Institution
University of Cologne
Education•Cologne, Germany•
About: University of Cologne is a education organization based out in Cologne, Germany. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Transplantation. The organization has 32050 authors who have published 66350 publications receiving 2210092 citations. The organization is also known as: Universität zu Köln & Universitatis Coloniensis.
Topics: Population, Transplantation, Gene, Star formation, Cancer
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
University of Chicago1, Broad Institute2, University of Amsterdam3, Harvard University4, University of Queensland5, University of Toronto6, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University7, University of Antioquia8, Johns Hopkins University9, Yale University10, New York University11, Hofstra University12, University of Hong Kong13, University of São Paulo14, University of California, San Diego15, Université de Montréal16, University of Southern California17, University of Illinois at Chicago18, Ghent University19, University of Würzburg20, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich21, Greifswald University Hospital22, Butler Hospital23, Shaare Zedek Medical Center24, Rutgers University25, Stellenbosch University26, Baylor College of Medicine27, University College London28, Memorial Hospital of South Bend29, University of Bonn30, University of California, San Francisco31, University of California, Irvine32, University of Utah33, National Institutes of Health34, University of California, Los Angeles35, St George's Hospital36, Federal University of São Paulo37, Wayne State University38, McGill University39, University of Cologne40, Federal University of Bahia41, VU University Amsterdam42, University of Cape Town43, Utrecht University44, Vanderbilt University45, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience46, Erasmus University Rotterdam47, University of Michigan48, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases49, University of British Columbia50
TL;DR: The results indicate that there is some genetic overlap between these two phenotypically-related neuropsychiatric disorders, but suggest that the two disorders have distinct genetic architectures.
Abstract: The direct estimation of heritability from genome-wide common variant data as implemented in the program Genome-wide Complex Trait Analysis (GCTA) has provided a means to quantify heritability attributable to all interrogated variants. We have quantified the variance in liability to disease explained by all SNPs for two phenotypically-related neurobehavioral disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and Tourette Syndrome (TS), using GCTA. Our analysis yielded a heritability point estimate of 0.58 (se = 0.09, p = 5.64e-12) for TS, and 0.37 (se = 0.07, p = 1.5e-07) for OCD. In addition, we conducted multiple genomic partitioning analyses to identify genomic elements that concentrate this heritability. We examined genomic architectures of TS and OCD by chromosome, MAF bin, and functional annotations. In addition, we assessed heritability for early onset and adult onset OCD. Among other notable results, we found that SNPs with a minor allele frequency of less than 5% accounted for 21% of the TS heritability and 0% of the OCD heritability. Additionally, we identified a significant contribution to TS and OCD heritability by variants significantly associated with gene expression in two regions of the brain (parietal cortex and cerebellum) for which we had available expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs). Finally we analyzed the genetic correlation between TS and OCD, revealing a genetic correlation of 0.41 (se = 0.15, p = 0.002). These results are very close to previous heritability estimates for TS and OCD based on twin and family studies, suggesting that very little, if any, heritability is truly missing (i.e., unassayed) from TS and OCD GWAS studies of common variation. The results also indicate that there is some genetic overlap between these two phenotypically-related neuropsychiatric disorders, but suggest that the two disorders have distinct genetic architectures.
307 citations
••
University of Vermont1, Bryn Mawr College2, University of Helsinki3, University of Southern Denmark4, Columbia University5, Babeș-Bolyai University6, University of Cologne7, Ankara University8, University of Barcelona9, Chuo University10, University of Missouri11, The Chinese University of Hong Kong12, Yonsei University13, University of Adelaide14, University of Zurich15, Medical University of Warsaw16, Mykolas Romeris University17, Erasmus University Medical Center18
TL;DR: Initial support for the taxonomic generalizability of the 8-syndrome model across very diverse societies, both genders, and 2 age groups is provided.
Abstract: As a basis for theories of psychopathology, clinical psychology and related disciplines need sound taxonomies that are generalizable across diverse populations. To test the generalizability of a statistically derived 8-syndrome taxonomic model for youth psychopathology, confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) were performed on the Youth Self-Report (T. M. Achenbach & L. A. Rescorla, 2001) completed by 30,243 youths 11-18 years old from 23 societies. The 8-syndrome taxonomic model met criteria for good fit to the data from each society. This was consistent with findings for the parent-completed Child Behavior Checklist (Achenbach & Rescorla, 2001) and the teacher-completed Teacher's Report Form (Achenbach & Rescorla, 2001) from many societies. Separate CFAs by gender and age group supported the 8-syndrome model for boys and girls and for younger and older youths within individual societies. The findings provide initial support for the taxonomic generalizability of the 8-syndrome model across very diverse societies, both genders, and 2 age groups.
306 citations
••
TL;DR: Genetic and biochemical evidence indicates that SUMO conjugation can ultimately lead to inactivation of sumoylated substrates by polysumoylation and/or ubiquitin-dependent degradation.
306 citations
•
TL;DR: Four steps to developing a profitable services capability are discovered and Schneider-Electric did a major overhaul of its sales organization and trained its people to switch from cost-plus pricing to value-based pricing.
Abstract: When products become commodities, manufacturing companies may seek to differentiate themselves with value-added services--a potentially profitable strategy. Unfortunately, companies often stumble in the effort. Reinartz and Ulaga conducted in-depth studies of 18 leading companies in a broad variety of product markets to learn what distinguished the successes from the rest. They discovered four steps to developing a profitable services capability. RECOGNIZE THAT YOU ALREADY HAVE A SERVICE COMPANY: You can identify and charge for simple services--as Merck did when it stopped quietly absorbing shipping costs. Switching services from free to fee clarifies their value for managers as well as for customers. INDUSTRIALIZE THE BACK OFFICE: To prevent delivery costs from eating up service-offering margins, build flexible service platforms, closely monitor process costs, and exploit new technologies that enable process innovations. The Swedish bearings manufacturer SKF provided off-site access to an online monitoring tool that could warn of potential failure in customers' machines. CREATE A SERVICE-SAVVY SALES FORCE: Services require longer sales cycles and, often, decisions from high up in a customer's hierarchy; what's more, product salespeople may be inimical to change. Schneider-Electric did a major overhaul of its sales organization and trained its people to switch from cost-plus pricing to value-based pricing. FOCUS ON CUSTOMERS' PROCESSES AND THE OPPORTUNITIES THEY AFFORD FOR NEW SERVICE OFFERINGS: You may need to acquire new capabilities to take advantage of those opportunities: The industrial coatings specialist PPG had to learn how painting robots function after it offered to take over Fiat's Torino paint shop. Services can both lock in customers and help acquire new accounts. They should be developed with care and attention.
306 citations
••
305 citations
Authors
Showing all 32558 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Julie E. Buring | 186 | 950 | 132967 |
Stuart H. Orkin | 186 | 715 | 112182 |
Cornelia M. van Duijn | 183 | 1030 | 146009 |
Dorret I. Boomsma | 176 | 1507 | 136353 |
Frederick W. Alt | 171 | 577 | 95573 |
Donald E. Ingber | 164 | 610 | 100682 |
Klaus Müllen | 164 | 2125 | 140748 |
Klaus Rajewsky | 154 | 504 | 88793 |
Frederik Barkhof | 154 | 1449 | 104982 |
Stefanie Dimmeler | 147 | 574 | 81658 |
Detlef Weigel | 142 | 516 | 84670 |
Hidde L. Ploegh | 135 | 674 | 67437 |
Luca Valenziano | 130 | 437 | 94728 |
Peter Walter | 126 | 841 | 71580 |
Peter G. Martin | 125 | 553 | 97257 |