scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Bath

EducationBath, Bath and North East Somerset, United Kingdom
About: University of Bath is a education organization based out in Bath, Bath and North East Somerset, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 15830 authors who have published 39608 publications receiving 1358769 citations. The organization is also known as: Bath University.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This discussion paper argues for a creative synthesis between simulation and clinical practice, where an iterative process of continual interaction ensures that skills are learned and reinforced within the context of everyday professional life.
Abstract: INTRODUCTION This discussion paper argues for a creative synthesis between simulation and clinical practice, where an iterative process of continual interaction ensures that skills are learned and reinforced within the context of everyday professional life. BACKGROUND Evidence is mounting that long-established approaches to surgical training are no longer acceptable in the current ethical and professional climate. This paper considers alternatives to the traditional approach of 'learning by doing' in a clinical context, focusing on recent developments in the technology of simulation and virtual reality. Clinical expertise is a complex phenomenon and no single theory can account for its acquisition. After a brief contextualising overview, Vygotsky's 'zone of proximal development' is proposed as a conceptual framework for task-based surgical learning that takes place within skills laboratories. The discussion is located within a wider context of educational theory, drawing on current thinking about situated learning and apprenticeship. The notion of 'legitimate peripheral participation' in a complex professional environment places technical skill alongside a range of other competencies that are necessary to safe practice. CONCLUSIONS Simulation offers a safe environment within which learners can repeatedly practise a range of clinical skills without endangering patients. Comprehensive simulated environments allow a move away from isolated tasks to more complex clinical situations, recreating many of the challenges of real life. Such simulations, however, can operate in isolation from their clinical context, ignoring the learning needs of individuals within a real health care environment. To realise its full potential as a learning aid, simulation must be used alongside clinical practice and linked closely with it.

397 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, an integrative model examining the relationships among relational, structural and cognitive dimensions of social capital, and between these dimensions and the cost and innovation performance of the firm was proposed.

396 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the techniques of neutron diffraction and x-ray diffraction, as applied to structural studies of liquids and glasses, are reviewed, with an emphasis on the explanation and discussion of the experimental techniques and data analysis methods, as illustrated by the results of representative experiments.
Abstract: The techniques of neutron diffraction and x-ray diffraction, as applied to structural studies of liquids and glasses, are reviewed. Emphasis is placed on the explanation and discussion of the experimental techniques and data analysis methods, as illustrated by the results of representative experiments. The disordered, isotropic nature of the structure of liquids and glasses leads to special considerations and certain difficulties when neutron and x-ray diffraction techniques are applied, especially when used in combination on the same system. Recent progress in experimental technique, as well as in data analysis and computer simulation, has motivated the writing of this review.

395 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The impact of Drosophila genetics on the field of insect resistance and the current and future impact of genomics is reviewed and three fundamental questions in the evolution of resistance are addressed.

395 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
29 Jun 2017-PLOS ONE
TL;DR: This is the first review to identify the 81 outcome measures the research community uses for disease-modifying trials in mild-to-moderate dementia, and recommended core outcomes were cognition as the fundamental deficit in dementia and to indicate disease modification, serial structural MRIs.
Abstract: Background There are no disease-modifying treatments for dementia. There is also no consensus on disease modifying outcomes. We aimed to produce the first evidence-based consensus on core outcome measures for trials of disease modification in mild-to-moderate dementia. Methods and findings We defined disease-modification interventions as those aiming to change the underlying pathology. We systematically searched electronic databases and previous systematic reviews for published and ongoing trials of disease-modifying treatments in mild-to-moderate dementia. We included 149/22,918 of the references found; with 81 outcome measures from 125 trials. Trials involved participants with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) alone (n = 111), or AD and mild cognitive impairment (n = 8) and three vascular dementia. We divided outcomes by the domain measured (cognition, activities of daily living, biological markers, neuropsychiatric symptoms, quality of life, global). We calculated the number of trials and of participants using each outcome. We detailed psychometric properties of each outcome. We sought the views of people living with dementia and family carers in three cities through Alzheimer’s society focus groups. Attendees at a consensus conference (experts in dementia research, disease-modification and harmonisation measures) decided on the core set of outcomes using these results. Recommended core outcomes were cognition as the fundamental deficit in dementia and to indicate disease modification, serial structural MRIs. Cognition should be measured by Mini Mental State Examination or Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale. MRIs would be optional for patients. We also made recommendations for measuring important, but non-core domains which may not change despite disease modification. Limitations Most trials were about AD. Specific instruments may be superseded. We searched one database for psychometric properties. Interpretation This is the first review to identify the 81 outcome measures the research community uses for disease-modifying trials in mild-to-moderate dementia. Our recommendations will facilitate designing, comparing and meta-analysing disease modification trials in mild-to-moderate dementia, increasing their value.

394 citations


Authors

Showing all 16056 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Michael Grätzel2481423303599
Brenda W.J.H. Penninx1701139119082
Amartya Sen149689141907
Gilbert Laporte12873062608
Andre K. Geim125445206833
Matthew Jones125116196909
Benoît Roux12049362215
Stephen Mann12066955008
Bruno S. Frey11990065368
Raymond A. Dwek11860352259
David Cutts11477864215
John Campbell107115056067
David Chandler10742452396
Peter H.R. Green10684360113
Huajian Gao10566746748
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Manchester
168K papers, 6.4M citations

96% related

University of Bristol
113.1K papers, 4.9M citations

94% related

National University of Singapore
165.4K papers, 5.4M citations

94% related

University of Oxford
258.1K papers, 12.9M citations

94% related

University of Cambridge
282.2K papers, 14.4M citations

93% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202386
2022404
20212,475
20202,371
20192,144
20181,972