Institution
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Healthcare•Taipei, Taiwan•
About: Taipei Veterans General Hospital is a healthcare organization based out in Taipei, Taiwan. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Cancer. The organization has 11878 authors who have published 16478 publications receiving 363424 citations. The organization is also known as: Táiběi Róngmín Zǒngyī Yuàn.
Topics: Population, Cancer, Hazard ratio, Atrial fibrillation, Cohort study
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
University of Glasgow1, Brigham and Women's Hospital2, Yale University3, University of Copenhagen4, University of Missouri–Kansas City5, National University of Cordoba6, Wrocław Medical University7, Harvard University8, University of Minnesota9, Charles University in Prague10, Saarland University11, National Yang-Ming University12, Taipei Veterans General Hospital13, Slovak Medical University14, Fudan University15, Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta16, University of Calgary17, Sofia Medical University18, University of Gothenburg19, Semmelweis University20, University of São Paulo21, Montreal Heart Institute22, University of Toronto23, Uppsala University24, University of Wisconsin-Madison25, AstraZeneca26
TL;DR: Among patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction, the risk of worsening heart failure or death from cardiovascular causes was lower among those who received dapagliflozin than amongThose who received placebo, regardless of the presence or absence of diabetes.
Abstract: Background In patients with type 2 diabetes, inhibitors of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) reduce the risk of a first hospitalization for heart failure, possibly through glucose-ind...
3,541 citations
Taipei Veterans General Hospital1, The Chinese University of Hong Kong2, Mahidol University3, University of Malaya4, South Korean Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs5, Ajou University6, Khon Kaen University7, Kyung Hee University8, National Cheng Kung University9, Chinese Ministry of Health10, Kyoto University11, University of Tokyo12
TL;DR: The AWGS consensus report is believed to promote more Asian sarcopenia research, and most important of all, to focus on sarc Openia intervention studies and the implementation of sarcopenian in clinical practice to improve health care outcomes of older people in the communities and the healthcare settings in Asia.
2,976 citations
Johns Hopkins University1, University of Barcelona2, St George's, University of London3, Taipei Veterans General Hospital4, Maastricht University5, Washington University in St. Louis6, Imperial College London7, University of Virginia8, Virginia Commonwealth University9, Thomas Jefferson University10, Beaumont Hospital11, University of Bordeaux12, Leipzig University13, University of Oklahoma14, University of Michigan15, Royal Melbourne Hospital16, University College Dublin17, Korea University18, University of Birmingham19, University of Münster20, University of Western Ontario21, Cleveland Clinic22, Harvard University23, University of Pennsylvania24, Northwestern University25, Université de Montréal26, Mayo Clinic27, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai28, University of California, Los Angeles29, National Yang-Ming University30, Loyola University Chicago31
TL;DR: This 2012 Consensus Statement is to provide a state-of-the-art review of the field of catheter and surgical ablation of AF and to report the findings of a Task Force, convened by the Heart Rhythm Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society and charged with defining the indications, techniques, and outcomes of this procedure.
Abstract: During the past decade, catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has evolved rapidly from an investigational procedure to its current status as a commonly performed ablation procedure in many major hospitals throughout the world. Surgical ablation of AF, using either standard or minimally invasive techniques, is also performed in many major hospitals throughout the world.
In 2007, an initial Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical AF Ablation was developed as a joint effort of the Heart Rhythm Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society.1 The 2007 document was also developed in collaboration with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the American College of Cardiology. Since the publication of the 2007 document, there has been much learned about AF ablation, and the indications for these procedures have changed. Therefore the purpose of this 2012 Consensus Statement is to provide a state-of-the-art review of the field of catheter and surgical ablation of AF and to report the findings of a Task Force, convened by the Heart Rhythm Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society and charged with defining the indications, techniques, and outcomes of this procedure. Included within this document are recommendations pertinent to the design of clinical trials in the field of AF ablation, including definitions relevant to this topic.
This statement summarizes the opinion of the Task Force members based on an extensive literature review as well as their own experience. It is directed to all health care professionals who are involved in the care of patients with AF, particularly those who are undergoing, or are being considered for, catheter or surgical ablation procedures for AF. This statement is not intended to recommend or promote catheter ablation of AF. Rather the ultimate judgment regarding care of a particular patient …
2,754 citations
University of Barcelona1, University of Bologna2, Taipei Veterans General Hospital3, Chiba University4, Pierre-and-Marie-Curie University5, University of Cambridge6, Tianjin Medical University7, University of Lorraine8, Kindai University9, National Taiwan University10, Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies11, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai12, University of California, Los Angeles13, Bayer Corporation14, Bayer15, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals16, Fourth Military Medical University17
TL;DR: Regorafenib is the only systemic treatment shown to provide survival benefit in HCC patients progressing on sorafenIB treatment, and future trials should explore combinations of regorAFenib with other systemic agents and third-line treatments for patients who fail or who do not tolerate the sequence of sorafanib and regorafinib.
2,543 citations
National Yang-Ming University1, The Chinese University of Hong Kong2, Mahidol University3, University of Tokyo4, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital5, Peking Union Medical College Hospital6, Kyung Hee University7, Nagoya University8, Seoul National University9, Taipei Veterans General Hospital10, Ajou University11, Tan Tock Seng Hospital12, Osaka University13, University of Tsukuba14, Chinese Ministry of Health15
TL;DR: The Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 introduces "possible sarcopenia," defined by either low muscle strength or low physical performance only, specifically for use in primary health care or community-based health promotion, to enable earlier lifestyle interventions.
2,287 citations
Authors
Showing all 11952 results
| Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peng Huang | 95 | 590 | 39098 |
| Hui Y. Lan | 86 | 248 | 23383 |
| Yau-Huei Wei | 78 | 385 | 22286 |
| Chunyu Liu | 76 | 450 | 26738 |
| Ching-Yu Cheng | 75 | 541 | 39780 |
| Shou-Dong Lee | 75 | 788 | 26066 |
| Shih Ann Chen | 73 | 698 | 28441 |
| Shuu Jiun Wang | 71 | 502 | 24800 |
| Pesus Chou | 65 | 481 | 16907 |
| Jong Ling Fuh | 65 | 383 | 19559 |
| Shing Jong Lin | 63 | 401 | 13236 |
| Charles Y. Chiu | 62 | 236 | 13185 |
| Bor-Luen Chiang | 60 | 460 | 13597 |
| Tzeng Ji Chen | 60 | 541 | 13644 |
| Shih Hwa Chiou | 58 | 262 | 12289 |