scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Houston

EducationHouston, Texas, United States
About: University of Houston is a education organization based out in Houston, Texas, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 23074 authors who have published 53903 publications receiving 1641968 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a conceptual framework that focuses on the degree of consumer cocreation in new product development (NPD) is presented. And the authors examine the major stimulators and impediments to this process, as well as the impact of cocreations at each stage of the NPD process.
Abstract: The area of consumer cocreation is in its infancy and many aspects are not well understood. In this article, we outline and discuss a conceptual framework that focuses on the degree of consumer cocreation in new product development (NPD). The authors examine (a) the major stimulators and impediments to this process, (b) the impact of cocreation at each stage of the NPD process, and (c) the various firm-related and consumer-related outcomes. A number of areas for future research are suggested.

1,186 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
K. Aamodt1, N. Abel2, A. Abrahantes Quintana, A. Acero  +989 moreInstitutions (76)
TL;DR: In this paper, the production of mesons containing strange quarks (KS, φ) and both singly and doubly strange baryons (,, and − + +) are measured at mid-rapidity in pp collisions at √ s = 0.9 TeV with the ALICE experiment at the LHC.

1,176 citations

Posted ContentDOI
Spyridon Bakas1, Mauricio Reyes, Andras Jakab2, Stefan Bauer3  +435 moreInstitutions (111)
TL;DR: This study assesses the state-of-the-art machine learning methods used for brain tumor image analysis in mpMRI scans, during the last seven instances of the International Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge, i.e., 2012-2018, and investigates the challenge of identifying the best ML algorithms for each of these tasks.
Abstract: Gliomas are the most common primary brain malignancies, with different degrees of aggressiveness, variable prognosis and various heterogeneous histologic sub-regions, i.e., peritumoral edematous/invaded tissue, necrotic core, active and non-enhancing core. This intrinsic heterogeneity is also portrayed in their radio-phenotype, as their sub-regions are depicted by varying intensity profiles disseminated across multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) scans, reflecting varying biological properties. Their heterogeneous shape, extent, and location are some of the factors that make these tumors difficult to resect, and in some cases inoperable. The amount of resected tumoris a factor also considered in longitudinal scans, when evaluating the apparent tumor for potential diagnosis of progression. Furthermore, there is mounting evidence that accurate segmentation of the various tumor sub-regions can offer the basis for quantitative image analysis towards prediction of patient overall survival. This study assesses thestate-of-the-art machine learning (ML) methods used for brain tumor image analysis in mpMRI scans, during the last seven instances of the International Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge, i.e., 2012-2018. Specifically, we focus on i) evaluating segmentations of the various glioma sub-regions in pre-operative mpMRI scans, ii) assessing potential tumor progression by virtue of longitudinal growth of tumor sub-regions, beyond use of the RECIST/RANO criteria, and iii) predicting the overall survival from pre-operative mpMRI scans of patients that underwent gross tota lresection. Finally, we investigate the challenge of identifying the best ML algorithms for each of these tasks, considering that apart from being diverse on each instance of the challenge, the multi-institutional mpMRI BraTS dataset has also been a continuously evolving/growing dataset.

1,165 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Perceived user resources are examined, which are measures of self-efficacy and perceived behavioral control that concentrate on how well individuals perceive they can execute specific courses of action, that can facilitate or inhibit such behaviors.
Abstract: There has been considerable research on the factors that predict whether individuals will accept and voluntarily use information systems The technology acceptance model (TAM) has a base in psychological research, is parsimonious, explains usage behavior quite well, and can be operationalized with valid and reliable instruments A limitation of TAM is that it assumes usage is volitional, that is, there are no barriers that would prevent an individual from using an IS if he or she chose to do so This research extends TAM by adding perceived user resources to the model, with careful attention to placing the construct in TAM's existing nomological structure In contrast to measures of self-efficacy and perceived behavioral control that concentrate on how well individuals perceive they can execute specific courses of action, this paper examines perceptions of adequate resources that can facilitate or inhibit such behaviors The inclusion of both a formative and reflective set of measures provides the opportunity for the researcher and manager to decide whether to evaluate only the overall perceptions of adequate resources or also the specific underlying causes The extended model incorporating these measures was then tested in the field The results confirmed that perceived user resources is a valuable addition to the model

1,164 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide an integrative and analytical review of factors impacting transfer of training, and synthesize the developing knowledge regarding the primary factors influencing transfer to identify variables with substantive support and to discern the most pressing gaps.
Abstract: Given the proliferation of training transfer studies in various disciplines, we provide an integrative and analytical review of factors impacting transfer of training. Relevant empirical research for transfer across the management, human resource development (HRD), training, adult learning, performance improvement, and psychology literatures is integrated into the review. We synthesize the developing knowledge regarding the primary factors influencing transfer—learner characteristics, intervention design and delivery, and work environment influences—to identify variables with substantive support and to discern the most pressing gaps. Ultimately, a critique of the state of the transfer literature is provided and targeted suggestions are outlined to guide future empirical and theoretical work in a meaningful direction.

1,156 citations


Authors

Showing all 23345 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Matthew Meyerson194553243726
Gad Getz189520247560
Eric Boerwinkle1831321170971
Pulickel M. Ajayan1761223136241
Zhenan Bao169865106571
Marc Weber1672716153502
Steven N. Blair165879132929
Martin Karplus163831138492
Dongyuan Zhao160872106451
Xiang Zhang1541733117576
Jan-Åke Gustafsson147105898804
James M. Tour14385991364
Guanrong Chen141165292218
Naomi J. Halas14043582040
Antonios G. Mikos13869470204
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Texas at Austin
206.2K papers, 9M citations

95% related

University of Southern California
169.9K papers, 7.8M citations

94% related

Texas A&M University
164.3K papers, 5.7M citations

93% related

Pennsylvania State University
196.8K papers, 8.3M citations

93% related

University of California, Irvine
113.6K papers, 5.5M citations

92% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023111
2022440
20213,031
20203,072
20192,806
20182,568