scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "University of Barcelona published in 2021"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The content of these European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines has been published for personal and educational use only and no commercial use is authorized.
Abstract: Supplementary Table 9, column 'Edoxaban', row 'eGFR category', '95 mL/min' (page 15). The cell should be coloured green instead of yellow. It should also read "60 mg"instead of "60 mg (use with caution in 'supranormal' renal function)."In the above-indicated cell, a footnote has also been added to state: "Edoxaban should be used in patients with high creatinine clearance only after a careful evaluation of the individual thromboembolic and bleeding risk."Supplementary Table 9, column 'Edoxaban', row 'Dose reduction in selected patients' (page 16). The cell should read "Edoxaban 60 mg reduced to 30 mg once daily if any of the following: creatinine clearance 15-50 mL/min, body weight <60 kg, concomitant use of dronedarone, erythromycin, ciclosporine or ketokonazole"instead of "Edoxaban 60 mg reduced to 30 mg once daily, and edoxaban 30 mg reduced to 15mg once daily, if any of the following: creatinine clearance of 30-50 mL/min, body weight <60 kg, concomitant us of verapamil or quinidine or dronedarone."

4,285 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Survey data from across 19 countries reveal heterogeneity in attitudes toward acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine and suggest that trust in government is associated with vaccine confidence.
Abstract: Several coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines are currently in human trials. In June 2020, we surveyed 13,426 people in 19 countries to determine potential acceptance rates and factors influencing acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine. Of these, 71.5% of participants reported that they would be very or somewhat likely to take a COVID-19 vaccine, and 48.1% reported that they would accept their employer's recommendation to do so. Differences in acceptance rates ranged from almost 90% (in China) to less than 55% (in Russia). Respondents reporting higher levels of trust in information from government sources were more likely to accept a vaccine and take their employer's advice to do so.

1,923 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes.
Abstract: In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.

1,129 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results of a collaborative multistakeholder consensus project on advanced bladder cancer (BC) have been incorporated in the 2020 guidelines, addressing those areas where it is unlikely that prospective comparative studies will be conducted.

946 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present those that have primed a change in the strategy and comment why some encouraging data in select interventions are still considered immature and in need to further research to gain their incorporation into an evidence-based model for clinicians and researchers.

774 citations



Journal ArticleDOI
Shadab Alam1, Marie Aubert, Santiago Avila2, Christophe Balland3, Julian E. Bautista4, Matthew A. Bershady5, Matthew A. Bershady6, Dmitry Bizyaev7, Dmitry Bizyaev8, Michael R. Blanton9, Adam S. Bolton10, Jo Bovy11, Jonathan Brinkmann8, Joel R. Brownstein10, Etienne Burtin12, Solène Chabanier12, Michael J. Chapman13, Peter Doohyun Choi14, Chia-Hsun Chuang15, Johan Comparat16, M. C. Cousinou, Andrei Cuceu17, Kyle S. Dawson10, Sylvain de la Torre, Arnaud de Mattia12, Victoria de Sainte Agathe3, Hélion du Mas des Bourboux10, Stephanie Escoffier, Thomas Etourneau12, James Farr17, Andreu Font-Ribera17, Peter M. Frinchaboy18, S. Fromenteau19, Héctor Gil-Marín20, Jean Marc Le Goff12, Alma X. Gonzalez-Morales21, Alma X. Gonzalez-Morales22, Violeta Gonzalez-Perez23, Violeta Gonzalez-Perez4, Kathleen Grabowski8, Julien Guy24, Adam J. Hawken, Jiamin Hou16, Hui Kong25, James C. Parker8, Mark A. Klaene8, Jean-Paul Kneib26, Sicheng Lin9, Daniel Long8, Brad W. Lyke27, Axel de la Macorra19, Paul Martini25, Karen L. Masters28, Faizan G. Mohammad13, Jeongin Moon14, Eva Maria Mueller29, Andrea Muñoz-Gutiérrez19, Adam D. Myers27, Seshadri Nadathur4, Richard Neveux12, Jeffrey A. Newman30, P. Noterdaeme3, Audrey Oravetz8, Daniel Oravetz8, Nathalie Palanque-Delabrouille12, Kaike Pan8, Romain Paviot, Will J. Percival13, Will J. Percival31, Ignasi Pérez-Ràfols3, Patrick Petitjean3, Matthew M. Pieri, Abhishek Prakash32, Anand Raichoor26, Corentin Ravoux12, Mehdi Rezaie33, J. Rich12, Ashley J. Ross25, Graziano Rossi14, Rossana Ruggeri4, Rossana Ruggeri34, V. Ruhlmann-Kleider12, Ariel G. Sánchez16, F. Javier Sánchez35, José R. Sánchez-Gallego36, Conor Sayres36, Donald P. Schneider, Hee-Jong Seo33, Arman Shafieloo37, Anže Slosar38, Alex Smith12, Julianna Stermer3, Amélie Tamone26, Jeremy L. Tinker9, Rita Tojeiro39, Mariana Vargas-Magaña19, Andrei Variu26, Yuting Wang, Benjamin A. Weaver, Anne-Marie Weijmans39, C. Yeche12, Pauline Zarrouk40, Pauline Zarrouk12, Cheng Zhao26, Gong-Bo Zhao, Zheng Zheng10 
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present the cosmological implications from final measurements of clustering using galaxies, quasars, and Lyα forests from the completed SDSS lineage of experiments in large-scale structure.
Abstract: We present the cosmological implications from final measurements of clustering using galaxies, quasars, and Lyα forests from the completed Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) lineage of experiments in large-scale structure. These experiments, composed of data from SDSS, SDSS-II, BOSS, and eBOSS, offer independent measurements of baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements of angular-diameter distances and Hubble distances relative to the sound horizon, rd, from eight different samples and six measurements of the growth rate parameter, fσ8, from redshift-space distortions (RSD). This composite sample is the most constraining of its kind and allows us to perform a comprehensive assessment of the cosmological model after two decades of dedicated spectroscopic observation. We show that the BAO data alone are able to rule out dark-energy-free models at more than eight standard deviations in an extension to the flat, ΛCDM model that allows for curvature. When combined with Planck Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) measurements of temperature and polarization, under the same model, the BAO data provide nearly an order of magnitude improvement on curvature constraints relative to primary CMB constraints alone. Independent of distance measurements, the SDSS RSD data complement weak lensing measurements from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) in demonstrating a preference for a flat ΛCDM cosmological model when combined with Planck measurements. The combined BAO and RSD measurements indicate σ8=0.85±0.03, implying a growth rate that is consistent with predictions from Planck temperature and polarization data and with General Relativity. When combining the results of SDSS BAO and RSD, Planck, Pantheon Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia), and DES weak lensing and clustering measurements, all multiple-parameter extensions remain consistent with a ΛCDM model. Regardless of cosmological model, the precision on each of the three parameters, ωΛ, H0, and σ8, remains at roughly 1%, showing changes of less than 0.6% in the central values between models. In a model that allows for free curvature and a time-evolving equation of state for dark energy, the combined samples produce a constraint ωk=-0.0022±0.0022. The dark energy constraints lead to w0=-0.909±0.081 and wa=-0.49-0.30+0.35, corresponding to an equation of state of wp=-1.018±0.032 at a pivot redshift zp=0.29 and a Dark Energy Task Force Figure of Merit of 94. The inverse distance ladder measurement under this model yields H0=68.18±0.79 km s-1 Mpc-1, remaining in tension with several direct determination methods; the BAO data allow Hubble constant estimates that are robust against the assumption of the cosmological model. In addition, the BAO data allow estimates of H0 that are independent of the CMB data, with similar central values and precision under a ΛCDM model. Our most constraining combination of data gives the upper limit on the sum of neutrino masses at mν<0.115 eV (95% confidence). Finally, we consider the improvements in cosmology constraints over the last decade by comparing our results to a sample representative of the period 2000-2010. We compute the relative gain across the five dimensions spanned by w, ωk, mν, H0, and σ8 and find that the SDSS BAO and RSD data reduce the total posterior volume by a factor of 40 relative to the previous generation. Adding again the Planck, DES, and Pantheon SN Ia samples leads to an overall contraction in the five-dimensional posterior volume of 3 orders of magnitude.

575 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
Dominik Pfister1, Dominik Pfister2, Nicolás Gonzalo Núñez3, Roser Pinyol4, Olivier Govaere5, Matthias Pinter6, Marta Szydlowska2, Revant Gupta7, Mengjie Qiu8, Aleksandra Deczkowska9, Assaf Weiner9, Florian Müller2, Ankit Sinha10, Ankit Sinha11, Ekaterina Friebel3, Thomas Engleitner11, Thomas Engleitner2, Daniela Lenggenhager3, Anja Moncsek3, Danijela Heide2, Kristin Stirm2, Jan Kosla2, Eleni Kotsiliti2, Valentina Leone2, Michael Dudek11, Suhail Yousuf8, Donato Inverso12, Donato Inverso2, Indrabahadur Singh2, Ana Teijeiro, Florian Castet4, Carla Montironi4, Philipp K. Haber13, Dina Tiniakos14, Dina Tiniakos5, Pierre Bedossa5, Simon Cockell5, Ramy Younes15, Ramy Younes5, Michele Vacca16, Fabio Marra17, Jörn M. Schattenberg, Michael Allison16, Elisabetta Bugianesi15, Vlad Ratziu18, Tiziana Pressiani, Antonio D'Alessio, Nicola Personeni19, Lorenza Rimassa19, Ann K. Daly5, Bernhard Scheiner6, Katharina Pomej6, Martha M. Kirstein20, Arndt Vogel20, Markus Peck-Radosavljevic, F. Hucke, Fabian Finkelmeier, Oliver Waidmann, Jörg Trojan, Kornelius Schulze21, Henning Wege21, Sandra Koch22, Arndt Weinmann22, Marco Bueter3, Fabian Rössler3, Alexander Siebenhüner3, Sara De Dosso, Jan-Philipp Mallm2, Viktor Umansky2, Viktor Umansky12, Manfred Jugold2, Tom Luedde23, Andrea Schietinger24, Andrea Schietinger25, Peter Schirmacher8, Brinda Emu2, Hellmut G. Augustin2, Hellmut G. Augustin12, Adrian T. Billeter8, Beat P. Müller-Stich8, Hiroto Kikuchi26, Dan G. Duda26, Fabian Kütting27, Dirk Waldschmidt27, Matthias P. Ebert12, Nuh N. Rahbari12, Henrik E. Mei28, Axel Schulz28, Marc Ringelhan11, Nisar P. Malek, Stephan Spahn, Michael Bitzer, Marina Ruiz de Galarreta13, Amaia Lujambio13, Jean-François Dufour29, Thomas U. Marron30, Thomas U. Marron13, Ahmed Kaseb31, Masatoshi Kudo32, Yi Hsiang Huang33, Yi Hsiang Huang34, Nabil Djouder, Katharina Wolter7, Lars Zender7, Lars Zender2, Parice N. Marche35, Parice N. Marche36, Thomas Decaens35, Thomas Decaens36, David J. Pinato37, Roland Rad11, Roland Rad2, Joachim C. Mertens3, Achim Weber3, Kristian Unger, Felix Meissner10, Susanne Roth8, Zuzana Macek Jilkova37, Zuzana Macek Jilkova36, Zuzana Macek Jilkova35, Manfred Claassen7, Quentin M. Anstee5, Ido Amit9, Percy A. Knolle11, Burkhard Becher3, Josep M. Llovet13, Josep M. Llovet4, Josep M. Llovet38, Mathias Heikenwalder2 
15 Apr 2021-Nature
TL;DR: The progressive accumulation of exhausted, unconventionally activated CD8+PD1+ T cells in NASH-affected livers provides a rationale for stratification of patients with HCC according to underlying aetiology in studies of immunotherapy as a primary or adjuvant treatment.
Abstract: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can have viral or non-viral causes1-5. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is an important driver of HCC. Immunotherapy has been approved for treating HCC, but biomarker-based stratification of patients for optimal response to therapy is an unmet need6,7. Here we report the progressive accumulation of exhausted, unconventionally activated CD8+PD1+ T cells in NASH-affected livers. In preclinical models of NASH-induced HCC, therapeutic immunotherapy targeted at programmed death-1 (PD1) expanded activated CD8+PD1+ T cells within tumours but did not lead to tumour regression, which indicates that tumour immune surveillance was impaired. When given prophylactically, anti-PD1 treatment led to an increase in the incidence of NASH-HCC and in the number and size of tumour nodules, which correlated with increased hepatic CD8+PD1+CXCR6+, TOX+, and TNF+ T cells. The increase in HCC triggered by anti-PD1 treatment was prevented by depletion of CD8+ T cells or TNF neutralization, suggesting that CD8+ T cells help to induce NASH-HCC, rather than invigorating or executing immune surveillance. We found similar phenotypic and functional profiles in hepatic CD8+PD1+ T cells from humans with NAFLD or NASH. A meta-analysis of three randomized phase III clinical trials that tested inhibitors of PDL1 (programmed death-ligand 1) or PD1 in more than 1,600 patients with advanced HCC revealed that immune therapy did not improve survival in patients with non-viral HCC. In two additional cohorts, patients with NASH-driven HCC who received anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 treatment showed reduced overall survival compared to patients with other aetiologies. Collectively, these data show that non-viral HCC, and particularly NASH-HCC, might be less responsive to immunotherapy, probably owing to NASH-related aberrant T cell activation causing tissue damage that leads to impaired immune surveillance. Our data provide a rationale for stratification of patients with HCC according to underlying aetiology in studies of immunotherapy as a primary or adjuvant treatment.

526 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
Lennart Lindegren1, Sergei A. Klioner2, Jose M Hernandez3, Alex Bombrun3, M. Ramos-Lerate3, H. Steidelmüller2, Ulrich Bastian4, M. Biermann4, A. de Torres3, E. Gerlach2, R. Geyer2, Thomas Hilger2, David Hobbs1, U. Lammers3, Paul J. McMillan1, C.A. Stephenson3, J. Castañeda5, Michael Davidson6, C. Fabricius5, G. Gracia-Abril4, Jordi Portell5, Nicholas Rowell6, David Teyssier3, F. Torra5, S. Bartolomé5, M. Clotet5, N. Garralda5, J.J. González-Vidal5, J. Torra5, U. Abbas7, Martin Altmann4, Martin Altmann8, E. Anglada Varela3, L. Balaguer-Núñez5, Zoltan Balog9, Zoltan Balog4, C. Barache8, Ugo Becciani7, M. Bernet5, Stefano Bertone10, Stefano Bertone7, Stefano Bertone11, Luciana Bianchi, S. Bouquillon8, Anthony G. A. Brown12, Beatrice Bucciarelli7, D. Busonero7, A. G. Butkevich7, R. Buzzi7, Rossella Cancelliere13, T. Carlucci8, Patrick Charlot14, Maria-Rosa L. Cioni15, Mariateresa Crosta7, C. Crowley3, E. F. del Peloso4, E. del Pozo3, Ronald Drimmel7, P. Esquej3, Agnes Fienga8, Agnes Fienga14, E. Fraile3, Mario Gai7, M. Garcia-Reinaldos3, Raphael Guerra3, Nigel Hambly6, M. Hauser9, K. Janßen15, Stefan Jordan4, Z. Kostrzewa-Rutkowska16, Z. Kostrzewa-Rutkowska12, Massimiliano Lattanzi7, Massimiliano Lattanzi13, S. Liao7, E. Licata7, Tim Lister17, W. Löffler4, Jon Marchant18, A. Masip5, Francois Mignard14, Alexey Mints15, D. Molina5, Alcione Mora3, Roberto Morbidelli7, C. P. Murphy3, C. Pagani19, Pasquale Panuzzo8, X. Peñalosa Esteller5, E. Poggio7, P. Re Fiorentin7, Alberto Riva7, A. Sagristà Sellés4, V. Sanchez Gimenez5, M. Sarasso7, Eva Sciacca7, H. I. Siddiqui20, Richard L. Smart7, D. Souami21, D. Souami8, Alessandro Spagna7, Iain A. Steele18, F. Taris8, E. Utrilla3, W. van Reeven3, Alberto Vecchiato7 
TL;DR: Gaia Early Data Release 3 (Gaia EDR3) as mentioned in this paper contains results for 1.812 billion sources in the magnitude range G = 3-21 based on observations collected by the European Space Agency Gaia satellite during the first 34 months of its operational phase.
Abstract: Context. Gaia Early Data Release 3 (Gaia EDR3) contains results for 1.812 billion sources in the magnitude range G = 3–21 based on observations collected by the European Space Agency Gaia satellite during the first 34 months of its operational phase.Aims. We describe the input data, the models, and the processing used for the astrometric content of Gaia EDR3, as well as the validation of these results performed within the astrometry task.Methods. The processing broadly followed the same procedures as for Gaia DR2, but with significant improvements to the modelling of observations. For the first time in the Gaia data processing, colour-dependent calibrations of the line- and point-spread functions have been used for sources with well-determined colours from DR2. In the astrometric processing these sources obtained five-parameter solutions, whereas other sources were processed using a special calibration that allowed a pseudocolour to be estimated as the sixth astrometric parameter. Compared with DR2, the astrometric calibration models have been extended, and the spin-related distortion model includes a self-consistent determination of basic-angle variations, improving the global parallax zero point.Results. Gaia EDR3 gives full astrometric data (positions at epoch J2016.0, parallaxes, and proper motions) for 1.468 billion sources (585 millionwith five-parameter solutions, 882 million with six parameters), and mean positions at J2016.0 for an additional 344 million.Solutions with five parameters are generally more accurate than six-parameter solutions, and are available for 93% of the sources brighter than the 17th magnitude. The median uncertainty in parallax and annual proper motion is 0.02–0.03 mas at magnitude G = 9–14, and around 0.5 mas at G = 20. Extensive characterisation of the statistical properties of the solutions is provided, including the estimated angular power spectrum of parallax bias from the quasars.

475 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
Richard J. Abbott1, T. D. Abbott2, Sheelu Abraham3, Fausto Acernese4  +1428 moreInstitutions (155)
TL;DR: In this article, the population of 47 compact binary mergers detected with a false-alarm rate of 0.614 were dynamically assembled, and the authors found that the BBH rate likely increases with redshift, but not faster than the star formation rate.
Abstract: We report on the population of 47 compact binary mergers detected with a false-alarm rate of 0.01 are dynamically assembled. Third, we estimate merger rates, finding RBBH = 23.9-+8.614.3 Gpc-3 yr-1 for BBHs and RBNS = 320-+240490 Gpc-3 yr-1 for binary neutron stars. We find that the BBH rate likely increases with redshift (85% credibility) but not faster than the star formation rate (86% credibility). Additionally, we examine recent exceptional events in the context of our population models, finding that the asymmetric masses of GW190412 and the high component masses of GW190521 are consistent with our models, but the low secondary mass of GW190814 makes it an outlier.

468 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Compared with a global estimated prevalence of depression of 3.44% in 2017, the pooled prevalence of 25% appears to be 7 times higher, thus suggesting an important impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on people's mental health.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors performed a genome-wide association study of 41,917 bipolar disorder cases and 371,549 controls of European ancestry, which identified 64 associated genomic loci, including genes encoding targets of antipsychotics, calcium channel blockers, antiepileptics and anesthetics.
Abstract: Bipolar disorder is a heritable mental illness with complex etiology. We performed a genome-wide association study of 41,917 bipolar disorder cases and 371,549 controls of European ancestry, which identified 64 associated genomic loci. Bipolar disorder risk alleles were enriched in genes in synaptic signaling pathways and brain-expressed genes, particularly those with high specificity of expression in neurons of the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus. Significant signal enrichment was found in genes encoding targets of antipsychotics, calcium channel blockers, antiepileptics and anesthetics. Integrating expression quantitative trait locus data implicated 15 genes robustly linked to bipolar disorder via gene expression, encoding druggable targets such as HTR6, MCHR1, DCLK3 and FURIN. Analyses of bipolar disorder subtypes indicated high but imperfect genetic correlation between bipolar disorder type I and II and identified additional associated loci. Together, these results advance our understanding of the biological etiology of bipolar disorder, identify novel therapeutic leads and prioritize genes for functional follow-up studies.

Journal ArticleDOI
Richard J. Abbott1, T. D. Abbott2, Sheelu Abraham3, Fausto Acernese4  +1692 moreInstitutions (195)
TL;DR: In this article, the authors reported the observation of gravitational waves from two compact binary coalescences in LIGO's and Virgo's third observing run with properties consistent with neutron star-black hole (NSBH) binaries.
Abstract: We report the observation of gravitational waves from two compact binary coalescences in LIGO’s and Virgo’s third observing run with properties consistent with neutron star–black hole (NSBH) binaries. The two events are named GW200105_162426 and GW200115_042309, abbreviated as GW200105 and GW200115; the first was observed by LIGO Livingston and Virgo and the second by all three LIGO–Virgo detectors. The source of GW200105 has component masses 8.9−1.5+1.2 and 1.9−0.2+0.3M⊙ , whereas the source of GW200115 has component masses 5.7−2.1+1.8 and 1.5−0.3+0.7M⊙ (all measurements quoted at the 90% credible level). The probability that the secondary’s mass is below the maximal mass of a neutron star is 89%–96% and 87%–98%, respectively, for GW200105 and GW200115, with the ranges arising from different astrophysical assumptions. The source luminosity distances are 280−110+110 and 300−100+150Mpc , respectively. The magnitude of the primary spin of GW200105 is less than 0.23 at the 90% credible level, and its orientation is unconstrained. For GW200115, the primary spin has a negative spin projection onto the orbital angular momentum at 88% probability. We are unable to constrain the spin or tidal deformation of the secondary component for either event. We infer an NSBH merger rate density of 45−33+75Gpc−3yr−1 when assuming that GW200105 and GW200115 are representative of the NSBH population or 130−69+112Gpc−3yr−1 under the assumption of a broader distribution of component masses.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A review of the immune microenvironments underlying the response or resistance of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to immunotherapies is presented in this paper, where current evidence from phase III trials on the efficacy, immune-related adverse events and aetiology-dependent mechanisms of response are described.
Abstract: Liver cancer, more specifically hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is the second leading cause of cancer-related death and its incidence is increasing globally. Around 50% of patients with HCC receive systemic therapies, traditionally sorafenib or lenvatinib in the first line and regorafenib, cabozantinib or ramucirumab in the second line. In the past 5 years, immune-checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the management of HCC. The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab has been shown to improve overall survival relative to sorafenib, resulting in FDA approval of this regimen. More recently, durvalumab plus tremelimumab yielded superior overall survival versus sorafenib and atezolizumab plus cabozantinib yielded superior progression-free survival. In addition, pembrolizumab monotherapy and the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab have received FDA Accelerated Approval in the second-line setting based on early efficacy data. Despite these major advances, the molecular underpinnings governing immune responses and evasion remain unclear. The immune microenvironment has crucial roles in the development and progression of HCC and distinct aetiology-dependent immune features have been defined. Inflamed and non-inflamed classes of HCC and genomic signatures have been associated with response to immune-checkpoint inhibitors, yet no validated biomarker is available to guide clinical decision-making. This Review provides information on the immune microenvironments underlying the response or resistance of HCC to immunotherapies. In addition, current evidence from phase III trials on the efficacy, immune-related adverse events and aetiology-dependent mechanisms of response are described. Finally, we discuss emerging trials assessing immunotherapies across all stages of HCC that might change the management of this disease in the near future.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An overview of the management of patients with COPD during the COVID-19 pandemic is presented and inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting bronchodilators, roflumilast, or chronic macrolides should be used as indicated for stable COPD management.
Abstract: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has raised many questions about the management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and whether modifications of their therapy are required. It has raised questions about recognizing and differentiating coronavirus disease (COVID-19) from COPD given the similarity of the symptoms. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Science Committee used established methods for literature review to present an overview of the management of patients with COPD during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is unclear whether patients with COPD are at increased risk of becoming infected with SARS-CoV-2. During periods of high community prevalence of COVID-19, spirometry should only be used when it is essential for COPD diagnosis and/or to assess lung function status for interventional procedures or surgery. Patients with COPD should follow basic infection control measures, including social distancing, hand washing, and wearing a mask or face covering. Patients should remain up to date with appropriate vaccinations, particularly annual influenza vaccination. Although data are limited, inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting bronchodilators, roflumilast, or chronic macrolides should continue to be used as indicated for stable COPD management. Systemic steroids and antibiotics should be used in COPD exacerbations according to the usual indications. Differentiating symptoms of COVID-19 infection from chronic underlying symptoms or those of an acute COPD exacerbation may be challenging. If there is suspicion for COVID-19, testing for SARS-CoV-2 should be considered. Patients who developed moderate-to-severe COVID-19, including hospitalization and pneumonia, should be treated with evolving pharmacotherapeutic approaches as appropriate, including remdesivir, dexamethasone, and anticoagulation. Managing acute respiratory failure should include appropriate oxygen supplementation, prone positioning, noninvasive ventilation, and protective lung strategy in patients with COPD and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Patients who developed asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 should be followed with the usual COPD protocols. Patients who developed moderate or worse COVID-19 should be monitored more frequently and accurately than the usual patients with COPD, with particular attention to the need for oxygen therapy.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that baseline liver disease stage and ALD are independent risk factor for death from COVID-19, which is the largest reported cohort of CLD and cirrhosis patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection to date.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on the photometric content, describing the input data, the algorithms, the processing, and the validation of the results of Gaia EDR3.
Abstract: Context. Gaia Early Data Release 3 (Gaia EDR3) contains astrometry and photometry results for about 1.8 billion sources based on observations collected by the European Space Agency Gaia satellite during the first 34 months of its operational phase.Aims. In this paper, we focus on the photometric content, describing the input data, the algorithms, the processing, and the validation of the results. Particular attention is given to the quality of the data and to a number of features that users may need to take into account to make the best use of the Gaia EDR3 catalogue.Methods. The processing broadly followed the same procedure as for Gaia DR2, but with significant improvements in several aspects of the blue and red photometer (BP and RP) preprocessing and in the photometric calibration process. In particular, the treatment of the BP and RP background has been updated to include a better estimation of the local background, and the detection of crowding effects has been used to exclude affected data from the calibrations. The photometric calibration models have also been updated to account for flux loss over the whole magnitude range. Significant improvements in the modelling and calibration of the Gaia point and line spread functions have also helped to reduce a number of instrumental effects that were still present in DR2. Results. Gaia EDR3 contains 1.806 billion sources with G -band photometry and 1.540 billion sources with G BP and G RP photometry. The median uncertainty in the G -band photometry, as measured from the standard deviation of the internally calibrated mean photometry for a given source, is 0.2 mmag at magnitude G = 10–14, 0.8 mmag at G ≈ 17, and 2.6 mmag at G ≈ 19. The significant magnitude term found in the Gaia DR2 photometry is no longer visible, and overall there are no trends larger than 1 mmag mag−1 . Using one passband over the whole colour and magnitude range leaves no systematics above the 1% level in magnitude in any of the bands, and a larger systematic is present for a very small sample of bright and blue sources. A detailed description of the residual systematic effects is provided. Overall the quality of the calibrated mean photometry in Gaia EDR3 is superior with respect to DR2 for all bands.


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors reviewed the intricacies of COVID-19 pathophysiology, its various phenotypes, and the anti-SARS-CoV-2 host response at the humoral and cellular levels.

Journal ArticleDOI
Eleonora Di Valentino1, Luis A. Anchordoqui2, Özgür Akarsu3, Yacine Ali-Haïmoud4, Luca Amendola5, Nikki Arendse6, Marika Asgari7, Mario Ballardini8, Spyros Basilakos9, Elia S. Battistelli10, Micol Benetti11, Simon Birrer12, François R. Bouchet13, Marco Bruni14, Erminia Calabrese15, David Camarena16, Salvatore Capozziello11, Angela Chen17, Jens Chluba1, Anton Chudaykin, Eoin Ó Colgáin18, Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine19, Paolo de Bernardis10, Javier de Cruz Pérez20, Jacques Delabrouille21, Jo Dunkley22, Celia Escamilla-Rivera23, Agnès Ferté24, Fabio Finelli25, Wendy L. Freedman26, Noemi Frusciante, Elena Giusarma27, Adrià Gómez-Valent5, Julien Guy28, Will Handley29, Ian Harrison1, Luke Hart1, Alan Heavens30, Hendrik Hildebrandt31, Daniel E. Holz26, Dragan Huterer17, Mikhail M. Ivanov4, Shahab Joudaki32, Shahab Joudaki33, Marc Kamionkowski34, Tanvi Karwal35, Lloyd Knox36, Suresh Kumar37, Luca Lamagna10, Julien Lesgourgues38, Matteo Lucca39, Valerio Marra16, Silvia Masi10, Sabino Matarrese40, Arindam Mazumdar41, Alessandro Melchiorri10, Olga Mena42, Laura Mersini-Houghton43, Vivian Miranda44, Cristian Moreno-Pulido20, David F. Mota45, J. Muir12, Ankan Mukherjee46, Florian Niedermann47, Alessio Notari20, Rafael C. Nunes48, Francesco Pace1, Andronikos Paliathanasis, Antonella Palmese49, Supriya Pan50, Daniela Paoletti25, Valeria Pettorino51, F. Piacentini10, Vivian Poulin52, Marco Raveri35, Adam G. Riess34, Vincenzo Salzano53, Emmanuel N. Saridakis, Anjan A. Sen46, Arman Shafieloo54, Anowar J. Shajib55, Joseph Silk56, Joseph Silk34, Alessandra Silvestri57, Martin S. Sloth47, Tristan L. Smith58, Joan Solà Peracaula20, Carsten van de Bruck59, Licia Verde20, Luca Visinelli60, Benjamin D. Wandelt56, Deng Wang, Jian-Min Wang, Anil Kumar Yadav61, Weiqiang Yang62 
University of Manchester1, City University of New York2, Istanbul Technical University3, New York University4, Heidelberg University5, Niels Bohr Institute6, University of Edinburgh7, University of Bologna8, Academy of Athens9, Sapienza University of Rome10, University of Naples Federico II11, Stanford University12, Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris13, University of Portsmouth14, Cardiff University15, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo16, University of Michigan17, Asia Pacific Center for Theoretical Physics18, University of New Mexico19, University of Barcelona20, University of St. Thomas (Minnesota)21, Princeton University22, National Autonomous University of Mexico23, California Institute of Technology24, INAF25, University of Chicago26, Michigan Technological University27, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory28, University of Cambridge29, Imperial College London30, Ruhr University Bochum31, University of Waterloo32, University of Oxford33, Johns Hopkins University34, University of Pennsylvania35, University of California, Davis36, Birla Institute of Technology and Science37, RWTH Aachen University38, Université libre de Bruxelles39, University of Padua40, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur41, Spanish National Research Council42, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill43, University of Arizona44, University of Oslo45, Jamia Millia Islamia46, University of Southern Denmark47, National Institute for Space Research48, Fermilab49, Presidency University, Kolkata50, Université Paris-Saclay51, University of Montpellier52, University of Szczecin53, Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute54, University of California, Los Angeles55, University of Paris56, Leiden University57, Swarthmore College58, University of Sheffield59, University of Amsterdam60, United College, Winnipeg61, Liaoning Normal University62
TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on the 4.4σ tension between the Planck estimate of the Hubble constant H0 and the SH0ES collaboration measurements and discuss how the next decade's experiments will be crucial.

Journal ArticleDOI
Richard J. Abbott1, T. D. Abbott2, Sheelu Abraham3, Fausto Acernese4  +1335 moreInstitutions (144)
TL;DR: The data recorded by these instruments during their first and second observing runs are described, including the gravitational-wave strain arrays, released as time series sampled at 16384 Hz.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: La declaracion prisma 2020 sustituye a laDeclaracion PRISMA 2020 e incluye una nueva guia of presentacion de las publicaciones that refleja los avances en los metodos para identificar, seleccionar, evaluar, Evaluar and sintetizar estudios.
Abstract: Resumen La declaracion PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses), publicada en 2009, se diseno para ayudar a los autores de revisiones sistematicas a documentar de manera transparente el porque de la revision, que hicieron los autores y que encontraron. Durante la ultima decada, ha habido muchos avances en la metodologia y terminologia de las revisiones sistematicas, lo que ha requerido una actualizacion de esta guia. La declaracion prisma 2020 sustituye a la declaracion de 2009 e incluye una nueva guia de presentacion de las publicaciones que refleja los avances en los metodos para identificar, seleccionar, evaluar y sintetizar estudios. La estructura y la presentacion de los items ha sido modificada para facilitar su implementacion. En este articulo, presentamos la lista de verificacion PRISMA 2020 con 27 items, y una lista de verificacion ampliada que detalla las recomendaciones en la publicacion de cada item, la lista de verificacion del resumen estructurado PRISMA 2020 y el diagrama de flujo revisado para revisiones sistematicas.

Journal ArticleDOI
Richard R. Orlandi1, Todd T. Kingdom2, Timothy L. Smith3, Benjamin S. Bleier4, Adam S. DeConde5, Amber U Luong6, David M. Poetker7, Zachary M. Soler8, Kevin C. Welch9, Sarah K. Wise10, Nithin D. Adappa11, Jeremiah A. Alt1, Wilma Terezinha Anselmo-Lima12, Claus Bachert13, Claus Bachert14, Claus Bachert15, Fuad M. Baroody16, Pete S. Batra17, Manuel Bernal-Sprekelsen18, Daniel M. Beswick19, Neil Bhattacharyya4, Rakesh K. Chandra20, Eugene H. Chang21, Alexander G. Chiu22, Naweed I. Chowdhury20, Martin J. Citardi6, Noam A. Cohen11, David B. Conley9, John M. DelGaudio10, Martin Desrosiers23, Richard G. Douglas24, Jean Anderson Eloy25, Wytske Fokkens26, Stacey T. Gray4, David A. Gudis27, Daniel L. Hamilos4, Joseph K. Han28, Richard J. Harvey29, Peter Hellings30, Eric H. Holbrook4, Claire Hopkins31, Peter H. Hwang32, Amin R. Javer33, Rong San Jiang, David N. Kennedy11, Robert C. Kern9, Tanya M. Laidlaw4, Devyani Lal34, Andrew P. Lane35, Heung Man Lee36, Jivianne T. Lee19, Joshua M. Levy10, Sandra Y. Lin35, Valerie J. Lund, Kevin C. McMains37, Ralph Metson4, Joaquim Mullol18, Robert M. Naclerio35, Gretchen M. Oakley1, Nobuyoshi Otori38, James N. Palmer11, Sanjay R. Parikh39, Desiderio Passali40, Zara M. Patel32, Anju T. Peters9, Carl Philpott41, Alkis J. Psaltis42, Vijay R. Ramakrishnan2, Murugappan Ramanathan35, Hwan Jung Roh43, Luke Rudmik44, Raymond Sacks29, Rodney J. Schlosser8, Ahmad R. Sedaghat45, Brent A. Senior46, Raj Sindwani47, Kristine A. Smith48, Kornkiat Snidvongs49, Michael G. Stewart50, Jeffrey D. Suh19, Bruce K. Tan9, Justin H. Turner20, Cornelis M. van Drunen26, Richard Louis Voegels12, De Yun Wang51, Bradford A. Woodworth52, Peter-John Wormald42, Erin D. Wright53, Carol H. Yan5, Luo Zhang54, Bing Zhou54 
University of Utah1, University of Colorado Denver2, Oregon Health & Science University3, Harvard University4, University of California, San Diego5, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston6, Medical College of Wisconsin7, Medical University of South Carolina8, Northwestern University9, Emory University10, University of Pennsylvania11, University of São Paulo12, Ghent University13, Sun Yat-sen University14, Karolinska Institutet15, University of Chicago16, Rush University Medical Center17, University of Barcelona18, University of California, Los Angeles19, Vanderbilt University20, University of Arizona21, University of Kansas22, Université de Montréal23, University of Auckland24, Rutgers University25, University of Amsterdam26, Columbia University27, Eastern Virginia Medical School28, University of New South Wales29, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven30, Guy's Hospital31, Stanford University32, University of British Columbia33, Mayo Clinic34, Johns Hopkins University35, Korea University36, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences37, Jikei University School of Medicine38, University of Washington39, University of Siena40, University of East Anglia41, University of Adelaide42, Pusan National University43, University of Calgary44, University of Cincinnati45, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill46, Cleveland Clinic47, University of Winnipeg48, Chulalongkorn University49, Cornell University50, National University of Singapore51, University of Alabama at Birmingham52, University of Alberta53, Capital Medical University54
TL;DR: The 5 years since the publication of the first International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis (ICAR‐RS) has witnessed foundational progress in the understanding and treatment of rhinologic disease.
Abstract: I. Executive summary BACKGROUND: The 5 years since the publication of the first International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis (ICAR-RS) has witnessed foundational progress in our understanding and treatment of rhinologic disease. These advances are reflected within the more than 40 new topics covered within the ICAR-RS-2021 as well as updates to the original 140 topics. This executive summary consolidates the evidence-based findings of the document. Methods ICAR-RS presents over 180 topics in the forms of evidence-based reviews with recommendations (EBRRs), evidence-based reviews, and literature reviews. The highest grade structured recommendations of the EBRR sections are summarized in this executive summary. Results ICAR-RS-2021 covers 22 topics regarding the medical management of RS, which are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Additionally, 4 topics regarding the surgical management of RS are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Finally, a comprehensive evidence-based management algorithm is provided. Conclusion This ICAR-RS-2021 executive summary provides a compilation of the evidence-based recommendations for medical and surgical treatment of the most common forms of RS.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyse data from randomized and uncontrolled studies reported with ablative and locoregional techniques and examine the expected effects of combinations with systemic treatments, and discuss trial design and benchmarks to be used as a reference for future investigations in a promising new era for HCC treatment.
Abstract: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality and has an increasing incidence worldwide. Locoregional therapies, defined as imaging-guided liver tumour-directed procedures, play a leading part in the management of 50-60% of HCCs. Radiofrequency is the mainstay for local ablation at early stages and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) remains the standard treatment for intermediate-stage HCC. Other local ablative techniques (microwave ablation, cryoablation and irreversible electroporation) or locoregional therapies (for example, radioembolization and sterotactic body radiation therapy) have been explored, but have not yet modified the standard therapies established decades ago. This understanding is currently changing, and several drugs have been approved for the management of advanced HCC. Molecular therapies dominate the adjuvant trials after curative therapies and combination strategies with TACE for intermediate stages. The rationale for these combinations is sound. Local therapies induce antigen and proinflammatory cytokine release, whereas VEGF inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors boost immunity and prime tumours for checkpoint inhibition. In this Review, we analyse data from randomized and uncontrolled studies reported with ablative and locoregional techniques and examine the expected effects of combinations with systemic treatments. We also discuss trial design and benchmarks to be used as a reference for future investigations in the dawn of a promising new era for HCC treatment.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyzed data from linked index cases of COVID-19 and their contacts to explore the factors associated with transmission of SARS-CoV-2.
Abstract: Summary Background Scarce data are available on what variables affect the risk of transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the development of symptomatic COVID-19, and, particularly, the relationship with viral load We aimed to analyse data from linked index cases of COVID-19 and their contacts to explore factors associated with transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Methods In this cohort study, patients were recruited as part of a randomised controlled trial done between March 17 and April 28, 2020, that aimed to assess if hydroxychloroquine reduced transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Patients with COVID-19 and their contacts were identified by use of the electronic registry of the Epidemiological Surveillance Emergency Service of Catalonia (Spain) Patients with COVID-19 included in our analysis were aged 18 years or older, not hospitalised, had quantitative PCR results available at baseline, had mild symptom onset within 5 days before enrolment, and had no reported symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infections in their accommodation or workplace within the 14 days before enrolment Contacts included were adults with a recent history of exposure and absence of COVID-19-like symptoms within the 7 days preceding enrolment Viral load of contacts, measured by quantitative PCR from a nasopharyngeal swab, was assessed at enrolment, at day 14, and whenever the participant reported COVID-19-like symptoms We assessed risk of transmission and developing symptomatic disease and incubation dynamics using regression analysis We assessed the relationship of viral load and characteristics of cases (age, sex, number of days from reported symptom onset, and presence or absence of fever, cough, dyspnoea, rhinitis, and anosmia) and associations between risk of transmission and characteristics of the index case and contacts Findings We identified 314 patients with COVID-19, with 282 (90%) having at least one contact (753 contacts in total), resulting in 282 clusters 90 (32%) of 282 clusters had at least one transmission event The secondary attack rate was 17% (125 of 753 contacts), with a variation from 12% when the index case had a viral load lower than 1 × 106 copies per mL to 24% when the index case had a viral load of 1 × 1010 copies per mL or higher (adjusted odds ratio per log10 increase in viral load 1·3, 95% CI 1·1–1·5) Increased risk of transmission was also associated with household contact (3·0, 1·59–5·65) and age of the contact (per year: 1·02, 1·01–1·04) 449 contacts had a positive PCR result at baseline 28 (6%) of 449 contacts had symptoms at the first visit Of 421 contacts who were asymptomatic at the first visit, 181 (43%) developed symptomatic COVID-19, with a variation from approximately 38% in contacts with an initial viral load lower than 1 × 107 copies per mL to greater than 66% for those with an initial viral load of 1 × 1010 copies per mL or higher (hazard ratio per log10 increase in viral load 1·12, 95% CI 1·05–1·20; p=0·0006) Time to onset of symptomatic disease decreased from a median of 7 days (IQR 5–10) for individuals with an initial viral load lower than 1 × 107 copies per mL to 6 days (4–8) for those with an initial viral load between 1 × 107 and 1 × 109 copies per mL, and 5 days (3–8) for those with an initial viral load higher than 1 × 109 copies per mL Interpretation In our study, the viral load of index cases was a leading driver of SARS-CoV-2 transmission The risk of symptomatic COVID-19 was strongly associated with the viral load of contacts at baseline and shortened the incubation time of COVID-19 in a dose-dependent manner Funding YoMeCorono, Generalitat de Catalunya Translations For the Catalan translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Parkinson's disease is evolving from a clinical to a biomarker-supported diagnostic entity, for which earlier identification is possible, different subtypes with diverse prognosis are recognised, and novel disease-modifying treatments are in development.
Abstract: Parkinson's disease is the second most common neurodegenerative disease and its prevalence has been projected to double over the next 30 years. An accurate diagnosis of Parkinson's disease remains challenging and the characterisation of the earliest stages of the disease is ongoing. Recent developments over the past 5 years include the validation of clinical diagnostic criteria, the introduction and testing of research criteria for prodromal Parkinson's disease, and the identification of genetic subtypes and a growing number of genetic variants associated with risk of Parkinson's disease. Substantial progress has been made in the development of diagnostic biomarkers, and genetic and imaging tests are already part of routine protocols in clinical practice, while novel tissue and fluid markers are under investigation. Parkinson's disease is evolving from a clinical to a biomarker-supported diagnostic entity, for which earlier identification is possible, different subtypes with diverse prognosis are recognised, and novel disease-modifying treatments are in development.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a comprehensive survey of body gesture recognition methods and discuss multi-modal approaches that combine speech or face with body gestures for improved emotion recognition, and define a complete framework for automatic emotional body gestures recognition.
Abstract: Automatic emotion recognition has become a trending research topic in the past decade. While works based on facial expressions or speech abound, recognizing affect from body gestures remains a less explored topic. We present a new comprehensive survey hoping to boost research in the field. We first introduce emotional body gestures as a component of what is commonly known as ”body language” and comment general aspects as gender differences and culture dependence. We then define a complete framework for automatic emotional body gesture recognition. We introduce person detection and comment static and dynamic body pose estimation methods both in RGB and 3D. We then comment the recent literature related to representation learning and emotion recognition from images of emotionally expressive gestures. We also discuss multi-modal approaches that combine speech or face with body gestures for improved emotion recognition. While pre-processing methodologies (e.g., human detection and pose estimation) are nowadays mature technologies fully developed for robust large scale analysis, we show that for emotion recognition the quantity of labelled data is scarce. There is no agreement on clearly defined output spaces and the representations are shallow and largely based on naive geometrical representations.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An evidence-based justification for bleeding risk assessment in patients with cirrhosis prior to invasive procedures, including current concepts in preprocedural testing and laboratory analysis and their role in predicting bleeding complications are explained.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Being chronically immunosuppressed, liver transplant patients have an increased risk of acquiring Covid-19 but their mortality rates are lower than matched general population, and complete immunOSuppression withdrawal should be discouraged.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The PRISMA 2020 statement as discussed by the authors replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies, and an expanded 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
Abstract: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews. Full English text available from:www.revespcardiol.org/en.