scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Groningen

EducationGroningen, Groningen, Netherlands
About: University of Groningen is a education organization based out in Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 36346 authors who have published 69116 publications receiving 2940370 citations. The organization is also known as: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen & RUG.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Patricio Godoy, Nicola J. Hewitt, Ute Albrecht1, Melvin E. Andersen, Nariman Ansari2, Sudin Bhattacharya, Johannes G. Bode1, Jennifer Bolleyn3, Christoph Borner4, J Böttger5, Albert Braeuning, Robert A. Budinsky6, Britta Burkhardt7, Neil R. Cameron8, Giovanni Camussi9, Chong Su Cho10, Yun Jaie Choi10, J. Craig Rowlands6, Uta Dahmen11, Georg Damm12, Olaf Dirsch11, María Teresa Donato13, Jian Dong, Steven Dooley14, Dirk Drasdo5, Dirk Drasdo15, Dirk Drasdo16, Rowena Eakins17, Karine Sá Ferreira4, Valentina Fonsato9, Joanna Fraczek3, Rolf Gebhardt5, Andrew Gibson17, Matthias Glanemann12, Christopher E. Goldring17, María José Gómez-Lechón, Geny M. M. Groothuis18, Lena Gustavsson19, Christelle Guyot, David Hallifax20, Seddik Hammad21, Adam S. Hayward8, Dieter Häussinger1, Claus Hellerbrand22, Philip Hewitt23, Stefan Hoehme5, Hermann-Georg Holzhütter12, J. Brian Houston20, Jens Hrach, Kiyomi Ito24, Hartmut Jaeschke25, Verena Keitel1, Jens M. Kelm, B. Kevin Park17, Claus Kordes1, Gerd A. Kullak-Ublick, Edward L. LeCluyse, Peng Lu, Jennifer Luebke-Wheeler, Anna Lutz4, Daniel J. Maltman, Madlen Matz-Soja5, Patrick D. McMullen, Irmgard Merfort4, Simon Messner, Christoph Meyer14, Jessica Mwinyi, Dean J. Naisbitt17, Andreas K. Nussler7, Peter Olinga18, Francesco Pampaloni2, Jingbo Pi, Linda J. Pluta, Stefan Przyborski8, Anup Ramachandran25, Vera Rogiers3, Cliff Rowe17, Celine Schelcher26, Kathrin Schmich4, Michael Schwarz, Bijay Singh10, Ernst H. K. Stelzer2, Bruno Stieger, Regina Stöber, Yuichi Sugiyama, Ciro Tetta27, Wolfgang E. Thasler26, Tamara Vanhaecke3, Mathieu Vinken3, Thomas S. Weiss28, Agata Widera, Courtney G. Woods, Jinghai James Xu29, Kathy Yarborough, Jan G. Hengstler 
TL;DR: This review encompasses the most important advances in liver functions and hepatotoxicity and analyzes which mechanisms can be studied in vitro and how closely hepatoma, stem cell and iPS cell–derived hepatocyte-like-cells resemble real hepatocytes.
Abstract: This review encompasses the most important advances in liver functions and hepatotoxicity and analyzes which mechanisms can be studied in vitro. In a complex architecture of nested, zonated lobules, the liver consists of approximately 80 % hepatocytes and 20 % non-parenchymal cells, the latter being involved in a secondary phase that may dramatically aggravate the initial damage. Hepatotoxicity, as well as hepatic metabolism, is controlled by a set of nuclear receptors (including PXR, CAR, HNF-4α, FXR, LXR, SHP, VDR and PPAR) and signaling pathways. When isolating liver cells, some pathways are activated, e.g., the RAS/MEK/ERK pathway, whereas others are silenced (e.g. HNF-4α), resulting in up- and downregulation of hundreds of genes. An understanding of these changes is crucial for a correct interpretation of in vitro data. The possibilities and limitations of the most useful liver in vitro systems are summarized, including three-dimensional culture techniques, co-cultures with non-parenchymal cells, hepatospheres, precision cut liver slices and the isolated perfused liver. Also discussed is how closely hepatoma, stem cell and iPS cell-derived hepatocyte-like-cells resemble real hepatocytes. Finally, a summary is given of the state of the art of liver in vitro and mathematical modeling systems that are currently used in the pharmaceutical industry with an emphasis on drug metabolism, prediction of clearance, drug interaction, transporter studies and hepatotoxicity. One key message is that despite our enthusiasm for in vitro systems, we must never lose sight of the in vivo situation. Although hepatocytes have been isolated for decades, the hunt for relevant alternative systems has only just begun.

1,085 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the effects of the dual cholinesterase inhibitor rivastigmine in patients with mild-to-moderate dementia associated with Parkinson's disease were investigated.
Abstract: background Cholinergic deficits are prominent in patients who have dementia associated with Parkinson’s disease. We investigated the effects of the dual cholinesterase inhibitor rivastigmine in such patients. methods Patients in whom mild-to-moderate dementia developed at least 2 years after they received a clinical diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease were randomly assigned to receive placebo or 3 to 12 mg of rivastigmine per day for 24 weeks. Primary efficacy variables were the scores for the cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-cog) and Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study–Clinician’s Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC). Secondary clinical outcomes were the scores for the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study–Activities of Daily Living, the 10-item Neuropsychiatric Inventory, the Mini–Mental State Examination, Cognitive Drug Research power of attention tests, the Verbal Fluency test, and the Ten Point Clock-Drawing test. results A total of 541 patients were enrolled, and 410 completed the study. The outcomes were better among patients treated with rivastigmine than among those who received placebo; however, the differences between these two groups were moderate and similar to those reported in trials of rivastigmine for Alzheimer’s disease. Rivastigmine-treated patients had a mean improvement of 2.1 points in the score for the 70-point ADAS-cog, from a baseline score of 23.8, as compared with a 0.7-point worsening in the placebo group, from a baseline score of 24.3 (P<0.001). Clinically meaningful improvements in the scores for the ADCS-CGIC were observed in 19.8 percent of patients in the rivastigmine group and 14.5 percent of those in the placebo group, and clinically meaningful worsening was observed in 13.0 percent and 23.1 percent, respectively (mean score at 24 weeks, 3.8 and 4.3, respectively; P=0.007). Significantly better outcomes were seen with rivastigmine with respect to all secondary efficacy variables. The most frequent adverse events were nausea (affecting 29.0 percent of patients in the rivastigmine group and 11.2 percent of those in the placebo group, P<0.001), vomiting (16.6 and 1.7 percent, P<0.001), and tremor (10.2 and 3.9 percent, P=0.01). conclusions In this placebo-controlled study, rivastigmine was associated with moderate improvements in dementia associated with Parkinson’s disease but also with higher rates of nausea, vomiting, and tremor.

1,082 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Light is shed on the genetic architecture and pathophysiological mechanisms underlying BMD variation and fracture susceptibility and within the RANK-RANKL-OPG, mesenchymal stem cell differentiation, endochondral ossification and Wnt signaling pathways.
Abstract: Bone mineral density (BMD) is the most widely used predictor of fracture risk. We performed the largest meta-analysis to date on lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD, including 17 genome-wide association studies and 32,961 individuals of European and east Asian ancestry. We tested the top BMD-associated markers for replication in 50,933 independent subjects and for association with risk of low-trauma fracture in 31,016 individuals with a history of fracture (cases) and 102,444 controls. We identified 56 loci (32 new) associated with BMD at genome-wide significance (P < 5 × 10(-8)). Several of these factors cluster within the RANK-RANKL-OPG, mesenchymal stem cell differentiation, endochondral ossification and Wnt signaling pathways. However, we also discovered loci that were localized to genes not known to have a role in bone biology. Fourteen BMD-associated loci were also associated with fracture risk (P < 5 × 10(-4), Bonferroni corrected), of which six reached P < 5 × 10(-8), including at 18p11.21 (FAM210A), 7q21.3 (SLC25A13), 11q13.2 (LRP5), 4q22.1 (MEPE), 2p16.2 (SPTBN1) and 10q21.1 (DKK1). These findings shed light on the genetic architecture and pathophysiological mechanisms underlying BMD variation and fracture susceptibility.

1,076 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a critical review of the kinetics and selectivity of the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FTS) is given, focusing on reaction mechanisms and kinetics.
Abstract: A critical review of the kinetics and selectivity of the Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (FTS) is given. The focus is on reaction mechanisms and kinetics of the water–gas shift and Fischer–Tropsch (FT) reactions. New developments in the product selectivity as well as the overall kinetics are reviewed. It is concluded that the development of rate equations for the FTS should be based on realistic mechanistic schemes. Qualitatively, there is agreement that the product distribution is affected by the occurrence of secondary reactions (hydrogenation, isomerization, reinsertion, and hydrogenolysis). At high CO and H2O pressures, the most important secondary reaction is readsorption of olefins, resulting in initiation of chain growth processes. Secondary hydrogenation of α-olefins may occur and depends on the catalytic system and the process conditions. The rates of the secondary reactions increase exponentially with chain length. Much controversy exists about whether these chain-length dependencies stem from differe...

1,074 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The physico-chemical mechanisms underlying the adhesive interactions are described and a critical review is given of currently employed methods to study microbial adhesive interactions, with an emphasis on the use of the parallel plate flow chamber.
Abstract: In this review, initial microbial adhesive interactions are divided into adhesion to substratum surfaces, coaggregation between microbial pairs and co-adhesion between sessile and planktonic microorganisms of different strains or species. The physico-chemical mechanisms underlying the adhesive interactions are described and a critical review is given of currently employed methods to study microbial adhesive interactions, with an emphasis on the use of the parallel plate flow chamber. Subsequently, for each of the three microbial adhesive interactions distinguished, the role of Lifshitz-van der Waals, acid-base and electrostatic interactions is described based on existing literature.

1,071 citations


Authors

Showing all 36692 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Ronald C. Kessler2741332328983
Nicholas J. Wareham2121657204896
André G. Uitterlinden1991229156747
Lei Jiang1702244135205
Brenda W.J.H. Penninx1701139119082
Richard H. Friend1691182140032
Panos Deloukas162410154018
Jerome I. Rotter1561071116296
Christopher M. Dobson1501008105475
Dirk Inzé14964774468
Scott T. Weiss147102574742
Dieter Lutz13967167414
Wilmar B. Schaufeli13751395718
Cisca Wijmenga13666886572
Arnold B. Bakker135506103778
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Amsterdam
140.8K papers, 5.9M citations

98% related

Utrecht University
139.3K papers, 6.2M citations

97% related

University of Manchester
168K papers, 6.4M citations

94% related

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
176.5K papers, 6.2M citations

94% related

University College London
210.6K papers, 9.8M citations

94% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023166
2022543
20214,487
20203,990
20193,283
20182,836