scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

St Thomas' Hospital

HealthcareLondon, United Kingdom
About: St Thomas' Hospital is a healthcare organization based out in London, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Pregnancy. The organization has 12105 authors who have published 15596 publications receiving 624309 citations. The organization is also known as: St Thomas's Hospital & St. Thomas's.


Papers
More filters
Journal Article
TL;DR: This review gives an overview of this naturally occurring dietary element, its metabolism and the evidence of its potential role in bone health.
Abstract: Low bone mass (osteoporosis) is a silent epidemic of the 21st century, which presently in the UK results in over 200,000 fractures annually at a cost of over one billion pounds. Figures are set to increase worldwide. Understanding the factors which affect bone metabolism is thus of primary importance in order to establish preventative measures or treatments for this condition. Nutrition is an important determinant of bone health, but the effects of the individual nutrients and minerals, other than calcium, is little understood. Accumulating evidence over the last 30 years strongly suggest that dietary silicon is beneficial to bone and connective tissue health and we recently reported strong positive associations between dietary Si intake and bone mineral density in US and UK cohorts. The exact biological role(s) of silicon in bone health is still not clear, although a number of possible mechanisms have been suggested, including the synthesis of collagen and/or its stabilization, and matrix mineralization. This review gives an overview of this naturally occurring dietary element, its metabolism and the evidence of its potential role in bone health.

448 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: Genetic effects are of major importance in myopia/hyperopia; astigmatism appears to be dominantly inherited.
Abstract: PURPOSE. A classical twin study was performed to examine the relative importance of genes and environment in refractive error. METHODS. Refractive error was examined in 226 monozygotic (MZ) and 280 dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs aged 49 to 79 years (mean age, 62.4 years). Using a Humphrey-670 automatic refractor, continuous measures of spherical equivalent, total astigmatism, and corneal astigmatism were recorded. Univariate and bivariate maximum likelihood model fitting was used to estimate genetic and environmental variance components using information from both eyes. RESULTS. For the continuous spectrum of myopia/hyperopia, a model specifying additive genetic and unique environmental factors showed the best fit to the data, yielding a heritability of 84% to 86% (95% confidence interval [CI], 81%-89%). If myopia and hyperopia (≤ -0.5 D and ≥ 0.5 D, respectively) were treated as binary traits, the heritability was 90% (95% CI, 81%-95%) for myopia and 89% (95% CI, 81%-94%) for hyperopia. For total and corneal astigmatism, modeling showed dominant genetic effects are important; dominant genetic effects accounted for 47% to 49% of the variance of total astigmatism (95% CI, 37%-55%) and 42% to 61% of corneal astigmatism variance (95% CI, 8%-71%), with additive genetic factors accounting for 1% to 4% and 4% to 18%, respectively (95% CIs, 0%-13% and 0%-60%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS. Genetic effects are of major importance in myopia/hyperopia; astigmatism appears to be dominantly inherited.

447 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Patients with APs plus SLE and PAPS have similar clinical profiles, although heart valve disease, hemolytic anemia, low C4 levels, and neutropenia seem to be more common in patients with APSplus SLE.

446 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Complete anatomic and, to some extent, functional recovery can be induced by intravitreal TA despite long-term refractory inflammatory CME, and optical coherence tomography aids in the management of these cases.

445 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The significant difference in unadjusted mortality and the fact that this difference disappears with severity adjustment raise important questions about the effect of the approach to critical care in Europe compared with that in the USA.
Abstract: Summary Background Mortality from severe sepsis and septic shock differs across continents, countries, and regions. We aimed to use data from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) to compare models of care and outcomes for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in the USA and Europe. Methods The SSC was introduced into more than 200 sites in Europe and the USA. All patients identified with severe sepsis and septic shock in emergency departments or hospital wards and admitted to intensive care units (ICUs), and those with sepsis in ICUs were entered into the SSC database. Patients entered into the database from its launch in January, 2005, through January, 2010, in units with at least 20 patients and 3 months of enrolment of patients were included in this analysis. Patients included in the cohort were limited to those entered in the first 4 years at every site. We used random-effects logistic regression to estimate the hospital mortality odds ratio (OR) for Europe relative to the USA. We used random-effects linear regression to find the relation between lengths of stay in hospital and ICU and geographic region. Findings 25 375 patients were included in the cohort. The USA included 107 sites with 18 766 (74%) patients, and Europe included 79 hospital sites with 6609 (26%) patients. In the USA, 12 218 (65·1%) were admitted to the ICU from the emergency department whereas in Europe, 3405 (51·5%) were admitted from the wards. The median stay on the hospital wards before ICU admission was longer in Europe than in the USA (1·0 vs 0·1 days, difference 0·9, 95% CI 0·8–0·9). Raw hospital mortality was higher in Europe than in the USA (41·1% vs 28·3%, difference 12·8, 95% CI 11·5–14·7). The median length of stay in ICU (7·8 vs 4·2 days, 3·6, 3·3–3·7) and hospital (22·8 vs 10·5 days, 12·3, 11·9–12·8) was longer in Europe than in the USA. Adjusted mortality in Europe was not significantly higher than that in the USA (32·3% vs 31·3%, 1·0, −1·7 to 3·7, p=0·468). Complete compliance with all applicable elements of the sepsis resuscitation bundle was higher in the USA than in Europe (21·6% vs 18·4%, 3·2, 2·2–4·4). Interpretation The significant difference in unadjusted mortality and the fact that this difference disappears with severity adjustment raise important questions about the effect of the approach to critical care in Europe compared with that in the USA. The effect of ICU bed availability on outcomes in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock requires further investigation. Funding Eli Lilly Co, Baxter Lifesciences, Philips Medical Systems, the Society of Critical Care Medicine, and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

444 citations


Authors

Showing all 12132 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
David J. Hunter2131836207050
Rory Collins162489193407
Steven Williams144137586712
Geoffrey Burnstock141148899525
Nick C. Fox13974893036
Christopher D.M. Fletcher13867482484
David A. Jackson136109568352
Paul Harrison133140080539
Roberto Ferrari1331654103824
David Taylor131246993220
Keith Hawton12565755138
Nicole Soranzo12431674494
Roger Williams122145572416
John C. Chambers12264571028
Derek M. Yellon12263854319
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Hammersmith Hospital
14.3K papers, 769.1K citations

93% related

John Radcliffe Hospital
23.6K papers, 1.4M citations

93% related

Leiden University Medical Center
38K papers, 1.6M citations

92% related

Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
12.6K papers, 659.2K citations

92% related

University Medical Center Groningen
30.3K papers, 967K citations

91% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20237
202235
2021654
2020595
2019485
2018462