Institution
Torrey Pines Institute for Molecular Studies
Nonprofit•San Diego, California, United States•
About: Torrey Pines Institute for Molecular Studies is a nonprofit organization based out in San Diego, California, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: T cell & Antigen. The organization has 2323 authors who have published 2217 publications receiving 112618 citations.
Topics: T cell, Antigen, Solid-phase synthesis, Cytotoxic T cell, Peptide
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: This review attempts to catalogue published and unpublished problems, shortcomings, failures, and technical traps of VS methods with the aim to avoid pitfalls by making the user aware of them in the first place.
Abstract: The aim of virtual screening (VS) is to identify bioactive compounds through computational means, by employing knowledge about the protein target (structure-based VS) or known bioactive ligands (ligand-based VS). In VS, a large number of molecules are ranked according to their likelihood to be bioactive compounds, with the aim to enrich the top fraction of the resulting list (which can be tested in bioassays afterward). At its core, VS attempts to improve the odds of identifying bioactive molecules by maximizing the true positive rate, that is, by ranking the truly active molecules as high as possible (and, correspondingly, the truly inactive ones as low as possible). In choosing the right approach, the researcher is faced with many questions: where does the optimal balance between efficiency and accuracy lie when evaluating a particular algorithm; do some methods perform better than others and in what particular situations; and what do retrospective results tell us about the prospective utility of a part...
352 citations
••
TL;DR: It is argued from the findings that the major conformational change underlying PrPSc formation occurs within the N-terminal segment of PrP 27-30.
346 citations
••
TL;DR: It is envisioned that widespread adoption of electrochemistry will go beyond supplanting unsustainable reagents in mundane redox reactions to the development of exciting reactivity paradigms that enable heretofore unimagined retrosynthetic pathways.
Abstract: The appeal and promise of synthetic organic electrochemistry have been appreciated over the past century. In terms of redox chemistry, which is frequently encountered when forging new bonds, it is difficult to conceive of a more economical way to add or remove electrons than electrochemistry. Indeed, many of the largest industrial synthetic chemical processes are achieved in a practical way using electrons as a reagent. Why then, after so many years of the documented benefits of electrochemistry, is it not more widely embraced by mainstream practitioners? Erroneous perceptions that electrochemistry is a "black box" combined with a lack of intuitive and inexpensive standardized equipment likely contributed to this stagnation in interest within the synthetic organic community. This barrier to entry is magnified by the fact that many redox processes can already be accomplished using simple chemical reagents even if they are less atom-economic. Time has proven that sustainability and economics are not strong enough driving forces for the adoption of electrochemical techniques within the broader community. Indeed, like many synthetic organic chemists that have dabbled in this age-old technique, our first foray into this area was not by choice but rather through sheer necessity. The unique reactivity benefits of this old redox-modulating technique must therefore be highlighted and leveraged in order to draw organic chemists into the field. Enabling new bonds to be forged with higher levels of chemo- and regioselectivity will likely accomplish this goal. In doing so, it is envisioned that widespread adoption of electrochemistry will go beyond supplanting unsustainable reagents in mundane redox reactions to the development of exciting reactivity paradigms that enable heretofore unimagined retrosynthetic pathways. Whereas the rigorous physical organic chemical principles of electroorganic synthesis have been reviewed elsewhere, it is often the case that such summaries leave out the pragmatic aspects of designing, optimizing, and scaling up preparative electrochemical reactions. Taken together, the task of setting up an electrochemical reaction, much less inventing a new one, can be vexing for even seasoned organic chemists. This Account therefore features a unique format that focuses on addressing this exact issue within the context of our own studies. The graphically rich presentation style pinpoints basic concepts, typical challenges, and key insights for those "electro-curious" chemists who seek to rapidly explore the power of electrochemistry in their research.
342 citations
••
TL;DR: Improvements in flexible docking technology may lead to a bigger role for computational methods in lead discovery, and the docking and screening procedures can select small sets of likely lead candidates from large libraries of either commercially or synthetically available compounds.
342 citations
••
340 citations
Authors
Showing all 2327 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Eric J. Topol | 193 | 1373 | 151025 |
John R. Yates | 177 | 1036 | 129029 |
George F. Koob | 171 | 935 | 112521 |
Ian A. Wilson | 158 | 971 | 98221 |
Peter G. Schultz | 156 | 893 | 89716 |
Gerald M. Edelman | 147 | 545 | 69091 |
Floyd E. Bloom | 139 | 616 | 72641 |
Stuart A. Lipton | 134 | 488 | 71297 |
Benjamin F. Cravatt | 131 | 666 | 61932 |
Chi-Huey Wong | 129 | 1220 | 66349 |
Klaus Ley | 129 | 495 | 57964 |
Nicholas J. Schork | 125 | 587 | 62131 |
Michael Andreeff | 117 | 959 | 54734 |
Susan L. McElroy | 117 | 570 | 44992 |
Peter E. Wright | 115 | 444 | 55388 |