scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of California, Santa Cruz

EducationSanta Cruz, California, United States
About: University of California, Santa Cruz is a education organization based out in Santa Cruz, California, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Galaxy & Population. The organization has 15541 authors who have published 44120 publications receiving 2759983 citations. The organization is also known as: UCSC & UC, Santa Cruz.
Topics: Galaxy, Population, Star formation, Redshift, Planet


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This work generates primary data, creates bioinformatics tools and provides analysis to support the work of expert manual gene annotators and automated gene annotation pipelines to identify and characterise gene loci to the highest standard.
Abstract: The accurate identification and description of the genes in the human and mouse genomes is a fundamental requirement for high quality analysis of data informing both genome biology and clinical genomics. Over the last 15 years, the GENCODE consortium has been producing reference quality gene annotations to provide this foundational resource. The GENCODE consortium includes both experimental and computational biology groups who work together to improve and extend the GENCODE gene annotation. Specifically, we generate primary data, create bioinformatics tools and provide analysis to support the work of expert manual gene annotators and automated gene annotation pipelines. In addition, manual and computational annotation workflows use any and all publicly available data and analysis, along with the research literature to identify and characterise gene loci to the highest standard. GENCODE gene annotations are accessible via the Ensembl and UCSC Genome Browsers, the Ensembl FTP site, Ensembl Biomart, Ensembl Perl and REST APIs as well as https://www.gencodegenes.org.

2,095 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Norman A. Grogin1, Dale D. Kocevski2, Sandra M. Faber2, Henry C. Ferguson1, Anton M. Koekemoer1, Adam G. Riess3, Viviana Acquaviva4, David M. Alexander5, Omar Almaini6, Matthew L. N. Ashby7, Marco Barden8, Eric F. Bell9, Frédéric Bournaud10, Thomas M. Brown1, Karina Caputi11, Stefano Casertano1, Paolo Cassata12, Marco Castellano, Peter Challis7, Ranga-Ram Chary13, Edmond Cheung2, Michele Cirasuolo14, Christopher J. Conselice6, Asantha Cooray15, Darren J. Croton16, Emanuele Daddi10, Tomas Dahlen1, Romeel Davé17, Duilia F. de Mello18, Duilia F. de Mello19, Avishai Dekel20, Mark Dickinson, Timothy Dolch3, Jennifer L. Donley1, James Dunlop11, Aaron A. Dutton21, David Elbaz10, Giovanni G. Fazio7, Alexei V. Filippenko22, Steven L. Finkelstein23, Adriano Fontana, Jonathan P. Gardner18, Peter M. Garnavich24, Eric Gawiser4, Mauro Giavalisco12, Andrea Grazian, Yicheng Guo12, Nimish P. Hathi25, Boris Häussler6, Philip F. Hopkins22, Jiasheng Huang26, Kuang-Han Huang1, Kuang-Han Huang3, Saurabh Jha4, Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe, Robert P. Kirshner7, David C. Koo2, Kamson Lai2, Kyoung-Soo Lee27, Weidong Li22, Jennifer M. Lotz1, Ray A. Lucas1, Piero Madau2, Patrick J. McCarthy25, Elizabeth J. McGrath2, Daniel H. McIntosh28, Ross J. McLure11, Bahram Mobasher29, Leonidas A. Moustakas13, Mark Mozena2, Kirpal Nandra30, Jeffrey A. Newman31, Sami Niemi1, Kai G. Noeske1, Casey Papovich23, Laura Pentericci, Alexandra Pope12, Joel R. Primack2, Abhijith Rajan1, Swara Ravindranath32, Naveen A. Reddy29, Alvio Renzini, Hans-Walter Rix30, Aday R. Robaina33, Steven A. Rodney3, David J. Rosario30, Piero Rosati34, S. Salimbeni12, Claudia Scarlata35, Brian Siana29, Luc Simard36, Joseph Smidt15, Rachel S. Somerville4, Hyron Spinrad22, Amber Straughn18, Louis-Gregory Strolger37, Olivia Telford31, Harry I. Teplitz13, Jonathan R. Trump2, Arjen van der Wel30, Carolin Villforth1, Risa H. Wechsler38, Benjamin J. Weiner17, Tommy Wiklind39, Vivienne Wild11, Grant W. Wilson12, Stijn Wuyts30, Hao Jing Yan40, Min S. Yun12 
TL;DR: The Cosmic Assembly Near-IR Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey (CANDELS) as discussed by the authors was designed to document the first third of galactic evolution, from z approx. 8 - 1.5 to test their accuracy as standard candles for cosmology.
Abstract: The Cosmic Assembly Near-IR Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey (CANDELS) is designed to document the first third of galactic evolution, from z approx. 8 - 1.5. It will image > 250,000 distant galaxies using three separate cameras on the Hubble Space Tele8cope, from the mid-UV to near-IR, and will find and measure Type Ia supernovae beyond z > 1.5 to test their accuracy as standard candles for cosmology. Five premier multi-wavelength sky regions are selected, each with extensive ancillary data. The use of five widely separated fields mitigates cosmic variance and yields statistically robust and complete samples of galaxies down to a stellar mass of 10(exp 9) solar mass to z approx. 2, reaching the knee of the UV luminosity function of galaxies to z approx. 8. The survey covers approximately 800 square arc minutes and is divided into two parts. The CANDELS/Deep survey (5(sigma) point-source limit H =27.7mag) covers approx. 125 square arcminutes within GOODS-N and GOODS-S. The CANDELS/Wide survey includes GOODS and three additional fields (EGS, COSMOS, and UDS) and covers the full area to a 50(sigma) point-source limit of H ? or approx. = 27.0 mag. Together with the Hubble Ultradeep Fields, the strategy creates a three-tiered "wedding cake" approach that has proven efficient for extragalactic surveys. Data from the survey are non-proprietary and are useful for a wide variety of science investigations. In this paper, we describe the basic motivations for the survey, the CANDELS team science goals and the resulting observational requirements, the field selection and geometry, and the observing design.

2,088 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a robust method to constrain average galaxy star formation rates, star formation histories (SFHs), and the intracluster light (ICL) as a function of halo mass is presented.
Abstract: We present a robust method to constrain average galaxy star formation rates (SFRs), star formation histories (SFHs), and the intracluster light (ICL) as a function of halo mass. Our results are consistent with observed galaxy stellar mass functions, specific star formation rates (SSFRs), and cosmic star formation rates (CSFRs) from z = 0 to z = 8. We consider the effects of a wide range of uncertainties on our results, including those affecting stellar masses, SFRs, and the halo mass function at the heart of our analysis. As they are relevant to our method, we also present new calibrations of the dark matter halo mass function, halo mass accretion histories, and halo-subhalo merger rates out to z = 8. We also provide new compilations of CSFRs and SSFRs; more recent measurements are now consistent with the buildup of the cosmic stellar mass density at all redshifts. Implications of our work include: halos near 1012 M ☉ are the most efficient at forming stars at all redshifts, the baryon conversion efficiency of massive halos drops markedly after z ~ 2.5 (consistent with theories of cold-mode accretion), the ICL for massive galaxies is expected to be significant out to at least z ~ 1-1.5, and dwarf galaxies at low redshifts have higher stellar mass to halo mass ratios than previous expectations and form later than in most theoretical models. Finally, we provide new fitting formulae for SFHs that are more accurate than the standard declining tau model. Our approach places a wide variety of observations relating to the SFH of galaxies into a self-consistent framework based on the modern understanding of structure formation in ΛCDM. Constraints on the stellar mass-halo mass relationship and SFRs are available for download online.

2,085 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An interactive system, Galaxy, that combines the power of existing genome annotation databases with a simple Web portal to enable users to search remote resources, combine data from independent queries, and visualize the results.
Abstract: Accessing and analyzing the exponentially expanding genomic sequence and functional data pose a challenge for biomedical researchers. Here we describe an interactive system, Galaxy, that combines the power of existing genome annotation databases with a simple Web portal to enable users to search remote resources, combine data from independent queries, and visualize the results. The heart of Galaxy is a flexible history system that stores the queries from each user; performs operations such as intersections, unions, and subtractions; and links to other computational tools. Galaxy can be accessed at http://g2.bx.psu.edu.

2,071 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Andrew G. Clark1, Michael B. Eisen2, Michael B. Eisen3, Douglas Smith  +426 moreInstitutions (70)
08 Nov 2007-Nature
TL;DR: These genome sequences augment the formidable genetic tools that have made Drosophila melanogaster a pre-eminent model for animal genetics, and will further catalyse fundamental research on mechanisms of development, cell biology, genetics, disease, neurobiology, behaviour, physiology and evolution.
Abstract: Comparative analysis of multiple genomes in a phylogenetic framework dramatically improves the precision and sensitivity of evolutionary inference, producing more robust results than single-genome analyses can provide. The genomes of 12 Drosophila species, ten of which are presented here for the first time (sechellia, simulans, yakuba, erecta, ananassae, persimilis, willistoni, mojavensis, virilis and grimshawi), illustrate how rates and patterns of sequence divergence across taxa can illuminate evolutionary processes on a genomic scale. These genome sequences augment the formidable genetic tools that have made Drosophila melanogaster a pre-eminent model for animal genetics, and will further catalyse fundamental research on mechanisms of development, cell biology, genetics, disease, neurobiology, behaviour, physiology and evolution. Despite remarkable similarities among these Drosophila species, we identified many putatively non-neutral changes in protein-coding genes, non-coding RNA genes, and cis-regulatory regions. These may prove to underlie differences in the ecology and behaviour of these diverse species.

2,057 citations


Authors

Showing all 15733 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
David J. Schlegel193600193972
David R. Williams1782034138789
John R. Yates1771036129029
David Haussler172488224960
Evan E. Eichler170567150409
Anton M. Koekemoer1681127106796
Mark Gerstein168751149578
Alexander S. Szalay166936145745
Charles M. Lieber165521132811
Jorge E. Cortes1632784124154
M. Razzano155515106357
Lars Hernquist14859888554
Aaron Dominguez1471968113224
Taeghwan Hyeon13956375814
Garth D. Illingworth13750561793
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of California, Berkeley
265.6K papers, 16.8M citations

94% related

Massachusetts Institute of Technology
268K papers, 18.2M citations

93% related

University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign
225.1K papers, 10.1M citations

92% related

Max Planck Society
406.2K papers, 19.5M citations

92% related

Stanford University
320.3K papers, 21.8M citations

91% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202351
2022328
20212,157
20202,353
20192,209
20182,157