scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research

FacilityBirmensdorf, Switzerland
About: Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research is a facility organization based out in Birmensdorf, Switzerland. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Climate change & Soil water. The organization has 1256 authors who have published 3222 publications receiving 161639 citations. The organization is also known as: WSL.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Drought has a limiting effect on tree growth and acts as a bottleneck event in triggering Scots pine decline in the Valais.
Abstract: During the 20th century, high mortality rates of Scots pine (Pinus silvestris L.) have been observed over large areas in the Rhone valley (Valais, Switzerland) and in other dry valleys of the European Alps. In this study, we evaluated drought as a possible inciting factor of Scots pine decline in the Valais. Averaged tree-ring widths, standardized tree-ring series, and estimated annual mortality risks were related to a drought index. Correlations between drought indices and standardized tree-ring series from 11 sites showed a moderate association. Several drought years and drought periods could be detected since 1864 that coincided with decreased growth. Although single, extreme drought years had generally a short-term, reversible effect on tree growth, multi-year drought initiated prolonged growth decreases that increased a tree’s long-term risk of death. Tree death occurred generally several years or even decades after the drought. In conclusion, drought has a limiting effect on tree growth and acts as a bottleneck event in triggering Scots pine decline in the Valais.

445 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A review of forest ecosystem services including biomass production, habitat provisioning services, pollination, seed dispersal, resistance to wind storms, fire regulation and mitigation, pest regulation of native and invading insects, carbon sequestration, and cultural ecosystem services, in relation to forest type, structure and diversity is provided in this article.
Abstract: Forests are critical habitats for biodiversity and they are also essential for the provision of a wide range of ecosystem services that are important to human well-being. There is increasing evidence that biodiversity contributes to forest ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services. Here we provide a review of forest ecosystem services including biomass production, habitat provisioning services, pollination, seed dispersal, resistance to wind storms, fire regulation and mitigation, pest regulation of native and invading insects, carbon sequestration, and cultural ecosystem services, in relation to forest type, structure and diversity. We also consider relationships between forest biodiversity and multifunctionality, and trade-offs among ecosystem services. We compare the concepts of ecosystem processes, functions and services to clarify their definitions. Our review of published studies indicates a lack of empirical studies that establish quantitative and causal relationships between forest biodiversity and many important ecosystem services. The literature is highly skewed; studies on provisioning of nutrition and energy, and on cultural services, delivered by mixed-species forests are under-represented. Planted forests offer ample opportunity for optimising their composition and diversity because replanting after harvesting is a recurring process. Planting mixed-species forests should be given more consideration as they are likely to provide a wider range of ecosystem services within the forest and for adjacent land uses. This review also serves as the introduction to this special issue of Biodiversity and Conservation on various aspects of forest biodiversity and ecosystem services.

435 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Anne D. Bjorkman1, Anne D. Bjorkman2, Isla H. Myers-Smith1, Sarah C. Elmendorf3, Sarah C. Elmendorf4, Sarah C. Elmendorf5, Signe Normand2, Nadja Rüger6, Pieter S. A. Beck, Anne Blach-Overgaard2, Daan Blok7, J. Hans C. Cornelissen8, Bruce C. Forbes9, Damien Georges1, Scott J. Goetz10, Kevin C. Guay11, Gregory H. R. Henry12, Janneke HilleRisLambers13, Robert D. Hollister14, Dirk Nikolaus Karger15, Jens Kattge16, Peter Manning, Janet S. Prevéy, Christian Rixen, Gabriela Schaepman-Strub17, Haydn J.D. Thomas1, Mark Vellend18, Martin Wilmking19, Sonja Wipf, Michele Carbognani20, Luise Hermanutz21, Esther Lévesque22, Ulf Molau23, Alessandro Petraglia20, Nadejda A. Soudzilovskaia24, Marko J. Spasojevic25, Marcello Tomaselli20, Tage Vowles23, Juha M. Alatalo26, Heather D. Alexander27, Alba Anadon-Rosell28, Alba Anadon-Rosell19, Sandra Angers-Blondin1, Mariska te Beest29, Mariska te Beest30, Logan T. Berner10, Robert G. Björk23, Agata Buchwal31, Agata Buchwal32, Allan Buras33, Katherine S. Christie34, Elisabeth J. Cooper35, Stefan Dullinger36, Bo Elberling37, Anu Eskelinen38, Anu Eskelinen39, Esther R. Frei12, Esther R. Frei15, Oriol Grau40, Paul Grogan41, Martin Hallinger, Karen A. Harper42, Monique M. P. D. Heijmans33, James I. Hudson, Karl Hülber36, Maitane Iturrate-Garcia17, Colleen M. Iversen43, Francesca Jaroszynska44, Jill F. Johnstone45, Rasmus Halfdan Jørgensen37, Elina Kaarlejärvi29, Elina Kaarlejärvi46, Rebecca A Klady12, Sara Kuleza45, Aino Kulonen, Laurent J. Lamarque22, Trevor C. Lantz47, Chelsea J. Little17, Chelsea J. Little48, James D. M. Speed49, Anders Michelsen37, Ann Milbau50, Jacob Nabe-Nielsen2, Sigrid Schøler Nielsen2, Josep M. Ninot28, Steven F. Oberbauer51, Johan Olofsson29, Vladimir G. Onipchenko52, Sabine B. Rumpf36, Philipp R. Semenchuk35, Philipp R. Semenchuk36, Rohan Shetti19, Laura Siegwart Collier21, Lorna E. Street1, Katharine N. Suding4, Ken D. Tape53, Andrew J. Trant54, Andrew J. Trant21, Urs A. Treier2, Jean-Pierre Tremblay55, Maxime Tremblay22, Susanna Venn56, Stef Weijers57, Tara Zamin41, Noémie Boulanger-Lapointe12, William A. Gould58, David S. Hik59, Annika Hofgaard, Ingibjörg S. Jónsdóttir60, Ingibjörg S. Jónsdóttir61, Janet C. Jorgenson62, Julia A. Klein63, Borgthor Magnusson, Craig E. Tweedie64, Philip A. Wookey65, Michael Bahn66, Benjamin Blonder67, Benjamin Blonder68, Peter M. van Bodegom24, Benjamin Bond-Lamberty69, Giandiego Campetella70, Bruno Enrico Leone Cerabolini71, F. Stuart Chapin53, William K. Cornwell72, Joseph M. Craine, Matteo Dainese, Franciska T. de Vries73, Sandra Díaz74, Brian J. Enquist75, Brian J. Enquist76, Walton A. Green77, Rubén Milla78, Ülo Niinemets79, Yusuke Onoda80, Jenny C. Ordoñez81, Wim A. Ozinga33, Wim A. Ozinga82, Josep Peñuelas40, Hendrik Poorter83, Hendrik Poorter84, Peter Poschlod85, Peter B. Reich86, Peter B. Reich87, Brody Sandel88, Brandon S. Schamp89, Serge N. Sheremetev90, Evan Weiher91 
University of Edinburgh1, Aarhus University2, Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research3, University of Colorado Boulder4, National Ecological Observatory Network5, Smithsonian Institution6, Lund University7, VU University Amsterdam8, University of Lapland9, Northern Arizona University10, Bigelow Laboratory For Ocean Sciences11, University of British Columbia12, University of Washington13, Grand Valley State University14, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research15, Max Planck Society16, University of Zurich17, Université de Sherbrooke18, University of Greifswald19, University of Parma20, Memorial University of Newfoundland21, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières22, University of Gothenburg23, Leiden University24, University of California, Riverside25, Qatar University26, Mississippi State University27, University of Barcelona28, Umeå University29, Utrecht University30, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań31, University of Alaska Anchorage32, Wageningen University and Research Centre33, Alaska Department of Fish and Game34, University of Tromsø35, University of Vienna36, University of Copenhagen37, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ38, University of Oulu39, Spanish National Research Council40, Queen's University41, Saint Mary's University42, Oak Ridge National Laboratory43, University of Aberdeen44, University of Saskatchewan45, Vrije Universiteit Brussel46, University of Victoria47, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology48, Norwegian University of Science and Technology49, Research Institute for Nature and Forest50, Florida International University51, Moscow State University52, University of Alaska Fairbanks53, University of Waterloo54, Laval University55, Deakin University56, University of Bonn57, United States Forest Service58, Simon Fraser University59, University of Iceland60, University Centre in Svalbard61, United States Fish and Wildlife Service62, Colorado State University63, University of Texas at El Paso64, University of Stirling65, University of Innsbruck66, University of Oxford67, Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory68, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory69, University of Camerino70, University of Insubria71, University of New South Wales72, University of Manchester73, National University of Cordoba74, University of Arizona75, Santa Fe Institute76, Harvard University77, King Juan Carlos University78, Estonian University of Life Sciences79, Kyoto University80, World Agroforestry Centre81, Radboud University Nijmegen82, Forschungszentrum Jülich83, Macquarie University84, University of Regensburg85, University of Minnesota86, University of Sydney87, Santa Clara University88, Algoma University89, Komarov Botanical Institute90, University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire91
04 Oct 2018-Nature
TL;DR: Biome-wide relationships between temperature, moisture and seven key plant functional traits across the tundra and over time show that community height increased with warming across all sites, whereas other traits lagged behind predicted rates of change.
Abstract: The tundra is warming more rapidly than any other biome on Earth, and the potential ramifications are far-reaching because of global feedback effects between vegetation and climate. A better understanding of how environmental factors shape plant structure and function is crucial for predicting the consequences of environmental change for ecosystem functioning. Here we explore the biome-wide relationships between temperature, moisture and seven key plant functional traits both across space and over three decades of warming at 117 tundra locations. Spatial temperature-trait relationships were generally strong but soil moisture had a marked influence on the strength and direction of these relationships, highlighting the potentially important influence of changes in water availability on future trait shifts in tundra plant communities. Community height increased with warming across all sites over the past three decades, but other traits lagged far behind predicted rates of change. Our findings highlight the challenge of using space-for-time substitution to predict the functional consequences of future warming and suggest that functions that are tied closely to plant height will experience the most rapid change. They also reveal the strength with which environmental factors shape biotic communities at the coldest extremes of the planet and will help to improve projections of functional changes in tundra ecosystems with climate warming.

425 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A systematic and holistic approach to investigate how soil and plant community characteristics change with altered precipitation regimes and the consequent effects on ecosystem processes and functioning within these experiments will greatly increase their value to the climate change and ecosystem research communities.
Abstract: Climatic changes, including altered precipitation regimes, will affect key ecosystem processes, such as plant productivity and biodiversity for many terrestrial ecosystems. Past and ongoing precipitation experiments have been conducted to quantify these potential changes. An analysis of these experiments indicates that they have provided important information on how water regulates ecosystem processes. However, they do not adequately represent global biomes nor forecasted precipitation scenarios and their potential contribution to advance our understanding of ecosystem responses to precipitation changes is therefore limited, as is their potential value for the development and testing of ecosystem models. This highlights the need for new precipitation experiments in biomes and ambient climatic conditions hitherto poorly studied applying relevant complex scenarios including changes in precipitation frequency and amplitude, seasonality, extremity and interactions with other global change drivers. A systematic and holistic approach to investigate how soil and plant community characteristics change with altered precipitation regimes and the consequent effects on ecosystem processes and functioning within these experiments will greatly increase their value to the climate change and ecosystem research communities. Experiments should specifically test how changes in precipitation leading to exceedance of biological thresholds affect ecosystem resilience and acclimation.

416 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The climatic factors used to drive the model explained a major part of the observed patterns, and information on land use was detected as a major factor that could significantly improve both the species and the community model.
Abstract: Separate logistic regression models were developed to predict the distribution and large-scale spatial patterns of dominant graminoid species and communities in alpine grasslands. The models are driven by four bioclimatic param- eters: degree-days of growing season (basis 0 °C), a moisture index for July, potential direct solar radiation for March, and a continentality index. Geology and slope angle were used as a surrogate for nutrient availability and soil water capacity. The bioclimatic parameters were derived from monthly mean tem- perature, precipitation, cloudiness and potential direct solar radiation. The environmental parameters were interpolated us- ing a digital elevation model with a resolution of 50 m. The vegetation data for model calibration originate from field sur- veys and literature. An independent test data set with samples from three different climatic zones was used to test the model. The degree of coincidence between simulated and observed patterns was similar for species and communities, but the κ- values for communities were generally higher (κ = 0.539) than for species (mean individual κ = 0.201). Information on land use was detected as a major factor that could significantly improve both the species and the community model. Never- theless, the climatic factors used to drive the model explained a major part of the observed patterns.

412 citations


Authors

Showing all 1333 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Peter H. Verburg10746434254
Bernhard Schmid10346046419
Christian Körner10337639637
André S. H. Prévôt9051138599
Fortunat Joos8727636951
Niklaus E. Zimmermann8027739364
Robert Huber7831125131
David Frank7818618624
Jan Esper7525419280
James W. Kirchner7323821958
David B. Roy7025026241
Emmanuel Frossard6835615281
Derek Eamus6728517317
Benjamin Poulter6625522519
Ulf Büntgen6531615876
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
United States Forest Service
21.8K papers, 959.1K citations

90% related

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
35.2K papers, 1.4M citations

89% related

Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ
9.8K papers, 394.3K citations

88% related

Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
5K papers, 367K citations

87% related

Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
7.2K papers, 449.5K citations

87% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023111
2022173
2021395
2020327
2019269
2018281