles, and it is suggested that the development of muscular imbalance as well as diminution of muscle mass would compromise force potential early after SCI.
Abstract: In this study we examined the influence of complete spinal cord injury (SCI) on affected skeletal muscle morphology within 6 months of SCI. Magnetic resonance (MR) images of the leg and thigh were taken as soon as patients were clinically stable, on average 6 weeks post injury, and 11 and 24 weeks after SCI to assess average muscle cross-sectional area (CSA). MR images were also taken from nine able-bodied controls at two time points separated from one another by 18 weeks. The controls showed no change in any variable over time. The patients showed differential atrophy (P = 0.0001) of the ankle plantar or dorsi flexor muscles. The average CSA of m. gastrocnemius and m. soleus decreased by 24% and 12%, respectively (P = 0.0001). The m. tibialis anterior CSA showed no change (P = 0.3644). As a result of this muscle-specific atrophy, the ratio of average CSA of m. gastrocnemius to m. soleus, m. gastrocnemius to m. tibialis anterior and m. soleus to m. tibialis anterior declined (P = 0.0001). The average CSA of m, quadriceps femoris, the hamstring muscle group and the adductor muscle group decreased by 16%, 14% and 16%, respectively (P< or =0.0045). No differential atrophy was observed among these thigh muscle groups, thus the ratio of their CSAs did not change (P = 0.6210). The average CSA of atrophied skeletal muscle in the patients was 45-80% of that of age- and weight-matched able-bodied controls 24 weeks after injury. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that there is marked loss of contractile protein early after SCI which differs among affected skeletal muscles. While the mechanism(s) responsible for loss of muscle size are not clear, it is suggested that the development of muscular imbalance as well as diminution of muscle mass would compromise force potential early after SCI.

351 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Skeletal muscle atrophy is associated with greater IMF accumulation in SCI group 6 weeks post-injury compared to AB controls, and IMF continues to increase over time in incomplete SCI.
Abstract: Cross-sectional and longitudinal design. (1) To quantify skeletal muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) after correcting for intramuscular fat (IMF) in thigh muscle groups 6 weeks after incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI), (2) to monitor the changes in muscle CSA and IMF after 3 months from the initial measurement. Academic institution Athens, GA, USA. Six incomplete SCI patients (28±4 years, 178±5 cm and 78±6 kg, mean±SE, C7 to L3, American Spinal Injury Association B or C) were tested at 5±1 weeks and 3 months after the initial measurement. T1-weighted magnetic resonance images were taken of both thighs. Six able-bodied (AB) controls were matched in age, sex, height and weight (29±4 years, four male and two female subjets, 179±5 cm and 77±6 kg). At 6 weeks post-injury, muscle CSA was 82±4 cm2 in incomplete SCI and 123±21 cm2 in AB controls (P=0.04). IMF CSA was 5.2±1.3 and 2.3±0.6 cm2 in incomplete SCI and AB controls, respectively (P=0.03). Relative IMF was three-fold higher (P=0.03) in the SCI group versus AB controls (5.8±1.4 versus 2.0±0.6%). After 3 months, IMF increased 26% in the SCI group compared to the initial measurement (P=0.02). Skeletal muscle atrophy is associated with greater IMF accumulation in SCI group 6 weeks post-injury compared to AB controls. Moreover, IMF continues to increase over time in incomplete SCI.

349 citations


Authors

Showing all 270 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Ross Zafonte6441416373
Gary A. Dudley6114613074
James S. Krause452176564
Ronald T. Seel35724451
Julie Gassaway32833298
Stephen N. Macciocchi29654088
Edelle C. Field-Fote28882814
Rosemarie Cooper28892283
Jill M. Slade26502205
John L.K. Kramer231091539
Deborah Backus22801485
C. Scott Bickel22502451
Jay M. Uomoto22373968
Guy J. Buckle22361857
J. Stuart Krause21232114
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
2.8K papers, 106.4K citations

85% related

Toronto Rehabilitation Institute
2.8K papers, 85.2K citations

82% related

VA Palo Alto Healthcare System
4.6K papers, 209.9K citations

77% related

VA Boston Healthcare System
4.8K papers, 181K citations

76% related

Harborview Medical Center
2.8K papers, 124.6K citations

75% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20222
202144
202035
201919
201837
201728