scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

State University of New York System

EducationAlbany, New York, United States
About: State University of New York System is a education organization based out in Albany, New York, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 54077 authors who have published 78070 publications receiving 2985160 citations.
Topics: Population, Poison control, RNA, Gene, Receptor


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Myalgic encephalomyelitis: International Consensus Criteria (Review).
Abstract: 12 FatigueConsultationClinic,SaltLake RegionalMedicalCenter; 13 InternalMedicine,FamilyPractice,UniversityofUtah,SaltLakeCity,UT,USA; 14 ME ⁄CFSCenter,OsloUniversity HospitalHF,Norway; 15 DepartmentofPaediatrics,StateUniversityofNewYork,Buffalo,NY,USA; 16 Independent,Pavia,Italy; 17 Harbor-UCLA MedicalCenter,UniversityofCalifornia,LosAngeles,CA; 18 EVMedResearch,Lomita,CA,USA; 19 UniversityofLimerick,Limerick,Ireland; 20 Pain Clinic,KonyangUniversityHospital,Daejeon,Korea; 21 DonvaleSpecialistMedicalCentre,Donvale,Victoria,Australia; 22 Departmentsof Anesthesiology,NeurobiologyandAnatomy,UniversityofUtah,SaltLakeCity,UT,USA; 23 DepartmentofMedicinaNuclear,ClinicaLasCondes, Santiago,Chile; 24 WhittemorePetersonInstitute,UniversityofNevada,Reno,NV,USA; 25 MiwaNaikaClinic,Toyama,Japan; 26 A.Kirchenstein InstituteofMicrobiologyandVirology,RigaStradinsUniversity,Riga,Latvia; 27 DepartmentofBiochemistryBand 28 DepartmentofSportsSciences,UniversityofthePacific,Stockton,CAUSA

810 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The c-myc Tunnel and an Elusive Protein Partner are described, as well as other oncoproteins, which help clarify the role of DNA-Binding Site and Protein Partner in the regulation of transcription.
Abstract: PERSPECTIVES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 810 myc BELO NG S TO A SMALL FAM ILY OF H IGHLY RELAT ED PROTO -O NCOGENES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 811 General Structure-Function Properties of c-myc Polypeptides . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 813 Light at the End of the myc Tunnel: A DNA-Binding Site and an Elusive Protein Partner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ 815 EFFECT S O N A ND BY myc IN CELL -CYCL E PROG RESSIO N A ND PROLIFERA TIO N. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 817 EFFECT S O N A ND BY myc IN D IFFERENT IATO N. . . . . ... . .. ..... ...... . . . . . . 821 TUMO RIG ENESIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . 824 A ROL E FO R c-myc IN D NA REPL ICAT IO N: FA CT OR FA NTA SY ? . . . . . . 827 REG ULAT IO N O F myc A ND BY myc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 828 myc Autoregulation 828 Regulation of Other Cellular Genes by myc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 830 Regulation of myc Transcriptional Initiation 831 Regulation of myc Transcriptional Elongation 838 Other Oncoproteins Contribute co myc Transcriptional Regulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 841 Significance of c-myc Antisense Transcription 842 Posttranscriptional Control of c-myc Expression 843 MODES O F myc ACTIVATIO N IN MALIG NA NC IES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 845 Gene Amplification 845 Proviral Insertion 845 Chromosomal Translocations 846 myc INTERACT IO NS W ITH T UMO R SUPPRESSO RS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 849 RETRO SPECT IV E. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .... . . ..... . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . ... . . . . . . .... . . . . 850

809 citations

Book ChapterDOI
28 Jun 2010
TL;DR: A complete methodology for designing practical and highly-undetectable stegosystems for real digital media and explains why high-dimensional models might be problem in steganalysis, and introduces HUGO, a new embedding algorithm for spatial-domain digital images and its performance with LSB matching.
Abstract: This paper presents a complete methodology for designing practical and highly-undetectable stegosystems for real digital media. The main design principle is to minimize a suitably-defined distortion by means of efficient coding algorithm. The distortion is defined as a weighted difference of extended state-of-the-art feature vectors already used in steganalysis. This allows us to "preserve" the model used by steganalyst and thus be undetectable even for large payloads. This framework can be efficiently implemented even when the dimensionality of the feature set used by the embedder is larger than 107. The high dimensional model is necessary to avoid known security weaknesses. Although high-dimensional models might be problem in steganalysis, we explain, why they are acceptable in steganography. As an example, we introduce HUGO, a new embedding algorithm for spatial-domain digital images and we contrast its performance with LSB matching. On the BOWS2 image database and in contrast with LSB matching, HUGO allows the embedder to hide 7× longer message with the same level of security level.

808 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Javier Prado-Martinez1, Peter H. Sudmant2, Jeffrey M. Kidd3, Jeffrey M. Kidd4, Heng Li5, Joanna L. Kelley4, Belen Lorente-Galdos1, Krishna R. Veeramah6, August E. Woerner6, Timothy D. O’Connor2, Gabriel Santpere1, Alex Cagan7, Christoph Theunert7, Ferran Casals1, Hafid Laayouni1, Kasper Munch8, Asger Hobolth8, Anders E. Halager8, Maika Malig2, Jessica Hernandez-Rodriguez1, Irene Hernando-Herraez1, Kay Prüfer7, Marc Pybus1, Laurel Johnstone6, Michael Lachmann7, Can Alkan9, Dorina Twigg3, Natalia Petit1, Carl Baker2, Fereydoun Hormozdiari2, Marcos Fernandez-Callejo1, Marc Dabad1, Michael L. Wilson10, Laurie S. Stevison11, Cristina Camprubí12, Tiago Carvalho1, Aurora Ruiz-Herrera12, Laura Vives2, Marta Melé1, Teresa Abello, Ivanela Kondova13, Ronald E. Bontrop13, Anne E. Pusey14, Felix Lankester15, John Kiyang, Richard A. Bergl, Elizabeth V. Lonsdorf16, Simon Myers17, Mario Ventura18, Pascal Gagneux19, David Comas1, Hans R. Siegismund20, Julie Blanc, Lidia Agueda-Calpena, Marta Gut, Lucinda Fulton21, Sarah A. Tishkoff22, James C. Mullikin23, Richard K. Wilson21, Ivo Gut, Mary Katherine Gonder24, Oliver A. Ryder, Beatrice H. Hahn22, Arcadi Navarro25, Arcadi Navarro1, Joshua M. Akey2, Jaume Bertranpetit1, David Reich5, Thomas Mailund8, Mikkel H. Schierup8, Christina Hvilsom20, Christina Hvilsom26, Aida M. Andrés7, Jeffrey D. Wall11, Carlos Bustamante4, Michael F. Hammer6, Evan E. Eichler2, Evan E. Eichler27, Tomas Marques-Bonet25, Tomas Marques-Bonet1 
25 Jul 2013-Nature
TL;DR: This comprehensive catalogue of great ape genome diversity provides a framework for understanding evolution and a resource for more effective management of wild and captive great ape populations.
Abstract: Most great ape genetic variation remains uncharacterized; however, its study is critical for understanding population history, recombination, selection and susceptibility to disease. Here we sequence to high coverage a total of 79 wild- and captive-born individuals representing all six great ape species and seven subspecies and report 88.8 million single nucleotide polymorphisms. Our analysis provides support for genetically distinct populations within each species, signals of gene flow, and the split of common chimpanzees into two distinct groups: Nigeria-Cameroon/western and central/eastern populations. We find extensive inbreeding in almost all wild populations, with eastern gorillas being the most extreme. Inferred effective population sizes have varied radically over time in different lineages and this appears to have a profound effect on the genetic diversity at, or close to, genes in almost all species. We discover and assign 1,982 loss-of-function variants throughout the human and great ape lineages, determining that the rate of gene loss has not been different in the human branch compared to other internal branches in the great ape phylogeny. This comprehensive catalogue of great ape genome diversity provides a framework for understanding evolution and a resource for more effective management of wild and captive great ape populations.

807 citations


Authors

Showing all 54162 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Meir J. Stampfer2771414283776
Bert Vogelstein247757332094
Zhong Lin Wang2452529259003
Peter Libby211932182724
Robert M. Califf1961561167961
Stephen V. Faraone1881427140298
David L. Kaplan1771944146082
David Baker1731226109377
Nora D. Volkow165958107463
David R. Holmes1611624114187
Richard J. Davidson15660291414
Ronald G. Crystal15599086680
Jovan Milosevic1521433106802
James J. Collins15166989476
Mark A. Rubin14569995640
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Washington
305.5K papers, 17.7M citations

97% related

Columbia University
224K papers, 12.8M citations

97% related

University of California, San Diego
204.5K papers, 12.3M citations

97% related

University of California, Los Angeles
282.4K papers, 15.7M citations

96% related

University of Minnesota
257.9K papers, 11.9M citations

96% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202325
2022168
20212,825
20202,891
20192,528
20182,456