Institution
University of Grenoble
Education•Saint-Martin-d'Hères, France•
About: University of Grenoble is a education organization based out in Saint-Martin-d'Hères, France. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Large Hadron Collider. The organization has 25658 authors who have published 45143 publications receiving 909760 citations.
Topics: Population, Large Hadron Collider, Planet, Nanowire, Stars
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
TL;DR: Some lichens have a unique ability to grow in heavily contaminated areas due to the development of adaptative mechanisms allowing a high tolerance to metals as mentioned in this paper, and the chemical forms of these organisms are reported in the literature.
Abstract: Some lichens have a unique ability to grow in heavily contaminated areas due to the development of adaptative mechanisms allowing a high tolerance to metals. Here we report on the chemical forms of...
176 citations
TL;DR: The models fit the morphologies of the patients, and that the predicted soft tissue modifications are coherent with what they would expect, seems compatible with clinical use.
176 citations
University of Geneva1, University Medical Center Groningen2, University of Groningen3, McGovern Institute for Brain Research4, University of Pittsburgh5, University of Graz6, Massachusetts Institute of Technology7, Northeastern University8, University of Macau9, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne10, University of Texas at Austin11, University of Tübingen12, University of California, Los Angeles13, Boston University14, Maastricht University15, Charité16, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile17, Ottawa University18, University of Zurich19, University of Salzburg20, King's College London21, University of Lisbon22, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology23, University of California, San Diego24, Heidelberg University25, National Research University – Higher School of Economics26, Shanghai Normal University27, University of Bordeaux28, University of Münster29, University of Tennessee30, Duke University31, University of Western Ontario32, University of Würzburg33, University of Oldenburg34, Yale University35, Medical University of Vienna36, University of Sheffield37, University of Toulouse38, Brown University39, Eindhoven University of Technology40, Allen Institute for Brain Science41, Goldsmiths, University of London42, university of lille43, National Autonomous University of Mexico44, University of Otago45, Birkbeck, University of London46, University of Grenoble47, University of Greenwich48, Radboud University Nijmegen49, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki50, University of Surrey51, University of Bristol52
TL;DR: Over 80 neurofeedback researchers present a consensus-derived checklist – CRED-nf – for reporting and experimental design standards in the field.
Abstract: Neurofeedback has begun to attract the attention and scrutiny of the scientific and medical mainstream. Here, neurofeedback researchers present a consensus-derived checklist that aims to improve the reporting and experimental design standards in the field.
176 citations
TL;DR: In this article, the authors measured the charged-particle fragmentation functions of jets produced in ultra-relativistic nuclear collisions to provide insight into the modification of parton showers in the hot, dense medi...
176 citations
TL;DR: A task force of experts in the field of diagnostic DNA image cytometry, invited by the ESACP, and further scientists or physicians revealing experience in that diagnostic procedure, agreed upon the following 4th updated Consensus Report on Standardised Diagnostic DNA Image Cytometry during the 7th International Congress of that society in Caen, 2001.
Abstract: A task force of experts in the field of diagnostic DNA image cytometry, invited by the ESACP, and further scientists or physicians revealing experience in that diagnostic procedure (names are given in Addendum A), agreed upon the following 4th updated Consensus Report on Standardised Diagnostic DNA Image Cytometry during the 7th International Congress of that society in Caen, 2001. This report is based on the three preceding ones [6,14,17]. It deals with the following items:- Critical review and update of the definitions given in the 1997 Consensus Update;- Review and detailed description of basic terms, principles and algorithms for diagnostic interpretation;- Recommendations concerning diagnostic or prognostic applications in specific fields of tumour pathology. This update is not aimed to substitute the 1997 consensus, but to make necessary addenda and give more detailed descriptions of those items not unequivocally to interpret by potential users of the methodology.
176 citations
Authors
Showing all 25961 results
| Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dieter Lutz | 139 | 671 | 67414 |
| Marcella Bona | 137 | 1391 | 92162 |
| Nicolas Berger | 137 | 1581 | 96529 |
| Cordelia Schmid | 135 | 464 | 103925 |
| J. F. Macías-Pérez | 134 | 486 | 94715 |
| Marina Cobal | 132 | 1078 | 85437 |
| Lydia Roos | 132 | 1284 | 89435 |
| Tetiana Hryn'ova | 131 | 1059 | 84260 |
| Johann Collot | 131 | 1018 | 82865 |
| Remi Lafaye | 131 | 1012 | 83281 |
| Jan Stark | 131 | 1186 | 87025 |
| Sabine Crépé-Renaudin | 129 | 1142 | 82741 |
| Isabelle Wingerter-Seez | 129 | 930 | 79689 |
| James Alexander | 129 | 886 | 75096 |
| Jessica Levêque | 129 | 1006 | 70208 |