scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Stockholm School of Economics

EducationStockholm, Sweden
About: Stockholm School of Economics is a education organization based out in Stockholm, Sweden. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Entrepreneurship. The organization has 1186 authors who have published 4891 publications receiving 285543 citations. The organization is also known as: Stockholm Business School & Handelshögskolan i Stockholm.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the relationship between a bundle or system of human resource practices and firm performance and the processes through which these HR practices affect organizational outcomes and found that employee skills, attitudes and behaviours play a mediating role between HR systems and firm outcomes in multinational corporations.
Abstract: The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between a bundle or system of human resource (HR) practices and firm performance and the processes through which these HR practices affect organizational outcomes. Using a sample of fifty-two Japanese multinational corporation subsidiaries operating in the United States and Russia, we examine the impact of HR systems on firm performance mediated by employee skills, attitudes and motivation in an attempt to shed light on the so-called ‘black box’ through which HR practices lead to firm performance. The results support the notion that employee skills, attitudes and behaviours play a mediating role between HR systems and firm outcomes in multinational corporations. These findings illustrate the varying impact of synergistic systems of HR practices and their generalizability in different national contexts.

195 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined how receiving negative and positive word-of-mouth from satisfied and dissatisfied customers influences the potential customer and found that emotional contagion and affect infusion were involved in the response process.

194 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper used prediction markets to quantify the reproducibility of 44 studies published in prominent psychology journals and replicated in the Reproducibility Project: Psychology and found that the hypotheses being tested in psychology typically have low prior probabilities of being true (median, 9%) and that a "statistically significant" finding needs to be confirmed in a well-powered replication to have a high probability of being false.
Abstract: Concerns about a lack of reproducibility of statistically significant results have recently been raised in many fields, and it has been argued that this lack comes at substantial economic costs. We here report the results from prediction markets set up to quantify the reproducibility of 44 studies published in prominent psychology journals and replicated in the Reproducibility Project: Psychology. The prediction markets predict the outcomes of the replications well and outperform a survey of market participants' individual forecasts. This shows that prediction markets are a promising tool for assessing the reproducibility of published scientific results. The prediction markets also allow us to estimate probabilities for the hypotheses being true at different testing stages, which provides valuable information regarding the temporal dynamics of scientific discovery. We find that the hypotheses being tested in psychology typically have low prior probabilities of being true (median, 9%) and that a "statistically significant" finding needs to be confirmed in a well-powered replication to have a high probability of being true. We argue that prediction markets could be used to obtain speedy information about reproducibility at low cost and could potentially even be used to determine which studies to replicate to optimally allocate limited resources into replications.

194 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors argue that there is less consensus in our understanding of internalization and transaction costs than commonly supposed, and that a fuller vision of the terrain already mapped and that which is yet uncharted would provide a more useful basis for exploration and discovery.
Abstract: Debate is an indication that an issue warrants discussion. The comments of James Love and Donald McFetridge in this issue are fine statements that articulate a received wisdom.' Their comments differ with each other, and these differences remind us that there is less consensus in our understanding of internalization and transaction costs than commonly supposed. If we do not address all of the commentators' specific points, it is not for lack of appreciation, but because it is our belief that a fuller vision of the terrain already mapped and that which is yet uncharted would provide a more useful basis for exploration and discovery. A listing of issues is the task of a referee, while a published debate might perform a useful task by laying out the contours of the research tradition and future.

194 citations


Authors

Showing all 1218 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Magnus Johannesson10234240776
Thomas J. Sargent9637039224
Bengt Jönsson8136533623
J. Scott Armstrong7644533552
Johan Wiklund7428830038
Per Davidsson7130932262
Julian Birkinshaw6423329262
Timo Teräsvirta6222420403
Lars E.O. Svensson6118820666
Jonathan D. Ostry5923211776
Alexander Ljungqvist5913914466
Richard Green5846814244
Bo Jönsson5729411984
Magnus Henrekson5626113346
Assar Lindbeck5423413761
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
London School of Economics and Political Science
35K papers, 1.4M citations

91% related

INSEAD
4.8K papers, 369.4K citations

90% related

Tilburg University
22.3K papers, 791.3K citations

90% related

London Business School
5.1K papers, 437.9K citations

89% related

University of Mannheim
12.9K papers, 446.5K citations

88% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20237
202251
2021247
2020219
2019186
2018168