scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Adelaide

EducationAdelaide, South Australia, Australia
About: University of Adelaide is a education organization based out in Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 27251 authors who have published 79167 publications receiving 2671128 citations. The organization is also known as: The University of Adelaide & Adelaide University.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
J. Abadie1, B. P. Abbott1, R. Abbott1, T. D. Abbott2  +611 moreInstitutions (63)
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors demonstrate the squeezed-light enhancement of GEO600, which will be the GW observatory operated by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration in its search for GWs for the next 3-4 years.
Abstract: Around the globe several observatories are seeking the first direct detection of gravitational waves (GWs). These waves are predicted by Einstein’s general theory of relativity1 and are generated, for example, by black-hole binary systems2. Present GW detectors are Michelson-type kilometre-scale laser interferometers measuring the distance changes between mirrors suspended in vacuum. The sensitivity of these detectors at frequencies above several hundred hertz is limited by the vacuum (zero-point) fluctuations of the electromagnetic field. A quantum technology—the injection of squeezed light3—offers a solution to this problem. Here we demonstrate the squeezed-light enhancement of GEO 600, which will be the GW observatory operated by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration in its search for GWs for the next 3–4 years. GEO 600 now operates with its best ever sensitivity, which proves the usefulness of quantum entanglement and the qualification of squeezed light as a key technology for future GW astronomy4.

810 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Lorenzo Galluzzi1, J M Bravo-San Pedro2, Ilio Vitale, Stuart A. Aaronson3, John M. Abrams4, Dieter Adam5, Emad S. Alnemri6, Lucia Altucci7, David W. Andrews8, Margherita Annicchiarico-Petruzzelli, Eric H. Baehrecke9, Nicolas G. Bazan10, Mathieu J.M. Bertrand11, Mathieu J.M. Bertrand12, Katiuscia Bianchi13, Katiuscia Bianchi14, Mikhail V. Blagosklonny15, Klas Blomgren16, Christoph Borner17, Dale E. Bredesen18, Dale E. Bredesen19, Catherine Brenner20, Catherine Brenner21, Michelangelo Campanella22, Eleonora Candi23, Francesco Cecconi23, Francis Ka-Ming Chan9, Navdeep S. Chandel24, Emily H. Cheng25, Jerry E. Chipuk3, John A. Cidlowski26, Aaron Ciechanover27, Ted M. Dawson28, Valina L. Dawson28, V De Laurenzi29, R De Maria, Klaus-Michael Debatin30, N. Di Daniele23, Vishva M. Dixit31, Brian David Dynlacht32, Wafik S. El-Deiry33, Gian Maria Fimia34, Richard A. Flavell35, Simone Fulda36, Carmen Garrido37, Marie-Lise Gougeon38, Douglas R. Green, Hinrich Gronemeyer39, György Hajnóczky6, J M Hardwick28, Michael O. Hengartner40, Hidenori Ichijo41, Bertrand Joseph16, Philipp J. Jost42, Thomas Kaufmann43, Oliver Kepp2, Daniel J. Klionsky44, Richard A. Knight45, Richard A. Knight22, Sharad Kumar46, Sharad Kumar47, John J. Lemasters48, Beth Levine49, Beth Levine50, Andreas Linkermann5, Stuart A. Lipton, Richard A. Lockshin51, Carlos López-Otín52, Enrico Lugli, Frank Madeo53, Walter Malorni54, Jean-Christophe Marine55, Seamus J. Martin56, J-C Martinou57, Jan Paul Medema58, Pascal Meier, Sonia Melino23, Noboru Mizushima41, Ute M. Moll59, Cristina Muñoz-Pinedo, Gabriel Núñez44, Andrew Oberst60, Theocharis Panaretakis16, Josef M. Penninger, Marcus E. Peter24, Mauro Piacentini23, Paolo Pinton61, Jochen H. M. Prehn62, Hamsa Puthalakath63, Gabriel A. Rabinovich64, Kodi S. Ravichandran65, Rosario Rizzuto66, Cecília M. P. Rodrigues67, David C. Rubinsztein68, Thomas Rudel69, Yufang Shi70, Hans-Uwe Simon43, Brent R. Stockwell49, Brent R. Stockwell71, Gyorgy Szabadkai66, Gyorgy Szabadkai22, Stephen W.G. Tait72, H. L. Tang28, Nektarios Tavernarakis73, Nektarios Tavernarakis74, Yoshihide Tsujimoto, T Vanden Berghe12, T Vanden Berghe11, Peter Vandenabeele11, Peter Vandenabeele12, Andreas Villunger75, Erwin F. Wagner76, Henning Walczak22, Eileen White77, W. G. Wood78, Junying Yuan79, Zahra Zakeri80, Boris Zhivotovsky81, Boris Zhivotovsky16, Gerry Melino23, Gerry Melino45, Guido Kroemer1 
Paris Descartes University1, Institut Gustave Roussy2, Mount Sinai Hospital3, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center4, University of Kiel5, Thomas Jefferson University6, Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli7, University of Toronto8, University of Massachusetts Medical School9, Louisiana State University10, Ghent University11, Flanders Institute for Biotechnology12, Cancer Research UK13, Queen Mary University of London14, Roswell Park Cancer Institute15, Karolinska Institutet16, University of Freiburg17, Buck Institute for Research on Aging18, University of California, San Francisco19, French Institute of Health and Medical Research20, Université Paris-Saclay21, University College London22, University of Rome Tor Vergata23, Northwestern University24, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center25, National Institutes of Health26, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology27, Johns Hopkins University28, University of Chieti-Pescara29, University of Ulm30, Genentech31, New York University32, Pennsylvania State University33, University of Salento34, Yale University35, Goethe University Frankfurt36, University of Burgundy37, Pasteur Institute38, University of Strasbourg39, University of Zurich40, University of Tokyo41, Technische Universität München42, University of Bern43, University of Michigan44, Medical Research Council45, University of South Australia46, University of Adelaide47, Medical University of South Carolina48, Howard Hughes Medical Institute49, University of Texas at Dallas50, St. John's University51, University of Oviedo52, University of Graz53, Istituto Superiore di Sanità54, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven55, Trinity College, Dublin56, University of Geneva57, University of Amsterdam58, Stony Brook University59, University of Washington60, University of Ferrara61, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland62, La Trobe University63, University of Buenos Aires64, University of Virginia65, University of Padua66, University of Lisbon67, University of Cambridge68, University of Würzburg69, Soochow University (Suzhou)70, Columbia University71, University of Glasgow72, Foundation for Research & Technology – Hellas73, University of Crete74, Innsbruck Medical University75, Carlos III Health Institute76, Rutgers University77, University of Minnesota78, Harvard University79, City University of New York80, Moscow State University81
TL;DR: The Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death formulates a set of recommendations to help scientists and researchers to discriminate between essential and accessory aspects of cell death.
Abstract: Cells exposed to extreme physicochemical or mechanical stimuli die in an uncontrollable manner, as a result of their immediate structural breakdown. Such an unavoidable variant of cellular demise is generally referred to as ‘accidental cell death’ (ACD). In most settings, however, cell death is initiated by a genetically encoded apparatus, correlating with the fact that its course can be altered by pharmacologic or genetic interventions. ‘Regulated cell death’ (RCD) can occur as part of physiologic programs or can be activated once adaptive responses to perturbations of the extracellular or intracellular microenvironment fail. The biochemical phenomena that accompany RCD may be harnessed to classify it into a few subtypes, which often (but not always) exhibit stereotyped morphologic features. Nonetheless, efficiently inhibiting the processes that are commonly thought to cause RCD, such as the activation of executioner caspases in the course of apoptosis, does not exert true cytoprotective effects in the mammalian system, but simply alters the kinetics of cellular demise as it shifts its morphologic and biochemical correlates. Conversely, bona fide cytoprotection can be achieved by inhibiting the transduction of lethal signals in the early phases of the process, when adaptive responses are still operational. Thus, the mechanisms that truly execute RCD may be less understood, less inhibitable and perhaps more homogeneous than previously thought. Here, the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death formulates a set of recommendations to help scientists and researchers to discriminate between essential and accessory aspects of cell death.

809 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: Supervised Discrete Hashing (SDH) as mentioned in this paper proposes a new supervised hashing framework, where the learning objective is to generate the optimal binary hash codes for linear classification, which can support efficient storage and retrieval for high-dimensional data such as images, videos, documents, etc.
Abstract: Recently, learning based hashing techniques have attracted broad research interests because they can support efficient storage and retrieval for high-dimensional data such as images, videos, documents, etc. However, a major difficulty of learning to hash lies in handling the discrete constraints imposed on the pursued hash codes, which typically makes hash optimizations very challenging (NP-hard in general). In this work, we propose a new supervised hashing framework, where the learning objective is to generate the optimal binary hash codes for linear classification. By introducing an auxiliary variable, we reformulate the objective such that it can be solved substantially efficiently by employing a regularization algorithm. One of the key steps in this algorithm is to solve a regularization sub-problem associated with the NP-hard binary optimization. We show that the sub-problem admits an analytical solution via cyclic coordinate descent. As such, a high-quality discrete solution can eventually be obtained in an efficient computing manner, therefore enabling to tackle massive datasets. We evaluate the proposed approach, dubbed Supervised Discrete Hashing (SDH), on four large image datasets and demonstrate its superiority to the state-of-the-art hashing methods in large-scale image retrieval.

807 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
J. Aasi1, J. Abadie1, B. P. Abbott1, R. Abbott1  +745 moreInstitutions (73)
TL;DR: In this article, the authors inject squeezed states to improve the performance of one of the detectors of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) beyond the quantum noise limit, most notably in the frequency region down to 150 Hz.
Abstract: Nearly a century after Einstein first predicted the existence of gravitational waves, a global network of Earth-based gravitational wave observatories1, 2, 3, 4 is seeking to directly detect this faint radiation using precision laser interferometry. Photon shot noise, due to the quantum nature of light, imposes a fundamental limit on the attometre-level sensitivity of the kilometre-scale Michelson interferometers deployed for this task. Here, we inject squeezed states to improve the performance of one of the detectors of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) beyond the quantum noise limit, most notably in the frequency region down to 150 Hz, critically important for several astrophysical sources, with no deterioration of performance observed at any frequency. With the injection of squeezed states, this LIGO detector demonstrated the best broadband sensitivity to gravitational waves ever achieved, with important implications for observing the gravitational-wave Universe with unprecedented sensitivity.

805 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
B. P. Abbott1, Richard J. Abbott1, T. D. Abbott2, M. R. Abernathy3  +1135 moreInstitutions (139)
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present possible observing scenarios for the Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA gravitational-wave detectors over the next decade, with the intention of providing information to the astronomy community to facilitate planning for multi-messenger astronomy with gravitational waves.
Abstract: We present possible observing scenarios for the Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA gravitational-wave detectors over the next decade, with the intention of providing information to the astronomy community to facilitate planning for multi-messenger astronomy with gravitational waves. We estimate the sensitivity of the network to transient gravitational-wave signals, and study the capability of the network to determine the sky location of the source. We report our findings for gravitational-wave transients, with particular focus on gravitational-wave signals from the inspiral of binary neutron star systems, which are the most promising targets for multi-messenger astronomy. The ability to localize the sources of the detected signals depends on the geographical distribution of the detectors and their relative sensitivity, and 90% credible regions can be as large as thousands of square degrees when only two sensitive detectors are operational. Determining the sky position of a significant fraction of detected signals to areas of 5– 20 deg2 requires at least three detectors of sensitivity within a factor of ∼2 of each other and with a broad frequency bandwidth. When all detectors, including KAGRA and the third LIGO detector in India, reach design sensitivity, a significant fraction of gravitational-wave signals will be localized to a few square degrees by gravitational-wave observations alone.

804 citations


Authors

Showing all 27579 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Martin White1962038232387
Nicholas G. Martin1921770161952
David W. Johnson1602714140778
Nicholas J. Talley158157190197
Mark E. Cooper1581463124887
Xiang Zhang1541733117576
John E. Morley154137797021
Howard I. Scher151944101737
Christopher M. Dobson1501008105475
A. Artamonov1501858119791
Timothy P. Hughes14583191357
Christopher Hill1441562128098
Shi-Zhang Qiao14252380888
Paul Jackson141137293464
H. A. Neal1411903115480
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Melbourne
174.8K papers, 6.3M citations

97% related

University of British Columbia
209.6K papers, 9.2M citations

92% related

McGill University
162.5K papers, 6.9M citations

92% related

University of Edinburgh
151.6K papers, 6.6M citations

92% related

Imperial College London
209.1K papers, 9.3M citations

91% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023127
2022597
20215,500
20205,342
20194,803
20184,443