scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Tata Memorial Hospital

HealthcareMumbai, India
About: Tata Memorial Hospital is a healthcare organization based out in Mumbai, India. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Cancer & Breast cancer. The organization has 3187 authors who have published 4636 publications receiving 109143 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) is a highly contagious zoonosis produced by SARS‐CoV‐2 that is spread human‐to‐human by respiratory secretions that was declared by the WHO as a public health emergency.
Abstract: The 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a highly contagious zoonosis produced by SARS-CoV-2 that is spread human-to-human by respiratory secretions. It was declared by the WHO as a public health emergency. The most susceptible populations, needing mechanical ventilation, are the elderly and people with associated comorbidities. There is an important risk of contagion for anesthetists, dentists, head and neck surgeons, maxillofacial surgeons, ophthalmologists, and otolaryngologists. Health workers represent between 3.8% and 20% of the infected population; some 15% will develop severe complaints and among them, many will lose their lives. A large number of patients do not have overt signs and symptoms (fever/respiratory), yet pose a real risk to surgeons (who should know this fact and must therefore apply respiratory protective strategies for all patients they encounter). All interventions that have the potential to aerosolize aerodigestive secretions should be avoided or used only when mandatory. Health workers who are: pregnant, over 55 to 65 years of age, with a history of chronic diseases (uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, and all clinical scenarios where immunosuppression is feasible, including that induced to treat chronic inflammatory conditions and organ transplants) should avoid the clinical attention of a potentially infected patient. Health care facilities should prioritize urgent and emergency visits and procedures until the present condition stabilizes; truly elective care should cease and discussed on a case-by-case basis for patients with cancer. For those who are working with COVID-19 infected patients' isolation is compulsory in the following settings: (a) unprotected close contact with COVID-19 pneumonia patients; (b) onset of fever, cough, shortness of breath, and other symptoms (gastrointestinal complaints, anosmia, and dysgeusia have been reported in a minority of cases). For any care or intervention in the upper aerodigestive tract region, irrespective of the setting and a confirmed diagnosis (eg, rhinoscopy or flexible laryngoscopy in the outpatient setting and tracheostomy or rigid endoscopy under anesthesia), it is strongly recommended that all health care personnel wear personal protective equipment such as N95, gown, cap, eye protection, and gloves. The procedures described are essential in trying to maintain safety of health care workers during COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, otolaryngologists, head and neck, and maxillofacial surgeons are per se exposed to the greatest risk of infection while caring for COVID-19 positive subjects, and their protection should be considered a priority in the present circumstances.

238 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This International Collaborative study examines a large cohort of patients accumulated from multiple institutions experienced in craniofacial surgery, with the aim of reporting benchmark figures for outcomes and identifying patient‐related and tumor‐related predictors of prognosis after cranioFacial resection (CFR).
Abstract: Background. Malignant tumors of the superior sinonasal vault are rare, and, because of this and the varied histologic findings, most outcomes data reflect the experience of small patient cohorts. This International Collaborative study examines a large cohort of patients accumulated from multiple institutions experienced in craniofacial surgery, with the aim of reporting benchmark figures for outcomes and identifying patient-related and tumor-related predictors of prognosis after craniofacial resection (CFR). Methods. Three hundred thirty-four patients from 17 institutions were analyzed for outcome. Patients with esthesioneuroblastoma were excluded and are being reported separately. The median age was 57 years (range, 3–98 years). One hundred eighty-eight patients (56.3%) had had prior single-modality or combined treatment, which included surgery in 120 (36%), radiation in 79 (23.7%), and chemotherapy in 56 (16.8%). The most common histologic findings were adenocarcinoma in 107 (32%) and squamous cell carcinoma in 101 (30.2%). The margins of resection were close or microscopically positive in 95 (30%). Adjuvant radiotherapy was given in 161 (48.2%) and chemotherapy in 16 (4.8%). Statistical analyses for outcomes were performed in relation to patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, including histologic findings and extent of disease, surgical resection margins, prior radiation, and prior chemotherapy to determine predictive factors. Results. Postoperative mortality occurred in 15 patients (4.5%). Postoperative complications occurred in 110 patients (32.9%). The 5-year overall, disease-specific, and recurrence-free survival rates were 48.3%, 53.3%, and 45.8%, respectively. The status of surgical margins, histologic findings of the primary tumor, and intracranial extent were independent predictors of overall, disease-specific, and recurrence-free survival on multivariate analysis. Conclusions. CFR for malignant paranasal sinus tumors is a safe surgical treatment with an overall mortality of 4.5% and complication rate of 33%. The status of surgical margins, histologic findings of the primary tumor, and intracranial extent are independent predictors of outcome. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck27: XXX–XXX, 2005

238 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A meta-analysis of 3 randomized controlled trials revealed no significant difference between PJ and PG regarding overall postoperative complications, pancreatic fistula, intra-abdominal fluid collection, or mortality, and analysis of 13 nonrandomized observational clinical studies showed significant results in favor of PG for the outcome parameters.
Abstract: Objective Pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) and pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) are the commonly preferred methods of anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The ideal choice of anastomosis remains a matter of debate. Data Sources Articles published until end of March 2006 comparing PJ and PG after PD were searched. Study Selection Two reviewers independently assessed quality and eligibility of the studies and extracted data for further analysis. Meta-analysis was performed with a random-effects model by using weighted odds ratios. Data Extraction and Synthesis Sixteen articles were included; meta-analysis of 3 randomized controlled trials (RCT) revealed no significant difference between PJ and PG regarding overall postoperative complications, pancreatic fistula, intra-abdominal fluid collection, or mortality. On the contrary, analysis of 13 nonrandomized observational clinical studies (OCSs) showed significant results in favor of PG for the outcome parameters with a reduction of pancreatic fistula and mortality in favor of PG. Conclusions All OCSs reported superiority of PG over PJ, most likely influenced by publication bias. In contrast, all RCTs failed to show advantage of a particular technique, suggesting that both PJ and PG provide equally good results. This meta-analysis yet again highlights the singular importance of performing well-designed RCTs and the role of evidence-based medicine in guiding modern surgical practice.

231 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: High interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics and nonlinear dose dependency was observed, suggesting potentially complex absorption kinetics in late-stage osteosarcoma patients, and good tolerability was noted in both healthy and osteosARcoma groups.
Abstract: Curcumin is the lipid-soluble antioxidant compound obtained from the rhizome of Curcuma longa Linn, also known as turmeric. Curcumin targets multiple chemotherapeutic and inflammatory pathways and has demonstrated safety and tolerability in humans, supporting its potential as a therapeutic agent; however, the clinical literature lacks conclusive evidence supporting its use as a therapeutic agent due to its low bioavailability in humans. The purpose of this study was to quantify plasma levels of free curcumin after dosing of a solid lipid curcumin particle (SLCP) formulation versus unformulated curcumin in healthy volunteers and to determine its tolerability and dose−plasma concentration relationship in late-stage osteosarcoma patients. Doses of 2, 3, and 4 g of SLCP were evaluated in 11 patients with osteosarcoma. Plasma curcumin levels were measured using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method. The limit of detection of the assay was 1 ng/mL of curcumin. In healthy subjects, the mean p...

229 citations


Authors

Showing all 3213 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Al B. Benson11357848364
Keitaro Matsuo9781837349
Ashish K. Jha8750330020
Noopur Raje8250627878
Muthupandian Ashokkumar7651120771
Snehal G. Patel7336716905
Rainu Kaushal5823216794
Ajit S. Puri543699948
Jasbir S. Arora5135115696
Sudeep Sarkar4827310087
Ian T. Magrath471078084
Pankaj Chaturvedi4532515871
Pradeep Kumar Gupta444167181
Shiv K. Gupta431508911
Kikkeri N. Naresh432456264
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
40.1K papers, 640.4K citations

91% related

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
13.4K papers, 668.8K citations

87% related

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
65.3K papers, 4.4M citations

85% related

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
92.5K papers, 4.7M citations

85% related

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
9.8K papers, 458.8K citations

84% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20235
202232
2021223
2020244
2019206
2018239