Institution
University of California, Santa Cruz
Education•Santa Cruz, California, United States•
About: University of California, Santa Cruz is a education organization based out in Santa Cruz, California, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Galaxy & Population. The organization has 15541 authors who have published 44120 publications receiving 2759983 citations. The organization is also known as: UCSC & UC, Santa Cruz.
Topics: Galaxy, Population, Star formation, Redshift, Planet
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors outline a series of themes, questions, and concerns that should be addressed both in the work of scholars engaged in analyzing this emergent agenda, and in the efforts of advocates and donor institutions who are engaged in designing and implementing community-based natural resource management programs and policies.
Abstract: Recent years have witnessed the emergence of a loosely woven transnational movement, based particularly on advocacy by nongovernmental organizations working with local groups and communities, on the one hand, and national and transnational organizations, on the other, to build and extend new versions of environmental and social advocacy that link social justice and environmental management agendas. One of the most significant developments has been the promotion of community‐based natural resource management programs and policies. However, the success of disseminating this paradigm has raised new challenges, as concepts of community, territory, conservation, and indigenous are worked into politically varied plans and programs in disparate sites. We outline a series of themes, questions, and concerns that we believe should be addressed both in the work of scholars engaged in analyzing this emergent agenda, and in the efforts of advocates and donor institutions who are engaged in designing and implementing s...
570 citations
••
National Institutes of Health1, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute2, Rockefeller University3, University of California, Davis4, European Bioinformatics Institute5, Seoul National University6, Max Planck Society7, Durham University8, University of Massachusetts Amherst9, University of Adelaide10, University of Missouri11, East Carolina University12, University of Queensland13, Queen Mary University of London14, Wellington Management Company15, University of Arizona16, Natural History Museum17, Bangor University18, University of Konstanz19, Northeastern University20, Naturalis21, University of Graz22, Florida Museum of Natural History23, University of California, Santa Cruz24, Pacific Biosciences25, University of Maryland, College Park26, Harbin Institute of Technology27, University of Chicago28, Oregon Health & Science University29, Monash University Malaysia Campus30, University of Milan31, University of Copenhagen32, Pennsylvania State University33, University of Los Andes34, Agency for Science, Technology and Research35, Royal Ontario Museum36, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute37, University of East Anglia38, Pompeu Fabra University39, University College Dublin40, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign41, La Trobe University42, University of California, San Diego43, UPRRP College of Natural Sciences44, Dresden University of Technology45
TL;DR: The Vertebrate Genomes Project is embarked on, an effort to generate high-quality, complete reference genomes for all ~70,000 extant vertebrate species and help enable a new era of discovery across the life sciences.
Abstract: High-quality and complete reference genome assemblies are fundamental for the application of genomics to biology, disease, and biodiversity conservation. However, such assemblies are only available for a few non-microbial species. To address this issue, the international Genome 10K (G10K) consortium has worked over a five-year period to evaluate and develop cost-effective methods for assembling the most accurate and complete reference genomes to date. Here we summarize these developments, introduce a set of quality standards, and present lessons learned from sequencing and assembling 16 species representing major vertebrate lineages (mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, teleost fishes and cartilaginous fishes). We confirm that long-read sequencing technologies are essential for maximizing genome quality and that unresolved complex repeats and haplotype heterozygosity are major sources of error in assemblies. Our new assemblies identify and correct substantial errors in some of the best historical reference genomes. Adopting these lessons, we have embarked on the Vertebrate Genomes Project (VGP), an effort to generate high-quality, complete reference genomes for all ~70,000 extant vertebrate species and help enable a new era of discovery across the life sciences.
567 citations
••
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution1, North Carolina State University2, San Francisco State University3, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science4, Stony Brook University5, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission6, University of California, Santa Cruz7, Florida Gulf Coast University8, University of Maine9, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration10, University of South Florida11
TL;DR: In some regions of the U.S., the linkages between HABs and eutrophication are clear and well documented, whereas in others, information is limited, thereby highlighting important areas for further research.
567 citations
••
TL;DR: Forward and reverse ratcheting of DNA templates through the α-hemolysin nanopore controlled by phi29 DNA polymerase without the need for active voltage control facilitates multiple reads of individual strands and is transferable to other nanopore devices for implementation of DNA sequence analysis.
Abstract: A key obstacle to sequencing DNA as it passes through a nanopore is that the translocation rate is too fast to resolve individual bases. Cherf et al. solve this problem with an improved method for ratcheting DNA forward and backward through the nanopore using a DNA polymerase.
567 citations
••
TL;DR: Control-flow integrity (CFI) as discussed by the authors is a basic safety property, which can prevent malicious code from arbitrarily controlling program behavior, even with respect to powerful adversaries, and can be enforced formally.
Abstract: Current software attacks often build on exploits that subvert machine-code execution. The enforcement of a basic safety property, control-flow integrity (CFI), can prevent such attacks from arbitrarily controlling program behavior. CFI enforcement is simple and its guarantees can be established formally, even with respect to powerful adversaries. Moreover, CFI enforcement is practical: It is compatible with existing software and can be done efficiently using software rewriting in commodity systems. Finally, CFI provides a useful foundation for enforcing further security policies, as we demonstrate with efficient software implementations of a protected shadow call stack and of access control for memory regions.
566 citations
Authors
Showing all 15733 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
David J. Schlegel | 193 | 600 | 193972 |
David R. Williams | 178 | 2034 | 138789 |
John R. Yates | 177 | 1036 | 129029 |
David Haussler | 172 | 488 | 224960 |
Evan E. Eichler | 170 | 567 | 150409 |
Anton M. Koekemoer | 168 | 1127 | 106796 |
Mark Gerstein | 168 | 751 | 149578 |
Alexander S. Szalay | 166 | 936 | 145745 |
Charles M. Lieber | 165 | 521 | 132811 |
Jorge E. Cortes | 163 | 2784 | 124154 |
M. Razzano | 155 | 515 | 106357 |
Lars Hernquist | 148 | 598 | 88554 |
Aaron Dominguez | 147 | 1968 | 113224 |
Taeghwan Hyeon | 139 | 563 | 75814 |
Garth D. Illingworth | 137 | 505 | 61793 |