scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Bremen

EducationBremen, Germany
About: University of Bremen is a education organization based out in Bremen, Germany. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 14563 authors who have published 37279 publications receiving 970381 citations. The organization is also known as: Universität Bremen.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
04 Nov 2011-Science
TL;DR: The results indicate regional increases in N availability due to anthropogenic N deposition, and Atmospheric nitrogen dioxide measurements and increased emissions of anthropogenic reactive N over tropical land areas suggest that these changes are widespread in tropical forests.
Abstract: Deposition of reactive nitrogen (N) from human activities has large effects on temperate forests where low natural N availability limits productivity but is not known to affect tropical forests where natural N availability is often much greater. Leaf N and the ratio of N isotopes (δ15N) increased substantially in a moist forest in Panama between ~1968 and 2007, as did tree-ring δ15N in a dry forest in Thailand over the past century. A decade of fertilization of a nearby Panamanian forest with N caused similar increases in leaf N and δ15N. Therefore, our results indicate regional increases in N availability due to anthropogenic N deposition. Atmospheric nitrogen dioxide measurements and increased emissions of anthropogenic reactive N over tropical land areas suggest that these changes are widespread in tropical forests.

259 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Yousef Abou El-Neaj1, Cristiano Alpigiani2, Sana Amairi-Pyka3, Henrique Araujo4, Antun Balaž5, Angelo Bassi6, Lars Bathe-Peters7, Baptiste Battelier8, Aleksandar Belić5, Elliot Bentine9, Jose Bernabeu10, Andrea Bertoldi8, Robert Bingham11, Robert Bingham12, Diego Blas13, Vasiliki Bolpasi14, Kai Bongs15, Sougato Bose16, Philippe Bouyer8, T. J. V. Bowcock17, William B. Bowden18, Oliver Buchmueller4, Clare Burrage19, Xavier Calmet20, Benjamin Canuel8, Laurentiu Ioan Caramete, Andrew Carroll17, Giancarlo Cella6, Vassilis Charmandaris14, S. Chattopadhyay21, S. Chattopadhyay22, Xuzong Chen23, Maria Luisa Chiofalo24, J. P. Coleman17, J. P. Cotter4, Y. Cui25, Andrei Derevianko26, Albert De Roeck27, Goran S. Djordjevic28, P. J. Dornan4, Michael Doser27, Ioannis Drougkakis14, Jacob Dunningham20, Ioana Dutan, Sajan Easo11, G. Elertas17, John Ellis13, John Ellis27, John Ellis29, Mai El Sawy30, Mai El Sawy31, Farida Fassi, D. Felea, Chen Hao Feng8, R. L. Flack16, Christopher J. Foot9, Ivette Fuentes19, Naceur Gaaloul32, A. Gauguet33, Remi Geiger34, Valerie Gibson35, Gian F. Giudice27, J. Goldwin15, O. A. Grachov36, Peter W. Graham37, Dario Grasso24, Maurits van der Grinten11, Mustafa Gündoğan3, Martin G. Haehnelt35, Tiffany Harte35, Aurélien Hees34, Richard Hobson18, Jason M. Hogan37, Bodil Holst38, Michael Holynski15, Mark A. Kasevich37, Bradley J. Kavanagh39, Wolf von Klitzing14, Tim Kovachy40, Benjamin Krikler41, Markus Krutzik3, Marek Lewicki42, Marek Lewicki13, Yu-Hung Lien16, Miaoyuan Liu23, Giuseppe Gaetano Luciano6, Alain Magnon43, Mohammed Mahmoud44, Sudhir Malik4, Christopher McCabe13, J. W. Mitchell21, Julia Pahl3, Debapriya Pal14, Saurabh Pandey14, Dimitris G. Papazoglou45, Mauro Paternostro46, Bjoern Penning47, Achim Peters3, Marco Prevedelli48, Vishnupriya Puthiya-Veettil49, J. J. Quenby4, Ernst M. Rasel32, Sean Ravenhall9, Jack Ringwood17, Albert Roura50, D. O. Sabulsky8, M. Sameed51, Ben Sauer4, Stefan A. Schäffer52, Stephan Schiller53, Vladimir Schkolnik3, Dennis Schlippert32, Christian Schubert32, Haifa Rejeb Sfar, Armin Shayeghi54, Ian Shipsey9, Carla Signorini24, Yeshpal Singh15, Marcelle Soares-Santos47, Fiodor Sorrentino6, T. J. Sumner4, Konstantinos Tassis14, S. Tentindo55, Guglielmo M. Tino6, Guglielmo M. Tino56, Jonathan N. Tinsley56, James Unwin57, Tristan Valenzuela11, Georgios Vasilakis14, Ville Vaskonen13, Ville Vaskonen29, Christian Vogt58, Alex Webber-Date17, André Wenzlawski59, Patrick Windpassinger59, Marian Woltmann58, Efe Yazgan60, Ming Sheng Zhan60, Xinhao Zou8, Jure Zupan61 
Harvard University1, University of Washington2, Humboldt University of Berlin3, Imperial College London4, University of Belgrade5, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare6, Technical University of Berlin7, University of Bordeaux8, University of Oxford9, University of Valencia10, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory11, University of Strathclyde12, King's College London13, Foundation for Research & Technology – Hellas14, University of Birmingham15, University College London16, University of Liverpool17, National Physical Laboratory18, University of Nottingham19, University of Sussex20, Northern Illinois University21, Fermilab22, Peking University23, University of Pisa24, University of California, Riverside25, University of Nevada, Reno26, CERN27, University of Niš28, National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics29, British University in Egypt30, Beni-Suef University31, Leibniz University of Hanover32, Paul Sabatier University33, University of Paris34, University of Cambridge35, Wayne State University36, Stanford University37, University of Bergen38, University of Amsterdam39, Northwestern University40, University of Bristol41, University of Warsaw42, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign43, Fayoum University44, University of Crete45, Queen's University Belfast46, Brandeis University47, University of Bologna48, Cochin University of Science and Technology49, German Aerospace Center50, University of Manchester51, University of Copenhagen52, University of Düsseldorf53, University of Vienna54, Florida State University55, University of Florence56, University of Illinois at Chicago57, University of Bremen58, University of Mainz59, Chinese Academy of Sciences60, University of Cincinnati61
TL;DR: The Atomic Experiment for Dark Matter and Gravity Exploration (AEDGE) as mentioned in this paper is a space experiment using cold atoms to search for ultra-light dark matter, and to detect gravitational waves in the frequency range between the most sensitive ranges of LISA and the terrestrial LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA/INDIGO experiments.
Abstract: We propose in this White Paper a concept for a space experiment using cold atoms to search for ultra-light dark matter, and to detect gravitational waves in the frequency range between the most sensitive ranges of LISA and the terrestrial LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA/INDIGO experiments. This interdisciplinary experiment, called Atomic Experiment for Dark Matter and Gravity Exploration (AEDGE), will also complement other planned searches for dark matter, and exploit synergies with other gravitational wave detectors. We give examples of the extended range of sensitivity to ultra-light dark matter offered by AEDGE, and how its gravitational-wave measurements could explore the assembly of super-massive black holes, first-order phase transitions in the early universe and cosmic strings. AEDGE will be based upon technologies now being developed for terrestrial experiments using cold atoms, and will benefit from the space experience obtained with, e.g., LISA and cold atom experiments in microgravity.

259 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a method of evaluating systematic errors in measurements of total column dry-air mole fractions of CO2 (XCO2) from space is described, and applied to the v2.8 Atmospheric CO2 Observations from Space retrievals of the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (ACOS-GOSAT) measurements over land.
Abstract: . We describe a method of evaluating systematic errors in measurements of total column dry-air mole fractions of CO2 (XCO2) from space, and we illustrate the method by applying it to the v2.8 Atmospheric CO2 Observations from Space retrievals of the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (ACOS-GOSAT) measurements over land. The approach exploits the lack of large gradients in XCO2 south of 25° S to identify large-scale offsets and other biases in the ACOS-GOSAT data with several retrieval parameters and errors in instrument calibration. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the method by comparing the ACOS-GOSAT data in the Northern Hemisphere with ground truth provided by the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON). We use the observed correlation between free-tropospheric potential temperature and XCO2 in the Northern Hemisphere to define a dynamically informed coincidence criterion between the ground-based TCCON measurements and the ACOS-GOSAT measurements. We illustrate that this approach provides larger sample sizes, hence giving a more robust comparison than one that simply uses time, latitude and longitude criteria. Our results show that the agreement with the TCCON data improves after accounting for the systematic errors, but that extrapolation to conditions found outside the region south of 25° S may be problematic (e.g., high airmasses, large surface pressure biases, M-gain, measurements made over ocean). A preliminary evaluation of the improved v2.9 ACOS-GOSAT data is also discussed.

259 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The best-fit method for the estimation of low-effect concentrations is validated by a simulation study, and its applicability is demonstrated with toxicity data for 64 chemicals tested in an algal and a bacterial bioassay, where a clear improvement is achieved.
Abstract: Risk assessments of toxic chemicals currently rely heavily on the use of no-observed-effect concentrations (NOECs). Due to several crucial flaws in this concept, however, discussion of replacing NOECs with statistically estimated low-effect concentrations continues. This paper describes a general best-fit method for the estimation of effects and effect concentrations by the use of a pool of 10 different sigmoidal regression functions for continuous toxicity data. Due to heterogeneous variabilities in replicated data (i.e., heteroscedasticity), the concept of generalized least squares is used for the estimation of the model parameters, whereas a nonparametric variance model based on smoothing spline functions is used to describe the heteroscedasticity. To protect the estimates against outliers, the generalized least-squares method is improved by winsorization. On the basis of statistical selection criteria, the best-fit model is chosen individually for each set of data. Furthermore, the bootstrap methodology is applied for constructing confidence intervals for the estimated effect concentrations. The best-fit method for the estimation of low-effect concentrations is validated by a simulation study, and its applicability is demonstrated with toxicity data for 64 chemicals tested in an algal and a bacterial bioassay. In comparison with common methods of concentration-response analysis, a clear improvement is achieved.

258 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the results of recent measurements of gaseous elemental mercury (GEM), as well as total particulate-phase mercury (TPM) concentrations in Arctic air, total Hg concentration in Arctic snow, and tropospheric BrO concentrations from an earth-orbiting-satellite platform are presented and discussed.
Abstract: Mercury—in the chemical/physical forms present in the biosphere—is a persistent, toxic, bioaccumulative pollutant that is dispersed throughout the environment on a global scale, mainly via the atmosphere. It is among the “heavy metals” for which the natural biogeochemical cycle has been perturbed by a wide range of human activities, including fossil-fuel combustion and waste incineration. Results of our recent measurements of gaseous elemental mercury (GEM), as well as total particulate-phase mercury (TPM) concentrations in Arctic air, ‘total Hg’ concentrations in Arctic snow, and tropospheric BrO concentrations from an earth-orbiting-satellite platform are presented and discussed. Findings of our research, and the conclusions derived therefrom, are important for environmental protection as well as the health and well-being of aboriginal people in Arctic circumpolar nations.

258 citations


Authors

Showing all 14961 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Roger Y. Tsien163441138267
Klaus-Robert Müller12976479391
Ron Kikinis12668463398
Ulrich S. Schubert122222985604
Andreas Richter11076948262
Michael Böhm10875566103
Juan Bisquert10745046267
John P. Sumpter10126646184
Jos Lelieveld10057037657
Michael Schulz10075950719
Peter Singer9470237128
Charles R. Tyler9232531724
John P. Burrows9081536169
Hans-Peter Kriegel8944473932
Harald Haas8575034927
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
ETH Zurich
122.4K papers, 5.1M citations

93% related

University of Hamburg
89.2K papers, 2.8M citations

92% related

Centre national de la recherche scientifique
382.4K papers, 13.6M citations

92% related

Technische Universität München
123.4K papers, 4M citations

91% related

École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
98.2K papers, 4.3M citations

91% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023343
2022709
20212,106
20202,309
20192,191
20181,965