Institution
Texas Christian University
Education•Fort Worth, Texas, United States•
About: Texas Christian University is a education organization based out in Fort Worth, Texas, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 3245 authors who have published 8258 publications receiving 282216 citations. The organization is also known as: TCU & Texas Christian University, TCU.
Topics: Population, Poison control, Earnings, Substance abuse, Mental health
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: Findings revealed that although a number of factors were related to staff burnout, younger counselor age, lower adaptability, poorer clarity of agency mission, and higher stress were most significant.
Abstract: As a result of limited budgets, many treatment programs are forced to operate for extended periods at or beyond their capacity. The resulting pressure and stress on treatment staff can be taxing and lead to serious problems, including job burnout. Although the concept of burnout within other social service professions has been broadly researched, less attention has been given to burnout among drug abuse treatment staff, especially among corrections-based drug treatment staff. The goal of this article is to extend this area of research by exploring the impact of individual factors and organizational factors on burnout. Findings revealed that although a number of factors were related to staff burnout, younger counselor age, lower adaptability, poorer clarity of agency mission, and higher stress were most significant. Ways in which treatment programs might address these issues affecting staff burnout are discussed.
125 citations
•
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined whether there is a relationship between evidence of reduced audit quality, measured by estimated discretionary accruals, and audit partner tenure with a specific client.
Abstract: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires the lead audit or coordinating partner and the reviewing partner to rotate off the audit every five years so the engagement can be viewed "with fresh and skeptical eyes." Using data obtained from actual audits by multiple U.S. offices of three large international audit firms, we examine whether there is a relationship between evidence of reduced audit quality, measured by estimated discretionary accruals, and audit partner tenure with a specific client. We find that estimated discretionary accruals are significantly and negatively associated with the lead audit partner's tenure with a specific client. Thus, audit quality appears to increase with increased partner tenure. After controlling for client size and engagement risk, we find audit partner tenure significantly and negatively associated with estimated discretionary accruals only for small clients with partner tenure of greater than seven years, regardless of risk level. We also find that tenure is not significantly associated with estimated discretionary accruals for large clients. This suggests that as partner tenure increases, auditors of small client firms become less willing to accept more aggressive financial statement assertions by managers, and that partner tenure does not affect audit quality for large clients or for shorter-tenure smaller clients. Our results relating to audit partner tenure are consistent with the conclusions about audit firm tenure by Geiger and Raghunandan (2002); Johnson, Khurana, and Reynolds (2002);Myers, Myers, and Omer (2003); and Nagy (2005) and extend their findings by focusing on individual audit partners rather than on audit firms.
125 citations
••
TL;DR: The palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling of dialkylphosphite with aromatic electrophiles (Hirao coupling) was re-investigated and the first examples of aryl chloride couplings are reported.
124 citations
••
TL;DR: A widespread methodological concern in the organizational literature is the possibility that observed results are due to the influence of common-method variance or mono-method bias as mentioned in this paper, and this concern is...
124 citations
••
TL;DR: A comprehensive review of the organ-specific clinical manifestations of COVID-19 is provided to increase awareness about the various organs affected by SARS-CoV-2 and to provide a brief insight into the similarities and differences in the clinical manifestations.
Abstract: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus−2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been recently identified as the culprit of the highly infectious, outbreak named coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China. Now declared a public health emergency, this pandemic is present in more than 200 countries with over 14 million cases and 600,000 deaths as of July 18, 2020. Primarily transmitted through the respiratory tract, the most common clinical presentations of symptomatic individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 include fever, dyspnea, cough, fatigue, and sore throat. In advanced cases, patients may rapidly develop respiratory failure with acute respiratory distress syndrome, and even progress to death. While it is known that COVID-19 manifests similarly to the 2003 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and the 2012 Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), primarily affecting the pulmonary system, the impact of the disease extends far beyond the respiratory system and affects other organs of the body. The literature regarding the extrapulmonary manifestations (cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, ocular, dermatologic, and neurological) of COVID-19 is scant. Herein, we provide a comprehensive review of the organ-specific clinical manifestations of COVID-19, to increase awareness about the various organs affected by SARS-CoV-2 and to provide a brief insight into the similarities and differences in the clinical manifestations of COVID-19 and the earlier SARS and MERS.
124 citations
Authors
Showing all 3295 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Fred H. Gage | 216 | 967 | 185732 |
Daniel J. Eisenstein | 179 | 672 | 151720 |
Michael A. Hitt | 120 | 361 | 74448 |
Joseph Sarkis | 101 | 482 | 45116 |
Peter M. Frinchaboy | 76 | 216 | 38085 |
Lynn A. Boatner | 72 | 661 | 22536 |
Tai C. Chen | 70 | 276 | 22671 |
D. Dwayne Simpson | 65 | 245 | 16239 |
Garry D. Bruton | 64 | 150 | 17157 |
Robert F. Lusch | 64 | 180 | 43021 |
Johnmarshall Reeve | 60 | 113 | 18671 |
Nigel F. Piercy | 54 | 166 | 9051 |
Barbara J. Thompson | 53 | 217 | 12992 |
Zygmunt Gryczynski | 52 | 374 | 10692 |
Priyabrata Mukherjee | 51 | 140 | 14328 |