scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Technical University of Dortmund

EducationDortmund, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
About: Technical University of Dortmund is a education organization based out in Dortmund, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Context (language use) & Large Hadron Collider. The organization has 13028 authors who have published 27666 publications receiving 615557 citations. The organization is also known as: Dortmund University & University of Dortmund.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Thorunn Rafnar1, Sita H. Vermeulen, Patrick Sulem1, Gudmar Thorleifsson1, Katja K.H. Aben, J. Alfred Witjes, Anne J. Grotenhuis, Gerald W. Verhaegh, Christina A. Hulsbergen-van de Kaa2, Søren Besenbacher3, Daniel F. Gudbjartsson1, Simon N. Stacey1, Julius Gudmundsson1, Hrefna Johannsdottir1, Hjordis Bjarnason1, Carlo Zanon1, Hafdis T. Helgadottir1, Jon G. Jonasson4, Laufey Tryggvadottir4, Eirikur Jonsson, Gudmundur Geirsson, Sigfus Nikulasson, Vigdis Petursdottir, D. Timothy Bishop, Sei Chung-Sak5, Ananya Choudhury6, Faye Elliott, Jennifer H. Barrett, Margaret A. Knowles5, Petra J. de Verdier, Charlotta Ryk, Annika Lindblom7, Peter Rudnai8, Eugene Gurzau, Kvetoslava Koppova, Paolo Vineis9, Silvia Polidoro, Simonetta Guarrera, Carlotta Sacerdote, Angeles Panadero, José I Sanz-Velez, Manuel Sanchez10, Gabriel Valdivia10, Maria D. Garcia-Prats, Jan G. Hengstler11, Silvia Selinski11, Holger Gerullis, Daniel Ovsiannikov, Abdolaziz Khezri, Alireza Aminsharifi12, Mahyar Malekzadeh, Leonard H. van den Berg, Roel A. Ophoff13, Roel A. Ophoff14, Jan H. Veldink, Maurice P. Zeegers15, Eliane Kellen16, Jacopo Fostinelli17, Daniele Andreoli17, Cecilia Arici17, Stefano Porru17, Frank Buntinx18, Frank Buntinx19, Abbas Ghaderi, Klaus Golka11, Jose I. Mayordomo10, Giuseppe Matullo20, Rajesh Kumar21, Gunnar Steineck22, Anne E. Kiltie23, Augustine Kong1, Unnur Thorsteinsdottir1, Unnur Thorsteinsdottir4, Kari Stefansson4, Kari Stefansson1, Lambertus A. Kiemeney 
TL;DR: It is speculated that rs17674580, or other sequence variants in LD with it, indirectly modifies UBC risk by affecting urine production, which would support the 'urogenous contact hypothesis' that urine production and voiding frequency modify the risk of UBC.
Abstract: Three genome-wide association studies in Europe and the USA have reported eight urinary bladder cancer (UBC) susceptibility loci. Using extended case and control series and 1000 Genomes imputations of 5 340 737 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), we searched for additional loci in the European GWAS. The discovery sample set consisted of 1631 cases and 3822 controls from the Netherlands and 603 cases and 37 781 controls from Iceland. For follow-up, we used 3790 cases and 7507 controls from 13 sample sets of European and Iranian ancestry. Based on the discovery analysis, we followed up signals in the urea transporter (UT) gene SLC14A. The strongest signal at this locus was represented by a SNP in intron 3, rs17674580, that reached genome-wide significance in the overall analysis of the discovery and follow-up groups: odds ratio = 1.17, P = 7.6 × 10(-11). SLC14A1 codes for UTs that define the Kidd blood group and are crucial for the maintenance of a constant urea concentration gradient in the renal medulla and, through this, the kidney's ability to concentrate urine. It is speculated that rs17674580, or other sequence variants in LD with it, indirectly modifies UBC risk by affecting urine production. If confirmed, this would support the 'urogenous contact hypothesis' that urine production and voiding frequency modify the risk of UBC.

134 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a comprehensive taxonomy of aspects to be considered when designing explanation facilities for current and future decision support systems for advice-giving systems is presented, which includes a variety of different facets, such as explanation objective, responsiveness, content and presentation.
Abstract: With the recent advances in the field of artificial intelligence, an increasing number of decision-making tasks are delegated to software systems. A key requirement for the success and adoption of such systems is that users must trust system choices or even fully automated decisions. To achieve this, explanation facilities have been widely investigated as a means of establishing trust in these systems since the early years of expert systems. With today’s increasingly sophisticated machine learning algorithms, new challenges in the context of explanations, accountability, and trust towards such systems constantly arise. In this work, we systematically review the literature on explanations in advice-giving systems. This is a family of systems that includes recommender systems, which is one of the most successful classes of advice-giving software in practice. We investigate the purposes of explanations as well as how they are generated, presented to users, and evaluated. As a result, we derive a novel comprehensive taxonomy of aspects to be considered when designing explanation facilities for current and future decision support systems. The taxonomy includes a variety of different facets, such as explanation objective, responsiveness, content and presentation. Moreover, we identified several challenges that remain unaddressed so far, for example related to fine-grained issues associated with the presentation of explanations and how explanation facilities are evaluated.

134 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, an ion-based strategy including a Debye-Huckel Helmholtz energy term to represent the ionic interactions was used to investigate the density and gas solubilities in imidazolium-based ionic liquids.

134 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This work systematically review the literature on explanations in advice-giving systems, which includes recommender systems, and derives a novel comprehensive taxonomy of aspects to be considered when designing explanation facilities for current and future decision support systems.
Abstract: With the recent advances in the field of artificial intelligence, an increasing number of decision-making tasks are delegated to software systems. A key requirement for the success and adoption of such systems is that users must trust system choices or even fully automated decisions. To achieve this, explanation facilities have been widely investigated as a means of establishing trust in these systems since the early years of expert systems. With today's increasingly sophisticated machine learning algorithms, new challenges in the context of explanations, accountability, and trust towards such systems constantly arise. In this work, we systematically review the literature on explanations in advice-giving systems. This is a family of systems that includes recommender systems, which is one of the most successful classes of advice-giving software in practice. We investigate the purposes of explanations as well as how they are generated, presented to users, and evaluated. As a result, we derive a novel comprehensive taxonomy of aspects to be considered when designing explanation facilities for current and future decision support systems. The taxonomy includes a variety of different facets, such as explanation objective, responsiveness, content and presentation. Moreover, we identified several challenges that remain unaddressed so far, for example related to fine-grained issues associated with the presentation of explanations and how explanation facilities are evaluated.

134 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Roel Aaij, Bernardo Adeva1, Marco Adinolfi2, A. A. Affolder3  +699 moreInstitutions (59)
TL;DR: In this article, the three-body decay modes B±→K±π+π−, B±√K±K+K− and B± √π±π +π− are reconstructed using data, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 3.0
Abstract: The charmless three-body decay modes B±→K±π+π−, B±→K±K+K−, B±→π±K+K− and B±→π±π+π− are reconstructed using data, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 3.0 fb−1, collected by the LHCb detector. The inclusive CP asymmetries of these modes are measured to be ACP(B±→K±π+π−)=+0.025±0.004±0.004±0.007,ACP(B±→K±K+K−)=−0.036±0.004±0.002±0.007,ACP(B±→π±π+π−)=+0.058±0.008±0.009±0.007,ACP(B±→π±K+K−)=−0.123±0.017±0.012±0.007, where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is due to the CP asymmetry of the B±→J/ψK± reference mode. The distributions of these asymmetries are also studied as functions of position in the Dalitz plot and suggest contributions from rescattering and resonance interference processes.

134 citations


Authors

Showing all 13240 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Hermann Kolanoski145127996152
Marc Besancon1431799106869
Kerstin Borras133134192173
Emmerich Kneringer129102180898
Achim Geiser129133184136
Valerio Vercesi12993779519
Jens Weingarten12889674667
Giuseppe Mornacchi12789475830
Kevin Kroeninger12683670010
Daniel Muenstermann12688570855
Reiner Klingenberg12673370069
Claus Gössling12677571975
Diane Cinca12682270126
Frank Meier12467764889
Daniel Dobos12467967434
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
RWTH Aachen University
96.2K papers, 2.5M citations

93% related

University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
85.6K papers, 2.6M citations

92% related

Technische Universität München
123.4K papers, 4M citations

91% related

ETH Zurich
122.4K papers, 5.1M citations

90% related

École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
98.2K papers, 4.3M citations

89% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023131
2022306
20211,694
20201,773
20191,653
20181,579