scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Colorado Colorado Springs

EducationColorado Springs, Colorado, United States
About: University of Colorado Colorado Springs is a education organization based out in Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 6664 authors who have published 10872 publications receiving 323416 citations. The organization is also known as: UCCS & University of Colorado at Colorado Springs.


Papers
More filters
Patent
13 Nov 1989
TL;DR: In this paper, a process of forming plated through-holes in a printed circuit board involves placing a film of fluid ink having electrically conductive properties on a side wall of the hole, curing the film to a solid and electroplating a layer of metal on the conductive ink film.
Abstract: A process of forming plated through-holes in a printed circuit board involves placing a film of fluid ink having electrically conductive properties on a side wall of the hole, curing the film to a solid and electroplating a layer of metal on the conductive ink film. The conductive ink preferably is a composition including conductive particles such as carbon and silver flakes. The ink also preferably includes a thermosetting or radiation curable binder and a thinner. The film of ink is cured before the layer of metal is electroplated thereon. The plated through-hole is protected from the etchant when the conductors are etched by placing a radiation curable putty material into the hole, curing it, and then depositing a layer of resist on top of the cured putty and a conductive sheet clad to the substrate of the circuit board.

118 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It was showed that inmates randomized into the MTC group had significantly lower rates of reincarceration compared with those in the MH group, and some support for the effectiveness of the prison TC only condition is provided.
Abstract: The study randomly assigned male inmates with co-occurring serious mental illness and chemical abuse (MICA) disorders to either modified therapeutic community (MTC) or mental health (MH) treatment programs. On their release from prison, MICA inmates who completed the prison MTC program could enter the MTC aftercare program. The results, obtained from an intent-to-treat analysis of all study entries, showed that inmates randomized into the MTC group had significantly lower rates of reincarceration compared with those in the MH group. The results also show that differences between the MTC + aftercare and comparison group across a variety of crime outcomes (i.e. any criminal activity, and alcohol or drug related criminal activity) are consistent and significant, and persist after an examination of various threats to validity (e.g. initial motivation, duration of treatment, exposure to risk). This study provides some support for the effectiveness of the prison TC only condition. The findings are encouraging and consonant with other studies of integrated prison and aftercare TC programs for substance abusing non-MICA offenders, although qualified by the possibility that selection bias (i.e. differences in motivation on entry into aftercare) may be operating. Nevertheless, given the available evidence and the need for effective programming for MICA offenders, program and policy makers should strongly consider developing integrated prison and aftercare modified TC programs for MICA offenders.

117 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Samantha Joel1, Paul W. Eastwick2, Colleen J. Allison3, Ximena B. Arriaga4, Zachary G. Baker5, Eran Bar-Kalifa6, Sophie Bergeron7, Gurit E. Birnbaum8, Rebecca L. Brock9, Claudia Chloe Brumbaugh10, Cheryl L. Carmichael10, Serena Chen11, Jennifer Clarke12, Rebecca J. Cobb13, Michael K. Coolsen14, Jody L. Davis15, David C. de Jong16, Anik Debrot17, Eva C. DeHaas3, Jaye L. Derrick5, Jami Eller18, Marie Joelle Estrada19, Ruddy Faure20, Eli J. Finkel21, R. Chris Fraley22, Shelly L. Gable23, Reuma Gadassi-Polack24, Yuthika U. Girme3, Amie M. Gordon25, Courtney L. Gosnell26, Matthew D. Hammond27, Peggy A. Hannon28, Cheryl Harasymchuk29, Wilhelm Hofmann30, Andrea B. Horn31, Emily A. Impett32, Jeremy P. Jamieson19, Dacher Keltner10, James J. Kim32, Jeffrey L. Kirchner33, Esther S. Kluwer34, Esther S. Kluwer35, Madoka Kumashiro36, Grace M. Larson37, Gal Lazarus38, Jill M. Logan3, Laura B. Luchies39, Geoff MacDonald32, Laura V. Machia40, Michael R. Maniaci41, Jessica A. Maxwell42, Moran Mizrahi43, Amy Muise44, Sylvia Niehuis13, Brian G. Ogolsky22, C. Rebecca Oldham13, Nickola C. Overall42, Meinrad Perrez45, Brett J. Peters46, Paula R. Pietromonaco47, Sally I. Powers47, Thery Prok23, Rony Pshedetzky-Shochat38, Eshkol Rafaeli48, Eshkol Rafaeli38, Erin L. Ramsdell9, Maija Reblin49, Michael Reicherts45, Alan Reifman13, Harry T. Reis19, Galena K. Rhoades50, William S. Rholes51, Francesca Righetti20, Lindsey M. Rodriguez49, Ron Rogge19, Natalie O. Rosen52, Darby E. Saxbe53, Haran Sened38, Jeffry A. Simpson18, Erica B. Slotter54, Scott M. Stanley50, Shevaun L. Stocker55, Cathy Surra56, Hagar Ter Kuile35, Allison A. Vaughn57, Amanda M. Vicary58, Mariko L. Visserman44, Mariko L. Visserman32, Scott T. Wolf33 
University of Western Ontario1, University of California, Davis2, Simon Fraser University3, Purdue University4, University of Houston5, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev6, Université de Montréal7, Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya8, University of Nebraska–Lincoln9, City University of New York10, University of California, Berkeley11, University of Colorado Colorado Springs12, Texas Tech University13, Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania14, Virginia Commonwealth University15, Western Carolina University16, University of Lausanne17, University of Minnesota18, University of Rochester19, VU University Amsterdam20, Northwestern University21, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign22, University of California, Santa Barbara23, Yale University24, University of Michigan25, Pace University26, Victoria University of Wellington27, University of Washington28, Carleton University29, Ruhr University Bochum30, University of Zurich31, University of Toronto32, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill33, Radboud University Nijmegen34, Utrecht University35, Goldsmiths, University of London36, University of Cologne37, Bar-Ilan University38, Calvin University39, Syracuse University40, Florida Atlantic University41, University of Auckland42, Ariel University43, York University44, University of Fribourg45, Ohio University46, University of Massachusetts Amherst47, Barnard College48, University of South Florida49, University of Denver50, Texas A&M University51, Dalhousie University52, University of Southern California53, Villanova University54, University of Wisconsin–Superior55, University of Texas at Austin56, San Diego State University57, Illinois Wesleyan University58
TL;DR: The findings imply that the sum of all individual differences and partner experiences exert their influence on relationship quality via a person’s own relationship-specific experiences, and effects due to moderation byindividual differences and moderation by partner-reports may be quite small.
Abstract: Given the powerful implications of relationship quality for health and well-being, a central mission of relationship science is explaining why some romantic relationships thrive more than others. This large-scale project used machine learning (i.e., Random Forests) to 1) quantify the extent to which relationship quality is predictable and 2) identify which constructs reliably predict relationship quality. Across 43 dyadic longitudinal datasets from 29 laboratories, the top relationship-specific predictors of relationship quality were perceived-partner commitment, appreciation, sexual satisfaction, perceived-partner satisfaction, and conflict. The top individual-difference predictors were life satisfaction, negative affect, depression, attachment avoidance, and attachment anxiety. Overall, relationship-specific variables predicted up to 45% of variance at baseline, and up to 18% of variance at the end of each study. Individual differences also performed well (21% and 12%, respectively). Actor-reported variables (i.e., own relationship-specific and individual-difference variables) predicted two to four times more variance than partner-reported variables (i.e., the partner's ratings on those variables). Importantly, individual differences and partner reports had no predictive effects beyond actor-reported relationship-specific variables alone. These findings imply that the sum of all individual differences and partner experiences exert their influence on relationship quality via a person's own relationship-specific experiences, and effects due to moderation by individual differences and moderation by partner-reports may be quite small. Finally, relationship-quality change (i.e., increases or decreases in relationship quality over the course of a study) was largely unpredictable from any combination of self-report variables. This collective effort should guide future models of relationships.

117 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: 1. Co-chaired panel 2 University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 3. University of Texas, San Antonio, TX 4. Sinai Hospital/Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
Abstract: 1. Co-chaired panel 2. University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 3. University of Texas, San Antonio, TX 4. Sinai Hospital/Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 5. GKT School of Medicine, King’s College, London, UK 6. University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX 7. Sequoia Hospital, Redwood City, CA 8. Maricopa Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ 9. Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, MA 10. Southampton University Hospitals Trust NHS, Southampton, UK 11. Penrose–St. Francis Health Services, Colorado Springs, CO 12. Beverly Surgical Associates, Beverly, MA 13. Saint Francis Memorial Hospital, San Francisco, CA 14. Northbay Center for Wound Care, Vacaville, CA, and 15. University of California, San Francisco, CA

117 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is shown that diverse, low-level immune activity predicts reduced childhood growth over periods of competing energy use ranging from 1 wk to 20 mo, and that modest body fat stores protect children from the particularly detrimental impact of acute inflammation on growth.
Abstract: Immune function is an energetically costly physiological activity that potentially diverts calories away from less immediately essential life tasks. Among developing organisms, the allocation of energy toward immune function may lead to tradeoffs with physical growth, particularly in high-pathogen, low-resource environments. The present study tests this hypothesis across diverse timeframes, branches of immunity, and conditions of energy availability among humans. Using a prospective mixed-longitudinal design, we collected anthropometric and blood immune biomarker data from 261 Amazonian forager-horticulturalist Shuar children (age 4-11 y old). This strategy provided baseline measures of participant stature, s.c. body fat, and humoral and cell-mediated immune activity as well as subsample longitudinal measures of linear growth (1 wk, 3 mo, 20 mo) and acute inflammation. Multilevel analyses demonstrate consistent negative effects of immune function on growth, with children experiencing up to 49% growth reduction during periods of mildly elevated immune activity. The direct energetic nature of these relationships is indicated by (i) the manifestation of biomarker-specific negative immune effects only when examining growth over timeframes capturing active competition for energetic resources, (ii) the exaggerated impact of particularly costly inflammation on growth, and (iii) the ability of children with greater levels of body fat (i.e., energy reserves) to completely avoid the growth-inhibiting effects of acute inflammation. These findings provide evidence for immunologically and temporally diverse body fat-dependent tradeoffs between immune function and growth during childhood. We discuss the implications of this work for understanding human developmental energetics and the biological mechanisms regulating variation in human ontogeny, life history, and health.

117 citations


Authors

Showing all 6706 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Jeff Greenberg10554243600
James F. Scott9971458515
Martin Wikelski8942025821
Neil W. Kowall8927934943
Ananth Dodabalapur8539427246
Tom Pyszczynski8224630590
Patrick S. Kamath7846631281
Connie M. Weaver7747330985
Alejandro Lucia7568023967
Michael J. McKenna7035616227
Timothy J. Craig6945818340
Sheldon Solomon6715023916
Michael H. Stone6537016355
Christopher J. Gostout6533413593
Edward T. Ryan6030311822
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Arizona State University
109.6K papers, 4.4M citations

93% related

University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign
225.1K papers, 10.1M citations

90% related

Pennsylvania State University
196.8K papers, 8.3M citations

90% related

Florida State University
65.3K papers, 2.5M citations

90% related

University of Maryland, College Park
155.9K papers, 7.2M citations

90% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202325
202246
2021568
2020543
2019479
2018454