Institution
Tilburg University
Education•Tilburg, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands•
About: Tilburg University is a education organization based out in Tilburg, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Anxiety. The organization has 5550 authors who have published 22330 publications receiving 791335 citations.
Topics: Population, Anxiety, Health care, Corporate governance, Personality
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
•
TL;DR: Claessens et al. as mentioned in this paper showed that increasing the number of foreign banks' ownership in domestic banks reduces both profits and overhead expenses of domestic banks in developing and industrial countries.
Abstract: Does the entry of foreign banks make domestic banks more competitive? This study shows that, in developing countries, increasing the number (even more than the share) of foreign banks reduces both profits and overhead expenses of domestic banks. Banking markets are becoming increasingly international through financial liberalization and general economic integration. Using bank-level data for 80 countries for 1988-95, Claessens, Demirguc-Kunt, and Huizinga examine the extent of foreign ownership in national banking markets. They compare net interest margins, overhead, taxes paid, and profitability of foreign and domestic banks. The comparative functions of foreign banks and domestic banks is very different in developing and industrial countries, possibly because of a different customer base, different bank procedures, and different regulatory and tax regimes: ° In developing countries foreign banks tend to have greater profits, higher interest margins, and higher tax payments than do domestic banks. ° In industrial countries it is the domestic banks that have greater profits, higher interest margins, and higher tax payments. It is common to read, in the literature on foreign banking, that the entry of foreign banks can make national banking markets more competitive, thereby forcing domestic banks to operate more efficiently. Claessens, Demirguc-Kunt, and Huizinga show that increasing the foreign share of bank ownership does indeed reduce profitability and overhead expenses in domestically owned banks - so the general effect of foreign bank entry may be positive. Interestingly, the number of foreign entrants matters more than their market share, suggesting that they affect local bank competition more on entry rather than after gaining a substantial market share. These effects hold even when controlling for the fact that foreign banks may be attracted to markets with certain characteristics, such as low banking costs. This paper - a joint product of the East Asia and Pacific Region and the Development Research Group - is part of a larger effort in the Bank to study the effects of increasing global integration of financial services. The authors may be contacted at cclaessens @worldbank.org, ademirguckunt@worldbank.org, or H.P.Huizinga@Kub.NL.
562 citations
••
TL;DR: It is concluded that two-system models currently provide little scientific advance, and researchers are encouraged to adopt more rigorous conceptual definitions and employ more stringent criteria for testing the empirical evidence in support for two- system theories.
Abstract: Over the past two decades, there has been an upsurge in theoretical frameworks alluding to the existence of two different processing systems that supposedly operate according to different rules. This article critically examines the scientific advance offered by these theories (in particular advances in the domains of reasoning, decision making, and social cognition) and questions their theoretical coherence as well as the evidence for their existence. We scrutinize the conceptual underpinnings of two-system models and explicate the assumptions underlying these models to see whether they are reasonable. We also evaluate the empirical paradigms used to validate two-system models and ponder about their explanatory strength and predictive power. Given the popularity of these models, we discuss the appeal of two-system theories and suggest potential reasons for their prevalence. We comment on the potential costs associated with these models and allude to the desired nature of potential alternatives. We conclude that two-system models currently provide little scientific advance, and we encourage researchers to adopt more rigorous conceptual definitions and employ more stringent criteria for testing the empirical evidence in support for two-system theories.
559 citations
••
TL;DR: Recent developments in modeling social-ecological systems are presented, some of these challenges are illustrated with examples related to coral reefs and grasslands, and the implications for economic and policy analysis are identified.
Abstract: Systems linking people and nature, known as social-ecological systems, are increasingly understood as complex adaptive systems. Essential features of these complex adaptive systems – such as nonlinear feedbacks, strategic interactions, individual and spatial heterogeneity, and varying time scales – pose substantial challenges for modeling. However, ignoring these characteristics can distort our picture of how these systems work, causing policies to be less effective or even counterproductive. In this paper we present recent developments in modeling social-ecological systems, illustrate some of these challenges with examples related to coral reefs and grasslands, and identify the implications for economic and policy analysis.
555 citations
••
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research1, University of Alberta2, University of Southampton3, Tenri Hospital4, Medical University of Warsaw5, Tilburg University6, Novo Nordisk7, Pennsylvania State University8, Kocaeli University9, Dalhousie University10, University of Antwerp11, Loyola University Maryland12
TL;DR: The second Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN2) study aimed to assess psychosocial outcomes in people with diabetes across countries for benchmarking.
Abstract: Aims
The second Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN2) study aimed to assess psychosocial outcomes in people with diabetes across countries for benchmarking.
Methods
Surveys included new and adapted questions from validated questionnaires that assess health-related quality of life, self-management, attitudes/beliefs, social support and priorities for improving diabetes care. Questionnaires were conducted online, by telephone or in person.
Results
Participants were 8596 adults with diabetes across 17 countries. There were significant between-country differences for all benchmarking indicators; no one country's outcomes were consistently better or worse than others. The proportion with likely depression [WHO-5 Well-Being Index (WHO-5) score ≤ 28] was 13.8% (country range 6.5–24.1%). Diabetes-related distress [Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale 5 (PAID-5) score ≥ 40] was reported by 44.6% of participants (17.2–67.6%). Overall quality of life was rated ‘poor’ or ‘very poor’ by 12.2% of participants (7.6–26.1%). Diabetes had a negative impact on all aspects investigated, ranging from 20.5% on relationship with family/friends to 62.2% on physical health. Approximately 40% of participants (18.6–64.9%) reported that their medication interfered with their ability to live a normal life. The availability of person-centred chronic illness care and support for active involvement was rated as low. Following self-care advice for medication and diet was most common, and least common for glucose monitoring and foot examination, with marked country variation. Only 48.8% of respondents had participated in diabetes educational programmes/activities to help manage their diabetes.
Conclusions
Cross-national benchmarking using psychometrically validated indicators can help identify areas for improvement and best practices to drive changes that improve outcomes for people with diabetes.
553 citations
•
TL;DR: For almost all graphs the answer to the question in the title is still unknown as mentioned in this paper, and the cases for which the answer is known are surveyed in the survey of cases where the Laplacian matrix is known.
Abstract: For almost all graphs the answer to the question in the title is still unknown. Here we survey the cases for which the answer is known. Not only the adjacency matrix, but also other types of matrices, such as the Laplacian matrix, are considered.
551 citations
Authors
Showing all 5691 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
David M. Fergusson | 127 | 474 | 55992 |
Johan P. Mackenbach | 120 | 783 | 56705 |
Henning Tiemeier | 108 | 866 | 48604 |
Allen N. Berger | 106 | 382 | 65596 |
Thorsten Beck | 99 | 373 | 62708 |
Luc Laeven | 93 | 355 | 36916 |
William J. Baumol | 85 | 460 | 49603 |
Michael H. Antoni | 84 | 431 | 21878 |
Russell Spears | 84 | 336 | 31609 |
Wim Meeus | 81 | 445 | 22646 |
Daan van Knippenberg | 80 | 223 | 25272 |
Wolfgang Karl Härdle | 79 | 783 | 28934 |
Aaron Cohen | 78 | 412 | 66543 |
Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp | 74 | 178 | 36059 |
Geert Hofstede | 72 | 126 | 103728 |