Institution
University of Arkansas
Education•Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States•
About: University of Arkansas is a education organization based out in Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 17225 authors who have published 33329 publications receiving 941102 citations. The organization is also known as: Arkansas & UA.
Topics: Population, Poison control, Quantum dot, Broiler, Supply chain
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: In this article, the critical experimental parameters that determine the cycle number of coin cells were investigated to understand the performance variations reported in the literature, and a representative Li-metal pouch cell with specific energy of 300 Wh/kg was exemplified to provide an effective validation of electrode materials and accurate cell performance evaluations.
298 citations
••
TL;DR: The results indicate that similarity-based interference is an important constraint on information processing that can be overcome to some degree during language comprehension by using the coherence of language to construct integrated representations of meaning.
Abstract: Participants remembered a short set of words while read- ing syntactically complex sentences (object-extracted clefts) and syn- tactically simpler sentences (subject-extracted clefts) in a memory-load study. The study also manipulated whether the words in the set and the words in the sentence were of matched or unmatched types (common nouns vs. proper names). Performance in sentence comprehension was worse for complex sentences than for simpler sentences, and this effect was greater when the type of words in the memory load matched the type of words in the sentence. These results indicate that syntactic processing is not modular, instead suggesting that it relies on working memory resources that are used for other nonsyntactic processes. Fur- ther, the results indicate that similarity-based interference is an im- portant constraint on information processing that can be overcome to some degree during language comprehension by using the coherence of language to construct integrated representations of meaning.
297 citations
••
TL;DR: An overview of the enormous morphological, taxonomical and functional diversity of soil protists is provided, and current challenges and opportunities in soil protistology are discussed.
Abstract: Protists include all eukaryotes except plants, fungi and animals. They are an essential, yet often forgotten, component of the soil microbiome. Method developments have now furthered our understanding of the real taxonomic and functional diversity of soil protists. They occupy key roles in microbial foodwebs as consumers of bacteria, fungi and other small eukaryotes. As parasites of plants, animals and even of larger protists, they regulate populations and shape communities. Pathogenic forms play a major role in public health issues as human parasites, or act as agricultural pests. Predatory soil protists release nutrients enhancing plant growth. Soil protists are of key importance for our understanding of eukaryotic evolution and microbial biogeography. Soil protists are also useful in applied research as bioindicators of soil quality, as models in ecotoxicology and as potential biofertilizers and biocontrol agents. In this review, we provide an overview of the enormous morphological, taxonomical and functional diversity of soil protists, and discuss current challenges and opportunities in soil protistology. Research in soil biology would clearly benefit from incorporating more protistology alongside the study of bacteria, fungi and animals.
297 citations
••
[...]
Eindhoven University of Technology1, Max Planck Society2, National Scientific and Technical Research Council3, University of Groningen4, Flinders University5, University of Oxford6, Illinois Institute of Technology7, Nottingham Trent University8, Bielefeld University9, University of Nevada, Las Vegas10, University of Wisconsin-Madison11, Missouri State University12, University of Arkansas13, Leiden University14, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven15, Linnaeus University16, Tzu Chi University17, University of British Columbia18, University of Cambridge19, University of Edinburgh20, Bangor University21, University of Glasgow22, Linköping University23, Florida State University24, Yale University25, University of Louisiana at Lafayette26, University of Texas at Austin27, St. Edward's University28, West Virginia University29, Rutgers University30, Indiana University31, RWTH Aachen University32, Keele University33, University of Tübingen34, Radboud University Nijmegen35, University of Chester36, New York University37, University of Nottingham38, Erasmus University Rotterdam39, University of Bristol40, Sahlgrenska University Hospital41, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań42, University of Connecticut43, Charité44, Humboldt University of Berlin45, University of Fribourg46, University of Kent47, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic48, RAND Corporation49, Baylor University50, Virginia Tech51, Northern Illinois University52, Open University53, King's College London54, Stockholm University55, Stanford University56, Karolinska Institutet57, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina58, University of Tromsø59, DePaul University60, Boğaziçi University61, University of Cologne62, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology63, University of Leeds64, University of Virginia65, Center for Open Science66, National Institutes of Health67, University of Southern Indiana68, Autonomous University of Madrid69, Utrecht University70, Tilburg University71, Massey University72, Saint Louis University73, University of California, Davis74, Ghent University75
TL;DR: In response to recommendations to redefine statistical significance to P ≤ 0.005, it is proposed that researchers should transparently report and justify all choices they make when designing a study, including the alpha level.
Abstract: In response to recommendations to redefine statistical significance to P ≤ 0.005, we propose that researchers should transparently report and justify all choices they make when designing a study, including the alpha level.
296 citations
•
TL;DR: The authors found a negative association between inside debt holdings and the volatility of future firm stock returns, R&D expenditures, and financial leverage and a positive association between CEO inside debt holders and the extent of diversification and asset liquidity.
Abstract: CEO inside debt holdings (pension benefits and deferred compensation) are generally unsecured and unfunded liabilities of the firm. Because these characteristics of inside debt expose the CEO to default risk similar to that faced by outside creditors, theory predicts that CEOs with large inside debt holdings will display lower levels of risk-seeking behavior (Jensen and Meckling, 1976). Consistent with the theoretical predictions, we find a negative association between CEO inside debt holdings and the volatility of future firm stock returns, R&D expenditures, and financial leverage and a positive association between CEO inside debt holdings and the extent of diversification and asset liquidity. Collectively, our results provide empirical evidence suggesting that CEOs with large inside debt holdings prefer investment and financial policies that are less risky.
295 citations
Authors
Showing all 17387 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Robert M. Califf | 196 | 1561 | 167961 |
Hugh A. Sampson | 147 | 816 | 76492 |
Stephen Boyd | 138 | 822 | 151205 |
Nikhil C. Munshi | 134 | 906 | 67349 |
Jian-Guo Bian | 128 | 1219 | 80964 |
Bart Barlogie | 126 | 779 | 57803 |
Robert R. Wolfe | 124 | 566 | 54000 |
Daniel B. Mark | 124 | 576 | 78385 |
E. Magnus Ohman | 124 | 622 | 68976 |
Benoît Roux | 120 | 493 | 62215 |
Robert C. Haddon | 112 | 577 | 52712 |
Rodney J. Bartlett | 109 | 700 | 56154 |
Baoshan Xing | 109 | 823 | 48944 |
Gareth J. Morgan | 109 | 1019 | 52957 |
Josep Dalmau | 108 | 568 | 49331 |