Institution
Tata Memorial Hospital
Healthcare•Mumbai, India•
About: Tata Memorial Hospital is a healthcare organization based out in Mumbai, India. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Cancer & Breast cancer. The organization has 3187 authors who have published 4636 publications receiving 109143 citations.
Topics: Cancer, Breast cancer, Population, Radiation therapy, Carcinoma
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
University of São Paulo1, University of Antioquia2, Fox Chase Cancer Center3, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital4, Utrecht University5, University of Udine6, Radboud University Nijmegen7, Karolinska Institutet8, University of Helsinki9, International Agency for Research on Cancer10, University of Michigan11, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust12, Institut Gustave Roussy13, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven14, University of Edinburgh15, University of Milan16, Beaumont Hospital17, University of Oviedo18, University of Florida19, Tata Memorial Hospital20, University of Hong Kong21
TL;DR: The 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) is a highly contagious zoonosis produced by SARS‐CoV‐2 that is spread human‐to‐human by respiratory secretions that was declared by the WHO as a public health emergency.
Abstract: The 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a highly contagious zoonosis produced by SARS-CoV-2 that is spread human-to-human by respiratory secretions. It was declared by the WHO as a public health emergency. The most susceptible populations, needing mechanical ventilation, are the elderly and people with associated comorbidities. There is an important risk of contagion for anesthetists, dentists, head and neck surgeons, maxillofacial surgeons, ophthalmologists, and otolaryngologists. Health workers represent between 3.8% and 20% of the infected population; some 15% will develop severe complaints and among them, many will lose their lives. A large number of patients do not have overt signs and symptoms (fever/respiratory), yet pose a real risk to surgeons (who should know this fact and must therefore apply respiratory protective strategies for all patients they encounter). All interventions that have the potential to aerosolize aerodigestive secretions should be avoided or used only when mandatory. Health workers who are: pregnant, over 55 to 65 years of age, with a history of chronic diseases (uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, and all clinical scenarios where immunosuppression is feasible, including that induced to treat chronic inflammatory conditions and organ transplants) should avoid the clinical attention of a potentially infected patient. Health care facilities should prioritize urgent and emergency visits and procedures until the present condition stabilizes; truly elective care should cease and discussed on a case-by-case basis for patients with cancer. For those who are working with COVID-19 infected patients' isolation is compulsory in the following settings: (a) unprotected close contact with COVID-19 pneumonia patients; (b) onset of fever, cough, shortness of breath, and other symptoms (gastrointestinal complaints, anosmia, and dysgeusia have been reported in a minority of cases). For any care or intervention in the upper aerodigestive tract region, irrespective of the setting and a confirmed diagnosis (eg, rhinoscopy or flexible laryngoscopy in the outpatient setting and tracheostomy or rigid endoscopy under anesthesia), it is strongly recommended that all health care personnel wear personal protective equipment such as N95, gown, cap, eye protection, and gloves. The procedures described are essential in trying to maintain safety of health care workers during COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, otolaryngologists, head and neck, and maxillofacial surgeons are per se exposed to the greatest risk of infection while caring for COVID-19 positive subjects, and their protection should be considered a priority in the present circumstances.
238 citations
••
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center1, University of California, Davis2, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center3, Toronto General Hospital4, Harvard University5, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research6, University of Virginia7, University of São Paulo8, Tata Memorial Hospital9, University of Pittsburgh10, University of Hong Kong11
TL;DR: This International Collaborative study examines a large cohort of patients accumulated from multiple institutions experienced in craniofacial surgery, with the aim of reporting benchmark figures for outcomes and identifying patient‐related and tumor‐related predictors of prognosis after cranioFacial resection (CFR).
Abstract: Background.
Malignant tumors of the superior sinonasal vault are rare, and, because of this and the varied histologic findings, most outcomes data reflect the experience of small patient cohorts. This International Collaborative study examines a large cohort of patients accumulated from multiple institutions experienced in craniofacial surgery, with the aim of reporting benchmark figures for outcomes and identifying patient-related and tumor-related predictors of prognosis after craniofacial resection (CFR).
Methods.
Three hundred thirty-four patients from 17 institutions were analyzed for outcome. Patients with esthesioneuroblastoma were excluded and are being reported separately. The median age was 57 years (range, 3–98 years). One hundred eighty-eight patients (56.3%) had had prior single-modality or combined treatment, which included surgery in 120 (36%), radiation in 79 (23.7%), and chemotherapy in 56 (16.8%). The most common histologic findings were adenocarcinoma in 107 (32%) and squamous cell carcinoma in 101 (30.2%). The margins of resection were close or microscopically positive in 95 (30%). Adjuvant radiotherapy was given in 161 (48.2%) and chemotherapy in 16 (4.8%). Statistical analyses for outcomes were performed in relation to patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, including histologic findings and extent of disease, surgical resection margins, prior radiation, and prior chemotherapy to determine predictive factors.
Results.
Postoperative mortality occurred in 15 patients (4.5%). Postoperative complications occurred in 110 patients (32.9%). The 5-year overall, disease-specific, and recurrence-free survival rates were 48.3%, 53.3%, and 45.8%, respectively. The status of surgical margins, histologic findings of the primary tumor, and intracranial extent were independent predictors of overall, disease-specific, and recurrence-free survival on multivariate analysis.
Conclusions.
CFR for malignant paranasal sinus tumors is a safe surgical treatment with an overall mortality of 4.5% and complication rate of 33%. The status of surgical margins, histologic findings of the primary tumor, and intracranial extent are independent predictors of outcome. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck27: XXX–XXX, 2005
238 citations
••
TL;DR: A meta-analysis of 3 randomized controlled trials revealed no significant difference between PJ and PG regarding overall postoperative complications, pancreatic fistula, intra-abdominal fluid collection, or mortality, and analysis of 13 nonrandomized observational clinical studies showed significant results in favor of PG for the outcome parameters.
Abstract: Objective Pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) and pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) are the commonly preferred methods of anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The ideal choice of anastomosis remains a matter of debate. Data Sources Articles published until end of March 2006 comparing PJ and PG after PD were searched. Study Selection Two reviewers independently assessed quality and eligibility of the studies and extracted data for further analysis. Meta-analysis was performed with a random-effects model by using weighted odds ratios. Data Extraction and Synthesis Sixteen articles were included; meta-analysis of 3 randomized controlled trials (RCT) revealed no significant difference between PJ and PG regarding overall postoperative complications, pancreatic fistula, intra-abdominal fluid collection, or mortality. On the contrary, analysis of 13 nonrandomized observational clinical studies (OCSs) showed significant results in favor of PG for the outcome parameters with a reduction of pancreatic fistula and mortality in favor of PG. Conclusions All OCSs reported superiority of PG over PJ, most likely influenced by publication bias. In contrast, all RCTs failed to show advantage of a particular technique, suggesting that both PJ and PG provide equally good results. This meta-analysis yet again highlights the singular importance of performing well-designed RCTs and the role of evidence-based medicine in guiding modern surgical practice.
231 citations
••
First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague1, Medical University of Vienna2, Linköping University3, Institut Gustave Roussy4, University of Cologne5, University of Milan6, Aarhus University7, Tata Memorial Hospital8, University of Lausanne9, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust10, University College Hospital11, Leiden University12, Athens State University13, University of Graz14, Dresden University of Technology15
TL;DR: These guidelines cover comprehensively staging, management, and follow-up for patients with cervical cancer and principles of radiotherapy and pathological evaluation are defined.
230 citations
••
TL;DR: High interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics and nonlinear dose dependency was observed, suggesting potentially complex absorption kinetics in late-stage osteosarcoma patients, and good tolerability was noted in both healthy and osteosARcoma groups.
Abstract: Curcumin is the lipid-soluble antioxidant compound obtained from the rhizome of Curcuma longa Linn, also known as turmeric. Curcumin targets multiple chemotherapeutic and inflammatory pathways and has demonstrated safety and tolerability in humans, supporting its potential as a therapeutic agent; however, the clinical literature lacks conclusive evidence supporting its use as a therapeutic agent due to its low bioavailability in humans. The purpose of this study was to quantify plasma levels of free curcumin after dosing of a solid lipid curcumin particle (SLCP) formulation versus unformulated curcumin in healthy volunteers and to determine its tolerability and dose−plasma concentration relationship in late-stage osteosarcoma patients. Doses of 2, 3, and 4 g of SLCP were evaluated in 11 patients with osteosarcoma. Plasma curcumin levels were measured using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method. The limit of detection of the assay was 1 ng/mL of curcumin. In healthy subjects, the mean p...
229 citations
Authors
Showing all 3213 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Al B. Benson | 113 | 578 | 48364 |
Keitaro Matsuo | 97 | 818 | 37349 |
Ashish K. Jha | 87 | 503 | 30020 |
Noopur Raje | 82 | 506 | 27878 |
Muthupandian Ashokkumar | 76 | 511 | 20771 |
Snehal G. Patel | 73 | 367 | 16905 |
Rainu Kaushal | 58 | 232 | 16794 |
Ajit S. Puri | 54 | 369 | 9948 |
Jasbir S. Arora | 51 | 351 | 15696 |
Sudeep Sarkar | 48 | 273 | 10087 |
Ian T. Magrath | 47 | 107 | 8084 |
Pankaj Chaturvedi | 45 | 325 | 15871 |
Pradeep Kumar Gupta | 44 | 416 | 7181 |
Shiv K. Gupta | 43 | 150 | 8911 |
Kikkeri N. Naresh | 43 | 245 | 6264 |