scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Houston

EducationHouston, Texas, United States
About: University of Houston is a education organization based out in Houston, Texas, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 23074 authors who have published 53903 publications receiving 1641968 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
20 Sep 2007-Neuron
TL;DR: It is shown that in visual cortex the rules of this spike-timing-dependent plasticity are not rigid, but shaped by neuromodulator receptors coupled to adenylyl cyclase (AC) and phospholipase C (PLC) signaling cascades.

384 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, an empirically based taxonomy, developed through cluster analysis of consumer's perceptions of services, is presented, which offers several insights into strategic marketing for service marketers.
Abstract: A theme emerging in the services marketing literature indicates that services marketers should look beyond their own industry boundaries to gain marketing insight. A number of conceptual typologies for grouping services have been developed. However, none of these conceptualizations have been studied empirically. This article presents an empirically based taxonomy, developed through cluster analysis of consumer's perceptions of services. The results of the study offer several insights into strategic marketing for service marketers.

384 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
22 Oct 1999-Science
TL;DR: The results demonstrate that the Drosophila circadian feedback loop is composed of two interlocked negative feedback loops: a per-tim loop, which is activated by dCLK-CYC and repressed by PER-TIM, and a dClk loop,Which is repression by dClK- CYC and derepressed by PerIOD-tIM.
Abstract: Drosophila Clock ( dClk ) is rhythmically expressed, with peaks in mRNA and protein (dCLK) abundance early in the morning. dClk mRNA cycling is shown here to be regulated by PERIOD-TIMELESS (PER-TIM)–mediated release of dCLK- and CYCLE (CYC)–dependent repression. Lack of both PER-TIM derepression and dCLK-CYC repression results in high levels of dClk mRNA, which implies that a separate dClk activator is present. These results demonstrate that the Drosophila circadian feedback loop is composed of two interlocked negative feedback loops: a per-tim loop, which is activated by dCLK-CYC and repressed by PER-TIM, and a dClk loop, which is repressed by dCLK-CYC and derepressed by PER-TIM.

383 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Patrick Abbot1, Jun Abe2, John Alcock3, Samuel Alizon, João Alpedrinha4, Malte Andersson5, Jean-Baptiste André6, Minus van Baalen6, Francois Balloux7, Sigal Balshine8, Nicholas H. Barton9, Leo W. Beukeboom10, Jay M. Biernaskie4, Trine Bilde11, Gerald Borgia12, Michael D. Breed13, Sam P. Brown4, Redouan Bshary, Angus Buckling4, Nancy Tyler Burley14, Max N. Burton-Chellew4, Michael A. Cant15, Michel Chapuisat16, Eric L. Charnov17, Tim H. Clutton-Brock18, Andrew Cockburn19, Blaine J. Cole20, Nick Colegrave21, Leda Cosmides22, Iain D. Couzin23, Jerry A. Coyne24, Scott Creel25, Bernard J. Crespi26, Robert L. Curry27, Sasha R. X. Dall15, Troy Day28, Janis L. Dickinson29, Lee Alan Dugatkin30, Claire El Mouden4, Stephen T. Emlen29, Jay D. Evans31, Régis Ferrière32, Jeremy Field33, Susanne Foitzik34, Kevin R. Foster4, William A. Foster18, Charles W. Fox35, Juergen Gadau3, Sylvain Gandon, Andy Gardner4, Michael G. Gardner36, Thomas Getty37, Michael A. D. Goodisman38, Alan Grafen4, Richard K. Grosberg39, Christina M. Grozinger40, Pierre-Henri Gouyon, Darryl T. Gwynne41, Paul H. Harvey4, Ben J. Hatchwell42, Jürgen Heinze43, Heikki Helanterä44, Ken R. Helms45, Kim Hill3, Natalie Jiricny4, Rufus A. Johnstone18, Alex Kacelnik4, E. Toby Kiers46, Hanna Kokko19, Jan Komdeur10, Judith Korb47, Daniel J. C. Kronauer48, Rolf Kümmerli49, Laurent Lehmann, Timothy A. Linksvayer50, Sébastien Lion51, Bruce E. Lyon52, James A. R. Marshall42, Richard McElreath39, Yannis Michalakis, Richard E. Michod53, Douglas W. Mock54, Thibaud Monnin6, Robert Montgomerie28, Allen J. Moore15, Ulrich G. Mueller55, Ronald Noë56, Samir Okasha57, Pekka Pamilo44, Geoff A. Parker58, Jes S. Pedersen50, Ido Pen10, David W. Pfennig59, David C. Queller60, Daniel J. Rankin61, Sarah E. Reece21, Hudson K. Reeve29, Max Reuter62, Gilbert Roberts63, Simon K. A. Robson64, Denis Roze6, François Rousset65, Olav Rueppell66, Joel L. Sachs67, Lorenzo A. Santorelli4, Paul Schmid-Hempel68, Michael P. Schwarz36, Thomas C. Scott-Phillips21, Janet Shellmann-Sherman29, Paul W. Sherman29, David M. Shuker69, jeff smith60, Joseph C. Spagna70, Beverly I. Strassmann71, Andrew V. Suarez72, Liselotte Sundström44, Michael Taborsky73, Peter D. Taylor28, Graham J. Thompson74, John Tooby22, Neil D. Tsutsui75, Kazuki Tsuji76, Stefano Turillazzi77, Francisco Úbeda78, Edward L. Vargo79, Bernard Voelkl80, Tom Wenseleers81, Stuart A. West4, Mary Jane West-Eberhard82, David F. Westneat35, Diane C. Wiernasz20, Geoff Wild74, Richard Wrangham1, Andrew J. Young15, David W. Zeh83, David W. Zeh48, Jeanne A. Zeh83, Andrew G. Zink84 
Vanderbilt University1, Shizuoka University2, Arizona State University3, University of Oxford4, University of Gothenburg5, Pierre-and-Marie-Curie University6, Imperial College London7, McMaster University8, Institute of Science and Technology Austria9, University of Groningen10, Aarhus University11, University of Maryland, College Park12, University of Colorado Boulder13, University of California, Irvine14, University of Exeter15, University of Lausanne16, University of New Mexico17, University of Cambridge18, Australian National University19, University of Houston20, University of Edinburgh21, University of California, Santa Barbara22, Princeton University23, University of Chicago24, Montana State University25, Simon Fraser University26, Villanova University27, Queen's University28, Cornell University29, University of Louisville30, United States Department of Agriculture31, École Normale Supérieure32, University of Sussex33, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich34, University of Kentucky35, Flinders University36, Michigan State University37, Georgia Institute of Technology38, University of California, Davis39, Pennsylvania State University40, University of Toronto41, University of Sheffield42, University of Regensburg43, University of Helsinki44, University of Vermont45, VU University Amsterdam46, University of Osnabrück47, Harvard University48, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology49, University of Copenhagen50, Royal Holloway, University of London51, University of California, Santa Cruz52, University of Arizona53, University of Oklahoma54, University of Texas at Austin55, University of Strasbourg56, University of Bristol57, University of Liverpool58, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill59, Rice University60, University of Zurich61, University College London62, Newcastle University63, James Cook University64, University of Montpellier65, University of North Carolina at Greensboro66, University of California, Riverside67, ETH Zurich68, University of St Andrews69, William Paterson University70, University of Michigan71, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign72, University of Bern73, University of Western Ontario74, University of California, Berkeley75, University of the Ryukyus76, University of Florence77, University of Tennessee78, North Carolina State University79, Humboldt University of Berlin80, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven81, Smithsonian Institution82, University of Nevada, Reno83, San Francisco State University84
24 Mar 2011-Nature
TL;DR: It is argued that inclusive fitness theory has been of little value in explained the natural world, and that it has led to negligible progress in explaining the evolution of eusociality, but these arguments are based upon a misunderstanding of evolutionary theory and a misrepresentation of the empirical literature.
Abstract: Arising from M. A. Nowak, C. E. Tarnita & E. O. Wilson 466, 1057-1062 (2010); Nowak et al. reply. Nowak et al. argue that inclusive fitness theory has been of little value in explaining the natural world, and that it has led to negligible progress in explaining the evolution of eusociality. However, we believe that their arguments are based upon a misunderstanding of evolutionary theory and a misrepresentation of the empirical literature. We will focus our comments on three general issues.

383 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A numerical measure of how well a frame reconstructs vectors when some of the frame coefficients of a vector are lost is introduced and the attempt to find and classify the frames that are optimal in this setting is attempted.

383 citations


Authors

Showing all 23345 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Matthew Meyerson194553243726
Gad Getz189520247560
Eric Boerwinkle1831321170971
Pulickel M. Ajayan1761223136241
Zhenan Bao169865106571
Marc Weber1672716153502
Steven N. Blair165879132929
Martin Karplus163831138492
Dongyuan Zhao160872106451
Xiang Zhang1541733117576
Jan-Åke Gustafsson147105898804
James M. Tour14385991364
Guanrong Chen141165292218
Naomi J. Halas14043582040
Antonios G. Mikos13869470204
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Texas at Austin
206.2K papers, 9M citations

95% related

University of Southern California
169.9K papers, 7.8M citations

94% related

Texas A&M University
164.3K papers, 5.7M citations

93% related

Pennsylvania State University
196.8K papers, 8.3M citations

93% related

University of California, Irvine
113.6K papers, 5.5M citations

92% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023111
2022440
20213,031
20203,072
20192,806
20182,568