scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Graz

EducationGraz, Steiermark, Austria
About: University of Graz is a education organization based out in Graz, Steiermark, Austria. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Quantum chromodynamics. The organization has 17934 authors who have published 37489 publications receiving 1110980 citations. The organization is also known as: Carolo Franciscea Graecensis & Karl Franzens Universität.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This Review highlights recent applications of controlled microwave heating in modern organic synthesis, and discusses some of the underlying phenomena and issues involved.
Abstract: Although fire is now rarely used in synthetic chemistry, it was not until Robert Bunsen invented the burner in 1855 that the energy from this heat source could be applied to a reaction vessel in a focused manner. The Bunsen burner was later superseded by the isomantle, oil bath, or hot plate as a source for applying heat to a chemical reaction. In the past few years, heating and driving chemical reactions by microwave energy has been an increasingly popular theme in the scientific community. This nonclassical heating technique is slowly moving from a laboratory curiosity to an established technique that is heavily used in both academia and industry. The efficiency of "microwave flash heating" in dramatically reducing reaction times (from days and hours to minutes and seconds) is just one of the many advantages. This Review highlights recent applications of controlled microwave heating in modern organic synthesis, and discusses some of the underlying phenomena and issues involved.

3,044 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the performance and safety of rechargeable batteries depend strongly on the materials used and future trends, such as alternative materials for achieving higher specific charges are discussed, and a review of the insertion materials suitable for negative and positive insertion electrodes is presented.
Abstract: The performance and safety of rechargeable batteries depend strongly on the materials used. Lithium insertion materials suitable for negative and positive insertion electrodes are reviewed. Future trends, such as alternative materials for achieving higher specific charges are discussed. (orig.) 1041 refs.

2,761 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A comprehensive survey on the compositional properties of LDL relevant for its susceptibility to oxidation, on the mechanism and kinetics of LDL oxidation, and on the chemical and physico-chemical properties of HDL oxidized by exposure to copper ions is provided.

2,289 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A functional classification of cell death subroutines is proposed that applies to both in vitro and in vivo settings and includes extrinsic apoptosis, caspase-dependent or -independent intrinsic programmed cell death, regulated necrosis, autophagic cell death and mitotic catastrophe.
Abstract: In 2009, the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death (NCCD) proposed a set of recommendations for the definition of distinct cell death morphologies and for the appropriate use of cell death-related terminology, including 'apoptosis', 'necrosis' and 'mitotic catastrophe'. In view of the substantial progress in the biochemical and genetic exploration of cell death, time has come to switch from morphological to molecular definitions of cell death modalities. Here we propose a functional classification of cell death subroutines that applies to both in vitro and in vivo settings and includes extrinsic apoptosis, caspase-dependent or -independent intrinsic apoptosis, regulated necrosis, autophagic cell death and mitotic catastrophe. Moreover, we discuss the utility of expressions indicating additional cell death modalities. On the basis of the new, revised NCCD classification, cell death subroutines are defined by a series of precise, measurable biochemical features.

2,238 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Lorenzo Galluzzi1, Lorenzo Galluzzi2, Lorenzo Galluzzi3, Stuart A. Aaronson4, John M. Abrams5, Emad S. Alnemri6, David W. Andrews7, Eric H. Baehrecke8, Nicolas G. Bazan9, Mikhail V. Blagosklonny10, Klas Blomgren11, Klas Blomgren12, Christoph Borner13, Dale E. Bredesen14, Dale E. Bredesen15, Catherine Brenner16, Maria Castedo1, Maria Castedo2, Maria Castedo3, John A. Cidlowski17, Aaron Ciechanover18, Gerald M. Cohen19, V De Laurenzi20, R De Maria21, Mohanish Deshmukh22, Brian David Dynlacht23, Wafik S. El-Deiry24, Richard A. Flavell25, Richard A. Flavell26, Simone Fulda27, Carmen Garrido3, Carmen Garrido28, Pierre Golstein3, Pierre Golstein29, Pierre Golstein16, Marie-Lise Gougeon30, Douglas R. Green, Hinrich Gronemeyer3, Hinrich Gronemeyer16, Hinrich Gronemeyer31, György Hajnóczky6, J. M. Hardwick32, Michael O. Hengartner33, Hidenori Ichijo34, Marja Jäättelä, Oliver Kepp1, Oliver Kepp2, Oliver Kepp3, Adi Kimchi35, Daniel J. Klionsky36, Richard A. Knight37, Sally Kornbluth38, Sharad Kumar, Beth Levine26, Beth Levine5, Stuart A. Lipton, Enrico Lugli17, Frank Madeo39, Walter Malorni21, Jean-Christophe Marine40, Seamus J. Martin41, Jan Paul Medema42, Patrick Mehlen43, Patrick Mehlen16, Gerry Melino19, Gerry Melino44, Ute M. Moll45, Ute M. Moll46, Eugenia Morselli2, Eugenia Morselli1, Eugenia Morselli3, Shigekazu Nagata47, Donald W. Nicholson48, Pierluigi Nicotera19, Gabriel Núñez36, Moshe Oren35, Josef M. Penninger49, Shazib Pervaiz50, Marcus E. Peter51, Mauro Piacentini44, Jochen H. M. Prehn52, Hamsa Puthalakath53, Gabriel A. Rabinovich54, Rosario Rizzuto55, Cecília M. P. Rodrigues56, David C. Rubinsztein57, Thomas Rudel58, Luca Scorrano59, Hans-Uwe Simon60, Hermann Steller61, Hermann Steller26, J. Tschopp62, Yoshihide Tsujimoto63, Peter Vandenabeele64, Ilio Vitale2, Ilio Vitale1, Ilio Vitale3, Karen H. Vousden65, Richard J. Youle17, Junying Yuan66, Boris Zhivotovsky67, Guido Kroemer2, Guido Kroemer3, Guido Kroemer1 
University of Paris-Sud1, Institut Gustave Roussy2, French Institute of Health and Medical Research3, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai4, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center5, Thomas Jefferson University6, McMaster University7, University of Massachusetts Medical School8, LSU Health Sciences Center New Orleans9, Roswell Park Cancer Institute10, Boston Children's Hospital11, University of Gothenburg12, University of Freiburg13, Buck Institute for Research on Aging14, University of California, San Francisco15, Centre national de la recherche scientifique16, National Institutes of Health17, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology18, University of Leicester19, University of Chieti-Pescara20, Istituto Superiore di Sanità21, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill22, New York University23, University of Pennsylvania24, Yale University25, Howard Hughes Medical Institute26, University of Ulm27, University of Burgundy28, Aix-Marseille University29, Pasteur Institute30, University of Strasbourg31, Johns Hopkins University32, University of Zurich33, University of Tokyo34, Weizmann Institute of Science35, University of Michigan36, University College London37, Duke University38, University of Graz39, Ghent University40, Trinity College, Dublin41, University of Amsterdam42, University of Lyon43, University of Rome Tor Vergata44, University of Göttingen45, Stony Brook University46, Kyoto University47, Merck & Co.48, Austrian Academy of Sciences49, National University of Singapore50, University of Chicago51, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland52, La Trobe University53, University of Buenos Aires54, University of Padua55, University of Lisbon56, University of Cambridge57, University of Würzburg58, University of Geneva59, University of Bern60, Rockefeller University61, University of Lausanne62, Osaka University63, University of California, San Diego64, University of Glasgow65, Harvard University66, Karolinska Institutet67
TL;DR: A nonexhaustive comparison of methods to detect cell death with apoptotic or nonapoptotic morphologies, their advantages and pitfalls is provided and the importance of performing multiple, methodologically unrelated assays to quantify dying and dead cells is emphasized.
Abstract: Cell death is essential for a plethora of physiological processes, and its deregulation characterizes numerous human diseases Thus, the in-depth investigation of cell death and its mechanisms constitutes a formidable challenge for fundamental and applied biomedical research, and has tremendous implications for the development of novel therapeutic strategies It is, therefore, of utmost importance to standardize the experimental procedures that identify dying and dead cells in cell cultures and/or in tissues, from model organisms and/or humans, in healthy and/or pathological scenarios Thus far, dozens of methods have been proposed to quantify cell death-related parameters However, no guidelines exist regarding their use and interpretation, and nobody has thoroughly annotated the experimental settings for which each of these techniques is most appropriate Here, we provide a nonexhaustive comparison of methods to detect cell death with apoptotic or nonapoptotic morphologies, their advantages and pitfalls These guidelines are intended for investigators who study cell death, as well as for reviewers who need to constructively critique scientific reports that deal with cellular demise Given the difficulties in determining the exact number of cells that have passed the point-of-no-return of the signaling cascades leading to cell death, we emphasize the importance of performing multiple, methodologically unrelated assays to quantify dying and dead cells

2,218 citations


Authors

Showing all 18136 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
David Haussler172488224960
Russel J. Reiter1691646121010
Frederik Barkhof1541449104982
Philip Scheltens1401175107312
Christopher D.M. Fletcher13867482484
Jennifer S. Haas12884071315
Jelena Krstic12683973457
Michael A. Kamm12463753606
Frances H. Arnold11951049651
Gert Pfurtscheller11750762873
Georg Kresse111430244729
Manfred T. Reetz11095942941
Alois Fürstner10845943085
David N. Herndon108122754888
David J. Williams107206062440
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
161.5K papers, 5.7M citations

93% related

Heidelberg University
119.1K papers, 4.6M citations

93% related

University of Zurich
124K papers, 5.3M citations

90% related

Uppsala University
107.5K papers, 4.2M citations

90% related

University of Amsterdam
140.8K papers, 5.9M citations

89% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023174
2022422
20211,775
20201,759
20191,649
20181,541