scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Antwerp

EducationAntwerp, Belgium
About: University of Antwerp is a education organization based out in Antwerp, Belgium. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Large Hadron Collider. The organization has 16682 authors who have published 48837 publications receiving 1689748 citations. The organization is also known as: Universiteit Antwerpen & UAntwerp.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
17 Feb 2011-Nature
TL;DR: 3D reconstruction of a complex crystalline nanoparticle at atomic resolution is reported, which helps close the gap between the atomic resolution achievable in two-dimensional electron micrographs and the coarser resolution that has hitherto been obtained by conventional electron tomography.
Abstract: Determining the three-dimensional (3D) arrangement of atoms in crystalline nanoparticles is important for nanometre-scale device engineering and also for applications involving nanoparticles, such as optoelectronics or catalysis. A nanoparticle's physical and chemical properties are controlled by its exact 3D morphology, structure and composition. Electron tomography enables the recovery of the shape of a nanoparticle from a series of projection images. Although atomic-resolution electron microscopy has been feasible for nearly four decades, neither electron tomography nor any other experimental technique has yet demonstrated atomic resolution in three dimensions. Here we report the 3D reconstruction of a complex crystalline nanoparticle at atomic resolution. To achieve this, we combined aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy, statistical parameter estimation theory and discrete tomography. Unlike conventional electron tomography, only two images of the target--a silver nanoparticle embedded in an aluminium matrix--are sufficient for the reconstruction when combined with available knowledge about the particle's crystallographic structure. Additional projections confirm the reliability of the result. The results we present help close the gap between the atomic resolution achievable in two-dimensional electron micrographs and the coarser resolution that has hitherto been obtained by conventional electron tomography.

506 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Khachatryan1, Albert M. Sirunyan1, Armen Tumasyan1, Wolfgang Adam  +2285 moreInstitutions (147)
TL;DR: In this paper, an improved jet energy scale corrections, based on a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 19.7 fb^(-1) collected by the CMS experiment in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 8 TeV, are presented.
Abstract: Improved jet energy scale corrections, based on a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 19.7 fb^(-1) collected by the CMS experiment in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 8 TeV, are presented. The corrections as a function of pseudorapidity η and transverse momentum p_T are extracted from data and simulated events combining several channels and methods. They account successively for the effects of pileup, uniformity of the detector response, and residual data-simulation jet energy scale differences. Further corrections, depending on the jet flavor and distance parameter (jet size) R, are also presented. The jet energy resolution is measured in data and simulated events and is studied as a function of pileup, jet size, and jet flavor. Typical jet energy resolutions at the central rapidities are 15–20% at 30 GeV, about 10% at 100 GeV, and 5% at 1 TeV. The studies exploit events with dijet topology, as well as photon+jet, Z+jet and multijet events. Several new techniques are used to account for the various sources of jet energy scale corrections, and a full set of uncertainties, and their correlations, are provided. The final uncertainties on the jet energy scale are below 3% across the phase space considered by most analyses (p_T > 30 GeV and 0|η| 30 GeV is reached, when excluding the jet flavor uncertainties, which are provided separately for different jet flavors. A new benchmark for jet energy scale determination at hadron colliders is achieved with 0.32% uncertainty for jets with p_T of the order of 165–330 GeV, and |η| < 0.8.

505 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Günter U. Höglinger1, Nadine M. Melhem2, Dennis W. Dickson3, Patrick M. A. Sleiman4, Li-San Wang4, Lambertus Klei2, Rosa Rademakers3, Rohan de Silva5, Irene Litvan6, David E. Riley7, John C. van Swieten8, Peter Heutink9, Zbigniew K. Wszolek3, Ryan J. Uitti3, Jana Vandrovcova5, Howard I. Hurtig4, Rachel G. Gross4, Walter Maetzler10, Stefano Goldwurm, Eduardo Tolosa11, Barbara Borroni12, Pau Pastor13, Laura B. Cantwell4, Mi Ryung Han4, Allissa Dillman14, Marcel P. van der Brug15, J. Raphael Gibbs5, J. Raphael Gibbs14, Mark R. Cookson14, Dena G. Hernandez14, Dena G. Hernandez5, Andrew B. Singleton14, Matthew J. Farrer16, Chang En Yu17, Lawrence I. Golbe18, Tamas Revesz5, John Hardy5, Andrew J. Lees5, Bernie Devlin2, Hakon Hakonarson4, Ulrich Müller19, Gerard D. Schellenberg4, Roger L. Albin20, Elena Alonso13, Angelo Antonini, Manuela Apfelbacher21, Steven E. Arnold4, Jesús Avila22, Thomas G. Beach, Sherry Beecher4, Daniela Berg23, Thomas D. Bird, Nenad Bogdanovic24, Agnita J.W. Boon8, Yvette Bordelon25, Alexis Brice26, Alexis Brice27, Herbert Budka28, Margherita Canesi, Wang Zheng Chiu8, Roberto Cilia, Carlo Colosimo29, Peter Paul De Deyn30, Justo Garcãa De Yebenes, Laura Donker Kaat8, Ranjan Duara31, Alexandra Durr27, Alexandra Durr26, Sebastiaan Engelborghs30, Giovanni Fabbrini29, Nicole A. Finch3, Robyn Flook32, Matthew P. Frosch33, Carles Gaig11, Douglas Galasko34, Thomas Gasser23, Marla Gearing35, Evan T. Geller4, Bernardino Ghetti36, Neill R. Graff-Radford3, Murray Grossman4, Deborah A. Hall37, Lili-Naz Hazrati38, Matthias Höllerhage1, Joseph Jankovic39, Jorge L. Juncos35, Anna Karydas40, Hans A. Kretzschmar41, Isabelle Leber27, Isabelle Leber26, Virginia M.-Y. Lee4, Andrew P. Lieberman20, Kelly E. Lyons42, Claudio Mariani, Eliezer Masliah34, Luke A. Massey5, Catriona McLean43, Nicoletta Meucci, Bruce L. Miller40, Brit Mollenhauer44, Jens Carsten Möller1, Huw R. Morris45, Christopher Morris46, Sean S. O'Sullivan5, Wolfgang H. Oertel1, Donatella Ottaviani29, Alessandro Padovani12, Rajesh Pahwa42, Gianni Pezzoli, Stuart Pickering-Brown47, Werner Poewe48, Alberto Rábano49, Alex Rajput50, Stephen G. Reich51, Gesine Respondek1, Sigrun Roeber41, Jonathan D. Rohrer5, Owen A. Ross3, Martin N. Rossor5, Giorgio Sacilotto, William W. Seeley40, Klaus Seppi48, Laura Silveira-Moriyama5, Salvatore Spina36, Karin Srulijes23, Peter St George-Hyslop52, Maria Stamelou1, David G. Standaert53, Silvana Tesei, Wallace W. Tourtellotte54, Claudia Trenkwalder44, Claire Troakes55, John Q. Trojanowski4, Juan C. Troncoso56, Vivianna M. Van Deerlin4, Jean Paul G. Vonsattel57, Gregor K. Wenning48, Charles L. White58, Pia Winter19, Chris Zarow59, Anna Zecchinelli 
University of Marburg1, University of Pittsburgh2, Mayo Clinic3, University of Pennsylvania4, University College London5, University of Louisville6, Case Western Reserve University7, Erasmus University Rotterdam8, VU University Amsterdam9, University of Tübingen10, University of Barcelona11, University of Brescia12, University of Navarra13, National Institutes of Health14, Scripps Research Institute15, University of British Columbia16, University of Washington17, Rutgers University18, University of Giessen19, University of Michigan20, University of Würzburg21, Autonomous University of Madrid22, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases23, Karolinska Institutet24, University of California, Los Angeles25, French Institute of Health and Medical Research26, Centre national de la recherche scientifique27, Medical University of Vienna28, Sapienza University of Rome29, University of Antwerp30, Mount Sinai Hospital31, Flinders University32, Harvard University33, University of California, San Diego34, Emory University35, Indiana University36, Rush University Medical Center37, University of Toronto38, Baylor College of Medicine39, University of California, San Francisco40, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich41, University of Kansas42, Mental Health Research Institute43, University of Göttingen44, Cardiff University45, Newcastle University46, University of Manchester47, Innsbruck Medical University48, Carlos III Health Institute49, University of Saskatchewan50, University of Maryland, Baltimore51, University of Cambridge52, University of Alabama at Birmingham53, Veterans Health Administration54, King's College London55, Johns Hopkins University56, Columbia University57, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center58, University of Southern California59
TL;DR: Two independent variants in MAPT affecting risk for PSP are confirmed, one of which influences MAPT brain expression and the genes implicated encode proteins for vesicle-membrane fusion at the Golgi-endosomal interface and for a myelin structural component.
Abstract: Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is a movement disorder with prominent tau neuropathology. Brain diseases with abnormal tau deposits are called tauopathies, the most common of which is Alzheimer's disease. Environmental causes of tauopathies include repetitive head trauma associated with some sports. To identify common genetic variation contributing to risk for tauopathies, we carried out a genome-wide association study of 1,114 individuals with PSP (cases) and 3,247 controls (stage 1) followed by a second stage in which we genotyped 1,051 cases and 3,560 controls for the stage 1 SNPs that yielded P ≤ 10−3. We found significant previously unidentified signals (P < 5 × 10−8) associated with PSP risk at STX6, EIF2AK3 and MOBP. We confirmed two independent variants in MAPT affecting risk for PSP, one of which influences MAPT brain expression. The genes implicated encode proteins for vesicle-membrane fusion at the Golgi-endosomal interface, for the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response and for a myelin structural component.

504 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The first all-electron ab initio study of Young's modulus and Poisson ratio for a number of closed single-walled nanotubes is presented in this paper.

502 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors compare the results of various cosmological gas-dynamical codes used to simulate the formation of a galaxy in the Λ cold dark matter structure formation paradigm.
Abstract: We compare the results of various cosmological gas-dynamical codes used to simulate the formation of a galaxy in the Λ cold dark matter structure formation paradigm. The various runs (13 in total) differ in their numerical hydrodynamical treatment [smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH), moving mesh and adaptive mesh refinement] but share the same initial conditions and adopt in each case their latest published model of gas cooling, star formation and feedback. Despite the common halo assembly history, we find large code-to-code variations in the stellar mass, size, morphology and gas content of the galaxy at z= 0, due mainly to the different implementations of star formation and feedback. Compared with observation, most codes tend to produce an overly massive galaxy, smaller and less gas rich than typical spirals, with a massive bulge and a declining rotation curve. A stellar disc is discernible in most simulations, although its prominence varies widely from code to code. There is a well-defined trend between the effects of feedback and the severity of the disagreement with observed spirals. In general, models that are more effective at limiting the baryonic mass of the galaxy come closer to matching observed galaxy scaling laws, but often to the detriment of the disc component. Although numerical convergence is not particularly good for any of the codes, our conclusions hold at two different numerical resolutions. Some differences can also be traced to the different numerical techniques; for example, more gas seems able to cool and become available for star formation in grid-based codes than in SPH. However, this effect is small compared to the variations induced by different feedback prescriptions. We conclude that state-of-the-art simulations cannot yet uniquely predict the properties of the baryonic component of a galaxy, even when the assembly history of its host halo is fully specified. Developing feedback algorithms that can effectively regulate the mass of a galaxy without hindering the formation of high angular momentum stellar discs remains a challenge.

502 citations


Authors

Showing all 16957 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Cornelia M. van Duijn1831030146009
John Hardy1771178171694
Mark Gerstein168751149578
Hannes Jung1592069125069
Rui Zhang1512625107917
Dirk Inzé14964774468
Walter Paulus14980986252
Robin Erbacher1381721100252
Rupert Leitner136120190597
Alison Goate13672185846
Andrea Giammanco135136298093
Maria Spiropulu135145596674
Peter Robmann135143897569
Michael Tytgat134144994133
Matthew Herndon133173297466
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Utrecht University
139.3K papers, 6.2M citations

95% related

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
176.5K papers, 6.2M citations

95% related

University of Amsterdam
140.8K papers, 5.9M citations

95% related

University of Helsinki
113.1K papers, 4.6M citations

94% related

University of British Columbia
209.6K papers, 9.2M citations

94% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023137
2022460
20213,656
20203,332
20192,982
20182,844