scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Iceland

EducationReykjavik, Suðurnes, Iceland
About: University of Iceland is a education organization based out in Reykjavik, Suðurnes, Iceland. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Genome-wide association study. The organization has 5423 authors who have published 16199 publications receiving 694762 citations. The organization is also known as: Háskóli Íslands.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Markus Ackermann, Andrea Albert1, Brandon Anderson2, W. B. Atwood3, Luca Baldini1, Guido Barbiellini4, Denis Bastieri4, Keith Bechtol5, Ronaldo Bellazzini4, Elisabetta Bissaldi4, Roger Blandford1, E. D. Bloom1, R. Bonino4, Eugenio Bottacini1, T. J. Brandt6, Johan Bregeon7, P. Bruel8, R. Buehler, G. A. Caliandro1, R. A. Cameron1, R. Caputo3, M. Caragiulo4, P. A. Caraveo9, C. Cecchi4, Eric Charles1, A. Chekhtman10, James Chiang1, G. Chiaro11, Stefano Ciprini4, R. Claus1, Johann Cohen-Tanugi7, Jan Conrad2, Alessandro Cuoco4, S. Cutini4, Filippo D'Ammando9, A. De Angelis4, F. de Palma4, R. Desiante4, Seth Digel1, L. Di Venere12, Persis S. Drell1, Alex Drlica-Wagner13, R. Essig14, C. Favuzzi4, S. J. Fegan8, Elizabeth C. Ferrara6, W. B. Focke1, A. Franckowiak1, Yasushi Fukazawa15, Stefan Funk, P. Fusco4, F. Gargano4, Dario Gasparrini4, Nicola Giglietto4, Francesco Giordano4, Marcello Giroletti9, T. Glanzman1, G. Godfrey1, G. A. Gomez-Vargas4, I. A. Grenier16, Sylvain Guiriec6, M. Gustafsson17, E. Hays6, John W. Hewitt18, D. Horan8, T. Jogler1, Gudlaugur Johannesson19, M. Kuss4, Stefan Larsson2, Luca Latronico4, Jingcheng Li20, L. Li2, M. Llena Garde2, Francesco Longo4, F. Loparco4, P. Lubrano4, D. Malyshev1, M. Mayer, M. N. Mazziotta4, Julie McEnery6, Manuel Meyer2, Peter F. Michelson1, Tsunefumi Mizuno15, A. A. Moiseev21, M. E. Monzani1, A. Morselli4, S. Murgia22, E. Nuss7, T. Ohsugi15, M. Orienti9, E. Orlando1, J. F. Ormes23, David Paneque1, J. S. Perkins6, Melissa Pesce-Rollins1, F. Piron7, G. Pivato4, T. A. Porter1, S. Rainò4, R. Rando4, M. Razzano4, A. Reimer1, Olaf Reimer1, Steven Ritz3, Miguel A. Sánchez-Conde2, André Schulz, Neelima Sehgal24, Carmelo Sgrò4, E. J. Siskind, F. Spada4, Gloria Spandre4, P. Spinelli4, Louis E. Strigari25, Hiroyasu Tajima1, Hiromitsu Takahashi15, J. B. Thayer1, L. Tibaldo1, Diego F. Torres20, Eleonora Troja6, Giacomo Vianello1, Michael David Werner, Brian L Winer26, K. S. Wood27, Matthew Wood1, Gabrijela Zaharijas4, Stephan Zimmer2 
TL;DR: In this article, the authors report on γ-ray observations of the Milky-Way satellite galaxies (dSphs) based on six years of Fermi Large Area Telescope data processed with the new Pass8 event-level analysis.
Abstract: The dwarf spheroidal satellite galaxies (dSphs) of the Milky Way are some of the most dark matter (DM) dominated objects known. We report on γ-ray observations of Milky Way dSphs based on six years of Fermi Large Area Telescope data processed with the new Pass8 event-level analysis. None of the dSphs are significantly detected in γ rays, and we present upper limits on the DM annihilation cross section from a combined analysis of 15 dSphs. These constraints are among the strongest and most robust to date and lie below the canonical thermal relic cross section for DM of mass ≲100 GeV annihilating via quark and τ-lepton channels.

1,166 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A method for the differential analysis of gene expression data that utilizes bootstrapping in conjunction with response error linear modeling to decouple biological variance from inferential variance is described.
Abstract: We describe sleuth (http://pachterlabgithubio/sleuth), a method for the differential analysis of gene expression data that utilizes bootstrapping in conjunction with response error linear modeling to decouple biological variance from inferential variance sleuth is implemented in an interactive shiny app that utilizes kallisto quantifications and bootstraps for fast and accurate analysis of data from RNA-seq experiments

1,154 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Anubha Mahajan1, Daniel Taliun2, Matthias Thurner1, Neil R. Robertson1, Jason M. Torres1, N. William Rayner3, N. William Rayner1, Anthony Payne1, Valgerdur Steinthorsdottir4, Robert A. Scott5, Niels Grarup6, James P. Cook7, Ellen M. Schmidt2, Matthias Wuttke8, Chloé Sarnowski9, Reedik Mägi10, Jana Nano11, Christian Gieger, Stella Trompet12, Cécile Lecoeur13, Michael Preuss14, Bram P. Prins3, Xiuqing Guo15, Lawrence F. Bielak2, Jennifer E. Below16, Donald W. Bowden17, John C. Chambers, Young-Jin Kim, Maggie C.Y. Ng17, Lauren E. Petty16, Xueling Sim18, Weihua Zhang19, Weihua Zhang20, Amanda J. Bennett1, Jette Bork-Jensen6, Chad M. Brummett2, Mickaël Canouil13, Kai-Uwe Ec Kardt21, Krista Fischer10, Sharon L.R. Kardia2, Florian Kronenberg22, Kristi Läll10, Ching-Ti Liu9, Adam E. Locke23, Jian'an Luan5, Ioanna Ntalla24, Vibe Nylander1, Sebastian Schönherr22, Claudia Schurmann14, Loic Yengo13, Erwin P. Bottinger14, Ivan Brandslund25, Cramer Christensen, George Dedoussis26, Jose C. Florez, Ian Ford27, Oscar H. Franco11, Timothy M. Frayling28, Vilmantas Giedraitis29, Sophie Hackinger3, Andrew T. Hattersley28, Christian Herder30, M. Arfan Ikram11, Martin Ingelsson29, Marit E. Jørgensen25, Marit E. Jørgensen31, Torben Jørgensen32, Torben Jørgensen6, Jennifer Kriebel, Johanna Kuusisto33, Symen Ligthart11, Cecilia M. Lindgren1, Cecilia M. Lindgren34, Allan Linneberg35, Allan Linneberg6, Valeriya Lyssenko36, Valeriya Lyssenko37, Vasiliki Mamakou26, Thomas Meitinger38, Karen L. Mohlke39, Andrew D. Morris40, Andrew D. Morris41, Girish N. Nadkarni14, James S. Pankow42, Annette Peters, Naveed Sattar43, Alena Stančáková33, Konstantin Strauch44, Kent D. Taylor15, Barbara Thorand, Gudmar Thorleifsson4, Unnur Thorsteinsdottir4, Unnur Thorsteinsdottir45, Jaakko Tuomilehto, Daniel R. Witte46, Josée Dupuis9, Patricia A. Peyser2, Eleftheria Zeggini3, Ruth J. F. Loos14, Philippe Froguel13, Philippe Froguel19, Erik Ingelsson47, Erik Ingelsson48, Lars Lind29, Leif Groop49, Leif Groop37, Markku Laakso33, Francis S. Collins50, J. Wouter Jukema12, Colin N. A. Palmer51, Harald Grallert, Andres Metspalu10, Abbas Dehghan11, Abbas Dehghan19, Anna Köttgen8, Gonçalo R. Abecasis2, James B. Meigs52, Jerome I. Rotter15, Jonathan Marchini1, Oluf Pedersen6, Torben Hansen6, Torben Hansen25, Claudia Langenberg5, Nicholas J. Wareham5, Kari Stefansson45, Kari Stefansson4, Anna L. Gloyn1, Andrew P. Morris1, Andrew P. Morris10, Andrew P. Morris7, Michael Boehnke2, Mark I. McCarthy1 
TL;DR: Combining 32 genome-wide association studies with high-density imputation provides a comprehensive view of the genetic contribution to type 2 diabetes in individuals of European ancestry with respect to locus discovery, causal-variant resolution, and mechanistic insight.
Abstract: We expanded GWAS discovery for type 2 diabetes (T2D) by combining data from 898,130 European-descent individuals (9% cases), after imputation to high-density reference panels. With these data, we (i) extend the inventory of T2D-risk variants (243 loci, 135 newly implicated in T2D predisposition, comprising 403 distinct association signals); (ii) enrich discovery of lower-frequency risk alleles (80 index variants with minor allele frequency 2); (iii) substantially improve fine-mapping of causal variants (at 51 signals, one variant accounted for >80% posterior probability of association (PPA)); (iv) extend fine-mapping through integration of tissue-specific epigenomic information (islet regulatory annotations extend the number of variants with PPA >80% to 73); (v) highlight validated therapeutic targets (18 genes with associations attributable to coding variants); and (vi) demonstrate enhanced potential for clinical translation (genome-wide chip heritability explains 18% of T2D risk; individuals in the extremes of a T2D polygenic risk score differ more than ninefold in prevalence).

1,136 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes.
Abstract: In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.

1,129 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Aysu Okbay1, Jonathan P. Beauchamp2, Mark Alan Fontana3, James J. Lee4  +293 moreInstitutions (81)
26 May 2016-Nature
TL;DR: In this article, the results of a genome-wide association study (GWAS) for educational attainment were reported, showing that single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with educational attainment disproportionately occur in genomic regions regulating gene expression in the fetal brain.
Abstract: Educational attainment is strongly influenced by social and other environmental factors, but genetic factors are estimated to account for at least 20% of the variation across individuals. Here we report the results of a genome-wide association study (GWAS) for educational attainment that extends our earlier discovery sample of 101,069 individuals to 293,723 individuals, and a replication study in an independent sample of 111,349 individuals from the UK Biobank. We identify 74 genome-wide significant loci associated with the number of years of schooling completed. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with educational attainment are disproportionately found in genomic regions regulating gene expression in the fetal brain. Candidate genes are preferentially expressed in neural tissue, especially during the prenatal period, and enriched for biological pathways involved in neural development. Our findings demonstrate that, even for a behavioural phenotype that is mostly environmentally determined, a well-powered GWAS identifies replicable associated genetic variants that suggest biologically relevant pathways. Because educational attainment is measured in large numbers of individuals, it will continue to be useful as a proxy phenotype in efforts to characterize the genetic influences of related phenotypes, including cognition and neuropsychiatric diseases.

1,102 citations


Authors

Showing all 5561 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Albert Hofman2672530321405
Kari Stefansson206794174819
Ronald Klein1941305149140
Eric Boerwinkle1831321170971
Unnur Thorsteinsdottir167444121009
Vilmundur Gudnason159837123802
Hakon Hakonarson152968101604
Bernhard O. Palsson14783185051
Andrew T. Hattersley146768106949
Fernando Rivadeneira14662886582
Rattan Lal140138387691
Jonathan G. Seidman13756389782
Christine E. Seidman13451967895
Augustine Kong13423789818
Timothy M. Frayling133500100344
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Lund University
124.6K papers, 5M citations

94% related

University of Helsinki
113.1K papers, 4.6M citations

93% related

University of Copenhagen
149.7K papers, 5.9M citations

93% related

Utrecht University
139.3K papers, 6.2M citations

91% related

University of Colorado Boulder
115.1K papers, 5.3M citations

89% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202377
2022210
20211,222
20201,118
20191,140
20181,070