Institution
Tufts University
Education•Medford, Massachusetts, United States•
About: Tufts University is a education organization based out in Medford, Massachusetts, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 32800 authors who have published 66881 publications receiving 3451152 citations. The organization is also known as: Tufts College & Universitatis Tuftensis.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
[...]
TL;DR: Considerations and techniques are proposed that reduce the complexity of programs by dividing them into functional modules, which can make it possible to create complex systems from simple, independent, reusable modules.
Abstract: Considerations and techniques are proposed that reduce the complexity of programs by dividing them into functional modules. This can make it possible to create complex systems from simple, independent, reusable modules. Debugging and modifying programs, reconfiguring I/O devices, and managing large programing projects can all be greatly simplified. And, as the module library grows, increasingly sophisticated programs can be implemented using less and less new code.
1,138 citations
••
[...]
TL;DR: This work presents a meta-analyses of serum Osteoporosis IgE levels in mice over a 12-month period that shows clear patterns of decline in meningitis and in women over a longer period of time.
Abstract: R. P. Heaney, S. Abrams, B. Dawson-Hughes, A. Looker, R. Marcus, V. Matkovic and C. Weaver Creighton University, Omaha, NE; Children’s Nutrition Research Center, Houston, TX; Tufts University, Boston, MA; National Osteoporosis Foundation, Washington, DC; National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD; Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
1,135 citations
••
TL;DR: The validity of a self-administered diet history questionnaire has been estimated using as the reference data the mean of three 4-day diet records collected over the year prior to the administration of the questionnaire, in 1985-1986, using participants in the Women's Health Trial Feasibility Study.
1,131 citations
••
Daniel J. Klionsky1, Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz2, Sara Abdelfatah3, Mahmoud Abdellatif4 +2980 more•Institutions (777)
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes.
Abstract: In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.
1,129 citations
••
TL;DR: Available data from biomonitoring studies clearly indicate that the general population is exposed to BPA and is at risk from internal exposure to unconjugated BPA.
Abstract: BackgroundBisphenol A (BPA) is one of the highest-volume chemicals produced worldwide, and human exposure to BPA is thought to be ubiquitous. Thus, there are concerns that the amount of BPA to whic...
1,124 citations
Authors
Showing all 33110 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Walter C. Willett | 334 | 2399 | 413322 |
Frank B. Hu | 250 | 1675 | 253464 |
Ralph B. D'Agostino | 226 | 1287 | 229636 |
John Q. Trojanowski | 226 | 1467 | 213948 |
Peter Libby | 211 | 932 | 182724 |
David Baltimore | 203 | 876 | 162955 |
Eric B. Rimm | 196 | 988 | 147119 |
Lewis C. Cantley | 196 | 748 | 169037 |
Bernard Rosner | 190 | 1162 | 147661 |
Charles A. Dinarello | 190 | 1058 | 139668 |
William B. Kannel | 188 | 533 | 175659 |
Scott M. Grundy | 187 | 841 | 231821 |
John P. A. Ioannidis | 185 | 1311 | 193612 |
David H. Weinberg | 183 | 700 | 171424 |
Joel Schwartz | 183 | 1149 | 109985 |