scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Cologne

EducationCologne, Germany
About: University of Cologne is a education organization based out in Cologne, Germany. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Gene. The organization has 32050 authors who have published 66350 publications receiving 2210092 citations. The organization is also known as: Universität zu Köln & Universitatis Coloniensis.
Topics: Population, Gene, Transplantation, Medicine, Cancer


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on ethnic competition as a contextual explanation of cross-national differences in anti-immigrant prejudice, and use the first round data set of the European Social Survey to investigate the relationship between outgroup size and perceived ethnic threat.
Abstract: This study focuses on ethnic competition as a contextual explanation of cross-national differences in anti-immigrant prejudice. It contributes to the existing literature by refining the concept of ethnic competition into a socio-economic and a cultural aspect, which is reflected in two different measures of outgroup size. To improve cross-national comparability, the outgroup size measure is based on foreign country of birth instead of citizenship. Moreover, as outgroup size does not only measure competition, but also contact opportunities and familiarity with immigration, intergroup contact theory is taken into account and a non-linear relationship between outgroup size and perceived ethnic threat is tested. This study employs multi-level linear regression and uses the first round data set of the European Social Survey. The main conclusions of this analysis are that economic and social competition between groups might play a lesser role in the explanation of cross-national differences in anti-immigrant attitudes than often assumed, and that it might be rather lacking familiarity and fear of conflict over values and culture that drive the relationship between outgroup size and anti-immigrant attitudes.

618 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An international consensus is achieved for the classification of inherited ichthyosis that should be useful for all clinicians and can serve as reference point for future research.
Abstract: Background Inherited ichthyoses belong to a large, clinically and etiologically heterogeneous group of mendelian disorders of cornification, typically involving the entire integument. Over the recent years, much progress has been made defining their molecular causes. However, there is no internationally accepted classification and terminology. Objective We sought to establish a consensus for the nomenclature and classification of inherited ichthyoses. Methods The classification project started at the First World Conference on Ichthyosis in 2007. A large international network of expert clinicians, skin pathologists, and geneticists entertained an interactive dialogue over 2 years, eventually leading to the First Ichthyosis Consensus Conference held in Soreze, France, on January 23 and 24, 2009, where subcommittees on different issues proposed terminology that was debated until consensus was reached. Results It was agreed that currently the nosology should remain clinically based. "Syndromic" versus "nonsyndromic" forms provide a useful major subdivision. Several clinical terms and controversial disease names have been redefined: eg, the group caused by keratin mutations is referred to by the umbrella term, "keratinopathic ichthyosis"–under which are included epidermolytic ichthyosis, superficial epidermolytic ichthyosis, and ichthyosis Curth-Macklin. "Autosomal recessive congenital ichthyosis" is proposed as an umbrella term for the harlequin ichthyosis, lamellar ichthyosis, and the congenital ichthyosiform erythroderma group. Limitations As more becomes known about these diseases in the future, modifications will be needed. Conclusion We have achieved an international consensus for the classification of inherited ichthyosis that should be useful for all clinicians and can serve as reference point for future research.

618 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Based on comparative longitudinal case analyses of six new biotechnology firms, the authors explores how the configuration, management, and evolution of entrepreneurial firms' social capital affect the performance of these firms.
Abstract: Based on comparative longitudinal case analyses of six new biotechnology firms, this paper explores how the configuration, management, and evolution of entrepreneurial firms' social capital affect

616 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Among patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia, venetoclax plus rituximab resulted in significantly higher rates of progression‐free survival than bendamustine plus r ituximac, and the benefit was maintained across all clinical and biologic subgroups.
Abstract: Background Venetoclax inhibits BCL2, an antiapoptotic protein that is pathologically overexpressed and that is central to the survival of chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. We evaluated the efficacy of venetoclax in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Methods In this randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 389 patients to receive venetoclax for up to 2 years (from day 1 of cycle 1) plus rituximab for the first 6 months (venetoclax–rituximab group) or bendamustine plus rituximab for 6 months (bendamustine–rituximab group). The trial design did not include crossover to venetoclax plus rituximab for patients in the bendamustine–rituximab group in whom progression occurred. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Results After a median follow-up period of 23.8 months, the rate of investigator-assessed progression-free survival was significantly higher in the venetoclax–rituximab group ...

615 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In highly immunocompromised patients, the effectiveness of 3 mg/kg of liposomal amphotericin B per day as first-line therapy for invasive aspergillosis is demonstrated, with a response rate of 50% and a 12-week survival rate of 72%.
Abstract: Background. Treatment of invasive mold infection in immunocompromised patients remains challenging. Voriconazole has been shown to have efficacy and survival benefits over amphotericin B deoxycholate, but its utility is limited by drug interactions. Liposomal amphotericin B achieves maximum plasma levels at a dosage of 10 mg/kg per day, but clinical efficacy data for higher doses are lacking. Methods. In a double-blind trial, patients with proven or probable invasive mold infection were randomized to receive liposomal amphotericin B at either 3 or 10 mg/kg per day for 14 days, followed by 3 mg/kg per day. The primary end point was favorable (i.e., complete or partial) response at the end of study drug treatment. Survival and safety outcomes were also evaluated. Results. Of 201 patients with confirmed invasive mold infection, 107 received the 3-mg/kg daily dose, and 94 received the 10-mg/kg daily dose. Invasive aspergillosis accounted for 97% of cases. Hematological malignancies were present in 93% of patients, and 73% of patients were neutropenic at baseline. A favorable response was achieved in 50% and 46% of patients in the 3- and 10-mg/kg groups, respectively (difference, 4%; 95% confidence interval, -10% to 18%; P>.05); the respective survival rates at 12 weeks were 72% and 59% (difference, 13%; 95% confidence interval, -0.2% to 26%; P> .05). Significantly higher rates of nephrotoxicity and hypokalemia were seen in the high-dose group. Conclusions. In highly immunocompromised patients, the effectiveness of 3 mg/kg of liposomal amphotericin B per day as first-line therapy for invasive aspergillosis is demonstrated, with a response rate of 50% and a 12-week survival rate of 72%. The regimen of 10 mg/kg per day demonstrated no additional benefit and higher rates of nephrotoxicity. © 2007 by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved.

615 citations


Authors

Showing all 32558 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Julie E. Buring186950132967
Stuart H. Orkin186715112182
Cornelia M. van Duijn1831030146009
Dorret I. Boomsma1761507136353
Frederick W. Alt17157795573
Donald E. Ingber164610100682
Klaus Müllen1642125140748
Klaus Rajewsky15450488793
Frederik Barkhof1541449104982
Stefanie Dimmeler14757481658
Detlef Weigel14251684670
Hidde L. Ploegh13567467437
Luca Valenziano13043794728
Peter Walter12684171580
Peter G. Martin12555397257
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Heidelberg University
119.1K papers, 4.6M citations

97% related

Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
161.5K papers, 5.7M citations

97% related

University of Zurich
124K papers, 5.3M citations

95% related

University of Amsterdam
140.8K papers, 5.9M citations

94% related

Utrecht University
139.3K papers, 6.2M citations

93% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023324
2022634
20214,225
20204,052
20193,526
20183,078