Institution
University of California, Davis
Education•Davis, California, United States•
About: University of California, Davis is a education organization based out in Davis, California, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 78770 authors who have published 180033 publications receiving 8064158 citations. The organization is also known as: UC Davis & UCD.
Topics: Population, Poison control, Gene, Galaxy, Genome
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
•
19 Feb 2004TL;DR: An economic survey of international capital mobility from the late nineteenth century to the present is presented in this article, where the authors examine the theory and empirical evidence surrounding the fall and rise of integration in the world market.
Abstract: This book presents an economic survey of international capital mobility from the late nineteenth century to the present The authors examine the theory and empirical evidence surrounding the fall and rise of integration in the world market A discussion of institutional developments focuses on capital controls and the pursuit of macroeconomic policy objectives in shifting monetary regimes The Great Depression emerges as the key turning point in recent history of international capital markets, and offers important insights for contemporary policy debates Its principal legacy is that the return to a world of global capital is marked by great unevenness in outcomes regarding both risks and rewards of capital market integration More than in the past, foreign investment flows largely from rich countries to other rich countries Yet most financial crises afflict developing countries, with costs for everyone
690 citations
••
TL;DR: An overview of the pathway from early nutrient deficiency to long-term brain function, cognition, and productivity, focusing on research from low- and middle-income countries is presented, with direct evidence of their impact on brain development scarce.
Abstract: Presented here is an overview of the pathway from early nutrient deficiency to long-term brain function, cognition, and productivity, focusing on research from low- and middle-income countries. Animal models have demonstrated the importance of adequate nutrition for the neurodevelopmental processes that occur rapidly during pregnancy and infancy, such as neuron proliferation and myelination. However, several factors influence whether nutrient deficiencies during this period cause permanent cognitive deficits in human populations, including the child's interaction with the environment, the timing and degree of nutrient deficiency, and the possibility of recovery. These factors should be taken into account in the design and interpretation of future research. Certain types of nutritional deficiency clearly impair brain development, including severe acute malnutrition, chronic undernutrition, iron deficiency, and iodine deficiency. While strategies such as salt iodization and micronutrient powders have been shown to improve these conditions, direct evidence of their impact on brain development is scarce. Other strategies also require further research, including supplementation with iron and other micronutrients, essential fatty acids, and fortified food supplements during pregnancy and infancy.
690 citations
••
University of California, Davis1, Yale University2, Laval University3, Joint Genome Institute4, Centre national de la recherche scientifique5, École normale supérieure de Cachan6, Wayne State University7, University of Georgia8, University of Udine9, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute10, University of California, Santa Cruz11, University of Notre Dame12, European Bioinformatics Institute13, Duke University14, Baylor College of Medicine15, Broad Institute16, University of Washington17, University of Maryland, College Park18, University of California, Berkeley19, University of Lisbon20, Howard Hughes Medical Institute21, University of California, San Francisco22, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory23, Royal Institute of Technology24
TL;DR: The Assemblathon 2 as mentioned in this paper presented a variety of sequence data to be assembled for three vertebrate species (a bird, a fish, and a snake) from 21 participating teams.
Abstract: Background - The process of generating raw genome sequence data continues to become cheaper, faster, and more accurate. However, assembly of such data into high-quality, finished genome sequences remains challenging. Many genome assembly tools are available, but they differ greatly in terms of their performance (speed, scalability, hardware requirements, acceptance of newer read technologies) and in their final output (composition of assembled sequence). More importantly, it remains largely unclear how to best assess the quality of assembled genome sequences. The Assemblathon competitions are intended to assess current state-of-the-art methods in genome assembly. Results - In Assemblathon 2, we provided a variety of sequence data to be assembled for three vertebrate species (a bird, a fish, and snake). This resulted in a total of 43 submitted assemblies from 21 participating teams. We evaluated these assemblies using a combination of optical map data, Fosmid sequences, and several statistical methods. From over 100 different metrics, we chose ten key measures by which to assess the overall quality of the assemblies. Conclusions - Many current genome assemblers produced useful assemblies, containing a significant representation of their genes, regulatory sequences, and overall genome structure. However, the high degree of variability between the entries suggests that there is still much room for improvement in the field of genome assembly and that approaches which work well in assembling the genome of one species may not necessarily work well for another.
690 citations
••
TL;DR: It is shown that the conditions that allow the evolution of reciprocal cooperation become extremely restrictive as group size increases, and reciprocal altruism is likely to evolve when social interactions involve more individuals.
690 citations
••
TL;DR: Results indicate reliable relative-control differences, in the small to medium effect size range, over a diverse array of tasks, with the largest effect sizes seen in complex versions of continuous performance tasks, auditory verbal learning, design copy tests, and category fluency.
Abstract: Cognitive deficits may index genetic liability for schizophrenia and are candidate endophenotypes for the illness. In order to compare the degree of sensitivity among cognitive tasks to group differences between healthy relatives and controls and the influence of moderator variables, this review reports mean effect sizes for 43 cognitive test scores from 58 studies of cognitive performance in the unaffected adult relatives of schizophrenia patients. Results indicate reliable relative-control differences, in the small to medium effect size range, over a diverse array of tasks, with the largest effect sizes seen in complex versions of continuous performance tasks, auditory verbal learning, design copy tests, and category fluency. Three study design features were found to have significant effects on overall effect size magnitude: groups unmatched on education, groups unmatched on age, and asymmetric psychiatric exclusion criteria. After excluding studies with the latter 2 design features, reliable performance differences were still observed over a smaller subset of cognitive test variables, with the largest effect sizes seen in Trails B (d = 0.50) and performance measures from both simple (d = 0.56) and complex (d = 0.60-0.66) versions of continuous performance tasks. Four of the 6 largest effect sizes reflect tasks with high executive control demands in common, such as working memory demands, set shifting, and inhibition of prepotent responses. Cognitive deficits, particularly those tapping such executive control functions, should continue to prove valuable as endophenotypes of interest in the search for specific genetic factors related to schizophrenia.
689 citations
Authors
Showing all 79538 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Eric S. Lander | 301 | 826 | 525976 |
Ronald C. Kessler | 274 | 1332 | 328983 |
George M. Whitesides | 240 | 1739 | 269833 |
Ronald M. Evans | 199 | 708 | 166722 |
Virginia M.-Y. Lee | 194 | 993 | 148820 |
Scott M. Grundy | 187 | 841 | 231821 |
Julie E. Buring | 186 | 950 | 132967 |
Patrick O. Brown | 183 | 755 | 200985 |
Anil K. Jain | 183 | 1016 | 192151 |
John C. Morris | 183 | 1441 | 168413 |
Douglas R. Green | 182 | 661 | 145944 |
John R. Yates | 177 | 1036 | 129029 |
Barry Halliwell | 173 | 662 | 159518 |
Roderick T. Bronson | 169 | 679 | 107702 |
Hongfang Liu | 166 | 2356 | 156290 |