scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Amsterdam

EducationAmsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
About: University of Amsterdam is a education organization based out in Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Randomized controlled trial. The organization has 59309 authors who have published 140894 publications receiving 5984137 citations. The organization is also known as: UvA & Universiteit van Amsterdam.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors evaluate the insights of more than a decade of scholarship on financialization and argue that a deeper understanding of financialization will lead to a better understanding of organized interests, the politics of the welfare state, and processes of institutional change.
Abstract: Since the early 2000s, scholars from a variety of disciplines have used the concept of financialization to describe a host of structural changes in the advanced political economies. Studies of financialization interrogate how an increasingly autonomous realm of global finance has altered the underlying logics of the industrial economy and the inner workings of democratic society. This paper evaluates the insights of more than a decade of scholarship on financialization. Three approaches will be discussed: the emergence of a new regime of accumulation, the ascendency of the shareholder value orientation and the financialization of everyday life. It is argued that a deeper understanding of financialization will lead to a better understanding of organized interests, the politics of the welfare state, and processes of institutional change.

893 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations on the recognition and management of sepsis and its complications as discussed by the authors, which are either strong or weak, or in the form of best practice statements.
Abstract: Background Sepsis poses a global threat to millions of lives. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations on the recognition and management of sepsis and its complications. Methods We formed a panel of 60 experts from 22 countries and 11 members of the public. The panel prioritized questions that are relevant to the recognition and management of sepsis and septic shock in adults. New questions and sections were addressed, relative to the previous guidelines. These questions were grouped under 6 subgroups (screening and early treatment, infection, hemodynamics, ventilation, additional therapies, and long-term outcomes and goals of care). With input from the panel and methodologists, professional medical librarians performed the search strategy tailored to either specific questions or a group of relevant questions. A dedicated systematic review team performed screening and data abstraction when indicated. For each question, the methodologists, with input from panel members, summarized the evidence assessed and graded the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The panel generated recommendations using the evidence-to-decision framework. Recommendations were either strong or weak, or in the form of best practice statements. When evidence was insufficient to support a recommendation, the panel was surveyed to generate “in our practice” statements. Results The SSC panel issued 93 statements: 15 best practice statements, 15 strong recommendations, and 54 weak recommendations and no recommendation was provided for 9 questions. The recommendations address several important clinical areas related to screening tools, acute resuscitation strategies, management of fluids and vasoactive agents, antimicrobials and diagnostic tests and the use of additional therapies, ventilation management, goals of care, and post sepsis care. Conclusion The SSC panel issued evidence-based recommendations to help support key stakeholders caring for adults with sepsis or septic shock and their families.

893 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A survey of dynamic heterogeneous agent models (HAMs) in economics and finance can be found in this article, where the authors focus on simple models that are tractable by analytic methods in combination with computational tools.
Abstract: This chapter surveys work on dynamic heterogeneous agent models (HAMs) in economics and finance. Emphasis is given to simple models that, at least to some extent, are tractable by analytic methods in combination with computational tools. Most of these models are behavioral models with boundedly rational agents using different heuristics or rule of thumb strategies that may not be perfect, but perform reasonably well. Typically these models are highly nonlinear, e.g. due to evolutionary switching between strategies, and exhibit a wide range of dynamical behavior ranging from a unique stable steady state to complex, chaotic dynamics. Aggregation of simple interactions at the micro level may generate sophisticated structure at the macro level. Simple HAMs can explain important observed stylized facts in financial time series, such as excess volatility, high trading volume, temporary bubbles and trend following, sudden crashes and mean reversion, clustered volatility and fat tails in the returns distribution.

892 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present definitions of visual attention and awareness that clearly distinguish between the two, yet explain why attention and attention are so intricately related, and why there seems more overlap between mechanisms of memory and awareness than between those of attention.

891 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors analyzed the impact of a leading entrepreneurship education program on college students' entrepreneurship skills and motivation using an instrumental variables approach in a difference-in-differences framework.

891 citations


Authors

Showing all 59759 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Richard A. Flavell2311328205119
Scott M. Grundy187841231821
Stuart H. Orkin186715112182
Kenneth C. Anderson1781138126072
David A. Weitz1781038114182
Dorret I. Boomsma1761507136353
Brenda W.J.H. Penninx1701139119082
Michael Kramer1671713127224
Nicholas J. White1611352104539
Lex M. Bouter158767103034
Wolfgang Wagner1562342123391
Jerome I. Rotter1561071116296
David Cella1561258106402
David Eisenberg156697112460
Naveed Sattar1551326116368
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University College London
210.6K papers, 9.8M citations

94% related

University of Edinburgh
151.6K papers, 6.6M citations

94% related

University of Pennsylvania
257.6K papers, 14.1M citations

94% related

Columbia University
224K papers, 12.8M citations

94% related

University of Pittsburgh
201K papers, 9.6M citations

94% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023198
2022698
20219,648
20208,534
20197,822
20186,407