Institution
Stockholm School of Economics
Education•Stockholm, Sweden•
About: Stockholm School of Economics is a education organization based out in Stockholm, Sweden. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Entrepreneurship. The organization has 1186 authors who have published 4891 publications receiving 285543 citations. The organization is also known as: Stockholm Business School & Handelshögskolan i Stockholm.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: The EQ-5D instrument distinguished well for the known groups: positive association between socio-economic status and HRQoL was observed among the Chinese population, and discriminative validity was supported.
Abstract: Purpose
To measure and analyse national EQ-5D data and to provide norms for the Chinese general population by age, sex, educational level, income and employment status.
188 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the effect of short-term investors' trading horizons on market-wide negative market shocks was investigated and it was shown that stocks held by short-time investors experienced more severe price drops and larger price reversals than those held by long time investors.
Abstract: After severe negative market shocks, institutional investors with short trading horizons are inclined or forced to sell their holdings to a larger extent than investors with longer trading horizons. This may amplify the effects of market-wide shocks on the prices of stocks held by short horizon investors. We test the relevance of this mechanism by exploiting the negative shock caused by Lehman Brothers’ bankruptcy in September 2008. Consistent with our conjecture, short-term investors sell significantly more than long-term investors around and after the Lehman Brothers’ bankruptcy. Most importantly, stocks held by short-term investors experience more severe price drops and larger price reversals than those held by long-term investors. Since they are obtained after controlling for the stocks’ exposure to innovations in implied volatility, aggregate liquidity, various firms’ and investors’ characteristics, including the momentum effect and the propensity of institutional investors to follow an index, our results cannot be explained by characteristics of the institutions’ investment styles other than their investment horizons. We also show that the effect of investor trading horizon emerges during other episodes of severe market turmoil, such as the October 1987 market crash. Overall, the empirical evidence strongly indicates that investors’ short horizons amplify the effects of market-wide negative shocks.
187 citations
••
TL;DR: It is shown how fixed budgets or predetermined prices per effectiveness unit can be used as decision rules to maximise health effects and to determine which programmes to implement on the basis of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.
Abstract: It has become increasingly popular to carry out cost-effectiveness analyses in economic evaluations of healthcare programmes. Cost-effectiveness analysis is based on the maximisation of the health effects for a given amount of resources. However, many published studies fail to report the results of cost-effectiveness analysis in a way that is consistent with this underlying aim. The aim of this article is to demonstrate the decision rules of cost-effectiveness analysis in an easily accessible way for practitioners in the field. A hypothetical example is used to demonstrate the decision rules of cost-effectiveness analysis, and we also show how to estimate the appropriate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and how to exclude dominated alternatives. It is then shown how fixed budgets or predetermined prices per effectiveness unit can be used as decision rules to maximise health effects and to determine which programmes to implement on the basis of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. We hope that the article will contribute towards an increased understanding and application of the appropriate decision rules of cost-effectiveness analysis, so that the results of cost-effectiveness analyses can be interpreted meaningfully by decision makers.
187 citations
•
TL;DR: The authors showed that when individuals' preferences are their private information, a convex combinations of selfishness and morality stand out as evolutionarily stable, and called individuals with such preferences homo moralis.
Abstract: What preferences will prevail in a society of rational individuals when preference evolution is driven by their success in terms of resulting payoffs? We show that when individuals’ preferences are their private information, a convex combinations of selfishness and morality stand out as evolutionarily stable. We call individuals with such preferences homo moralis. At one end of the spectrum is homo oeconomicus, who acts so as to maximize his or her material payoff. At the opposite end is homo kantiensis, who does what would be “the right thing to do,” in terms of material payoffs, if all others would do likewise. We show that the stable degree of morality - the weight placed on the moral goal - equals the index of assortativity in the matching process. The motivation of homo moralis is arguably compatible with how people often reason, and the induced behavior agrees with pro-social behaviors observed in many laboratory experiments.
187 citations
••
TL;DR: This paper found that approximately 25% of individual variation in portfolio risk is due to genetic variation and that these results extend to several other aspects of financial decision-making, such as financial decision making.
Abstract: Individuals differ in how they construct their investment portfolios, yet empirical models of portfolio risk typically account only for a small portion of the cross-sectional variance. This paper asks whether genetic variation can explain some of these individual differences. Following a major pension reform Swedish adults had to form a portfolio from a large menu of funds. We match data on these investment decisions with the Swedish Twin Registry and find that approximately 25% of individual variation in portfolio risk is due to genetic variation. We also find that these results extend to several other aspects of financial decision-making.
186 citations
Authors
Showing all 1218 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Magnus Johannesson | 102 | 342 | 40776 |
Thomas J. Sargent | 96 | 370 | 39224 |
Bengt Jönsson | 81 | 365 | 33623 |
J. Scott Armstrong | 76 | 445 | 33552 |
Johan Wiklund | 74 | 288 | 30038 |
Per Davidsson | 71 | 309 | 32262 |
Julian Birkinshaw | 64 | 233 | 29262 |
Timo Teräsvirta | 62 | 224 | 20403 |
Lars E.O. Svensson | 61 | 188 | 20666 |
Jonathan D. Ostry | 59 | 232 | 11776 |
Alexander Ljungqvist | 59 | 139 | 14466 |
Richard Green | 58 | 468 | 14244 |
Bo Jönsson | 57 | 294 | 11984 |
Magnus Henrekson | 56 | 261 | 13346 |
Assar Lindbeck | 54 | 234 | 13761 |