scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Stony Brook University

EducationStony Brook, New York, United States
About: Stony Brook University is a education organization based out in Stony Brook, New York, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 32534 authors who have published 68218 publications receiving 3035131 citations. The organization is also known as: State University of New York at Stony Brook & SUNY Stony Brook.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Exposure to interpersonal violence had the strongest associations with subsequent traumatic events, and limited resources may best be dedicated to those that are more likely to be further exposed such as victims of interpersonal violence.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Considerable research has documented that exposure to traumatic events has negative effects on physical and mental health. Much less research has examined the predictors of traumatic event exposure. Increased understanding of risk factors for exposure to traumatic events could be of considerable value in targeting preventive interventions and anticipating service needs. METHOD: General population surveys in 24 countries with a combined sample of 68 894 adult respondents across six continents assessed exposure to 29 traumatic event types. Differences in prevalence were examined with cross-tabulations. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to determine whether traumatic event types clustered into interpretable factors. Survival analysis was carried out to examine associations of sociodemographic characteristics and prior traumatic events with subsequent exposure. RESULTS: Over 70% of respondents reported a traumatic event; 30.5% were exposed to four or more. Five types - witnessing death or serious injury, the unexpected death of a loved one, being mugged, being in a life-threatening automobile accident, and experiencing a life-threatening illness or injury - accounted for over half of all exposures. Exposure varied by country, sociodemographics and history of prior traumatic events. Being married was the most consistent protective factor. Exposure to interpersonal violence had the strongest associations with subsequent traumatic events. CONCLUSIONS: Given the near ubiquity of exposure, limited resources may best be dedicated to those that are more likely to be further exposed such as victims of interpersonal violence. Identifying mechanisms that account for the associations of prior interpersonal violence with subsequent trauma is critical to develop interventions to prevent revictimization. Language: en

721 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Marlee A. Tucker1, Katrin Böhning-Gaese1, William F. Fagan2, John M. Fryxell3, Bram Van Moorter, Susan C. Alberts4, Abdullahi H. Ali, Andrew M. Allen5, Andrew M. Allen6, Nina Attias7, Tal Avgar8, Hattie L. A. Bartlam-Brooks9, Buuveibaatar Bayarbaatar10, Jerrold L. Belant11, Alessandra Bertassoni12, Dean E. Beyer13, Laura R. Bidner14, Floris M. van Beest15, Stephen Blake10, Stephen Blake16, Niels Blaum17, Chloe Bracis1, Danielle D. Brown18, P J Nico de Bruyn19, Francesca Cagnacci20, Francesca Cagnacci21, Justin M. Calabrese2, Justin M. Calabrese22, Constança Camilo-Alves23, Simon Chamaillé-Jammes24, André Chiaradia25, André Chiaradia26, Sarah C. Davidson27, Sarah C. Davidson16, Todd E. Dennis28, Stephen DeStefano29, Duane R. Diefenbach30, Iain Douglas-Hamilton31, Iain Douglas-Hamilton32, Julian Fennessy, Claudia Fichtel33, Wolfgang Fiedler16, Christina Fischer34, Ilya R. Fischhoff35, Christen H. Fleming2, Christen H. Fleming22, Adam T. Ford36, Susanne A. Fritz1, Benedikt Gehr37, Jacob R. Goheen38, Eliezer Gurarie39, Eliezer Gurarie2, Mark Hebblewhite40, Marco Heurich41, Marco Heurich42, A. J. Mark Hewison43, Christian Hof, Edward Hurme2, Lynne A. Isbell14, René Janssen, Florian Jeltsch17, Petra Kaczensky44, Adam Kane45, Peter M. Kappeler33, Matthew J. Kauffman38, Roland Kays46, Roland Kays47, Duncan M. Kimuyu48, Flávia Koch33, Flávia Koch49, Bart Kranstauber37, Scott D. LaPoint16, Scott D. LaPoint50, Peter Leimgruber22, John D. C. Linnell, Pascual López-López51, A. Catherine Markham52, Jenny Mattisson, Emília Patrícia Medici53, Ugo Mellone54, Evelyn H. Merrill8, Guilherme Miranda de Mourão55, Ronaldo Gonçalves Morato, Nicolas Morellet43, Thomas A. Morrison56, Samuel L. Díaz-Muñoz14, Samuel L. Díaz-Muñoz57, Atle Mysterud58, Dejid Nandintsetseg1, Ran Nathan59, Aidin Niamir, John Odden, Robert B. O'Hara60, Luiz Gustavo R. Oliveira-Santos7, Kirk A. Olson10, Bruce D. Patterson61, Rogério Cunha de Paula, Luca Pedrotti, Björn Reineking62, Björn Reineking63, Martin Rimmler, Tracey L. Rogers64, Christer Moe Rolandsen, Christopher S. Rosenberry65, Daniel I. Rubenstein66, Kamran Safi67, Kamran Safi16, Sonia Saïd, Nir Sapir68, Hall Sawyer, Niels Martin Schmidt15, Nuria Selva69, Agnieszka Sergiel69, Enkhtuvshin Shiilegdamba10, João P. Silva70, João P. Silva71, João P. Silva72, Navinder J. Singh6, Erling Johan Solberg, Orr Spiegel14, Olav Strand, Siva R. Sundaresan, Wiebke Ullmann17, Ulrich Voigt44, Jake Wall32, David W. Wattles29, Martin Wikelski16, Martin Wikelski67, Christopher C. Wilmers73, John W. Wilson74, George Wittemyer75, George Wittemyer32, Filip Zięba, Tomasz Zwijacz-Kozica, Thomas Mueller22, Thomas Mueller1 
Goethe University Frankfurt1, University of Maryland, College Park2, University of Guelph3, Duke University4, Radboud University Nijmegen5, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences6, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul7, University of Alberta8, Royal Veterinary College9, Wildlife Conservation Society10, Mississippi State University11, Sao Paulo State University12, Michigan Department of Natural Resources13, University of California, Davis14, Aarhus University15, Max Planck Society16, University of Potsdam17, Middle Tennessee State University18, Mammal Research Institute19, Harvard University20, Edmund Mach Foundation21, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute22, University of Évora23, University of Montpellier24, Parks Victoria25, Monash University26, Ohio State University27, Fiji National University28, University of Massachusetts Amherst29, United States Geological Survey30, University of Oxford31, Save the Elephants32, German Primate Center33, Technische Universität München34, Institute of Ecosystem Studies35, University of British Columbia36, University of Zurich37, University of Wyoming38, University of Washington39, University of Montana40, University of Freiburg41, Bavarian Forest National Park42, University of Toulouse43, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna44, University College Cork45, North Carolina State University46, North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences47, Karatina University48, University of Lethbridge49, Lamont–Doherty Earth Observatory50, University of Valencia51, Stony Brook University52, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources53, University of Alicante54, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária55, University of Glasgow56, New York University57, University of Oslo58, Hebrew University of Jerusalem59, Norwegian University of Science and Technology60, Field Museum of Natural History61, University of Grenoble62, University of Bayreuth63, University of New South Wales64, Pennsylvania Game Commission65, Princeton University66, University of Konstanz67, University of Haifa68, Polish Academy of Sciences69, University of Lisbon70, Instituto Superior de Agronomia71, University of Porto72, University of California, Santa Cruz73, University of Pretoria74, Colorado State University75
26 Jan 2018-Science
TL;DR: Using a unique GPS-tracking database of 803 individuals across 57 species, it is found that movements of mammals in areas with a comparatively high human footprint were on average one-half to one-third the extent of their movements in area with a low human footprint.
Abstract: Animal movement is fundamental for ecosystem functioning and species survival, yet the effects of the anthropogenic footprint on animal movements have not been estimated across species. Using a unique GPS-tracking database of 803 individuals across 57 species, we found that movements of mammals in areas with a comparatively high human footprint were on average one-half to one-third the extent of their movements in areas with a low human footprint. We attribute this reduction to behavioral changes of individual animals and to the exclusion of species with long-range movements from areas with higher human impact. Global loss of vagility alters a key ecological trait of animals that affects not only population persistence but also ecosystem processes such as predator-prey interactions, nutrient cycling, and disease transmission.

719 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The stability of anandamide in serum and its rapid breakdown in cells and tissues are consistent with the observation that it is active when administered systemically, and its duration of action will be regulated by its rate of degradation in cells.

718 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Schulze et al. as discussed by the authors presented a conceptual framework for interpreting experimental results and predicting effects of global warming on ecosystems, both in the temporal and spatial patterns of change and in how they affect ecosystems.
Abstract: raise global mean temperature over the next century by 1.0–3.5 °C (Houghton et al. 1995, 1996). Ecologists from around the world have begun experiments to investigate the effects of global warming on terrestrial ecosystems, the aspect of global climate change that attracts the most public attention (Woodwell and McKenzie 1995, Walker and Steffen 1999). The effort to understand response to warming builds on a history of investigations of the effects of elevated CO 2 on plants and ecosystems (Koch and Mooney 1996, Schulze et al. 1999). There are important differences, however, between increases in atmospheric CO 2 and temperature change, both in the temporal and spatial patterns of change and in how they affect ecosystems. The scientists involved in temperature change research have had to face new technical and conceptual challenges in designing and interpreting their experiments (Schulze et al. 1999). In this paper we describe these challenges and present a conceptual framework for interpreting experimental results and predicting effects of warming on ecosystems.

718 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the relative stability of europium in aqueous solution at elevated temperatures and pressures is predicted, and the predicted stability of divalent Europium is consistent with the large positive europity anomalies in rare earth element patterns of high-temperature barites of hydrothermal and metamorphic origin reported by Guichard et al. [5] and with the observed depletion of euro pium as a result of hightemperature sericitization of feldspar-bearing assemblages discovered by Alderton et al., which is suggested

718 citations


Authors

Showing all 32829 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Zhong Lin Wang2452529259003
Dennis W. Dickson1911243148488
Hyun-Chul Kim1764076183227
David Baker1731226109377
J. N. Butler1722525175561
Roderick T. Bronson169679107702
Nora D. Volkow165958107463
Jovan Milosevic1521433106802
Thomas E. Starzl150162591704
Paolo Boffetta148145593876
Jacques Banchereau14363499261
Larry R. Squire14347285306
John D. E. Gabrieli14248068254
Alexander Milov142114393374
Meenakshi Narain1421805147741
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Washington
305.5K papers, 17.7M citations

97% related

Stanford University
320.3K papers, 21.8M citations

96% related

Columbia University
224K papers, 12.8M citations

96% related

University of California, Los Angeles
282.4K papers, 15.7M citations

96% related

University of Pennsylvania
257.6K papers, 14.1M citations

95% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023124
2022453
20213,609
20203,747
20193,426
20183,127