scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Erlangen-Nuremberg

EducationErlangen, Bayern, Germany
About: University of Erlangen-Nuremberg is a education organization based out in Erlangen, Bayern, Germany. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Immune system. The organization has 42405 authors who have published 85600 publications receiving 2663922 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The consensus statement is annotated to document the credibility of the data supporting it as much as possible and the number of possible references has become so large that reviews are sometimes included; if they contain category A references, they will be referred to as category A evidence.
Abstract: As in previous years, the consensus group to consider the use of biological agents in the treatment of rheumatic diseases met during the 13th Annual Workshop on Advances in Targeted Therapies in April, 2011. The group consisted of rheumatologists from a number of universities among the continents of Europe, North America, South America, Australia and Asia. Pharmaceutical industry support was obtained from a number of companies for the annual workshop itself, but these companies had no part in the decisions about the specific programme or about the academic participants at this conference. Representatives of the supporting sponsors participated in the initial working groups to supply factual information. The sponsors did not participate in the drafting of the consensus statement. This consensus was prepared from the perspective of the treating physician. In view of the new data for abatacept, B cell-specific agents, interleukin 1 (IL-1) antagonists, tocilizumab (TCZ) and tumour necrosis factor α blocking agents (TNF inhibitors), an update of the previous consensus statement is appropriate. To allow ease of updating, the 2010 (data from March 2009 to January 2010) updates are incorporated into the body of the article, while 2011 updates (February 2010–January 2011) are separated and highlighted. The consensus statement is annotated to document the credibility of the data supporting it as much as possible. This annotation is that of Shekelle et al and is described in appendix 1.1 We have modified the Shekelle annotation by designating all abstracts as ‘category D evidence’, whether they describe well-controlled trials or not, as details of the study were often not available in the abstracts. Further, the number of possible references has become so large that reviews are sometimes included; if they contain category A references, they will be referred to as category A evidence. The rheumatologists and bioscientists who attended …

722 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a meta-analysis on controlled outcome evaluations of sexual offender treatment was conducted, and the majority confirmed the benefits of treatment, including 6 percentage points or 37% less sexual recidivism than controls.
Abstract: The article reports a meta-analysis on controlled outcome evaluations of sexual offender treatment. From 2,039 documents published in five languages, 69 studies containing 80 independent comparisons between treated and untreated offenders fulfilled stepwise eligibility criteria (total N = 22,181). Despite a wide range of positive and negative effect sizes, the majority confirmed the benefits of treatment. Treated offenders showed 6 percentage points or 37% less sexual recidivism than controls. Effects for violent and general recidivism were in a similar range. Organic treatments (surgical castration and hormonal medication) showed larger effects than psychosocial interventions. However, this difference was partially confounded with methodological and offender variables. Among psychological programs, cognitive–behavioral approaches revealed the most robust effect. Nonbehavioral treatments did not demonstrate a significant impact. There was no outcome difference between randomized and other designs, however, group equivalence was associated with slightly larger effects. Various other moderators had a stronger impact on effect size (e.g., small sample size, quality of outcome reporting, program completion vs. dropout, age homogeneity, outpatient treatment, and authors’ affiliation with the program). More differentiated, high-quality evaluations are needed to clarify: What works for whom under which circumstances?

721 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This poster presents a meta-analyses of the literature review conducted at the 2015 American College of Cardiology Annual Meeting and presented as a “roadmap for future studies” to improve the quality of care for patients with high-risk hearts.

719 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
08 Sep 2016-Nature
TL;DR: PZM21 is a potent Gi activator with exceptional selectivity for μOR and minimal β-arrestin-2 recruitment and is devoid of both respiratory depression and morphine-like reinforcing activity in mice at equi-analgesic doses.
Abstract: Morphine is an alkaloid from the opium poppy used to treat pain. The potentially lethal side effects of morphine and related opioids-which include fatal respiratory depression-are thought to be mediated by μ-opioid-receptor (μOR) signalling through the β-arrestin pathway or by actions at other receptors. Conversely, G-protein μOR signalling is thought to confer analgesia. Here we computationally dock over 3 million molecules against the μOR structure and identify new scaffolds unrelated to known opioids. Structure-based optimization yields PZM21-a potent Gi activator with exceptional selectivity for μOR and minimal β-arrestin-2 recruitment. Unlike morphine, PZM21 is more efficacious for the affective component of analgesia versus the reflexive component and is devoid of both respiratory depression and morphine-like reinforcing activity in mice at equi-analgesic doses. PZM21 thus serves as both a probe to disentangle μOR signalling and a therapeutic lead that is devoid of many of the side effects of current opioids.

715 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Liisa M. Pelttari1, Sofia Khan1, Mikko Vuorela2, Johanna I. Kiiski1, Sara Vilske1, Viivi Nevanlinna1, Salla Ranta1, Johanna Schleutker3, Johanna Schleutker4, Johanna Schleutker5, Robert Winqvist2, Anne Kallioniemi4, Thilo Dörk6, Natalia Bogdanova6, Jonine Figueroa, Paul D.P. Pharoah7, Marjanka K. Schmidt8, Alison M. Dunning7, Montserrat Garcia-Closas9, Manjeet K. Bolla7, Joe Dennis7, Kyriaki Michailidou7, Qin Wang7, John L. Hopper10, Melissa C. Southey10, Efraim H. Rosenberg8, Peter A. Fasching11, Peter A. Fasching12, Matthias W. Beckmann11, Julian Peto13, Isabel dos-Santos-Silva13, Elinor J. Sawyer14, Ian Tomlinson15, Barbara Burwinkel16, Barbara Burwinkel17, Harald Surowy16, Harald Surowy17, Pascal Guénel18, Thérèse Truong18, Stig E. Bojesen19, Stig E. Bojesen20, Børge G. Nordestgaard20, Børge G. Nordestgaard19, Javier Benitez, Anna González-Neira, Susan L. Neuhausen21, Hoda Anton-Culver22, Hermann Brenner16, Volker Arndt16, Alfons Meindl23, Rita K. Schmutzler24, Hiltrud Brauch16, Hiltrud Brauch25, Hiltrud Brauch26, Thomas Brüning27, Annika Lindblom28, Sara Margolin28, Arto Mannermaa29, Jaana M. Hartikainen29, Georgia Chenevix-Trench30, kConFab30, kConFab10, Aocs Investigators31, Laurien Van Dyck31, Hilde Janssen16, Hilde Janssen32, Jenny Chang-Claude16, Anja Rudolph, Paolo Radice, Paolo Peterlongo33, Emily Hallberg33, Janet E. Olson10, Janet E. Olson34, Graham G. Giles10, Graham G. Giles34, Roger L. Milne35, Christopher A. Haiman35, Fredrick Schumacher36, Jacques Simard36, Martine Dumont37, Martine Dumont38, Vessela N. Kristensen38, Vessela N. Kristensen37, Anne Lise Børresen-Dale39, Wei Zheng39, Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel40, Mervi Grip41, Mervi Grip42, Irene L. Andrulis41, Gord Glendon43, Peter Devilee44, Caroline Seynaeve44, Maartje J. Hooning45, Margriet Collée46, Angela Cox46, Simon S. Cross7, Mitul Shah7, Robert Luben16, Ute Hamann16, Ute Hamann47, Diana Torres48, Anna Jakubowska48, Jan Lubinski33, Fergus J. Couch, Drakoulis Yannoukakos9, Nick Orr9, Anthony J. Swerdlow28, Hatef Darabi28, Jingmei Li28, Kamila Czene28, Per Hall7, Douglas F. Easton1, Johanna Mattson1, Carl Blomqvist1, Kristiina Aittomäki1, Heli Nevanlinna 
05 May 2016-PLOS ONE
TL;DR: It is suggested that loss-of-function mutations in RAD 51B are rare, but common variation at the RAD51B region is significantly associated with familial breast cancer risk.
Abstract: Common variation on 14q24.1, close to RAD51B, has been associated with breast cancer: rs999737 and rs2588809 with the risk of female breast cancer and rs1314913 with the risk of male breast cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of RAD51B variants in breast cancer predisposition, particularly in the context of familial breast cancer in Finland. We sequenced the coding region of RAD51B in 168 Finnish breast cancer patients from the Helsinki region for identification of possible recurrent founder mutations. In addition, we studied the known rs999737, rs2588809, and rs1314913 SNPs and RAD51B haplotypes in 44,791 breast cancer cases and 43,583 controls from 40 studies participating in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) that were genotyped on a custom chip (iCOGS). We identified one putatively pathogenic missense mutation c.541C>T among the Finnish cancer patients and subsequently genotyped the mutation in additional breast cancer cases (n = 5259) and population controls (n = 3586) from Finland and Belarus. No significant association with breast cancer risk was seen in the meta-analysis of the Finnish datasets or in the large BCAC dataset. The association with previously identified risk variants rs999737, rs2588809, and rs1314913 was replicated among all breast cancer cases and also among familial cases in the BCAC dataset. The most significant association was observed for the haplotype carrying the risk-alleles of all the three SNPs both among all cases (odds ratio (OR): 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11-1.19, P = 8.88 x 10-16) and among familial cases (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.16-1.32, P = 6.19 x 10-11), compared to the haplotype with the respective protective alleles. Our results suggest that loss-of-function mutations in RAD51B are rare, but common variation at the RAD51B region is significantly associated with familial breast cancer risk.

715 citations


Authors

Showing all 42831 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Hermann Brenner1511765145655
Richard B. Devereux144962116403
Manfred Paulini1411791110930
Daniel S. Berman141136386136
Peter Lang140113698592
Joseph Sodroski13854277070
Richard J. Johnson13788072201
Jun Lu135152699767
Michael Schmitt1342007114667
Jost B. Jonas1321158166510
Andreas Mussgiller127105973778
Matthew J. Budoff125144968115
Stefan Funk12550656955
Markus F. Neurath12493462376
Jean-Marie Lehn123105484616
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Technische Universität München
123.4K papers, 4M citations

96% related

Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
161.5K papers, 5.7M citations

95% related

Heidelberg University
119.1K papers, 4.6M citations

94% related

National University of Singapore
165.4K papers, 5.4M citations

93% related

University of Padua
114.8K papers, 3.6M citations

93% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023208
2022660
20215,162
20204,911
20194,593
20184,374