United States Department of Energy

About: United States Department of Energy is a government organization based out in Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Coal & Catalysis. The organization has 13656 authors who have published 14177 publications receiving 556962 citations. The organization is also known as: DOE & Department of Energy.

Measurement of Higgs boson production in the diphoton decay channel in pp collisions at center-of-mass energies of 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector

Abstract: A measurement of the production processes of the recently discovered Higgs boson is performed in the two-photon final state using 4.5 fb(-1) of proton-proton collisions data at root s = 7 TeV and 20.3 fb(-1) at root s = 8 TeV collected by the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. The number of observed Higgs boson decays to diphotons divided by the corresponding Standard Model prediction, called the signal strength, is found to be mu = 1.17 +/- 0.27 at the value of the Higgs boson mass measured by ATLAS, m(H) = 125.4 GeV. The analysis is optimized to measure the signal strengths for individual Higgs boson production processes at this value of m(H). They are found to be mu(ggF) = 1.32 +/- 0.38, mu(VBF) = 0.8 +/- 0.7, mu(WH) = 1.0 +/- 1.6, mu(ZH) = 0.1(-0.1)(+3.7), and mu t (t) over barH = 1.6(-1.8)(+2.7), for Higgs boson production through gluon fusion, vector-boson fusion, and in association with a W or Z boson or a top-quark pair, respectively. Compared with the previously published ATLAS analysis, the results reported here also benefit from a new energy calibration procedure for photons and the subsequent reduction of the systematic uncertainty on the diphoton mass resolution. No significant deviations from the predictions of the Standard Model are found.

Mapping genome-wide transcription-factor binding sites using DAP-seq.

Abstract: To enable low-cost, high-throughput generation of cistrome and epicistrome maps for any organism, we developed DNA affinity purification sequencing (DAP-seq), a transcription factor (TF)-binding site (TFBS) discovery assay that couples affinity-purified TFs with next-generation sequencing of a genomic DNA library. The method is fast, inexpensive, and more easily scaled than chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq). DNA libraries are constructed using native genomic DNA from any source of interest, preserving cell- and tissue-specific chemical modifications that are known to affect TF binding (such as DNA methylation) and providing increased specificity as compared with in silico predictions based on motifs from methods such as protein-binding microarrays (PBMs) and systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX). The resulting DNA library is incubated with an affinity-tagged in vitro-expressed TF, and TF-DNA complexes are purified using magnetic separation of the affinity tag. Bound genomic DNA is eluted from the TF and sequenced using next-generation sequencing. Sequence reads are mapped to a reference genome, identifying genome-wide binding locations for each TF assayed, from which sequence motifs can then be derived. A researcher with molecular biology experience should be able to follow this protocol, processing up to 400 samples per week.

Challenges, Uncertainties, and Issues Facing Gas Production From Gas-Hydrate Deposits

Abstract: The current paper complements the Moridis et al. (2009) review of the status of the effort toward commercial gas production from hydrates. We aim to describe the concept of the gas hydrate petroleum system, to discuss advances, requirement and suggested practices in gas hydrate (GH) prospecting and GH deposit characterization, and to review the associated technical, economic and environmental challenges and uncertainties, including: the accurate assessment of producible fractions of the GH resource, the development of methodologies for identifying suitable production targets, the sampling of hydrate-bearing sediments and sample analysis, the analysis and interpretation of geophysical surveys of GH reservoirs, well testing methods and interpretation of the results, geomechanical and reservoir/well stability concerns, well design, operation and installation, field operations and extending production beyond sand-dominated GH reservoirs, monitoring production and geomechanical stability, laboratory investigations, fundamental knowledge of hydrate behavior, the economics of commercial gas production from hydrates, and the associated environmental concerns. Introduction Background. Gas hydrates (GH) are solid crystalline compounds of water and gaseous substances described by the general chemical formula G•NH H2O, in which the molecules of gas G (referred to as guests) occupy voids within the lattices of icelike crystal structures. Gas hydrate deposits occur in two distinctly different geographic settings where the necessary conditions of low temperature T and high pressure P exist for their formation and stability: in the Arctic (typically in association with permafrost) and in deep ocean sediments (Kvenvolden, 1988). The majority of naturally occurring hydrocarbon gas hydrates contain CH4 in overwhelming abundance. Simple CH4hydrates concentrate methane volumetrically by a factor of ~164 when compared to standard P and T conditions (STP). Natural CH4-hydrates crystallize mostly in the structure I form, which has a hydration number NH ranging from 5.77 to 7.4, with NH = 6 being the average hydration number and NH = 5.75 corresponding to complete hydration (Sloan and Koh, 2008). Natural GH can also contain other hydrocarbons (alkanes CH2+2,  = 2 to 4), but may also contain trace amounts of other gases (mainly CO2, H2S or N2). Although there has been no systematic effort to map and evaluate this resource on a global scale, and current estimates of in-place volumes vary widely (ranging between 10 to 10 m at standard conditions), the consensus is that the worldwide quantity of hydrocarbon within GH is vast (Milkov, 2004; Boswell and Collett, 2010). Given the sheer magnitude of the resource, ever increasing global energy demand, and the finite volume of conventional fossil fuel resources, GH are emerging as a potential energy source for a growing number of nations. The attractiveness of GH is further enhanced by the environmental desirability of natural gas, as it has the lowest carbon intensity of all fossil fuels. Thus, the appeal of GH accumulations as future hydrocarbon gas sources is rapidly increasing and their production potential clearly demands technical and economic evaluation. The past decade has seen a marked acceleration in gas hydrate R&D, including both a proliferation of basic scientific endeavors as well as the strong emergence of focused field studies of GH occurrence and resource potential, primarily within national GH programs (Paul et al., 2010). Together, these efforts have helped to clarify the dominant issues and challenges facing the extraction of methane from gas hydrates. A review paper by Moridis et al. (2009) summarized the status of the effort for production from gas hydrates. The authors discussed the distribution of natural gas hydrate accumulations, the status of the primary international research and development R&D programs (including current policies, focus and priorities), and the remaining science and technological challenges facing commercialization of production. After a brief examination of GH accumulations that are well characterized and appear to be models for future development and gas production, they analyzed the role of numerical simulation in the assessment of the hydrate production potential, identified the data needs for reliable predictions, evaluated the status of knowledge with regard to these needs, discussed knowledge gaps and their impact, and reached the conclusion that the numerical simulation capabilities are quite advanced and that the related gaps are either not significant or are being addressed. Furthermore, Moridis et al. (2009) reviewed the current body of literature relevant to potential productivity from different types of GH deposits, and determined that there are consistent indications of a large production potential at high rates over long periods from a wide variety of GH deposits. Finally, they identified (a) features, conditions, geology and techniques that are desirable in the selection of potential production targets, (b) methods to maximize production, and (c) some of the conditions and characteristics that render certain GH deposits undesirable for production.

Measurement of the charm fragmentation function in D* photoproduction at HERA

Abstract: The charm fragmentation function has been measured in D* photoproduction with the ZEUS detector at HERA using an integrated luminosity of 120 pb(-1). The fragmentation function is measured versus z = (E + p(parallel to))(D)* / 2E(jet), where E is the energy of the D* meson and p(parallel to) is the longitudinal momentum of the D* meson relative to the axis of the associated jet of energy E-jet. Jets were reconstructed using the k(T) clustering algorithm and required to have transverse energy larger than 9GeV. The D* meson associated with the jet was required to have a transverse momentum larger than 2GeV. The measured function is compared to different fragmentation models incorporated in leading-logarithm Monte Carlo simulations and in a next-to-leading-order QCD calculation. The free parameters in each fragmentation model are fitted to the data. The extracted parameters and the function itself are compared to measurements from e(+)e(-) experiments.