scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Temple University

EducationPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
About: Temple University is a education organization based out in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 32154 authors who have published 64375 publications receiving 2219828 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Si-Chun Ming1
01 Jun 1977-Cancer
TL;DR: This classification provided a simple basis for evaluation of various aspects of gastric cancer and indicated that intestinal metaplasia probably played a role in the development of expanding, but not infiltrative, carcinoma.
Abstract: Gastric carcinomas had various pathological features. Based on patterns of growth and invasiveness, however, they fell into two types; expanding type and infiltrative type. These types were readily recognizable histologically: expanding carcinomas grew en masse and by expansion, resulting in the formation of discrete tumor nodules, whereas in infiltrative carcinoma tumor cells invaded individuality. Both types showed varying degrees of cell maturation, but glands were much more common in expanding carcinoma. The difference in growth pattern was reflected partly by gross appearance of the tumors. These two types of carcinoma appeared to be different in their histogenetic origins. Intestinal metaplasia probably played a role in the development of expanding, but not infiltrative, carcinoma. There were differences also in the sex and age of the patients, survival rate, and epidemiological distribution. Thus, this classification provided a simple basis for evaluation of various aspects of gastric cancer.

479 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Significantly greater amounts of facial bone loss were associated with implants that failed to integrate and as the bone thickness approached 1.8 to 2 mm, bone loss decreased significantly and some evidence of bone gain was seen.
Abstract: Background: Various causes of facial bone loss around dental implants are reported in the literature; however, reports on the influence of residual facial bone thickness on the facial bone response (loss or gain) have not been published. This study measured changes in vertical dimension of facial bone between implant insertion and uncovering and compared these changes to facial bone thickness for more than 3,000 hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated and non–HA-coated root-form dental implants. Methods: Subjects were predominantly white males, 18 to 80+ years of age (mean 62.9 years), who were patients at 30 Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers and two university dental clinics. Alveolar ridges ranged from normal to resorbed with intact basal bone. Following preparation of the osteotomy site, direct measurements with calipers were made of the residual facial bone thickness, approximately 0.5 mm below the crest of the bone. The distance from the top of the implants to the crest of the facial bone was also me...

478 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Daniel E. Neafsey1, Robert M. Waterhouse, Mohammad Reza Abai2, Sergey Aganezov3, Max A. Alekseyev3, James E. Allen4, James Amon, Bruno Arcà5, Peter Arensburger6, Gleb N. Artemov7, Lauren A. Assour8, Hamidreza Basseri2, Aaron M. Berlin1, Bruce W. Birren1, Stéphanie Blandin9, Stéphanie Blandin10, Andrew I. Brockman11, Thomas R. Burkot12, Austin Burt11, Clara S. Chan13, Cedric Chauve14, Joanna C. Chiu15, Mikkel B. Christensen4, Carlo Costantini16, Victoria L.M. Davidson17, Elena Deligianni18, Tania Dottorini11, Vicky Dritsou19, Stacey Gabriel1, Wamdaogo M. Guelbeogo, Andrew Brantley Hall20, Mira V. Han21, Thaung Hlaing, Daniel S.T. Hughes4, Daniel S.T. Hughes22, Adam M. Jenkins23, Xiaofang Jiang20, Irwin Jungreis13, Evdoxia G. Kakani19, Evdoxia G. Kakani24, Maryam Kamali20, Petri Kemppainen25, Ryan C. Kennedy26, Ioannis K. Kirmitzoglou27, Ioannis K. Kirmitzoglou11, Lizette L. Koekemoer28, Njoroge Laban, Nicholas Langridge4, Mara K. N. Lawniczak11, Manolis Lirakis29, Neil F. Lobo8, Ernesto Lowy4, Robert M. MacCallum11, Chunhong Mao20, Gareth Maslen4, Charles Mbogo30, Jenny McCarthy6, Kristin Michel17, Sara N. Mitchell24, Wendy Moore31, Katherine A. Murphy15, Anastasia N. Naumenko20, Tony Nolan11, Eva Maria Novoa13, Samantha M. O’Loughlin11, Chioma Oringanje31, Mohammad Ali Oshaghi2, Nazzy Pakpour15, Philippos Aris Papathanos19, Philippos Aris Papathanos11, Ashley Peery20, Michael Povelones32, Anil Prakash33, David P. Price34, Ashok Rajaraman14, Lisa J. Reimer35, David C. Rinker36, Antonis Rokas37, Tanya L. Russell12, N’Fale Sagnon, Maria V. Sharakhova20, Terrance Shea1, Felipe A. Simão38, Felipe A. Simão39, Frédéric Simard16, Michel A. Slotman40, Pradya Somboon41, V. N. Stegniy7, Claudio J. Struchiner42, Claudio J. Struchiner43, Gregg W.C. Thomas44, Marta Tojo45, Pantelis Topalis18, Jose M. C. Tubio46, Maria F. Unger8, John Vontas29, Catherine Walton25, Craig S. Wilding47, Judith H. Willis48, Yi-Chieh Wu49, Yi-Chieh Wu13, Guiyun Yan50, Evgeny M. Zdobnov38, Evgeny M. Zdobnov39, Xiaofan Zhou37, Flaminia Catteruccia19, Flaminia Catteruccia24, George K. Christophides11, Frank H. Collins8, Robert S. Cornman48, Andrea Crisanti11, Andrea Crisanti19, Martin J. Donnelly35, Martin J. Donnelly46, Scott J. Emrich8, Michael C. Fontaine51, Michael C. Fontaine8, William M. Gelbart24, Matthew W. Hahn44, Immo A. Hansen34, Paul I. Howell52, Fotis C. Kafatos11, Manolis Kellis13, Daniel Lawson4, Christos Louis18, Shirley Luckhart15, Marc A. T. Muskavitch53, Marc A. T. Muskavitch23, José M. C. Ribeiro, Michael A. Riehle31, Igor V. Sharakhov20, Zhijian Tu20, Laurence J. Zwiebel37, Nora J. Besansky8 
Broad Institute1, Tehran University of Medical Sciences2, George Washington University3, European Bioinformatics Institute4, Sapienza University of Rome5, Temple University6, Tomsk State University7, University of Notre Dame8, Centre national de la recherche scientifique9, French Institute of Health and Medical Research10, Imperial College London11, James Cook University12, Massachusetts Institute of Technology13, Simon Fraser University14, University of California, Davis15, Institut de recherche pour le développement16, Kansas State University17, Foundation for Research & Technology – Hellas18, University of Perugia19, Virginia Tech20, University of Nevada, Las Vegas21, Baylor College of Medicine22, Boston College23, Harvard University24, University of Manchester25, University of California, San Francisco26, University of Cyprus27, National Health Laboratory Service28, University of Crete29, Kenya Medical Research Institute30, University of Arizona31, University of Pennsylvania32, Indian Council of Medical Research33, New Mexico State University34, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine35, Vanderbilt University Medical Center36, Vanderbilt University37, Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics38, University of Geneva39, Texas A&M University40, Chiang Mai University41, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation42, Rio de Janeiro State University43, Indiana University44, University of Santiago de Compostela45, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute46, Liverpool John Moores University47, University of Georgia48, Harvey Mudd College49, University of California, Irvine50, University of Groningen51, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention52, Biogen Idec53
02 Jan 2015-Science
TL;DR: The authors investigated the genomic basis of vectorial capacity and explore new avenues for vector control, sequenced the genomes of 16 anopheline mosquito species from diverse locations spanning ~100 million years of evolution Comparative analyses show faster rates of gene gain and loss, elevated gene shuffling on the X chromosome, and more intron losses, relative to Drosophila.
Abstract: Variation in vectorial capacity for human malaria among Anopheles mosquito species is determined by many factors, including behavior, immunity, and life history To investigate the genomic basis of vectorial capacity and explore new avenues for vector control, we sequenced the genomes of 16 anopheline mosquito species from diverse locations spanning ~100 million years of evolution Comparative analyses show faster rates of gene gain and loss, elevated gene shuffling on the X chromosome, and more intron losses, relative to Drosophila Some determinants of vectorial capacity, such as chemosensory genes, do not show elevated turnover but instead diversify through protein-sequence changes This dynamism of anopheline genes and genomes may contribute to their flexible capacity to take advantage of new ecological niches, including adapting to humans as primary hosts

476 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Although genomic alterations are dominated by loss of tumor suppressor genes, 80% of patients harbored at least one genomic alteration in a targetable gene, suggesting that novel approaches to treatment may be possible for this debilitating subset of head and neck cancers.
Abstract: The survival of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) has not changed significantly in several decades, leading clinicians and investigators to search for promising molecular targets. To this end, we performed comprehensive genomic analysis of gene expression, copy number, methylation and point mutations in OSCC. Integrated analysis revealed more somatic events than previously reported, identifying four major driver pathways (mitogenic signaling, Notch, cell cycle, TP53) and two additional key genes (FAT1, CASP8). The Notch pathway was defective in 66% of patients, and in follow-up studies of mechanism, functional NOTCH1 signaling inhibited proliferation of OSCC cell lines. Frequent mutation of CASP8 defines a new molecular subtype of OSCC with few copy number changes. Although genomic alterations are dominated by loss of tumor suppressor genes, 80% of patients harbored at least one genomic alteration in a targetable gene, suggesting that novel approaches to treatment may be possible for this debilitating disease.

475 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
14 Sep 1995-Nature
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that functional GLUT4 protein is not required for maintaining nearly normal glycaemia but that GLLJT4 is absolutely essential for sustained growth, normal cellular glucose and fat metabolism, and expected longevity.
Abstract: THE insulin-sensitive glucose transporter, GLUT4, is the most abundant facilitative glucose transporter in muscle and adipose tissue, the major sites for postprandial glucose disposal. To assess the role of GLUT4 in glucose homeostasis, we have disrupted the murine GLUT4 gene. Because GLUT4 has been shown to be dysregulated in pathological states such as diabetes and obesity, it was expected that genetic ablation of GLUT4 would result in abnormal glucose homeostasis. The mice deficient in GLUT4 (GLUT4-null) are growth-retarded and exhibit decreased longevity associated with cardiac hypertrophy and severely reduced adipose tissue deposits. Blood glucose levels in female GLUT4-null mice are not significantly elevated in either the fasting or fed state; in contrast, male GLUT4-null mice have moderately reduced glycaemias in the fasted state and increased glycaemias in the fed state. However, both female and male GLUT4-null mice exhibit postprandial hyperinsulinaemia, indicating possible insulin resistance. Increased expression of other glucose transporters is observed in the liver (GLUT2) and heart (GLUT1) but not skeletal muscle. Oral glucose tolerance tests show that both female and male GLUT4-null mice clear glucose as efficiently as controls, but insulin tolerance tests indicate that these mice are less sensitive to insulin action. The GLUT4-null mice demonstrate that functional GLUT4 protein is not required for maintaining nearly normal glycaemia but that GLLJT4 is absolutely essential for sustained growth, normal cellular glucose and fat metabolism, and expected longevity.

475 citations


Authors

Showing all 32360 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Robert J. Lefkowitz214860147995
Rakesh K. Jain2001467177727
Virginia M.-Y. Lee194993148820
Yury Gogotsi171956144520
Timothy A. Springer167669122421
Ralph A. DeFronzo160759132993
James J. Collins15166989476
Robert J. Glynn14674888387
Edward G. Lakatta14685888637
Steven Williams144137586712
Peter Buchholz143118192101
David Goldstein1411301101955
Scott D. Solomon1371145103041
Donald B. Rubin132515262632
Jeffery D. Molkentin13148261594
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Pittsburgh
201K papers, 9.6M citations

97% related

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
185.3K papers, 9.9M citations

97% related

New York University
165.5K papers, 8.3M citations

96% related

University of Pennsylvania
257.6K papers, 14.1M citations

96% related

University of Southern California
169.9K papers, 7.8M citations

95% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202366
2022335
20213,475
20203,281
20193,166
20183,019