Institution
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Education•Birmingham, Alabama, United States•
About: University of Alabama at Birmingham is a education organization based out in Birmingham, Alabama, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 38523 authors who have published 86775 publications receiving 3930642 citations. The organization is also known as: UAB & The University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Topics: Population, Poison control, Transplantation, Health care, Immune system
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center1, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center2, Institut Gustave Roussy3, Cornell University4, Northwestern University5, Ohio State University6, University of Miami7, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center8, University of California, San Francisco9, Anschutz Medical Campus10, Sarah Cannon Research Institute11, Harvard University12, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux13, University of Alabama at Birmingham14, Johns Hopkins University15, City of Hope National Medical Center16, Washington University in St. Louis17, Mayo Clinic18, Oregon Health & Science University19, Medical University of South Carolina20, Emory University21, Cleveland Clinic22, Agios Pharmaceuticals23
TL;DR: In patients with advanced IDH1‐mutated relapsed or refractory AML, ivosidenib at a dose of 500 mg daily was associated with a low frequency of grade 3 or higher treatment‐related adverse events and with transfusion independence, durable remissions, and molecular remissions in some patients with complete remission.
Abstract: Background Mutations in the gene encoding isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) occur in 6 to 10% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Ivosidenib (AG-120) is an oral, targeted, small-molecule inhibitor of mutant IDH1. Methods We conducted a phase 1 dose-escalation and dose-expansion study of ivosidenib monotherapy in IDH1-mutated AML. Safety and efficacy were assessed in all treated patients. The primary efficacy population included patients with relapsed or refractory AML receiving 500 mg of ivosidenib daily with at least 6 months of follow-up. Results Overall, 258 patients received ivosidenib and had safety outcomes assessed. Among patients with relapsed or refractory AML (179 patients), treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher that occurred in at least 3 patients were prolongation of the QT interval (in 7.8% of the patients), the IDH differentiation syndrome (in 3.9%), anemia (in 2.2%), thrombocytopenia or a decrease in the platelet count (in 3.4%), and leukocytosis (in 1.7%...
1,004 citations
••
Johns Hopkins University1, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance2, University of Colorado Boulder3, University of Utah4, Fox Chase Cancer Center5, Brigham and Women's Hospital6, Duke University7, Northwestern University8, University of South Florida9, University of Alabama at Birmingham10, Washington University in St. Louis11, University of California, San Francisco12, Roswell Park Cancer Institute13, Vanderbilt University14, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center15, Harvard University16, University of Wisconsin-Madison17, Yale Cancer Center18, University of Michigan19, Stanford University20, Ohio State University21, City of Hope National Medical Center22, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center23, Mayo Clinic24, Case Western Reserve University25, University Of Tennessee System26
TL;DR: This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) focuses on targeted therapies and immunotherapies for metastatic NSCLC, because therapeutic recommendations are rapidly changing for metastasis disease.
Abstract: This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) focuses on targeted therapies and immunotherapies for metastatic NSCLC, because therapeutic recommendations are rapidly changing for metastatic disease. For example, new recommendations were added for atezolizumab, ceritinib, osimertinib, and pembrolizumab for the 2017 updates.
1,003 citations
••
Memorial Hospital of South Bend1, Howard University2, Northwestern University3, George Washington University4, Harvard University5, Stanford University6, Yeshiva University7, University of Pittsburgh8, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center9, University of California, San Diego10, Rutgers University11, University of Alabama at Birmingham12, University of Florida13, University of Minnesota14, Ohio State University15, University of Massachusetts Medical School16, University of Miami17, Emory University18, University of California, Davis19, National Institutes of Health20, University of Wisconsin-Madison21, University of Iowa22, Kaiser Permanente23, University at Buffalo24, Wake Forest University25, Pfizer26, Brown University27, University of Arizona28, Rush University Medical Center29, University of Nevada, Reno30, University of Texas at San Antonio31, University of California, Los Angeles32, University of Cincinnati33, Stony Brook University34, Baylor College of Medicine35, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill36, Wayne State University37, University of California, Irvine38, University of Tennessee Health Science Center39, Medical College of Wisconsin40
TL;DR: A dietary intervention that reduced total fat intake and increased intakes of vegetables, fruits, and grains did not significantly reduce the risk of CHD, stroke, or CVD in postmenopausal women and achieved only modest effects on CVD risk factors, suggesting that more focused diet and lifestyle interventions may be needed to improve risk factors and reduce CVDrisk.
Abstract: ContextMultiple epidemiologic studies and some trials have linked diet with cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention, but long-term intervention data are needed.ObjectiveTo test the hypothesis that a dietary intervention, intended to be low in fat and high in vegetables, fruits, and grains to reduce cancer, would reduce CVD risk.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsRandomized controlled trial of 48 835 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 years, of diverse backgrounds and ethnicities, who participated in the Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification Trial. Women were randomly assigned to an intervention (19 541 [40%]) or comparison group (29 294 [60%]) in a free-living setting. Study enrollment occurred between 1993 and 1998 in 40 US clinical centers; mean follow-up in this analysis was 8.1 years.InterventionIntensive behavior modification in group and individual sessions designed to reduce total fat intake to 20% of calories and increase intakes of vegetables/fruits to 5 servings/d and grains to at least 6 servings/d. The comparison group received diet-related education materials.Main Outcome MeasuresFatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease (CHD), fatal and nonfatal stroke, and CVD (composite of CHD and stroke).ResultsBy year 6, mean fat intake decreased by 8.2% of energy intake in the intervention vs the comparison group, with small decreases in saturated (2.9%), monounsaturated (3.3%), and polyunsaturated (1.5%) fat; increases occurred in intakes of vegetables/fruits (1.1 servings/d) and grains (0.5 serving/d). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, diastolic blood pressure, and factor VIIc levels were significantly reduced by 3.55 mg/dL, 0.31 mm Hg, and 4.29%, respectively; levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose, and insulin did not significantly differ in the intervention vs comparison groups. The numbers who developed CHD, stroke, and CVD (annualized incidence rates) were 1000 (0.63%), 434 (0.28%), and 1357 (0.86%) in the intervention and 1549 (0.65%), 642 (0.27%), and 2088 (0.88%) in the comparison group. The diet had no significant effects on incidence of CHD (hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-1.06), stroke (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.90-1.15), or CVD (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.92-1.05). Excluding participants with baseline CVD (3.4%), the HRs (95% CIs) for CHD and stroke were 0.94 (0.86-1.02) and 1.02 (0.90-1.17), respectively. Trends toward greater reductions in CHD risk were observed in those with lower intakes of saturated fat or trans fat or higher intakes of vegetables/fruits.ConclusionsOver a mean of 8.1 years, a dietary intervention that reduced total fat intake and increased intakes of vegetables, fruits, and grains did not significantly reduce the risk of CHD, stroke, or CVD in postmenopausal women and achieved only modest effects on CVD risk factors, suggesting that more focused diet and lifestyle interventions may be needed to improve risk factors and reduce CVD risk.Clinical Trials RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000611
1,000 citations
••
Ohio State University1, University of Alabama at Birmingham2, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center3, National Institutes of Health4, George Washington University5, University of Utah6, University of Chicago7, University of Pittsburgh8, Wake Forest University9, Thomas Jefferson University10, Wayne State University11, Columbia University12, University of Cincinnati13, Brown University14, Northwestern University15, University of Miami16, University of Tennessee Health Science Center17, University of Texas at San Antonio18, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill19, University of Texas at Austin20, Case Western Reserve University21, Vanderbilt University22
TL;DR: The proportion of women who attempt vaginal delivery after prior cesarean delivery has decreased largely because of concern about safety, and the absolute and relative risks associated with a trial of labor in women with a history of cesAREan delivery are uncertain.
Abstract: background The proportion of women who attempt vaginal delivery after prior cesarean delivery has decreased largely because of concern about safety The absolute and relative risks associated with a trial of labor in women with a history of cesarean delivery, as compared with elective repeated cesarean delivery without labor, are uncertain
997 citations
••
University of Toronto1, University of Turin2, Imperial College London3, Leicester General Hospital4, John Radcliffe Hospital5, Université de Montréal6, University of Washington7, LSU Health Sciences Center Shreveport8, Leiden University9, Columbia University10, Case Western Reserve University11, Mayo Clinic12, University of Amsterdam13, Vanderbilt University14, Western Infirmary15, German Cancer Research Center16, Johns Hopkins University17, St. Vincent's Health System18, Scott & White Hospital19, University of Florida20, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill21, University of Alabama at Birmingham22, Jikei University School of Medicine23, The Chinese University of Hong Kong24, Nanjing University25, Austral University of Chile26, Juntendo University27, Peking University28, Erasmus University Rotterdam29, Wakayama Medical University30
TL;DR: In this article, a new classification for IgA nephropathy is presented by an international consensus working group and the goal of this new system was to identify specific pathological features that more accurately predict risk of progression of renal disease.
994 citations
Authors
Showing all 38940 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Rudolf Jaenisch | 206 | 606 | 178436 |
Joel Schwartz | 183 | 1149 | 109985 |
Tadamitsu Kishimoto | 181 | 1067 | 130860 |
Jasvinder A. Singh | 176 | 2382 | 223370 |
Gregg L. Semenza | 168 | 502 | 130316 |
David R. Jacobs | 165 | 1262 | 113892 |
Hua Zhang | 163 | 1503 | 116769 |
David R. Holmes | 161 | 1624 | 114187 |
David Cella | 156 | 1258 | 106402 |
Elaine S. Jaffe | 156 | 828 | 112412 |
Michael A. Matthay | 151 | 998 | 98687 |
Lawrence Corey | 146 | 773 | 78105 |
Barton F. Haynes | 144 | 911 | 79014 |
Douglas D. Richman | 142 | 633 | 82806 |
Kjell Fuxe | 142 | 1479 | 89846 |