scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of East Anglia

EducationNorwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom
About: University of East Anglia is a education organization based out in Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Climate change. The organization has 13250 authors who have published 37504 publications receiving 1669060 citations. The organization is also known as: UEA.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a reanalysis of both the existing and the newly available temperature datasets to produce a grid-box dataset of 5°×5° temperature anomalies is presented. But the analysis techniques used in their construction, particularly the need for a common reference period, mean that it is difficult to include, retrospectively, any of the new temperature datasets now available for some countries, so, despite data availability improvements in some areas, the number of stations used has fallen since 1970, both in the hemispheric averages and in their constituent gridbox datasets.
Abstract: Land-based compilations of gridded monthly surface air temperature anomalies, averaged into hemispheric values for the last 140 years, have been available for climatological analyses for the last 10 years or so. The analysis techniques used in their construction, particularly the need for a common reference period, mean that it is difficult to include, retrospectively, any of the new temperature datasets now available for some countries. So, despite data availability improvements in some areas, the number of stations used has fallen since 1970, both in the hemispheric averages and in their constituent grid-box datasets. The present study is a reanalysis of both the existing and the newly available temperature datasets to produce a grid-box dataset of 5°×5° temperature anomalies. The reanalysis not only uses over 1000 more stations (2961 in total), principally covering the period from the 1920s to about 1990, but also arrests the decline of stations incorporated in real time for the latest years. ...

649 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose the Political Economy of Accounting (PEA) framework to understand and evaluate the functions of accounting within the context of the economic, social and political environment in which it operates.
Abstract: Existing research on the choice of accounting methods for corporate reports emphasizes private interests. In particular, shareholders' interests predominate in studies of the effects of accounting information on individual users. Attempts at assessing the social value of accounting reports, using the approach of marginal economics to information or the analysis of economic consequences also exhibit, in their execution, a pronounced shareholder orientation. This paper suggests that an alternative approach, the Political Economy of Accounting, may be fruitful. This approach seeks to understand and evaluate the functions of accounting within the context of the economic, social and political environment in which it operates. Research within this framework is identified as having normative, descriptive and critical qualities, and the paper concludes with some illustrations of potential research areas.

648 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
11 Nov 2000-BMJ
TL;DR: Long term therapy with aspirin is associated with a significant increase in the incidence of gastrointestinal haemorrhage, and no evidence exists that reducing the dose or using modified release formulations would reduce the incidence.
Abstract: Objectives: To assess the incidence of gastrointestinal haemorrhage associated with long term aspirin therapy and to determine the effect of dose reduction and formulation on the incidence of such haemorrhage. Design: Meta-analysis of 24 randomised controlled trials (almost 66 000 participants). Intervention: Aspirin compared with placebo or no treatment, for a minimum of one year. Main outcome measures: Incidence of gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Results: Gastrointestinal haemorrhage occurred in 2.47% of patients taking aspirin compared with 1.42% taking placebo (odds ratio 1.68; 95% confidence interval 1.51 to 1.88); the number needed to harm was 106 (82 to 140) based on an average of 28 months9 therapy. At doses below 163 mg/day, gastrointestinal haemorrhage occurred in 2.30% of patients taking aspirin compared with 1.45% taking placebo (1.59; 1.40 to 1.81). Meta-regression showed no relation between gastrointestinal haemorrhage and dose. For modified release formulations of aspirin the odds ratio was 1.93 (1.15 to 3.23). Conclusions: Long term therapy with aspirin is associated with a significant increase in the incidence of gastrointestinal haemorrhage. No evidence exists that reducing the dose or using modified release formulations would reduce the incidence of gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

648 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the problem of constructing millennia-long tree-ring chronologies from overlapping segments of cross-dated ringwidth series is reviewed, with an emphasis on preserving very low-frequency signals.
Abstract: The problem of constructing millennia-long tree-ring chronologies from overlapping segments of cross-dated ring-width series is reviewed, with an emphasis on preserving very low-frequency signals p...

647 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Arang Rhie1, Shane A. McCarthy2, Shane A. McCarthy3, Olivier Fedrigo4, Joana Damas5, Giulio Formenti4, Sergey Koren1, Marcela Uliano-Silva6, William Chow3, Arkarachai Fungtammasan, J. H. Kim7, Chul Hee Lee7, Byung June Ko7, Mark Chaisson8, Gregory Gedman4, Lindsey J. Cantin4, Françoise Thibaud-Nissen1, Leanne Haggerty9, Iliana Bista3, Iliana Bista2, Michelle Smith3, Bettina Haase4, Jacquelyn Mountcastle4, Sylke Winkler10, Sylke Winkler11, Sadye Paez4, Jason T. Howard, Sonja C. Vernes12, Sonja C. Vernes11, Sonja C. Vernes13, Tanya M. Lama14, Frank Grützner15, Wesley C. Warren16, Christopher N. Balakrishnan17, Dave W Burt18, Jimin George19, Matthew T. Biegler4, David Iorns, Andrew Digby, Daryl Eason, Bruce C. Robertson20, Taylor Edwards21, Mark Wilkinson22, George F. Turner23, Axel Meyer24, Andreas F. Kautt24, Andreas F. Kautt25, Paolo Franchini24, H. William Detrich26, Hannes Svardal27, Hannes Svardal28, Maximilian Wagner29, Gavin J. P. Naylor30, Martin Pippel11, Milan Malinsky3, Milan Malinsky31, Mark Mooney, Maria Simbirsky, Brett T. Hannigan, Trevor Pesout32, Marlys L. Houck33, Ann C Misuraca33, Sarah B. Kingan34, Richard Hall34, Zev N. Kronenberg34, Ivan Sović34, Christopher Dunn34, Zemin Ning3, Alex Hastie, Joyce V. Lee, Siddarth Selvaraj, Richard E. Green32, Nicholas H. Putnam, Ivo Gut35, Jay Ghurye36, Erik Garrison32, Ying Sims3, Joanna Collins3, Sarah Pelan3, James Torrance3, Alan Tracey3, Jonathan Wood3, Robel E. Dagnew8, Dengfeng Guan37, Dengfeng Guan2, Sarah E. London38, David F. Clayton19, Claudio V. Mello39, Samantha R. Friedrich39, Peter V. Lovell39, Ekaterina Osipova11, Farooq O. Al-Ajli40, Farooq O. Al-Ajli41, Simona Secomandi42, Heebal Kim7, Constantina Theofanopoulou4, Michael Hiller43, Yang Zhou, Robert S. Harris44, Kateryna D. Makova44, Paul Medvedev44, Jinna Hoffman1, Patrick Masterson1, Karen Clark1, Fergal J. Martin9, Kevin L. Howe9, Paul Flicek9, Brian P. Walenz1, Woori Kwak, Hiram Clawson32, Mark Diekhans32, Luis R Nassar32, Benedict Paten32, Robert H. S. Kraus11, Robert H. S. Kraus24, Andrew J. Crawford45, M. Thomas P. Gilbert46, M. Thomas P. Gilbert47, Guojie Zhang, Byrappa Venkatesh48, Robert W. Murphy49, Klaus-Peter Koepfli50, Beth Shapiro51, Beth Shapiro32, Warren E. Johnson52, Warren E. Johnson50, Federica Di Palma53, Tomas Marques-Bonet, Emma C. Teeling54, Tandy Warnow55, Jennifer A. Marshall Graves56, Oliver A. Ryder57, Oliver A. Ryder33, David Haussler32, Stephen J. O'Brien58, Jonas Korlach34, Harris A. Lewin5, Kerstin Howe3, Eugene W. Myers10, Eugene W. Myers11, Richard Durbin3, Richard Durbin2, Adam M. Phillippy1, Erich D. Jarvis51, Erich D. Jarvis4 
National Institutes of Health1, University of Cambridge2, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute3, Rockefeller University4, University of California, Davis5, Leibniz Association6, Seoul National University7, University of Southern California8, European Bioinformatics Institute9, Dresden University of Technology10, Max Planck Society11, Radboud University Nijmegen12, University of St Andrews13, University of Massachusetts Amherst14, University of Adelaide15, University of Missouri16, East Carolina University17, University of Queensland18, Clemson University19, University of Otago20, University of Arizona21, Natural History Museum22, Bangor University23, University of Konstanz24, Harvard University25, Northeastern University26, University of Antwerp27, National Museum of Natural History28, University of Graz29, University of Florida30, University of Basel31, University of California, Santa Cruz32, Zoological Society of San Diego33, Pacific Biosciences34, Pompeu Fabra University35, University of Maryland, College Park36, Harbin Institute of Technology37, University of Chicago38, Oregon Health & Science University39, Qatar Airways40, Monash University Malaysia Campus41, University of Milan42, Goethe University Frankfurt43, Pennsylvania State University44, University of Los Andes45, University of Copenhagen46, Norwegian University of Science and Technology47, Agency for Science, Technology and Research48, Royal Ontario Museum49, Smithsonian Institution50, Howard Hughes Medical Institute51, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research52, University of East Anglia53, University College Dublin54, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign55, La Trobe University56, University of California, San Diego57, Nova Southeastern University58
28 Apr 2021-Nature
TL;DR: The Vertebrate Genomes Project (VGP) as mentioned in this paper is an international effort to generate high quality, complete reference genomes for all of the roughly 70,000 extant vertebrate species and to help to enable a new era of discovery across the life sciences.
Abstract: High-quality and complete reference genome assemblies are fundamental for the application of genomics to biology, disease, and biodiversity conservation. However, such assemblies are available for only a few non-microbial species1-4. To address this issue, the international Genome 10K (G10K) consortium5,6 has worked over a five-year period to evaluate and develop cost-effective methods for assembling highly accurate and nearly complete reference genomes. Here we present lessons learned from generating assemblies for 16 species that represent six major vertebrate lineages. We confirm that long-read sequencing technologies are essential for maximizing genome quality, and that unresolved complex repeats and haplotype heterozygosity are major sources of assembly error when not handled correctly. Our assemblies correct substantial errors, add missing sequence in some of the best historical reference genomes, and reveal biological discoveries. These include the identification of many false gene duplications, increases in gene sizes, chromosome rearrangements that are specific to lineages, a repeated independent chromosome breakpoint in bat genomes, and a canonical GC-rich pattern in protein-coding genes and their regulatory regions. Adopting these lessons, we have embarked on the Vertebrate Genomes Project (VGP), an international effort to generate high-quality, complete reference genomes for all of the roughly 70,000 extant vertebrate species and to help to enable a new era of discovery across the life sciences.

647 citations


Authors

Showing all 13512 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
George Davey Smith2242540248373
Nicholas J. Wareham2121657204896
Cyrus Cooper2041869206782
Kay-Tee Khaw1741389138782
Phillip A. Sharp172614117126
Rory Collins162489193407
William J. Sutherland14896694423
Shah Ebrahim14673396807
Kenneth M. Yamada13944672136
Martin McKee1381732125972
David Price138168793535
Sheila Bingham13651967332
Philip Jones13564490838
Peter M. Rothwell13477967382
Ivan Reid131131885123
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Bristol
113.1K papers, 4.9M citations

93% related

University of Oxford
258.1K papers, 12.9M citations

93% related

University of Manchester
168K papers, 6.4M citations

93% related

University College London
210.6K papers, 9.8M citations

93% related

Utrecht University
139.3K papers, 6.2M citations

92% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023115
2022385
20212,203
20202,121
20191,957
20181,798