Institution
Tilburg University
Education•Tilburg, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands•
About: Tilburg University is a education organization based out in Tilburg, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 5550 authors who have published 22330 publications receiving 791335 citations.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: Experimental evaluation confirms that MaltParser can achieve robust, efficient and accurate parsing for a wide range of languages without language-specific enhancements and with rather limited amounts of training data.
Abstract: Parsing unrestricted text is useful for many language technology applications but requires parsing methods that are both robust and efficient. MaltParser is a language-independent system for data-driven dependency parsing that can be used to induce a parser for a new language from a treebank sample in a simple yet flexible manner. Experimental evaluation confirms that MaltParser can achieve robust, efficient and accurate parsing for a wide range of languages without language-specific enhancements and with rather limited amounts of training data.
801 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors model dependence with switching-parameter copulas to study financial contagion, using daily returns from five East Asian stock indices during the Asian crisis and from four Latin American stock index during the Mexican crisis, finding evidence of changing dependence during periods of turmoil.
799 citations
••
TL;DR: The three key ad elements (brand, pictorial, and text) each have unique superiority effects on attention to advertisements, which are on par with many commonly held ideas in marketing practice.
Abstract: The three key ad elements (brand, pictorial, and text) each have unique superiority effects on attention to advertisements, which are on par with many commonly held ideas in marketing practice. This is the main conclusion of an analysis of 1363 print advertisements tested with infrared eye-tracking methodology on more than 3600 consumers. The pictorial is superior in capturing attention, independent of its size. The text element best captures attention in direct proportion to its surface size. The brand element most effectively transfers attention to the other elements. Only increments in the text element’s surface size produce a net gain in attention to the advertisement as a whole. The authors discuss how their findings can be used to render more effective decisions in advertising.
793 citations
••
TL;DR: The role of follower self-conception in leader-ship effectiveness is discussed in this paper, where it is shown that self-construal, selfefficacy, self-esteem, and self-consistency may be affected by leadership and may mediate the effects of leadership on follower behavior.
Abstract: This article reviews empirical research on the role of follower self-conception in leader-ship effectiveness. and specifies an agenda for future research in this area. The review shows that several aspects of follower self-conception (i.e., self-construal, self-efficacy, self-esteem, and self-consistency) may be affected by leadership. and may mediate the effects of leadership on follower behavior. There also is consistent evidence that follower self-construal moderates the impact of leadership on follower attitudes and behavior. Two key themes for future research are defined. First, future research should focus on the development of theory about the role of relational self-construal in the leadership process. Second, it seems particularly valuable to develop theory about the interplay of different aspects of follower self-conception in leadership effectiveness. including the interactive effects of these aspects of self Working backwards from these theoretical models of follower self-conception, specific leader behavior relevant to these aspects of self should then be identified. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
772 citations
••
University of Florida1, University of Padua2, University of Würzburg3, Pennsylvania State University4, University of Social Sciences and Humanities5, Tilburg University6, City University of New York7, Koç University8, University of Michigan9, University of Kuala Lumpur10, Texas A&M University11, San Diego State University12, Mount Saint Vincent University13, Radboud University Nijmegen14, Virginia Commonwealth University15, Texas A&M University–Commerce16, Loyola University Chicago17, Worcester Polytechnic Institute18, London School of Economics and Political Science19, James Madison University20, Occidental College21, McDaniel College22, Connecticut College23, Wilfrid Laurier University24, University of Brasília25, California State University, Northridge26, University of Virginia27, Ohio State University28, University of Wisconsin-Madison29, Ithaca College30, Charles University in Prague31, Western Kentucky University32, Washington and Lee University33
TL;DR: The authors compared variation in the replicability of 13 classic and contemporary effects across 36 independent samples totaling 6,344 participants and found that the results of these experiments are more dependent on the effect itself than on the sample and setting used to investigate the effect.
Abstract: Although replication is a central tenet of science, direct replications are rare in psychology. This research tested variation in the replicability of 13 classic and contemporary effects across 36 independent samples totaling 6,344 participants. In the aggregate, 10 effects replicated consistently. One effect – imagined contact reducing prejudice – showed weak support for replicability. And two effects – flag priming influencing conservatism and currency priming influencing system justification – did not replicate. We compared whether the conditions such as lab versus online or US versus international sample predicted effect magnitudes. By and large they did not. The results of this small sample of effects suggest that replicability is more dependent on the effect itself than on the sample and setting used to investigate the effect.
767 citations
Authors
Showing all 5691 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
David M. Fergusson | 127 | 474 | 55992 |
Johan P. Mackenbach | 120 | 783 | 56705 |
Henning Tiemeier | 108 | 866 | 48604 |
Allen N. Berger | 106 | 382 | 65596 |
Thorsten Beck | 99 | 373 | 62708 |
Luc Laeven | 93 | 355 | 36916 |
William J. Baumol | 85 | 460 | 49603 |
Michael H. Antoni | 84 | 431 | 21878 |
Russell Spears | 84 | 336 | 31609 |
Wim Meeus | 81 | 445 | 22646 |
Daan van Knippenberg | 80 | 223 | 25272 |
Wolfgang Karl Härdle | 79 | 783 | 28934 |
Aaron Cohen | 78 | 412 | 66543 |
Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp | 74 | 178 | 36059 |
Geert Hofstede | 72 | 126 | 103728 |