scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Exeter

EducationExeter, United Kingdom
About: University of Exeter is a education organization based out in Exeter, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Climate change. The organization has 15820 authors who have published 50650 publications receiving 1793046 citations. The organization is also known as: Exeter University & University of the South West of England.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
T. E. Cooke1
TL;DR: In this paper, the extent of disclosure in the corporate annual reports of Swedish companies is investigated and an assessment is made as to whether there is a significant association between a number of independent variables and the extentof disclosure.
Abstract: Sweden is of interest because of the rapid growth in the Stockholm stock exchange and because of the country's disproportionate number of multinational enterprises. This paper reports on the extent of disclosure in the corporate annual reports of Swedish companies. An assessment is made as to whether there is a significant association between a number of independent variables and the extent of disclosure.

796 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The 2019 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change : ensuring that the health of a child born today is not defined by a changing climate is ensured.

794 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: There is a need to increase the understanding of this enigmatic molecule since it could be involved in a wide range of important functions from antioxidant defence and photosynthesis to growth regulation.

794 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
02 Aug 2017-BMJ
TL;DR: Both versions of GRIPP2 represent the first international evidence based, consensus informed guidance for reporting patient and public involvement in research and aim to improve the quality, transparency, and consistency of the international PPI evidence base.
Abstract: While the patient and public involvement (PPI) evidence base has expanded over the past decade, the quality of reporting within papers is often inconsistent, limiting our understanding of how it works, in what context, for whom, and why. To develop international consensus on the key items to report to enhance the quality, transparency, and consistency of the PPI evidence base. To collaboratively involve patients as research partners at all stages in the development of GRIPP2. The EQUATOR method for developing reporting guidelines was used. The original GRIPP (Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public) checklist was revised, based on updated systematic review evidence. A three round Delphi survey was used to develop consensus on items to be included in the guideline. A subsequent face-to-face meeting produced agreement on items not reaching consensus during the Delphi process. One hundred forty-three participants agreed to participate in round one, with an 86% (123/143) response for round two and a 78% (112/143) response for round three. The Delphi survey identified the need for long form (LF) and short form (SF) versions. GRIPP2-LF includes 34 items on aims, definitions, concepts and theory, methods, stages and nature of involvement, context, capture or measurement of impact, outcomes, economic assessment, and reflections and is suitable for studies where the main focus is PPI. GRIPP2-SF includes five items on aims, methods, results, outcomes, and critical perspective and is suitable for studies where PPI is a secondary focus. GRIPP2-LF and GRIPP2-SF represent the first international evidence based, consensus informed guidance for reporting patient and public involvement in research. Both versions of GRIPP2 aim to improve the quality, transparency, and consistency of the international PPI evidence base, to ensure PPI practice is based on the best evidence. In order to encourage its wide dissemination this article is freely accessible on The BMJ and Research Involvement and Engagement journal websites.

777 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
28 Sep 2016
TL;DR: Evidence that epigenetic age predicts all-cause mortality above and beyond chronological age and traditional risk factors is strengthened and estimates that incorporate information on blood cell counts lead to highly significant associations with all- Cause mortality are demonstrated.
Abstract: Estimates of biological age based on DNA methylation patterns, often referred to as "epigenetic age", "DNAm age", have been shown to be robust biomarkers of age in humans. We previously demonstrated that independent of chronological age, epigenetic age assessed in blood predicted all-cause mortality in four human cohorts. Here, we expanded our original observation to 13 different cohorts for a total sample size of 13,089 individuals, including three racial/ethnic groups. In addition, we examined whether incorporating information on blood cell composition into the epigenetic age metrics improves their predictive power for mortality. All considered measures of epigenetic age acceleration were predictive of mortality (p≤8.2x10-9), independent of chronological age, even after adjusting for additional risk factors (p<5.4x10-4), and within the racial/ethnic groups that we examined (non-Hispanic whites, Hispanics, African Americans). Epigenetic age estimates that incorporated information on blood cell composition led to the smallest p-values for time to death (p=7.5x10-43). Overall, this study a) strengthens the evidence that epigenetic age predicts all-cause mortality above and beyond chronological age and traditional risk factors, and b) demonstrates that epigenetic age estimates that incorporate information on blood cell counts lead to highly significant associations with all-cause mortality.

775 citations


Authors

Showing all 16338 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Frank B. Hu2501675253464
John C. Morris1831441168413
David W. Johnson1602714140778
Kevin J. Gaston15075085635
Andrew T. Hattersley146768106949
Timothy M. Frayling133500100344
Joel N. Hirschhorn133431101061
Jonathan D. G. Jones12941780908
Graeme I. Bell12753161011
Mark D. Griffiths124123861335
Tao Zhang123277283866
Brinick Simmons12269169350
Edzard Ernst120132655266
Michael Stumvoll11965569891
Peter McGuffin11762462968
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Birmingham
115.3K papers, 4.3M citations

96% related

University of Manchester
168K papers, 6.4M citations

96% related

University of Oxford
258.1K papers, 12.9M citations

95% related

University of Bristol
113.1K papers, 4.9M citations

95% related

University College London
210.6K papers, 9.8M citations

95% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023295
2022782
20214,412
20204,192
20193,721
20183,385