Institution
University of Copenhagen
Education•Copenhagen, Denmark•
About: University of Copenhagen is a education organization based out in Copenhagen, Denmark. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Galaxy. The organization has 57645 authors who have published 149740 publications receiving 5903093 citations. The organization is also known as: Copenhagen University & Københavns Universitet.
Topics: Population, Galaxy, Insulin, Skeletal muscle, Diabetes mellitus
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
Theo Vos1, Amanuel Alemu Abajobir, Kalkidan Hassen Abate2, Cristiana Abbafati3 +775 more•Institutions (305)
TL;DR: The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2016 (GBD 2016) provides a comprehensive assessment of prevalence, incidence, and years lived with disability (YLDs) for 328 causes in 195 countries and territories from 1990 to 2016.
10,401 citations
TL;DR: In this article, a search for the Standard Model Higgs boson in proton-proton collisions with the ATLAS detector at the LHC is presented, which has a significance of 5.9 standard deviations, corresponding to a background fluctuation probability of 1.7×10−9.
9,282 citations
Northern Arizona University1, National Institutes of Health2, University of Minnesota3, University of California, Davis4, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution5, Massachusetts Institute of Technology6, University of Copenhagen7, University of Trento8, Chinese Academy of Sciences9, University of California, San Francisco10, University of Pennsylvania11, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory12, North Carolina State University13, University of California, San Diego14, Institute for Systems Biology15, Dalhousie University16, University of British Columbia17, Statens Serum Institut18, Anschutz Medical Campus19, University of Washington20, Michigan State University21, Stanford University22, Broad Institute23, Harvard University24, Australian National University25, University of Düsseldorf26, University of New South Wales27, Sookmyung Women's University28, San Diego State University29, Howard Hughes Medical Institute30, Max Planck Society31, Cornell University32, Colorado State University33, Google34, Syracuse University35, Webster University36, United States Department of Agriculture37, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences38, Colorado School of Mines39, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration40, University of Southern Mississippi41, University of California, Merced42, Wageningen University and Research Centre43, University of Arizona44, Environment Agency45, University of Florida46, Merck & Co.47
TL;DR: QIIME 2 development was primarily funded by NSF Awards 1565100 to J.G.C. and R.K.P. and partial support was also provided by the following: grants NIH U54CA143925 and U54MD012388.
Abstract: QIIME 2 development was primarily funded by NSF Awards 1565100 to J.G.C. and 1565057 to R.K. Partial support was also provided by the following: grants NIH U54CA143925 (J.G.C. and T.P.) and U54MD012388 (J.G.C. and T.P.); grants from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (J.G.C. and R.K.); ERCSTG project MetaPG (N.S.); the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences QYZDB-SSW-SMC021 (Y.B.); the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council APP1085372 (G.A.H., J.G.C., Von Bing Yap and R.K.); the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) to D.L.G.; and the State of Arizona Technology and Research Initiative Fund (TRIF), administered by the Arizona Board of Regents, through Northern Arizona University. All NCI coauthors were supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute. S.M.G. and C. Diener were supported by the Washington Research Foundation Distinguished Investigator Award.
8,821 citations
TL;DR: SignalP 4.0 was the best signal-peptide predictor for all three organism types but was not in all cases as good as SignalP 3.0 according to cleavage-site sensitivity or signal- peptide correlation when there are no transmembrane proteins present.
Abstract: We benchmarked SignalP 4.0 against SignalP 3.0 and ten other signal peptide prediction algorithms (Fig. 1). We compared prediction performance using the Matthews correlation coefficient16, for which each sequence was counted as a true or false positive or negative. To test SignalP 4.0 performance, we did not use data that had been used in training the networks or selecting the optimal architecture, and the test data did not contain homologs to the training and optimization data (Supplementary Methods). The test set for SignalP 3.0 was also independent of the training set because we removed sequences used to construct SignalP 3.0 and their homologs from the benchmark data. For other algorithms more recent than SignalP 3.0, the benchmark data may include data used to train the methods, possibly leading to slight overestimations of their performance. Our results show that SignalP 4.0 was the best signal-peptide predictor for all three organism types (Fig. 1). This comes at a price, however, because SignalP 4.0 was not in all cases as good as SignalP 3.0 according to cleavage-site sensitivity or signal-peptide correlation when there are no transmembrane proteins present (Supplementary Results). An ideal method would have the best SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions
8,370 citations
Book•
26 Apr 1990TL;DR: In this article, a strategy for redesigning jobs to reduce unnecessary stress and improve productivity and job satisfaction is proposed, which is based on the concept of job redesigning and re-designing.
Abstract: Suggests a strategy for redesigning jobs to reduce unnecessary stress and improve productivity and job satisfaction.
8,329 citations
Authors
Showing all 58387 results
| Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Karin | 236 | 704 | 226485 |
| Matthias Mann | 221 | 887 | 230213 |
| Peer Bork | 206 | 697 | 245427 |
| Ronald Klein | 194 | 1305 | 149140 |
| Kenneth S. Kendler | 177 | 1327 | 142251 |
| Dorret I. Boomsma | 176 | 1507 | 136353 |
| Ramachandran S. Vasan | 172 | 1100 | 138108 |
| Unnur Thorsteinsdottir | 167 | 444 | 121009 |
| Mika Kivimäki | 166 | 1515 | 141468 |
| Jun Wang | 166 | 1093 | 141621 |
| Anders Björklund | 165 | 769 | 84268 |
| Gerald I. Shulman | 164 | 579 | 109520 |
| Jaakko Kaprio | 163 | 1532 | 126320 |
| Veikko Salomaa | 162 | 843 | 135046 |
| Daniel J. Jacob | 162 | 656 | 76530 |