scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Copenhagen

EducationCopenhagen, Denmark
About: University of Copenhagen is a education organization based out in Copenhagen, Denmark. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Galaxy. The organization has 57645 authors who have published 149740 publications receiving 5903093 citations. The organization is also known as: Copenhagen University & Københavns Universitet.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The risk of major congenital malformations is influenced not only by type of antiepileptic drug, but also by dose and other variables, which should be taken into account in the management of epilepsy in women of childbearing potential.
Abstract: Summary Background Prenatal exposure to antiepileptic drugs is associated with a greater risk of major congenital malformations, but there is inadequate information on the comparative teratogenicity of individual antiepileptic drugs and the association with dose. We aimed to establish the risks of major congenital malformations after monotherapy exposure to four major antiepileptic drugs at different doses. Methods The EURAP epilepsy and pregnancy registry is an observational cohort study representing a collaboration of physicians from 42 countries. We prospectively monitored pregnancies exposed to monotherapy with different doses of four common drugs: carbamazepine, lamotrigine, valproic acid, or phenobarbital. Our primary endpoint was the rate of major congenital malformations detected up to 12 months after birth. We assessed pregnancy outcomes according to dose at the time of conception irrespective of subsequent dose changes. Findings After excluding pregnancies that ended in spontaneous abortions or chromosomal or genetic abnormalities, those in which the women had treatment changes in the first trimester, and those involving other diseases or treatments that could affect fetal outcome, we assessed rates of major congenital malformations in 1402 pregnancies exposed to carbamazepine, 1280 on lamotrigine, 1010 on valproic acid, and 217 on phenobarbital. An increase in malformation rates with increasing dose at the time of conception was recorded for all drugs. Multivariable analysis including ten covariates in addition to treatment with antiepileptic drugs showed that the risk of malformations was greater with a parental history of major congenital malformations (odds ratio 4·4, 95% CI 2·06–9·23). We noted the lowest rates of malformation with less than 300 mg per day lamotrigine (2·0% [17 events], 95% CI 1·19–3·24) and less than 400 mg per day carbamazepine (3·4% [5 events], 95% CI 1·11–7·71). Compared with lamotrigine monotherapy at doses less than 300 mg per day, risks of malformation were significantly higher with valproic acid and phenobarbital at all investigated doses, and with carbamazepine at doses greater than 400 mg per day. Interpretation The risk of major congenital malformations is influenced not only by type of antiepileptic drug, but also by dose and other variables, which should be taken into account in the management of epilepsy in women of childbearing potential. Funding Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, Netherlands Epilepsy Foundation, Stockholm County Council, and ALF.

619 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An online repository of published organic fluorescence spectra has been developed, which can be searched for quantitative matches with any set of unknown spectra as mentioned in this paper, which fills a critical gap by increasing access to measured and modelled (PARAFAC) spectra, and linking across studies and systems to reveal "global" fluorescence trends.
Abstract: An online repository of published organic fluorescence spectra has been developed, which can be searched for quantitative matches with any set of unknown spectra. It fills a critical gap by increasing access to measured and modelled (PARAFAC) spectra, and linking across studies and systems to reveal "global" fluorescence trends.

618 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This work has implemented a method that predicts the relative surface accessibility of an amino acid and simultaneously predicts the reliability for each prediction, in the form of a Z-score, which is comparable to the performance of the currently best public available method, Real-SPINE.
Abstract: Background Estimation of the reliability of specific real value predictions is nontrivial and the efficacy of this is often questionable. It is important to know if you can trust a given prediction and therefore the best methods associate a prediction with a reliability score or index. For discrete qualitative predictions, the reliability is conventionally estimated as the difference between output scores of selected classes. Such an approach is not feasible for methods that predict a biological feature as a single real value rather than a classification. As a solution to this challenge, we have implemented a method that predicts the relative surface accessibility of an amino acid and simultaneously predicts the reliability for each prediction, in the form of a Z-score.

618 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Georges Aad1, Brad Abbott2, Jalal Abdallah3, Ovsat Abdinov4, Baptiste Abeloos5, Rosemarie Aben6, Ossama AbouZeid7, N. L. Abraham8, Halina Abramowicz9, Henso Abreu10, Ricardo Abreu11, Yiming Abulaiti12, Bobby Samir Acharya13, Bobby Samir Acharya14, Leszek Adamczyk15, David H. Adams16, Jahred Adelman17, Stefanie Adomeit18, Tim Adye19, A. A. Affolder20, Tatjana Agatonovic-Jovin21, Johannes Agricola22, Juan Antonio Aguilar-Saavedra23, Steven Ahlen24, Faig Ahmadov4, Faig Ahmadov25, Giulio Aielli26, Henrik Akerstedt12, T. P. A. Åkesson27, Andrei Akimov, Gian Luigi Alberghi28, Justin Albert29, S. Albrand30, M. J. Alconada Verzini31, Martin Aleksa32, Igor Aleksandrov25, Calin Alexa, Gideon Alexander9, Theodoros Alexopoulos33, Muhammad Alhroob2, Malik Aliev34, Gianluca Alimonti, John Alison35, Steven Patrick Alkire36, Bmm Allbrooke8, Benjamin William Allen11, Phillip Allport37, Alberto Aloisio38, Alejandro Alonso39, Francisco Alonso31, Cristiano Alpigiani40, Mahmoud Alstaty1, B. Alvarez Gonzalez32, D. Álvarez Piqueras41, Mariagrazia Alviggi38, Brian Thomas Amadio42, K. Amako, Y. Amaral Coutinho43, Christoph Amelung44, D. Amidei45, S. P. Amor Dos Santos46, António Amorim47, Simone Amoroso32, Glenn Amundsen44, Christos Anastopoulos48, Lucian Stefan Ancu49, Nansi Andari17, Timothy Andeen50, Christoph Falk Anders51, G. Anders32, John Kenneth Anders20, Kelby Anderson35, Attilio Andreazza52, Andrei51, Stylianos Angelidakis53, Ivan Angelozzi6, Philipp Anger54, Aaron Angerami36, Francis Anghinolfi32, Alexey Anisenkov55, Nuno Anjos56 
Aix-Marseille University1, University of Oklahoma2, University of Iowa3, Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences4, Université Paris-Saclay5, University of Amsterdam6, University of California, Santa Cruz7, University of Sussex8, Tel Aviv University9, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology10, University of Oregon11, Stockholm University12, International Centre for Theoretical Physics13, King's College London14, AGH University of Science and Technology15, Brookhaven National Laboratory16, Northern Illinois University17, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich18, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory19, University of Liverpool20, University of Belgrade21, University of Göttingen22, University of Granada23, Boston University24, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research25, University of Rome Tor Vergata26, Lund University27, University of Bologna28, University of Victoria29, University of Grenoble30, National University of La Plata31, CERN32, National Technical University of Athens33, University of Salento34, University of Chicago35, Columbia University36, University of Birmingham37, University of Naples Federico II38, University of Copenhagen39, University of Washington40, University of Valencia41, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory42, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro43, Brandeis University44, University of Michigan45, University of Coimbra46, University of Lisbon47, University of Sheffield48, University of Geneva49, University of Texas at Austin50, Heidelberg University51, University of Milan52, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens53, Dresden University of Technology54, Novosibirsk State University55, IFAE56
TL;DR: In this article, a combined ATLAS and CMS measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates, as well as constraints on its couplings to vector bosons and fermions, are presented.
Abstract: Combined ATLAS and CMS measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates, as well as constraints on its couplings to vector bosons and fermions, are presented. The combination is based on the analysis of five production processes, namely gluon fusion, vector boson fusion, and associated production with a $W$ or a $Z$ boson or a pair of top quarks, and of the six decay modes $H \to ZZ, WW$, $\gamma\gamma, \tau\tau, bb$, and $\mu\mu$. All results are reported assuming a value of 125.09 GeV for the Higgs boson mass, the result of the combined measurement by the ATLAS and CMS experiments. The analysis uses the CERN LHC proton--proton collision data recorded by the ATLAS and CMS experiments in 2011 and 2012, corresponding to integrated luminosities per experiment of approximately 5 fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV and 20 fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s} = 8$ TeV. The Higgs boson production and decay rates measured by the two experiments are combined within the context of three generic parameterisations: two based on cross sections and branching fractions, and one on ratios of coupling modifiers. Several interpretations of the measurements with more model-dependent parameterisations are also given. The combined signal yield relative to the Standard Model prediction is measured to be 1.09 $\pm$ 0.11. The combined measurements lead to observed significances for the vector boson fusion production process and for the $H \to \tau\tau$ decay of $5.4$ and $5.5$ standard deviations, respectively. The data are consistent with the Standard Model predictions for all parameterisations considered.

618 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Body site largely explains the variation in epidermal thickness, but also a significant individual variation was observed, and thickness of the stratum corneum and cellular epidermis correlated positively to blood content and was greater in males than in females.
Abstract: Epidermal thickness and its relationship to age, gender, skin type, pigmentation, blood content, smoking habits and body site is important in dermatologic research and was investigated in this study. Biopsies from three different body sites of 71 human volunteers were obtained, and thickness of the stratum corneum and cellular epidermis was measured microscopically using a preparation technique preventing tissue damage. Multiple regressions analysis was used to evaluate the effect of the various factors independently of each other. Mean (SD) thickness of the stratum corneum was 18.3 (4.9) microm at the dorsal aspect of the forearm, 11.0 (2.2) microm at the shoulder and 14.9 (3.4) microm at the buttock. Corresponding values for the cellular epidermis were 56.6 (11.5) microm, 70.3 (13.6) microm and 81.5 (15.7) microm, respectively. Body site largely explains the variation in epidermal thickness, but also a significant individual variation was observed. Thickness of the stratum corneum correlated positively to pigmentation (p = 0.0008) and negatively to the number of years of smoking (p < 0.0001). Thickness of the cellular epidermis correlated positively to blood content (P = 0.028) and was greater in males than in females (P < 0.0001). Epidermal thickness was not correlated to age or skin type.

618 citations


Authors

Showing all 58387 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Michael Karin236704226485
Matthias Mann221887230213
Peer Bork206697245427
Ronald Klein1941305149140
Kenneth S. Kendler1771327142251
Dorret I. Boomsma1761507136353
Ramachandran S. Vasan1721100138108
Unnur Thorsteinsdottir167444121009
Mika Kivimäki1661515141468
Jun Wang1661093141621
Anders Björklund16576984268
Gerald I. Shulman164579109520
Jaakko Kaprio1631532126320
Veikko Salomaa162843135046
Daniel J. Jacob16265676530
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Utrecht University
139.3K papers, 6.2M citations

94% related

University of Amsterdam
140.8K papers, 5.9M citations

94% related

Karolinska Institutet
121.1K papers, 6M citations

93% related

Boston University
119.6K papers, 6.2M citations

93% related

University College London
210.6K papers, 9.8M citations

92% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023370
20221,266
202110,693
20209,956
20199,189
20188,620