Institution
University of Florence
Education•Florence, Toscana, Italy•
About: University of Florence is a education organization based out in Florence, Toscana, Italy. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Carbonic anhydrase. The organization has 27292 authors who have published 79599 publications receiving 2341684 citations. The organization is also known as: Università degli studi di Firenze & Universita degli studi di Firenze.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
TL;DR: In this article, the authors reviewed the synthetic strategies employed in a concerted effort to obtain new single molecule magnets based on lanthanide ions in the framework of the research program on Molecular Magnetism funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.
1,352 citations
TL;DR: Key pH regulators in tumour cells include: isoforms 2, 9 and 12 of carbonic anhydrase, isoforms of anion exchangers, Na+/HCO3− co-transporters, Na+./H+ exchanger, monocarboxylate transporters and the vacuolar ATPase.
Abstract: The high metabolic rate of tumours often leads to acidosis and hypoxia in poorly perfused regions. Tumour cells have thus evolved the ability to function in a more acidic environment than normal cells. Key pH regulators in tumour cells include: isoforms 2, 9 and 12 of carbonic anhydrase, isoforms of anion exchangers, Na+/HCO3- co-transporters, Na+/H+ exchangers, monocarboxylate transporters and the vacuolar ATPase. Both small molecules and antibodies targeting these pH regulators are currently at various stages of clinical development. These antitumour mechanisms are not exploited by the classical cancer drugs and therefore represent a new anticancer drug discovery strategy.
1,331 citations
Karlstad University1, Dresden University of Technology2, Karolinska University Hospital3, Mental Health Services4, Phillips University5, University of Florence6, Karolinska Institutet7, John Radcliffe Hospital8, King's College London9, London School of Economics and Political Science10, Lund University11, Harvard University12, University of Basel13, Norwegian University of Science and Technology14, University of Zurich15, Umeå University16, University of Cambridge17, University of Lausanne18, University of Sassari19, European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction20, Aalborg University21, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc22, Maastricht University Medical Centre23, Radboud University Nijmegen24, Stockholm School of Economics25
TL;DR: The present report presents much improved cost estimates for the total cost of disorders of the brain in Europe in 2010, covering 19 major groups of disorders, 7 more than previously, of an increased range of age groups and more cost items.
1,325 citations
TL;DR: In this article, the authors summarize recent technological developments that are enabling natural product-based drug discovery, highlight selected applications and discuss key opportunities, and discuss the potential of using natural products as drug leads.
Abstract: Natural products and their structural analogues have historically made a major contribution to pharmacotherapy, especially for cancer and infectious diseases. Nevertheless, natural products also present challenges for drug discovery, such as technical barriers to screening, isolation, characterization and optimization, which contributed to a decline in their pursuit by the pharmaceutical industry from the 1990s onwards. In recent years, several technological and scientific developments — including improved analytical tools, genome mining and engineering strategies, and microbial culturing advances — are addressing such challenges and opening up new opportunities. Consequently, interest in natural products as drug leads is being revitalized, particularly for tackling antimicrobial resistance. Here, we summarize recent technological developments that are enabling natural product-based drug discovery, highlight selected applications and discuss key opportunities. Natural products have historically made a major contribution to pharmacotherapy, but also present challenges for drug discovery, such as technical barriers to screening, isolation, characterization and optimization. This Review discusses recent technological developments — including improved analytical tools, genome mining and engineering strategies, and microbial culturing advances — that are enabling a revitalization of natural product-based drug discovery.
1,297 citations
Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute1, Université de Montréal2, University of Edinburgh3, University of Kiel4, Karolinska Institutet5, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center6, University of Cambridge7, University of Pennsylvania8, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza9, University of Pittsburgh10, Université libre de Bruxelles11, University of Otago12, Johns Hopkins University13, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich14, Charité15, Lille University of Science and Technology16, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center17, Ghent University18, Torbay Hospital19, University of Groningen20, Mater Health Services21, University of Liège22, University of Washington23, University of Utah24, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute25, University of Paris26, University of Western Australia27, Tel Aviv University28, University of Dundee29, Harvard University30, University of Manchester31, Utrecht University32, University of Florence33, King's College London34, Yale University35, Royal Hospital for Sick Children36, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven37, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust38, University of Barcelona39, University of Chicago40, University of Bern41, University of California, San Francisco42, Agency for Science, Technology and Research43, University of Toronto44, University of Oslo45, Leiden University46, University of Amsterdam47, Aarhus University48, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens49, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences50, Newcastle University51, Emory University52, Örebro University53, French Institute of Health and Medical Research54, Center for Applied Genomics55
TL;DR: A meta-analysis of six ulcerative colitis genome-wide association study datasets found many candidate genes that provide potentially important insights into disease pathogenesis, including IL1R2, IL8RA-IL8RB, IL7R, IL12B, DAP, PRDM1, JAK2, IRF5, GNA12 and LSP1.
Abstract: Genome-wide association studies and candidate gene studies in ulcerative colitis have identified 18 susceptibility loci. We conducted a meta-analysis of six ulcerative colitis genome-wide association study datasets, comprising 6,687 cases and 19,718 controls, and followed up the top association signals in 9,628 cases and 12,917 controls. We identified 29 additional risk loci (P < 5 × 10(-8)), increasing the number of ulcerative colitis-associated loci to 47. After annotating associated regions using GRAIL, expression quantitative trait loci data and correlations with non-synonymous SNPs, we identified many candidate genes that provide potentially important insights into disease pathogenesis, including IL1R2, IL8RA-IL8RB, IL7R, IL12B, DAP, PRDM1, JAK2, IRF5, GNA12 and LSP1. The total number of confirmed inflammatory bowel disease risk loci is now 99, including a minimum of 28 shared association signals between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.
1,291 citations
Authors
Showing all 27699 results
| Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Charles A. Dinarello | 190 | 1058 | 139668 |
| D. M. Strom | 176 | 3167 | 194314 |
| Gregory Y.H. Lip | 169 | 3159 | 171742 |
| Christopher M. Dobson | 150 | 1008 | 105475 |
| Dirk Inzé | 149 | 647 | 74468 |
| Thomas Hebbeker | 148 | 1984 | 114004 |
| Marco Zanetti | 145 | 1439 | 104610 |
| Richard B. Devereux | 144 | 962 | 116403 |
| Gunther Roland | 141 | 1471 | 100681 |
| Markus Klute | 139 | 1447 | 104196 |
| Tariq Aziz | 138 | 1646 | 96586 |
| Guido Tonelli | 138 | 1458 | 97248 |
| Giorgio Trinchieri | 138 | 433 | 78028 |
| Christof Roland | 137 | 1308 | 96632 |
| Christoph Paus | 137 | 1585 | 100801 |