scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Cagliari

EducationCagliari, Italy
About: University of Cagliari is a education organization based out in Cagliari, Italy. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Dopamine. The organization has 11029 authors who have published 29046 publications receiving 771023 citations. The organization is also known as: Università degli Studi di Cagliari & Universita degli Studi di Cagliari.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper presents a review and critical analysis on the modeling of the dynamics of vehicular traffic, human crowds and swarms seen as living and, hence, complex systems.
Abstract: This paper presents a review and critical analysis on the modeling of the dynamics of vehicular traffic, human crowds and swarms seen as living and, hence, complex systems. It contains a survey of ...

203 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Pretreatment of human ramified microglial cells with nearly physiological levels of exogenous NO prevents lipopolysaccharide (LPS)/tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα)-inducible NO synthesis, because by affecting NF-κB activation it inhibits inducible Ca-independent NO synthase isoform (iNOS) mRNA expression.

203 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Empirical support is provided for the expectation that genetic isolates like Finland and Sardinia will not prove significantly more valuable than general populations for LD mapping of common variants underlying complex disease.
Abstract: The choice of which population to study in the mapping of common disease genes may be critical. Isolated founder populations, such as that found in Finland, have already proved extremely useful for mapping the genes for specific rare monogenic disorders and are being used in attempts to map the genes underlying common, complex diseases. But simulation results suggest that, under the common disease-common variant hypothesis, most isolated populations will prove no more useful for linkage disequilibrium (LD) mapping of common disease genes than large outbred populations. There is very little empirical data to either support or refute this conclusion at present. Therefore, we evaluated LD between 21 common microsatellite polymorphisms on chromosome 18q21 in 2 genetic isolates (Finland and Sardinia) and compared the results with those observed in two mixed populations (United Kingdom and United States of America). Mean levels of LD were similar across all four populations. Our results provide empirical support for the expectation that genetic isolates like Finland and Sardinia will not prove significantly more valuable than general populations for LD mapping of common variants underlying complex disease.

203 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: To investigate whether the severity of GHD was correlated with the degree of bone mass and turnover impairment, BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck was evaluated and circulating IGF-I, IGF-binding protein-3, and osteocalcin levels, and urinary cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen (Ntx) levels were evaluated.
Abstract: Reduced bone mineral density (BMD) has been reported in patients with isolated GH deficiency (GHD) or with multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies (MPHD). To investigate whether the severity of GHD was correlated with the degree of bone mass and turnover impairment, we evaluated BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck; circulating insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), and osteocalcin levels, and urinary cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen (Ntx) levels in 101 adult hypopituitary patients and 35 sex- and age-matched healthy subjects. On the basis of the GH response to arginine plus GHRH (ARG+/-GHRH), patients were subdivided into 4 groups: group 1 included 41 patients with a GH peak below 3 microg/L (0.9 +/- 0.08 microg/L), defined as very severe GHD; group 2 included 25 patients with a GH peak between 3.1-9 microg/L (4.7 +/- 0.4 microg/L), defined as severe GHD; group 3 included 18 patients with a GH peak between 9.1-16.5 microg/L (11.0 +/- 0.3 microg/L), defined as partial GHD; and group 4 included 17 patients with a GH peak above 16.5 microg/L (28.3 +/- 4.3 microg/L), defined as non-GHD. In all 35 controls (group 5), the GH response after ARG+/-GHRH was above 16.5 microg/L (40.7 +/- 2.2 microg/L). In patients in group 1, circulating IGF-I (P < 0.001), IGFBP-3 (P < 0.05), osteocalcin (P < 0.001), and urinary Ntx levels (P < 0.001) were lower than those in group 3-5, which were not different from each other; the t score at the lumbar spine (-1.99 +/- 0.2) and that at the femoral neck (-1.86 +/- 0.3) were lower than those in groups 3 (-0.5 +/- 0.7, P < 0.01 and -0.3 +/- 0.7, P < 0.01, respectively), 4 (-0.5 +/- 0.2, P < 0.01 and -0.3 +/- 0.7, P < 0.01, respectively), and 5 (-0.5 +/- 0.2, P < 0.001 and 0.0 +/- 0.02, P < 0.001, respectively). In patients in group 2, circulating IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels were not different from those in group 1, whereas the t scores at the lumbar spine (-1.22 +/- 0.3) and femoral neck (-0.9 +/- 0.3) were significantly higher and lower, respectively, than those in groups 1 and 5 (P < 0.05) but not those in groups 3 and 4, and serum osteocalcin and urinary Ntx levels were significant higher than those in group 1 and lower than those in groups 3-5 (P < 0.001). To evaluate the effect of isolated GHD vs. MPHD, patients were subdivided according to the number of their hormonal deficits, such as panhypopituitarism with (10 patients) or without (31 patients) diabetes insipidus, GHD with 1 or more additional pituitary deficit(s) (36 patients), isolated GHD (7 patients), 1-2 pituitary hormone deficit(s) without GHD (10 patients), and normal anterior pituitary function (7 patients). The t score at the lumbar spine and femoral neck and the biochemical parameters of bone turnover were not significantly different among the different subgroups with similar GH secretions. A significant correlation was found between the GH peak after ARG+GHRH and IGF-I, osteocalcin, urinary Ntx levels, and the t score at the lumbar spine, but not that at the femoral neck level. A significant correlation was also found between plasma IGF-I levels and the t score at the lumbar spine and femoral neck, serum osteocalcin, and urinary Ntx. Multiple correlation analysis revealed that the t score at the lumbar spine, but not that at the femoral neck, was more strongly predicted by plasma IGF-I levels (t = 3.376; P < 0.005) than by the GH peak after ARG+GHRH (t = -0.968; P = 0.338). In conclusion, a significant reduction of BMD associated with abnormalities of bone turnover parameters was found only in patients with very severe or severe GHD, whereas normal BMD values were found in non-GHD hypopituitary patients. These abnormalities were consistently present in all patients with GHD regardless of the presence of additional hormone deficits, suggesting that GHD plays a central role in the development of osteopenia in hypopituitary patients.

203 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Sonja I. Berndt1, Christine F. Skibola2, Christine F. Skibola3, Vijai Joseph4, Nicola J. Camp5, Alexandra Nieters6, Zhaoming Wang1, Wendy Cozen7, Alain Monnereau8, Sophia S. Wang9, Rachel S. Kelly10, Qing Lan1, Lauren R. Teras11, Nilanjan Chatterjee1, Charles C. Chung1, Meredith Yeager1, Angela Brooks-Wilson12, Angela Brooks-Wilson13, Patricia Hartge1, Mark P. Purdue1, Brenda M. Birmann14, Bruce K. Armstrong15, Pierluigi Cocco16, Yawei Zhang17, Gianluca Severi18, Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte19, Charles E. Lawrence, Laurie Burdette1, Jeffrey Yuenger1, Amy Hutchinson1, Kevin B. Jacobs1, Timothy G. Call20, Tait D. Shanafelt20, Anne J. Novak20, Neil E. Kay20, Mark Liebow20, Alice H. Wang20, Karin E. Smedby21, Hans-Olov Adami14, Hans-Olov Adami21, Mads Melbye22, Bengt Glimelius21, Bengt Glimelius23, Ellen T. Chang24, Ellen T. Chang25, Martha Glenn5, Karen Curtin5, Lisa A. Cannon-Albright5, Lisa A. Cannon-Albright26, Brandt Jones5, W. Ryan Diver11, Brian K. Link27, George J. Weiner27, Lucia Conde2, Lucia Conde3, Paige M. Bracci28, Jacques Riby2, Elizabeth A. Holly28, Martyn T. Smith2, Rebecca D. Jackson29, Lesley F. Tinker30, Yolanda Benavente, Nikolaus Becker31, Paolo Boffetta32, Paul Brennan33, Lenka Foretova, Marc Maynadié34, James McKay33, Anthony Staines35, Kari G. Rabe20, Sara J. Achenbach20, Celine M. Vachon20, Lynn R. Goldin1, Sara S. Strom36, Mark C. Lanasa37, Logan G. Spector38, Jose F. Leis20, Julie M. Cunningham20, J. Brice Weinberg37, Vicki A. Morrison26, Neil E. Caporaso1, Aaron D. Norman20, Martha S. Linet1, Anneclaire J. De Roos30, Lindsay M. Morton1, Richard K. Severson39, Elio Riboli10, Paolo Vineis10, Rudolf Kaaks31, Dimitrios Trichopoulos40, Dimitrios Trichopoulos14, Giovanna Masala, Elisabete Weiderpass, María Dolores Chirlaque, Roel Vermeulen41, Ruth C. Travis42, Graham G. Giles18, Demetrius Albanes1, Jarmo Virtamo43, Stephanie J. Weinstein1, Jacqueline Clavel8, Tongzhang Zheng17, Theodore R. Holford17, Kenneth Offit4, Andrew D. Zelenetz4, Robert J. Klein4, John J. Spinelli13, Kimberly A. Bertrand14, Francine Laden14, Edward Giovannucci14, Peter Kraft14, Anne Kricker15, Jenny Turner44, Claire M. Vajdic45, Maria Grazia Ennas16, Giovanni Maria Ferri46, Lucia Miligi, Liming Liang14, Joshua N. Sampson1, Simon Crouch47, Ju-Hyun Park48, Kari E. North49, Angela Cox50, John A. Snowden50, Josh Wright, Angel Carracedo51, Carlos López-Otín52, Sílvia Beà53, Itziar Salaverria53, David Martín-García53, Elias Campo53, Joseph F. Fraumeni1, Silvia de Sanjosé, Henrik Hjalgrim22, James R. Cerhan20, Stephen J. Chanock1, Nathaniel Rothman1, Susan L. Slager20 
National Institutes of Health1, University of California, Berkeley2, University of Alabama3, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center4, University of Utah5, University of Freiburg6, University of Southern California7, French Institute of Health and Medical Research8, City of Hope National Medical Center9, Imperial College London10, American Cancer Society11, Simon Fraser University12, University of British Columbia13, Harvard University14, University of Sydney15, University of Cagliari16, Yale University17, Cancer Council Victoria18, New York University19, Mayo Clinic20, Karolinska Institutet21, Statens Serum Institut22, Uppsala University23, Stanford University24, Exponent25, Veterans Health Administration26, University of Iowa27, University of California, San Francisco28, Ohio State University29, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center30, German Cancer Research Center31, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai32, International Agency for Research on Cancer33, University of Burgundy34, Dublin City University35, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center36, Duke University37, University of Minnesota38, Wayne State University39, Academy of Athens40, Utrecht University41, University of Oxford42, National Institute for Health and Welfare43, Macquarie University44, University of New South Wales45, University of Bari46, University of York47, Dongguk University48, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill49, University of Sheffield50, University of Santiago de Compostela51, University of Oviedo52, University of Barcelona53
TL;DR: The largest meta-analysis for CLL thus far, including four GWAS with a total of 3,100 individuals with CLL (cases) and 7,667 controls, identified ten independent associated SNPs in nine new loci and found evidence for two additional promising loci below genome-wide significance.
Abstract: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have previously identified 13 loci associated with risk of chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL). To identify additional CLL susceptibility loci, we conducted the largest meta-analysis for CLL thus far, including four GWAS with a total of 3,100 individuals with CLL (cases) and 7,667 controls. In the meta-analysis, we identified ten independent associated SNPs in nine new loci at 10q23.31 (ACTA2 or FAS (ACTA2/FAS), P=1.22×10(-14)), 18q21.33 (BCL2, P=7.76×10(-11)), 11p15.5 (C11orf21, P=2.15×10(-10)), 4q25 (LEF1, P=4.24×10(-10)), 2q33.1 (CASP10 or CASP8 (CASP10/CASP8), P=2.50×10(-9)), 9p21.3 (CDKN2B-AS1, P=1.27×10(-8)), 18q21.32 (PMAIP1, P=2.51×10(-8)), 15q15.1 (BMF, P=2.71×10(-10)) and 2p22.2 (QPCT, P=1.68×10(-8)), as well as an independent signal at an established locus (2q13, ACOXL, P=2.08×10(-18)). We also found evidence for two additional promising loci below genome-wide significance at 8q22.3 (ODF1, P=5.40×10(-8)) and 5p15.33 (TERT, P=1.92×10(-7)). Although further studies are required, the proximity of several of these loci to genes involved in apoptosis suggests a plausible underlying biological mechanism.

202 citations


Authors

Showing all 11160 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Herbert W. Marsh15264689512
Michele Parrinello13363794674
Dafna D. Gladman129103675273
Peter J. Anderson12096663635
Alessandro Vespignani11841963824
C. Patrignani1171754110008
Hermine Katharina Wöhri11662955540
Francesco Muntoni11596352629
Giancarlo Comi10996154270
Giorgio Parisi10894160746
Luca Benini101145347862
Alessandro Cardini101128853804
Nicola Serra100104246640
Jurg Keller9938935628
Giulio Usai9751739392
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Florence
79.5K papers, 2.3M citations

97% related

Sapienza University of Rome
155.4K papers, 4.3M citations

97% related

University of Bologna
115.1K papers, 3.4M citations

96% related

University of Padua
114.8K papers, 3.6M citations

96% related

University of Milan
139.7K papers, 4.6M citations

96% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202374
2022230
20211,898
20201,903
20191,636
20181,600